Hello,


Here is my just new proverb:

"You don't learn a valuable lesson from making mistakes, but you learn a valuable lesson from being the right prevention and making the mistakes"

So I invite you to look at the following known black american that
says the following:

"FAILURE Means You've LEARNED Another VALUABLE LESSON!"

Here he is in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHpDeonEwO4

So i think i am smart, and from my just new above proverb you are understanding that the above general saying of the known black american is not smart, since the "failure" comes also from the mistakes. And
now by reading my just new above proverb you are understanding my logical proof below, so read all my previous thoughts below:

More of my philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart and i think that the problem of today Western countries is that they are not being the right Elitism, since i think that populism is not the right Elitism that we require, so i will give you an example so that you understand, so look
at the following new article of a journalist of a white supremacist website in USA called national vanguard:

https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/09/how-to-tell-true-philosophy-from-false-philosophy-in-30-seconds/

So i think that this article is not smart since look carefully
at how he is ranking Survival,Truth and Justice, Freedom, etc.
and notice carefully that he is saying that Survival comes before Truth,
and i think that it is not smart to say so, since i think i am smart and i say that Survival is like my smart redefinition of Utilitarianism, since you have to survive in the present and you have to survive in the near future or in the future, so since
you have to survive this way so you have to survive as a group to be better survival and then responsability is inherent to it since you have also to be more organized as a group so that to survive in the near future or future, so then since this
responsability is inherent so we can logically say that you have to be more organized by using more sophisticated knowledge or smartness, so then this more sophisticated knowledge comes with truth that permits you to be better organized so that to
survive, so then this proves that we can not simply Rank Survival before the truth, so then my logical proof is finished and it shows that the above article is not right by Ranking as he is ranking.

More of my philosophy of what is exactly smartness..

So what is exactly smartness ?

So i will think "rapidly" the answer of this question as follows:

If you look below at how i am discovering rapidly the pattern with my fluid intelligence in my logical proof, i think this shows more what is smartness of the fluid intelligence, i think that being smart is also the fluid intelligence that discovers
patterns, and i think that a pattern that you discover with your fluid intelligence is like a static or dynamic "system" that you discover, and this pattern recognition in human fluid intelligence is to recognize a particular way in which something is
done, is organized, or happens and this pattern that you discover can be low level or high level, for example look at my below logical proof and how i am discovering the pattern with my fluid intelligence and since the pattern that i have just discovered
gives a high level knowledge that is the pattern in itself, so i think it is a high level pattern, so there is also low level patterns that are a low level knowledge, and the high level knowledge is like Macroeconomics and the low level knowledge is like
Microeconomics and when you discover the sophisticated patterns with your fluid intelligence , those sophisticated patterns are the tools that make you more smart or much more smart.

And read carefully my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs


More of my philosophy about being logically consistent..

I invite you to look at the following known black american that
says the following:

"FAILURE Means You've LEARNED Another VALUABLE LESSON!"

Here he is in the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHpDeonEwO4

And we had, before the above saying, the same saying in Morocco as following:

"Koul 3atra fiha khir"

But i think that the above black american is not smart and that those above sayings are not smart and are not logically consistent, and i think i am smart and i am rapidly seeing a pattern with my fluid intelligence and here it is:

I will say that since you have two types of learning, and here they are:

1- Learning by being the right prevention

2- Learning by not being the right prevention

So i think the above sayings are not logically consistent,
since if in the second type of learning above you have made a mistake
that you have not to make if you are the right prevention, you can not "simply" say as a conclusion by being "positive" that it is a "valuable" lesson, since logically this positive way of saying is not logically allowed since the conclusion must be that
making the mistake is a stupidity that you had not to make and that it is not a "valuable" lesson , so then i say that the above sayings are logically inconsistent.

And if you want logically consistent proverbs, here is my new proverbs that are logically consistent and that are interesting:

So you can read all my proverbs that i have just invented quickly here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello,



I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


Here is my just new proverb:


"When you become really strong, you have then to know if
your strongness is tuned well and efficiently, like can be a so beautiful poem of Love, so when we will soon become much much stronger with the exponential progress of humanity, we have to take care of
is this strongness tuned well and efficiently, and i also think that self-improvement is what brings happiness."


I have just read the following interesting article from McKinsey, and
i invite you to read it carefully:

Drivers of student performance: Asia insights

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/drivers-of-student-performance-asia-insights

And i think i am smart, and i think that the following factors in the above article that influence student performance are not so difficult to implement:

1- Students who receive a blend of inquiry-based and teacher-directed
instruction have the best outcomes

2- School-based technology yields the best results when placed in the
hands of teachers

3- Early childhood education has a positive impact on student scores,
but the quality and type of care is important

But i think that the factor that is tricky to implement (since it needs good smartness) is good motivation calibration that permits to score 8 to 14 percent higher on the science test than poorly calibrated one, and the high self-identified motivation
that permits to score 6 to 8 percent higher.

More of my philosophy about money and about happiness and more of my thoughts..

I think i am really smart and here is my just new proverb:

"Passion is not a good engine since it is much less powerful,
so if for example you have passion for sex, then can you make sex
a passion that guides you ? no, so then it is not a general or
much more general way of doing, so i think that individual
happiness comes from the satisfaction of self-improvement,
and does money = happiness? I think that big money doesn't
add much individual happiness to having individually enough money
( look at the following video from a techlead so that to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1kQmeIsCVs ), but big money
can add much to societal happiness, and big money builds empires."

In my above smart new proverb , i am saying that individual happiness comes from satisfaction of self-improvement, and I invite you to read
my following thoughts of my philosophy that talks about it and
about how you become self-confidence and how you become this
positive energy and positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

And here is my other new proverb that also talks about how individual happiness comes from satisfaction of self-improvement:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."

And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."

So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world"


Also I have searched more on internet the most precise and correct Gödel's First incompleteness theorem, and here it is:

"Any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of elementary arithmetic can be carried out is incomplete; i.e., there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F"

And in mathematics, a statement is a declarative sentence that is either true or false but not both. A statement is sometimes called a proposition. The key is that there must be no ambiguity. To be a statement, a sentence "must" be true or false, and it
cannot be both.

So that means that we know that the statement is true or false but
it can not be proven true or false, so we then logically infer that
we can not prove the consistency of the system , so the statement can be that it is like an axiom in mathematics that is true but that we can not prove by such logical inference or deduction, so then the system
remains really useful even if it's incomplete by Gödel's incompleteness theorems, so i think that Gödel's incompleteness theorems are not so problematic.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)