Hello,


More of my philosophy about how to solve the greatly complex systems..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart, and notice how i am talking below about
how we have not to have a narrow view of what is smartness, and notice how i am talking about the distributed smartness as rules etc. so i think i can logically infer from my below thoughts the other way of
solving the greatly complex systems that is not by like "planning" the whole system from a centralized government, but by emergence of a higher level intelligence from distributing like the rules or.. into the small parts of the system that will solve
the greatly complex system, it looks like the evolutionary design and planning, and it looks like the way of the higher level smartness from an Ant colony, since in an Ant colony there is no central government, but there is a distributed intelligence
that needs a kind of diversity of genetics of the members of the colony and it needs like a distributed rules that the members have to follow that will make emerge a higher level of intelligence. And of course it looks like evolutionary algorithms in
artificial intelligence, since the advantage of evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence is that they don't plan in advance but they search by like following some distributed rules, and of course they need some "randomness" so that to not get
stuck in a local optimum, this is why i am talking below about how to make our civilization that is a complex system much more resilient by learning how to learn to humans ith like a set
of rules like in an Ant colony by saying the following:

More of my philosophy about how i am more happy and more..

I think that i am much more happy since i am understanding that being happy is like a lifestyle that is based on some efficient rules that permit the emergence of happiness, and i will talk about it more in my new philosophy, so i think that we even need
some important rules so that to be a much more resilient civilization, since i think that there is the way of learning people how to become an engineer, but this way of doing is lacking very much, and there is also the way of learning people how to learn
that also permits to efficiently take advantage of this sophisticated tool that we call internet, so i think that this way of learning how to learn to people does make our civilization much more resilient, since the way of "specialization" of our today
civilization is also a "weakness" that has to be solved much more efficiently by the way of learning people how to learn on internet etc. and here is my
new proverb that talks about it:

"I think what is happening in the West and other parts of the world,
it is that individuals are becoming too stupid, since it is the way of specialization that is required, since the individuals are specialized in there jobs so that to enhance much more the efficiency and productivity as a society or as group, but this
specialization is a weakness that is making individuals too stupid, but we can become smart working as a group or as a society using the tools of internet etc."

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/P9OTDTiCZ44


More of my philosophy of how to define smartness..

I think i am smart, and i say that measuring smartness
with an IQ is really a "narrow" view, so i will make you feel more what is smartness: I think that such a thing as a human "charisma" can be
a smart human dynamic system that can make us much more smart or much more synchronized as a people etc. so it can make us much more smart,
so there is some such human qualities that can be a dynamic smart human system that can be distributed into the brains of people as a smart rules or etc. and that can make us much more smart as a people, so the fact that we are distributing this
smartness of those kind of qualities into the brains of people as smart rules, it can give an "emergence" to a high level of smartness as a group or people, so we have not to have a narrow view of what is smartness, since those kind of qualities can
become a great smartness, so a "rule" can become a great smartness if we believe in it and follow it, and a beautiful tree can become a smartness too since we can have an artificial smartness, also we can say that smartness come not only from IQ, but
from creativity that make you much more smart etc. and i think that smartness is about "adaptation" or how we get more and more perfect as an individual or as a group..

More of my philosophy about the way of success of the best Big Brains..

I have just talked about the way to success, and read the following
about the best big brains from around the world in USA so that to understand correctly the way of success:

Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai that is a Ph.D., it says:

"Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the “smart fraction” of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance of that country, for example, its GDP."

And it also says the following:

"“According to recent population estimates, there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains.” But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every other country in the world because it
continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.

What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this
is because everyone is focusing on average and below average people. Maybe it’s time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country."

Read more here:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world

So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are making USA a rich country.

And read also the following to understand more:

Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants

There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech. Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies. Researchers have found that more than enough
students graduate from American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry’s friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B system, to get
foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones.

But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it misses the picture among Silicon Valley’s top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in that view, tech companies can hire just
about anyone from anywhere in the world to fill a particular role.

But today’s most ambitious tech companies are not like factories. They’re more like athletic teams. They’re looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely
reimagine what widgets should do in the first place.

“It’s not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants,” said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief executive of the cloud-storage company Box. “It’s about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that
are going to change everything.”

Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with those inventions? It’s partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5 percent of the world’s population; it
stands to reason that most of the world’s best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren’t born here.

If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google’s entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority of its revenues and profits, the
engine that allows it to hire thousands of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran, and Eric Veach, from Canada.

But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to new ideas.

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html

More of my philosophy about what is the way to success..

I invite you to look carefully at the following very interesting
video that explains what is the way to success, it is the same of
my way of doing below:

TOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office Hours Ep. 4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk

More of my philosophy about the real fight..

I think i am smart and i will explain my kind of spirit, i will
ask the following question and you will understand my way of thinking:
How can you accept that a big company such as Microsoft or Intel is much more smart and much better than you? so it is the way of my spirit, i am not accepting that Intel or Microsoft or such big companies are much smart or much better than me, so i am
constructing "alone" my Big business and i think i will win the fight and i think i will be successful, this is my way of doing, i want and i like to be my own big Boss and this is my way of doing, and i am not arab and i am not white european or.. i am
like a super Soldier that is fighting against the best PhD researchers and against some powerful companies by doing the following:

More precision about my way of being innovative and creative..

You have to understand my way of doing, i am in competition against
the best PhD researchers all around the world in what i am doing, so the way to success is not to compete against one PhD or some researchers, i think the way to success is competing against the best PhD researchers around the world in what you are doing
and win the fight, this is how i am doing it, and i am also reading the best PhD papers of the best PhD researchers and doing the following, read below, so i am like a super Soldier:

More of my philosophy about my kind of innovation and creativity..

Here is also my way of how i am becoming rich:

First i want to say that i have passed four IQ tests and some of them
are certified and i have scored high, so i am highly smart, second,
my methodology is also that i am reading many PhD papers of researchers and i am seeking the weaknesses of them, and i have found many weaknesses on those PhD papers and from those weaknesses i have invented many software scalable algorithms and
algorithms and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism etc., so i give you an example of one of my invention that is: A Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, so that you understand that i am truthful,
here it is:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

But the truth is that i have invented many scalable algorithms such
as this one, and i have made public some of them. And here is another example of how i am inventive and creative in operational research too, i have just read the following book (and of other books like it) of a PhD researcher about operational research
and capacity planning, here they are:

Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning by Example

https://www.amazon.ca/Performance-Design-Computer-Capacity-Planning/dp/0130906735

So i have just found that there methodologies of those PhD researchers for the E-Business service don't work, because they are doing calculations for a given arrival rate that is statistically and empirically measured from the behavior of customers, but
i think that it is not correct, so i am being inventive and i have come with my new methodology that fixes the arrival rate from the data by using an hyperexponential service distribution(and it is mathematical) since it is also good for Denial-of-
Service (DoS) attacks and i will write a powerful book about it that will teach my new methodology and i will also explain the mathematics behind it and i will sell it, and my new methodology will work for cloud computing and for computer servers.

You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

More of my philosophy about the financial market and more..

I think that the stock market crashes can be due to economic or natural disasters, speculation, or investor panic, but i also think that
it is the "control" over the factors of speculation and investment panic that is the most important that permits to prevent a stock market crash, so first we have to know that an investor is concerned with the fundamental value of his investment, whereas
a speculator is only concerned with market price movement, and here is my thoughts about how to avoid stock market crash:

More philosophy about the future of financial stability and cyber risk..

I have just read rapidly the following very interesting article,
i invite you to read it carefully:

The future of financial stability and cyber risk

https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-future-of-financial-stability-and-cyber-risk/

I think that we have to be positive about the future of financial
stability and cyber risk, since notice that the financial stability
depends on three things:

1- Leverage
2- Maturity and Risk Transformation
3- Procyclicality of the price of risk

Read the above article to notice it, but i think that for the first two,
i mean Leverage and Maturity and Risk Transformation, the financial institutions have not to put all the eggs in the same basket, so
they need to diversify the risk correctly by diversifying portfolios etc., and for the third that is the Procyclicality of the price of risk, i think that it is less risky since it depends on the "asset" prices that are diversified to a certain level,
and for the cyber risk i am positive since i think we are getting much more sophisticated in cyber security. So i remain positive.

And my above thoughts are related to how i will invest more for my retirement etc. as follows, read my following thoughts so that to understand my way of doing about it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h4FblBWnNHk

More of my philosophy about my new proverb and more..

I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person,
and as you have just noticed i have just invented quickly
a new proverb and here it is and read my explanation below:

---

Here is my new proverb:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and have more experience which is useful
while walking in the forest, then life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i think this
conception of life makes you more positive."

And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en
apprendre plus et avoir plus d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie ressemble à cela, tu peu