Hello,


More of my philosophy about markets and about globalization and
about capitalism..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I invite you to read the following paper on Foreign Market Servicing Strategies:

https://idjs.ca/images/rcsr/archives/V21N2-Buckley-et-al.pdf

And as you are noticing that the main important information
on the above paper is that the financial markets are substantially integrated so that the world financial market can, for many purposes, be regarded as a single market. And the market for goods and services is differentiated on a regional basis with '
single markets' either existing or emerging (especially in the cases of the EU and NAFTA). Such markets are increasingly uniform in regulation, standards, codes of practice (for example, anti-trust) and in business behaviour. They offer the possibility
of economies of scale across the market that also reduces costs of products and services, but are substantially differentiated by these aforementioned factors (and possibly by a common external tariff) from other regional markets. Labour markets, however,
remain primarily national. Governments wish to regulate their own labour markets and to differentiate them (to protect them) from neighbouring labour markets. Many of the current difficulties in governmental regulatory policy arise from the difficulty
of attempting to pursue independent labour market policies in the presence of regional goods and services markets and an international market for capital.

Also like in the below article about Canada, agility and flexibility is really important in organisations of multinational firms, and as
you notice it means that you have to be adaptable, progressive and responsive, so this needs new talents and skills, and you can read
the following article about why Canada is the No. 1 Country in the World, According to the 2021 Best Countries Report and you will notice
that Canada is also better at adaptablility than USA, read the following article so that to understand:

https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/canada-is-the-no-1-country-in-the-world-according-to-the-2021-best-countries-report-867033906.html

So then i will also say that it is paramount that the Government prioritises innovation. Since the competitive advantage depends on the ability to develop and commercialise new ideas as well as the ability of businesses to adopt technology and become
more productive.

More and more about globalization..

1- Globalization has created new opportunities for firms to develop business models and offerings that have a higher intensity of R&D, innovation and capital. Many of the goods and services that have entered the market over the past decades have exactly
those features, and without globalization, firms would have been forced to continue with
business models that work with a smaller volume of sales. Firms have been able to specialize more than before and, as a consequence, human capital and the share of skilled jobs in the economy have grown remarkably. Today, advanced economies have a
greater share of better-paid and better-skilled jobs than ever before.


2- Globalization has increased real wages for people in Western
economies by making products cheaper or reducing the pace of price
increases. If the typical goods that every household purchases had
followed domestic rather than international price developments,
consumers would have been poorer and saddled with products of lower quality.


3- Globalization has made significant contributions to productivity
growth and, as a consequence, further raised living standards.
Globalization has been particularly important for enabling new
technology to spread fast across markets. In the long term, it is the
speed of technological improvement that sets the pace for how richer
societies get.

However, trade and investment are not growing fast anymore, and there is
much suggesting that the decline in trade and investment growth is one explanation to the failing dynamism of Western economies. While some
appreciate the decline in the growth of globalization, those who care
about the prosperity of a society should deplore it and make efforts for
the world economy to return to high levels of trade growth.

Read the following study to know more about globalization:

The Economic Benefits of Globalization for Business and Consumers

http://ecipe.org/publications/the-economic-benefits-of-globalization-for-business-and-consumers/

And yet more philosophy about Globalization..

I think that globalization is a good thing, but you have to be smart
and know how to take advantage of it, so i invite you to read
the following about the positive effects of Globalization on developing countries such as:

1- Globalization has permitted developed nations to invest in less
developed nations which has lead to creation of jobs for poor people.

2- The health and education system in developing countries has benefited
in a positive way due to the contribution of globalization.

So i invite you to read the following article to notice it:

The effects of Globalization on developing countries

Read more here:

https://medium.com/@BonillaXM/the-effects-of-globalization-on-developing-countries-1e465257c400

And how to manage efficiently complexity ?

As i said before, notice how i am talking about how we have not to have a narrow view of what is smartness, and notice how i am talking about the distributed smartness as rules etc. so i think i can logically infer from my below thoughts the other way of
solving the greatly complex systems that is not by like "planning" the whole system from a centralized government, but by emergence of a higher level intelligence from distributing like the rules or.. into the small parts of the system that will solve
the greatly complex system, it looks like the evolutionary design and planning, and it looks like the way of the higher level smartness from an Ant colony, since in an Ant colony there is no central government, but there is a distributed intelligence
that needs a kind of diversity of genetics of the members of the colony and it needs like a distributed rules that the members have to follow that will make emerge a higher level of intelligence. And of course it looks like evolutionary algorithms in
artificial intelligence, since the advantage of evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence is that they don't plan in advance but they search by like following some distributed rules, and of course they need some "randomness" so that to not get
stuck in a local optimum, this is why i am talking below about how to make our civilization that is a complex system much more resilient by learning how to learn to humans with like a set
of rules like in an Ant colony by saying the following and notice
that the learning how to learn can be an efficient abstraction that helps a lot:

More of my philosophy about how i am more happy and more..

I think that i am much more happy since i am understanding that being happy is like a lifestyle that is based on some efficient rules that permit the emergence of happiness, and i will talk about it more in my new philosophy, so i think that we even need
some important rules so that to be a much more resilient civilization, since i think that there is the way of learning people how to become an engineer, but this way of doing is lacking very much, and there is also the way of learning people how to learn
that also permits to efficiently take advantage of this sophisticated tool that we call internet, so i think that this way of learning how to learn to people does make our civilization much more resilient, since the way of "specialization" of our today
civilization is also a "weakness" that has to be solved much more efficiently by the way of learning people how to learn on internet etc. and here is my
new proverb that talks about it:

"I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and productivity as a society or as group, but this
specialization is a weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44

Also I think you can manage complexity by the “divide and rule” approach
to management, which also leads to hierarchical division of large organisations, or wich also leads to the Division of "labour", you can read more about the Division of labour here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour

Also you can manage complexity by using constraints, such as laws, road rules and commercial standards, all of which limit the potential for harmful interactions to occur, also you can manage complexity by using higher layers of abstraction such as in
computer programming, and we can also follow the efficient rule of: "Do less and do it better" that can also use higher level layers of abstraction to enhance productivity and quality, this rule is good for productivity and quality, and about
productivity: I have also just posted about the following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:

https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/


Read more here his thoughts about productivity:


https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/


And i think he is making a mistake:


Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input


But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).


And it looks like the following:


About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..


Gustafson’s Law:


• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size


Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:


• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law


Load balance is also a crucial factor.


So read my following thoughts about the Threadpool to notice that my Threadpool that scales very well does Load balance well:


---


About the Threadpool..


I have just read the following:


Concurrency - Throttling Concurrency in the CLR 4.0 ThreadPool


https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2010/september/concurrency-throttling-concurrency-in-the-clr-4-0-threadpool


But i think that both the methodologies from Microsoft of the Hill Climbing and of the Control Theory using band pass filter or match filter and discrete Fourier transform have a weakness, there weakness is that they are "localized" optimization that
maximize the throughput , so they are not fair, so i don't think i will implement them, so then you can use my following invention of an efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales very well (and you can use a second Threadpool for IO etc.)
:


https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well


And here is my other Threadpool engine with priorities:


https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/t