Hello,





More of my philosophy about abstraction and intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask an important philosophical question of:

Does the level of abstraction that we use by using a language like english or french or arabic is sufficient and efficient ?

So i think the languages like english and french and arabic are languages that "abstract" the reality of the existence, so they are not
precise languages that describe reality, but i am smart and i say
that those languages, like english and french and arabic, have there deficiencies, since they can not describe the technical or scientific thoughts in a more precise and more technical manner , so then the languages like english and french and arabic are
not sufficient and are not efficient at expressing those kind of technical or scientific thoughts, this is why we are for example using software programming languages that can be described as technical languages since i say that they describe the
thoughts of humans that are more precise and more technical than non-technical or non-scientific thoughts, so i think i am smart and i will say that when you do software programming it is that you describe technical thoughts in a much more precise and
technical manner, this is why i say that software programming learns us to be more disciplined and more precise and more technical, since for example a cosine or a sine or other trigonometric functions are part of a technical language that we find in
technical languages like software programming languages, but i think that they were added late after to the english dictionary, but notice that they are not part of the english language, and look for example a computer programming register that we use in
software programming, notice that is part of technical language and it is not the english language, so look carefully at my following thoughts that i have thought quickly about more of my philosophy about stack memory allocations and about preemptive and
non-preemptive timesharing, and notice how i am using both the english language and the technical language so that to be much more precise and technical:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w

Also i say that the meaning of a language is so important, so
the modality of thoughts is so important, and here is my
thoughts about it:

More of my philosophy about smartness and about discovering patterns and more of my thoughts..


I think i am really smart, i think that inventing sophisticated theorems in mathematics is also discovering smart patterns with your fluid intelligence, it is why i am inventing my thoughts by also discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence , but
notice that discovering patterns in mathematics is like a low level way of doing like in microeconomics, but discovering patterns can be in a high level way like in macroeconomics, and here is an example of how i am doing it quickly, read my following
thoughts about Nikola Tesla and about Garry Tan that i have invented quickly so that to notice how i am discovering smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a high level way:

More of my philosophy of how i am smart and about what is smartness..

I think i am smart, and i think that smartness is not doing
mathematics, i think being highly smart is discovering smart patterns and composing smartly other patterns with those patterns etc. so i will
give you my examples of how i am genetically highly smart, so read
carefully my following thoughts and notice how i have quickly
read a saying of Nikola Tesla and how i have rapidly discovered
smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my
showing that Nikola Tesla is not correct thinking and by discovering
other patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my invention of my new proverb below etc. so read carefully my following thoughts and you will notice that being highly smart is also quickly discovering smart patterns in the way i am doing it below(
and notice below the other smart patterns that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence when i am rapidly showing that Garry Tan is not correct thinking):

More of my philosophy about Nikola Tesla and my proverbs and more..

I have just looked at the following video of the sayings of Nikola Tesla, and you can read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla, and you can look at the video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnQ-o6R2wac

And i think Nikola Tesla doesn't look like me, Since of course i am also an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, but i don't think Nikola Tesla was a wise type of person, since for example he is saying the following saying in the
above video:

"Be alone, that is the secret of invention;
be alone, that is when ideas are born"

So i think that the above saying from Nikola Tesla is not smart at all, since creativity needs convergent and divergent thinking, and divergent thinking needs to "collect" information and data from other people so that to be efficient, and i also think
that creativity is the mother of invention, so this is why Nikola Tesla is not smart by saying the above saying, and here is more of my smart thoughts about it so that you understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about divergent and convergent thinking and more..

I invite you to look at the following video:

5 Life-changing books YOU MUST READ in 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGZd2dn8IJ4

I think i am smart, and notice that he is talking about the book called "The one thing", and he is saying that we have to be focused on doing one thing at a time because it is good for productivity, and he is saying that doing many things at the same
time is not good for productivity, but i think i am smart and i say he is not smart and he is not correct to say so, because we can do many things at the same time and be like divergent thinking before doing one thing at a time and be like convergent
thinking, and this kind of efficient "balance" like between convergent and divergent thinking makes the efficient thinking, and here is my new proverb about my methodology:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..

I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:

So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a bachelor's degree in Computer Systems
Engineering:

So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:

"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and in life."

But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply but also on the "demand", so if the
demand doesn't want to give you enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above video has forgot the very basis of what is
it of something has to be useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can be influenced by other factors such as
Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

More of my philosophy about the Gödel's First incompleteness theorem and
more of my thoughts..

I have searched more on internet the most precise and correct Gödel's First incompleteness theorem, and here it is:

"Any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of elementary arithmetic can be carried out is incomplete; i.e., there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F"

And in mathematics, a statement is a declarative sentence that is either true or false but not both. A statement is sometimes called a proposition. The key is that there must be no ambiguity. To be a statement, a sentence "must" be true or false, and it
cannot be both.

So that means that we know that the statement is true or false but
it can not be proven true or false, so we then logically infer that
we can not prove the consistency of the system , so the statement can be that it is like an axiom in mathematics that is true but that we can not prove by such logical inference or deduction, so then the system
remains really useful even if it's incomplete by Gödel's incompleteness theorems, so i think that Gödel's incompleteness theorems are not so problematic.

More of my philosophy about the CIA and Mossad and such secret services and about fluid intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk more about my personality, so i invite you to look at the following web page of the Mossad:

https://www.mossad.gov.il/eng/Pages/default.aspx


So notice how the Mossad is saying in there above web page the following:

"Join us to see the invisible, and do the impossible"


And i think that it is part of my personality, since i am like the Mossad, since my way of doing is discovering patterns or smart patterns with my fluid intelligence, and we can abstract those patterns like being a "system" or smart system that you
discover, and the system can be like a rule or a theorem etc. and when you discover those patterns with your fluid intelligence, it is as you are seeing the "invisible" like is saying it the Mossad in there above web page, so i am discovering patterns
with my fluid intelligence that permit me to understand philosophy or politics or to make new philosophies, and it is like being an inventor, and i am also discovering patterns that make algorithms, so for example look at my following invention of a
scalable Lock algorithm called MLock, and how i have invented it by discovering smart patterns with my fluid intelligence , and read about it in my following thoughts:


About smartness and about my MLock and about MCS Lock and more..

I have just read the following article from ACM:

Scalability Techniques for Practical Synchronization Primitives

https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2698990

Notice how they are speaking about one of the best scalable Lock that we
call MCS lock, but i think that CLH and MCS locks are not smart since
those scalable Locks are like intrusive, since they have to hide the
required parameter to be passed, this is why i think i am smart since i
have invented a scalable Lock that is better than MCS Lock since my
scalable Lock doesn't require any parameter to be passed, just call the
Enter() and Leave() methods and that's all, here it is, read carefully
about it in my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock


And notice again how i have invented the following algorithm by
discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence, here it is:


And i have just updated my software invention of a Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, and it is
now working perfectly with both Windows and Linux, and you can read about it and download it from website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

More of my philosophy about cleverness and about the wise man and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i have just read the following
proverb or saying of Albert Einstein in the following web page of Wise Sayings, Quotes & Phrases:


https://everydaypower.com/wise-sayings-about-life/


Here it is:


174. “A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.” – Albert Einstein


So i will analyse or analyze it quickly with my fluid intelligence
by discovering patterns in it, so the first pattern is:

Notice you can analyse the system of the above proverb or saying of
Albert Einstein by looking if it is logically consistent, so notice that it is not logically consistent, since the good avoidance of problems
needs good cleverness and we can not logically say that avoidance of problems is not solving problems, since the good avoidance of problems can be solving problems, also the second pattern that i am discovering
with my fluid intelligence is that we can also look at the definition
of wisdom or a wise man and it is the following:

"Wisdom is the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment, and being wise is having or showing experience, knowledge, and good judgment, so then having and showing the good judgment is also being genetically apt at being or showing the
good judgment , so i think that being wise needs from you to be smart and clever , so it comes from both the genetical and cultural"


So then the above definition of Wisdom or the being wise shows that
the above proverb of Albert Einstein is not correct and is not smart.

And i have just found another interesting proverb or saying from Nelson Mandela in the above web page, and it is the following:


195. “If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his language, that goes to his heart.” — Nelson Mandela


And here is my proverb that is related to it:


And here is my other smart proverb:

"One very important sign of a wise man is that he knows how to use the appropriate language to talk to people, but does he needs to use only
one language with "people"? no, he has to know how to use different
languages to talk to people, for example when he talks to the birds he
uses the language of the birds, so he has to know how to be efficient at
that."

So notice that it is a smart proverb, since i am also saying in my new
proverb the following:

"..for example when he talks to the birds he uses the language of the
birds.."

So as you notice that it is also making it clear that a language
is not only like the spoken english language, since it can also mean the language of the heart(or of Love) or the language of technicality etc."


More of my philosophy about the laws and about free speech and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question
of:


Why i have just said below the following:

"So as you notice that those tough laws against conspiracy can
be "extended" to even control much more efficiently the free speech,
so i think that saying that free speech truly exists is naive."


So i think that the being "free" of free speech is not the being
free since the police or the FBI can investigate your free speech or actions if they evaluate that your free speech is a conspiracy, so if you are investigated in such a way by the police or FBI that also means that you are "not" free even if the
conspiracy is not represented by your kind of actions that are evaluated as conspiracy, but by the speech that is evaluated as conspiracy, so then i can logically infer that free speech doesn't truly exists.


More of my philosophy about free speech and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the following Wise Sayings, Quotes & Phrases:


https://everydaypower.com/wise-sayings-about-life/


And the web page above contains the following saying related to free speech:

153. “I like criticism. It makes you strong.” — LeBron James


So we can ask a philosophical question of:


Is free speech allowed by the laws ?


So i have just taken a look at the laws, and we have to see if the laws protect correctly the citizens or the state, and as an example, here is what i have just found as laws in Canada that are related to the above subject, since there is even in Canada tough laws against
conspiracy or what we call "complot" in french, and look at them here(and you have to translate it in english because the laws are in french) :

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/fra/lois/C-46/section-465.html


So as you notice that those tough laws against conspiracy can
be "extended" to even control much more efficiently the free speech,
so i think that saying that free speech truly exists is naive.


More of my philosophy of how to control your sexual desire and impulses and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask a philosophical question of:

How to control the sexual desire and impulses ?


I think i am highly smart, and i will say that you have to control
them by enhancing your taste or intellectual taste, and i have done it
and i think it works, so as i have just explained in my new proverb , read about it in my below thoughts of my philosophy about beauty, so when you are convinced that beauty is systemic in the way i am explaining it in
my new proverb about beauty below, and you get into much details of what is beauty, and when you get more conscious and more educated about life, you will start to notice that your intellectual taste and taste change, and i think it is the way to
control the sexual desire and impulses, and i think it works , since i have done it, so i think it looks by logical analogy like my following thoughts about the power of an idea, since you can understand beauty by the power of the ideas too, so read
carefully my following thoughts so that to understand my views:


What is the true power of the idea ?

This is a so important philosophical subject, since
i think i am smart and i will make you feel more the true
power of the idea by first talking about the technic in psychology that
we call "Mood freezing", since i think that the most important aspect of
Mood freezing is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and you
can read about it here:

https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Mood+Freezing

So as you are noticing that it says that when the respondents were
convinced that expressing aggression would not make them feel better,
they actually accepted their current situation which eventually improved
their moods, so this proves that the power of the idea is great, this is
why i am of the ones that believes that we can enhance much better
humans and construct a new type of man by using some intellectual
mechanisms, and i am talking about some of them below and here is my
poem about the true power of the idea, read it again:

"Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how they have built south Korea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we unite the people such as of Crimea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not just a pizza from the pizzeria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the simple prayer of Ave Maria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the stupid war between the sunnite and shiah
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we make north Korea look like a beautiful Canada
So give me more of those beautiful and so smart ideas !"


More of my philosophy about the “Customer is King” and about Democracy and about intelligence and more of my thoughts..



So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so the “Customer is King” is an age-old mantra reflecting the importance of customers or consumers in every business. But i think saying that the �
��Customer is King” is not wise and is not correct, since it is by logical analogy like Democracy, since in Democracy the people are not King, since the people have for example to be educated correctly and they have to be informed correctly by the
medias so that Democracy works correctly, so the medias have to be objective too, so then the customers in Business are not the King, since they can be not correctly wise and they can be not correctly educated so they can have a bad intellectual taste
or taste, so then the intellectual taste or taste of the customers in business have to be enhanced correctly so that they know how to buy so that to not cause problems, and i think it is progressive and it is part of the evolution of humanity since we
have to advance correctly.


And i have just updated my software invention of a Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, and it is
now working perfectly with both Windows and Linux, and you can read about it and download it from website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references


More of my philosophy about the essence of human or artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will explain more my views,
so since human intelligence is by essence an efficiency, since the highly human intelligence is an efficiency that comes from like the interactions of objects of the lower level layers of the universe and that works well and produces good results, so
then intelligence is not only the sophisticated plan that permits you to adapt efficiently, but it is by essence an efficiency that permits to adapt, so i think this abstraction permits us to say that a delicious maghrebian couscous is an efficiency, and
i think that we can call it an intelligence, since it is an efficiency that comes from like the interactions of objects of the lower level layers of the universe, so then we can consider tools such a static or dynamic system that gives an appreciable
efficiency as artificial intelligence or intelligence, and the tools can be constructed by humans or by mother nature, so then human smartness is not only genetical and cultural , but it is also the smartness or intelligence of the tool that can make
humans much more smart, and how to measure the greatness of the artificial intelligence or intelligence ? so for example a tool can become much more efficient if it it is bought by many customers , so then it is also relative and you have to
contextualize so that to measure the value of the tool.


Read my previous thoughts:

More philosophy about efficiency and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask a really smart philosophical question so that you understand my views:

So how can we define an artificial intelligence ?

So there is two ways to measure it, there is the relative way and the absolute way, so then notice carefully that can we say that we have
to measure artificial intelligence by comparing with human intelligence ? so i will answer this question by asking: Can we say that a monkey is not smart since a human is much smarter than a monkey ? so now you are understanding my kind of smartness, so
where have we to set the limit that defines artificial intelligence ? since i say that artificial intelligence can not just be measured by comparing with human intelligence, so now you are understanding that i am saying below that smartness is an
efficiency, so then i can logically infer that we can also set the limit by saying that we can consider an efficiency of a tool of a product or of a static system or of a dynamic system as being a kind of artificial intelligence. So read my previous
thoughts now:

More of my philosophy about efficiency and about smartness and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask an important philosophical question of:

Is smartness an efficiency ?


So i think that smartness is an efficiency, since
something that is efficient works well and produces good results by using the available time, money, supplies etc. in the most effective way,
so it is why i think i can logically infer that a tool of a product or service that is more efficient is like an "artificial" smartness that can make you much more smart than average smartness, so i think that smartness is not only the genetical
smartness or cultural smartness, but it is also smartness of the tool, so then i can logically infer that we can also become sophisticated smart Cyborgs by using powerful tools such as internet or the like, so we are not today just dealing with humans ,
but we are also dealing with Cyborgs,
so when you are creative or inventive and you invent tools , you can become a sophisticated Cyborg using those tools.

More of my philosophy about success and failure and more of my thoughts..


First you have to know that when i am saying the following:

"So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ."

It is the truth , but i am not narcissistic or arrogant by saying so,
since a highly smart IQ can also mean that it is 115 IQ.


Other than that i will ask a very important philosophical question of:

How to define the being success and failure ?


I think that you have to define it by looking at the weights of importance so that to "prioritize" by weights of importance so that

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)