• More of my philosophy of how to define smartness.. (1/3)

    From Amine Moulay Ramdane@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 9 19:09:11 2021
    Hello,


    More of my philosophy of how to define smartness..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    I think i am smart, and i say that measuring smartness
    with an IQ is really a "narrow" view, so i will make you feel more what is smartness: I think that such a thing as a human "charisma" can be
    a smart human dynamic system that can make us much more smart or much more synchronized as a people etc. so it can make us much more smart,
    so there is some such human qualities that can be a dynamic smart human system that can be distributed into the brains of people as a smart rules or etc. and that can make us much more smart as a people, so the fact that we are distributing this
    smartness of those kind of qualities into the brains of people as smart rules, it can give an "emergence" to a high level of smartness as a group or people, so we have not to have a narrow view of what is smartness, since those kind of qualities can
    become a great smartness, so a "rule" can become a great smartness if we believe in it and follow it, and a beautiful tree can become a smartness too since we can have an artificial smartness, also we can say that smartness come not only from IQ, but
    from creativity that make you much more smart etc. and i think that smartness is about "adaptation" or how we get more and more perfect as an individual or as a group..

    More of my philosophy about the way of success of the best Big Brains..

    I have just talked about the way to success, and read the following
    about the best big brains from around the world in USA so that to understand correctly the way of success:

    Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai that is a Ph.D., it says:

    "Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the “smart fraction” of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance of that country, for example, its GDP."

    And it also says the following:

    "“According to recent population estimates, there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains.” But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every other country in the world because it
    continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.

    What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this
    is because everyone is focusing on average and below average people. Maybe it’s time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country."

    Read more here:

    https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world

    So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are making USA a rich country.

    And read also the following to understand more:

    Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants

    There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech. Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies. Researchers have found that more than enough
    students graduate from American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry’s friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B system, to get
    foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones.

    But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it misses the picture among Silicon Valley’s top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in that view, tech companies can hire just
    about anyone from anywhere in the world to fill a particular role.

    But today’s most ambitious tech companies are not like factories. They’re more like athletic teams. They’re looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely
    reimagine what widgets should do in the first place.

    “It’s not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants,” said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief executive of the cloud-storage company Box. “It’s about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that
    are going to change everything.”

    Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with those inventions? It’s partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5 percent of the world’s population; it
    stands to reason that most of the world’s best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren’t born here.

    If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google’s entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority of its revenues and profits, the
    engine that allows it to hire thousands of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran, and Eric Veach, from Canada.

    But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to new ideas.

    Read more here:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html

    More of my philosophy about what is the way to success..

    I invite you to look carefully at the following very interesting
    video that explains what is the way to success, it is the same of
    my way of doing below:

    TOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office Hours Ep. 4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk

    More of my philosophy about the real fight..

    I think i am smart and i will explain my kind of spirit, i will
    ask the following question and you will understand my way of thinking:
    How can you accept that a big company such as Microsoft or Intel is much more smart and much better than you? so it is the way of my spirit, i am not accepting that Intel or Microsoft or such big companies are much smart or much better than me, so i am
    constructing "alone" my Big business and i think i will win the fight and i think i will be successful, this is my way of doing, i want and i like to be my own big Boss and this is my way of doing, and i am not arab and i am not white european or.. i am
    like a super Soldier that is fighting against the best PhD researchers and against some powerful companies by doing the following:

    More precision about my way of being innovative and creative..

    You have to understand my way of doing, i am in competition against
    the best PhD researchers all around the world in what i am doing, so the way to success is not to compete against one PhD or some researchers, i think the way to success is competing against the best PhD researchers around the world in what you are doing
    and win the fight, this is how i am doing it, and i am also reading the best PhD papers of the best PhD researchers and doing the following, read below, so i am like a super Soldier:

    More of my philosophy about my kind of innovation and creativity..

    Here is also my way of how i am becoming rich:

    First i want to say that i have passed four IQ tests and some of them
    are certified and i have scored high, so i am highly smart, second,
    my methodology is also that i am reading many PhD papers of researchers and i am seeking the weaknesses of them, and i have found many weaknesses on those PhD papers and from those weaknesses i have invented many software scalable algorithms and
    algorithms and i have invented some powerful software tools for parallelism etc., so i give you an example of one of my invention that is: A Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, so that you understand that i am truthful,
    here it is:

    https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

    But the truth is that i have invented many scalable algorithms such
    as this one, and i have made public some of them. And here is another example of how i am inventive and creative in operational research too, i have just read the following book (and of other books like it) of a PhD researcher about operational research
    and capacity planning, here they are:

    Performance by Design: Computer Capacity Planning by Example

    https://www.amazon.ca/Performance-Design-Computer-Capacity-Planning/dp/0130906735

    So i have just found that there methodologies of those PhD researchers for the E-Business service don't work, because they are doing calculations for a given arrival rate that is statistically and empirically measured from the behavior of customers, but
    i think that it is not correct, so i am being inventive and i have come with my new methodology that fixes the arrival rate from the data by using an hyperexponential service distribution(and it is mathematical) since it is also good for Denial-of-
    Service (DoS) attacks and i will write a powerful book about it that will teach my new methodology and i will also explain the mathematics behind it and i will sell it, and my new methodology will work for cloud computing and for computer servers.

    You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:

    And here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k

    More of my philosophy about the financial market and more..

    I think that the stock market crashes can be due to economic or natural disasters, speculation, or investor panic, but i also think that
    it is the "control" over the factors of speculation and investment panic that is the most important that permits to prevent a stock market crash, so first we have to know that an investor is concerned with the fundamental value of his investment, whereas
    a speculator is only concerned with market price movement, and here is my thoughts about how to avoid stock market crash:

    More philosophy about the future of financial stability and cyber risk..

    I have just read rapidly the following very interesting article,
    i invite you to read it carefully:

    The future of financial stability and cyber risk

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-future-of-financial-stability-and-cyber-risk/

    I think that we have to be positive about the future of financial
    stability and cyber risk, since notice that the financial stability
    depends on three things:

    1- Leverage
    2- Maturity and Risk Transformation
    3- Procyclicality of the price of risk

    Read the above article to notice it, but i think that for the first two,
    i mean Leverage and Maturity and Risk Transformation, the financial institutions have not to put all the eggs in the same basket, so
    they need to diversify the risk correctly by diversifying portfolios etc., and for the third that is the Procyclicality of the price of risk, i think that it is less risky since it depends on the "asset" prices that are diversified to a certain level,
    and for the cyber risk i am positive since i think we are getting much more sophisticated in cyber security. So i remain positive.

    And my above thoughts are related to how i will invest more for my retirement etc. as follows, read my following thoughts so that to understand my way of doing about it:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h4FblBWnNHk

    More of my philosophy about my new proverb and more..

    I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person,
    and as you have just noticed i have just invented quickly
    a new proverb and here it is and read my explanation below:

    ---

    Here is my new proverb:

    "When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and have more experience which is useful
    while walking in the forest, then life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i think this
    conception of life makes you more positive."

    And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

    "Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en
    apprendre plus et avoir plus d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie ressemble à cela, tu peu
  • From Branimir Maksimovic@21:1/5 to Amine Moulay Ramdane on Sun Oct 10 02:19:11 2021
    On 2021-10-10, Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hello,


    More of my philosophy of how to define smartness..

    Since is not the so beautiful like the idealistic ?

    And is not the so beautiful bringing the moralistic ?

    And is not the so beautiful bringing the xenophobic ?

    So is the so beautiful of the too materialistic ?

    And what about the so beautifully romantic ?

    And i think all of them needs the good strategic

    So then you have to avoid to be the too simplistic !

    Since you are even hearing this so beautiful music !

    Hey, you are not script level smart, because script
    can be changed. Only way you can listen is by force,
    becquse you can't see you are idiot :P


    --

    7-77-777
    Evil Sinner!
    with software, you repeat same experiment, expecting different results...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)