Hello,



More of my philosophy about the pragmatic meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that you can, like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, logically infer that human existence is absurd, but i don't think it is the
good way of measuring, since i think that there is also the "pragmatic" way of measuring, since i think that noticing that humans die or a part of humans suffer or the like is not the thing that must make us think that human existence is absurd, since
the "pragmatic" way of measuring the meaning of human life is to notice that we have really progressed in the today human life compared to the old human life and we are really progressing in an exponential way, and i think that it is what gives the
meaning of human life, so i think what remains is that we have to minimize at best or avoid wars and we have to be the right safety in managing the exponential progress of our humanity, and speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity, here is
what i have said about it:

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes the meaning of human life ?


I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things,
it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also
to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the
way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights
of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is
the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years
from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/


So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity.


More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at
the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake:

The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU


So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but
it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings
a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are
genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say
that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and
it is why i have just said the following:


More of my philosophy about how to create in new type of man and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that it is possible to create a kind of new sophisticated type of human or man, so i think i have just explained in my below thoughts of my
philosophy how to be hope and how to be a positive energy, but i think one of the most important thing is to ask a the following philosophical question:

What is the mechanisms that make a human be efficient at adaptation and perfection ?

So i think that i have also just talked in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the first mechanism that is that when you become more and more perfect, you begin to notice that human life becomes more and more easy for you, since for example when you
become more and more educated , you become more and more smart, so then for example the "reusability" of this smartness makes human life more easy for you, but not only that, but the second mechanism is that we have to organize knowledge and information
such as on internet in such way that it becomes easy to find the efficient and high quality knowledge and information, so then you have to be "selective" in such way of your knowledge and information so that to be efficient. And of course i have also
just said that this becoming more and more smart and more and more selective can hurt and can hurt business, and here is what i have just said about it:

More of my philosophy about the radical form of governance and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you have just noticed i have just
talked about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism, read it below, and as you have noticed i have just talked about the radical form of governance where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social
engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), so this way of governance has not worked, but today the way of governance has changed and i think that it is proceeding by the way of introducing appropriate, rational
reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments and by monitoring with statistics, other than that there is also another radical form of governance that says that we have to be the radical form of class struggle as in old communist
China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but i think that this way of doing has not worked since this radical way of class struggle renders people too much hateful(filled with hatred), since in this radical form of Class Struggle, the lower
classes in the society hate the upper classes and the upper classes hate the lower classes, so this kind
of radical form of Class Struggle doesn't work and it is not good for business, since i say that in business we have even to be disciplined at buying a product or service even if we don't love them, since for example i can say that when you become more
and more educated, so then you become more and more smart, so then you become more and more "selective" of products and of services and of humans and this can hurt and this can hurt business, so then i think that the solution of this problem is for
example to become disciplined at buying a product or service even if you don't love them, and of course you are noticing that we have to make people aware of it by educating them correctly. And here is what i say more about Class struggle:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

More of my philosophy about thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism and about competition and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism of marxism and communism, is by logical analogy like the process of
competition between ideas or between people that brings quality, so you can have a “synthesis” of private property and socialism understood as thesis and antithesis, and you can have collision of the bourgeoisie and the working class as competing
thesis and antithesis that can bring a synthesis as quality, so i think that marxism and communism say that the bourgeoisie of the capitalistic system is not capable of treating correctly the working class, and i think it is from where comes marxism, but
i think that this way of thinking is too extremist in our today world , since i have just for example said that workers living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the
90/50 ratio, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about the living standards that has brought capitalism, and you can read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it:

More of my philosophy about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism and more of my thoughts..

And read the following article so that you understand more:

Germany seeks ban on neo-Nazis

https://wc.arizona.edu/papers/94/58/01_96_m.html


And I invite you to read the following article from a white supremacist and neo-nazi website called national vanguard:


https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/04/cosmotheism-in-savitri-devi-2/


And notice that it is saying the following about national socialism
of the white supremacism and neo-nazism:

"[National Socialism] aimed at stemming the physical and moral decay of modern, technically “advanced” humanity by forcing it — by forcing its racial élite, at least — to live in accordance with the ultimate purpose of Nature, which is not to
make individuals “happy,” nor even to make, nations “happy,” but to evolve supermankind — living godhead — out of the existing master races, first of all, out of the pure Aryan. Happiness is a bourgeois conception, definitely. It is not our
concern. We want animals to be happy — and inferior men, also, to the extent their happiness does not disturb the New Order. We believe higher mankind has better things to do. The Aryan world, remoulded by us after our final triumph, will no longer
think in terms of happiness like the decadent world of today. It will think in terms of duty — like the early Vedic world, the early Christian world, the early Islamic world; like the world at the time of any great new beginning."


But i think i am smart and i say that there is two weaknesses in
the above thoughts of neo-nazism, first weakness is that neo-nazism wants to be dictatorship so that to use the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but this way of doing has not worked, and the second weakness is that the "duty" in the above thoughts of neo-nazism is idealized, but since the duty has to be dictated by the dictatorship of neo-
nazism, so since it is not the democratic way, then the duty that is dictated by neo-nazism can not work correctly and it can become a big problem since it comes from the dictatorship of neo-nazism.

I think i am smart, and i have just spoken yesterday about neo-Nazism
and i have just said that what also they want to do is to be a dictatorship so that to use the radical form that has not worked, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), and here is more logical proof about the way of Social Engineering of Nazism and how the Nazism or neo-Nazism define who belongs to the National Socialist ‘community’ and who does not, read
the following:

https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689590.001.0001/acprof-9780199689590

Other than that , i think you can live to 100 years if you take
Metformin, and here is the logical proof of it:

With reference to observed survival in diabetic patients initiated with metformin monotherapy [survival time ratio (STR) = 1.0], adjusted median survival time was 15% lower (STR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.90) in matched individuals without diabetes and 38%
lower (0.62, 0.58-0.66) in diabetic patients treated with sulphonylurea monotherapy.

Read more here on the following study so that to notice it:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25041462/


More of my philosophy about the stock price and about bitcoin and more of my thoughts..

Microsoft stock price stood in year 2022 at $268.09

According to the latest long-term forecast, Microsoft price will hit $300 by the end of 2022 and then $400 by the middle of 2025. Microsoft will rise to $500 within the year of 2026, $600 in 2027, $700 in 2028, $800 in 2031 and $900 in 2033.


Read more here:

Microsoft Stock Forecast 2022 - 2025 - 2030

https://coinpriceforecast.com/msft#:~:text=Microsoft%20stock%20price%20stood%20at,2031%20and%20%24900%20in%202033.


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that my below thoughts
about investments in stocks is valid, since look at the above example
at the Microsoft stock prices above, the first thing to notice is that
it is just a forecast, but as i am saying below that it is
too risky, since you have to diversify your investment by
for example investing in index funds as i am explaining it
below, and second important thing to notice is that the stock
price is the current price that a share of stock is trading for on the market , but it looks by analogy like the bitcoin currency, since
it also follows demand and supply, but i think that investing in
the stocks is better than investing in bitcoin, since there is
a return of investment in stocks that also permits you to sell much easily your shares of stock, and i think that this return of investment doesn't exist in bitcoin, also i think bitcoin has still much lesser value.


Here is my new proverb:


"When you see a giant killer wave coming to swallow you,
you have not to waste your time at being pessimistic,
but i think you have to know how to beautifully swim so that
to survive the giant killer wave. And i think it is my kind of spirit,
and notice that it is by logical analogy like my way of being the
good vibes that i am talking about below, even if our world
is too much pessimistic."

More of my philosophy about the good vibes and about Love and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


How can we Love when we are no more innocence ? and when we are no more adolescence ? so i think that there is still a beautiful "kind" of Love
and it is a kind of Love that comes from the good vibes, and i think that the good vibes also come from a wise spirit, and take for example a look at my following poems that i have invented quickly, and i think that you have to notice the good vibes in
them, since i think that i am both showing my good vibes in form of my poems of Love and i am also showing my wise kind of spirit in form of my other poems, and this kind
of wise spirit of mine is also like the good vibes of like being good professionalism, and i think that the good vibes also make the good fans (i mean the when you are fan of someone) and attracts customers in business, and it is my way of doing in
business, and notice that those good vibes are a first step to a trustworthy relationship, since i can also say that you cannot love without trusting a person. Since i think that trust is the building block of love. Just like how a child trusts her
mother and thereby loves her, your partner needs to know that you are trustworthy and won’t ditch them in difficult times. This feeling is important for love to sprout and flourish. Trust is also very important for Business Relations in the Arab World,
so i invite you to read the following interesting article from the Arab world about it:

Al-Ississ: Trust is at the Heart of Business Relations in the Arab World

https://www.aucegypt.edu/news/stories/al-ississ-trust-heart-business-relations-arab-world

So i invite you to look at my following poems in english and french
in the following web link so that to notice my good vibes in them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/NOpq_uc2gOg


More of my philosophy about being a seller of Amazon products and more of my thoughts..


I have just said the following:

"I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, I have quickly taken a look at Amazon profit margin and ROI(Return of investment), and i think by being a sellers of Amazon(or the like) products you
can become rich, since you can buy in more quantity so that to lower the price of an Item of Amazon, so it is better for you if you have more money when you start selling Amazon products, and after that i think that you can use Amazon shipment strategy
that easy the things for you, and after you make much more money by being a seller of Amazon products, you can invest a part of your money in index funds in stocks that have an average ROI of around 10%, so i think you can become rich by this way of
doing, and i think that it is better than Real Estate investment."


But i think there is still a problem in the being a seller of Amazon products, and it is that when you are a seller and you buy more quantity of a product so that to lower the price of an Item, there is a "competition" in this process of buying more
quantity of a product, like in the process of creativity below, so there can be others that can buy much more quantity than you, so that to lower more than you the price of an Item , so it is i think the problem, so i think so that to be successful as a
seller of Amazon products, you have to have much more money when you start selling Amazon products and so that to "also" lower the Risk, also you have to know that in most cases, customers(that i think can be sellers of Amazon products) can request
returns within 30 days of receiving their order, and this shows that it is not easy to become rich as i am explaining it below.


More of my philosophy about Real Estate investment and about
creativity and about stocks and bonds and more of my thoughts..


According to the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF), as of Q1 2021 the average 25-year return for private commercial real estate properties held for investment purposes slightly outperformed the S&P 500 Index, with average
annualized returns of 10.3% and 9.6%, respectively. Residential and diversified real estate investments also averaged returns of 10.3%, and i think that a good ROI for a rental property is usually above 10%, but 5% to 10% is also an acceptable range.
Real estate investing can be lucrative, but it's important to understand the "risks". Key risks include bad locations, negative cash flows, high vacancies, and problem tenants. Other risks to consider are the lack of liquidity, hidden structural problems,
and the unpredictable nature of the real estate market, so i think because of the Risks in Real Estate, i think it is in accordance with what i am saying below, so reread it carefully:

More of my philosophy about what about creativity and how to get rich and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you have just noticed i have
just said , read it below, that you can not get easily rich,
but as you have just noticed i have not taken into account the factor of creativity, so let us look at what the following web page is saying about creativity:

Everyone can be creative

https://edu.gcfglobal.org/en/creativity/everyone-can-be-creative/1/


But i think i am highly smart, and i say that what is not saying the
above web page, is that creativity is not just creativity , since
so that make much more money with your creativity, you have to be also "competition" with the other humans that can be much better than you
in the kind of your creativity, so this can lesser the value of your creativity, so then we can not generalize and say that everybody can become rich or easily rich by being creative, and this is in accordance with what i am saying below, so reread it
again:


More of my philosophy about Benjamin Franklin and about investments..


I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just looked at the following video about the US. president Benjamin Franklin that talks about the EASIEST way to become rich:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hWbRmkVqhQ


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i am not in accordance with the US. president Benjamin Franklin in the above video, since let us take a look at the following interesting web page of
the Investment growth calculator from Fidelity investments in Canada, since i am understanding it easily, and here it is and take a look at it carefully:

https://www.fidelity.ca/en/growthcalculator/


But notice that it is asking to put two important informations that are:

1- Rate of return
2- Inflation rate


But i think that for the long-term investment, the Inflation rate is not so important, so i think that we have to focus on the "Rate of return",
so i am highly smart, and i say that you can not be rich easily, since
you can not for example invest in stocks of this or that company
since it is so much more risky, so you have to "diversify" correctly by investing in index funds in stocks, since they are much less risky and i think that they have an average of around 10% of rate of return or return of investment, so i think that you
can not get rich easily with it, since the Time to grow in the above calculator has to be set to around 40 years or so and this will permit you to have a "good" retirement, but it will not permit you to easily become rich, and i think that the Bond
that is a fixed-income instrument that represents a loan made by an investor to a borrower (typically corporate or governmental) is not better in rate of return or return of investment than index funds, so then this shows that it is not easy to get
generally rich for the people, and i mean "generally".


More of my philosophy about IQ tests and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, but i have just passed more and more IQ tests, and i have just noticed that the manner in wich we test with IQ tests is not correct, since in an IQ test
you can be more specialized and above average in one subtest of intelligence than in another subtest of intelligence inside an IQ test, since IQ tests test for many kind of intelligences such as the spatial and speed and calculations and logical
intelligence etc., so i think that you can be really above average in logical intelligence, as i am really above average in logical intelligence, but at the same time you can be below average in calculations and/or spatial.., so since an IQ test doesn't
test for this kind of specializations of intelligence, so i think it is not good, since testing for this kind specializations in intelligence is really important so that to be efficient by knowing the strong advantages of this or that person in every
types of intelligences. And about the importance of specialization, read carefully my following thought about it:


More of my philosophy about specialization and about efficiency and productivity..

The previous CEO Larry Culp of General Electric and the architect of a strategy that represented a new turning point in the world corporate strategies, Larry Culp's strategy was to divide the company according to its activities. Something like we are
better of alone, seperately and
focused on each one's own activity, than together in a large
conglomerate. And it is a move from integration to specialization.
You see it is thought that a company always gains economies of scale
as it grows, but this is not necessarily the case, since as the company
gains in size - especially if it engages in many activities - it
also generates its own bureaucracy, with all that entails in term
of cost and efficiency. And not only that, it is also often the case
that by bringing together very different activities, strategic focus is lost and decision-making is diluted, so that in the end no one ends up
taking responsability, it doesn't always happen, but this reasons are
basically what is driving this increasing specialization. So i invite to look at the following video so that to understand more about it:

The decline of industrial icon of the US - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hqwYxFCY-k


And here is my previous thoughts about specialization and productivity so that to understand much more:

More about the Japanese Ikigai and about productivity and more of my thoughts..

Read the following interesting article about Japanese Ikigai:

The More People With Purpose, the Better the World Will Be

https://singularityhub.com/2018/06/15/the-more-people-with-purpose-the-better-the-world-will-be/

I think i am highly smart, so i say that the Japanese Ikigai is like a Japanese philosophy that is like the right combination or "balance" of passion, vocation, and mission, and Ikigai and MTP, as concepts, urge us to align our passions with a mission to
better the world, but i think that Japanese Ikiai is a also smart since it gets the "passion" from the "mission", since the mission is also the engine, so you have to align the passion with the mission of the country or the global world so that to be
efficient, and Japanese Ikigai is also smart since so that to higher productivity and be efficient, you have to "specialize" in doing a job, but so that to higher more productivity and be more efficient you can also specialize in what you do "better",
and it is what is doing Japanese Ikigai, since i think that in Japanese Ikigai, being the passion permits to make you specialized in a job in what you do better, and here is what i have just smartly said about productivity:

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system,
since i say that in an economic system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and productive, and
we have to minimize at best the idle time or the wasting of time doing a job, since i can also say that this average idle time or wasting time of the workers working in parallel can be converted to a contention like in parallel programming, so you have
to minimize it at best, and you have to minimize at best the coherency like in parallel programming so that to scale much better, and of course all this can create an economy of scale, and also i invite you to read my following smart and interesting
thoughts about scalability of productivity:

I will talk about following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:

https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/

Read more carefully here his thoughts about productivity:

https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/

And i think he is making a mistake in his above webpage about productivity:

Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

From where did You took this crap ?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)