Hello,
More of my philosophy about the model of a civilization and
the model of a democracy and the model of an economic system and
more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am highly smart, and notice carefully in my below thoughts how i am speaking about the model of an economic system or the model
of a democracy or the model of a civilization, so as you notice that
i am speaking about the ingredients that makes or creates the model, for example when i ask if the following ingredients as a model can serve as an interesting model:
self-interest and egoism ?
So as you notice when you look at the model of self-interest and egoism
you will think that it is not a good model, but when you are smart
you will notice that self-interest needs the profit and the big profit
that creates a smart competition and this competition regulates
the self-interest and egoism in an efficient way, as also has said it Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism , and the self-interest and competition and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity , so you are noticing that the
primitive model of self-interest and egoism can build great things such as prosperity and happiness, so then you notice the self-interest and egoism can appear like not the good way at first, but when you
analyze it like i am doing it, you can notice that the primitive
model of self-interest and egoism is so interesting and so useful,
but taking a look further at the so important ingredient in Democracy and in an economic system that is "competition", notice that
when you say a "good competition", it also means a good diversification
like the good diversification of economy, that makes the system "resilient", so then look carefully in my below thoughts how i have just said that the engines of a civilization are
self-improvement and money, but you will think that i am idiotic by
saying so, but i am not, since it is inherent to the primitive model of self-improvement and money, that there is of course a self-interest and egoism, but the engine of money is like the profit or big profit that
create the smart competition that regulates the self-interest and egoism
in an efficient way as i am saying it above, so then we have to guide the self-improvement that is the other engine so that it become a good self-improvement that makes democracy and the economic system and the civilization the efficient systems.
More of my philosophy about unity and about democracy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, but as you have noticed i am talking
here about more and more subjects about philosophy and politics,
but i think that there remain a very important thing that i have
to talk about, and it is that the main advantage of "Democracy", it is the one of "competition" that brings the best governance, not about the being unity, since i think that the wanting to be unity like in China
communist way of governance of today, is not a good way of doing, and i think that the way of Democracy that is to be the right competition that brings the best governance and that fights much more efficiently corruption is the good way, and notice that
corruption can be corruption of morality that can be viewed as corruption of efficiency, so i think that the mechanisms of Democracy are so important, so as you notice that the mechanisms of Democracy is not that we have to be unity , so read my
following thoughts about arab countries so that to understand more my views:
I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the following
video of the Arab Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZA3gMBsrQ
And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
being this kind of unity in a country or in the arab world is a defect, and it is the basis of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing, since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united, but it is about plurality of views
or diversity thoughts or political views that uses the mechanism of competition so that to bring the best governance, but of course we have to know how to avoid extremism, and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where comes the
defect of the arab countries or such countries that are lacking Democracy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s
So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:
"A house divided can not stand"
But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or perfection as i am explaining above.
And here is more of my thoughts about Democracy:
We can say the following:
The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.
But i ask a smart question of:
Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?
Here is my answer:
But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU
More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..
Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?
When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
we can logically prove it by saying the following:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.
But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:
Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:
From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide
people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
a country can become a more global world like European union or such.
More precision about the way of international relations and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed i have
just talked about international relations between countries
and zones, read it in my below thoughts, but you have to
understand what i am trying to make you understand, since i think
that self-interest and egoism build great things too, and build
great things in international relations too, but i am saying below
that you have to be the right "patience" that permits
self-interest and egoism to take form into collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity that build great things and that creates prosperity
and happiness of nations, i mean that you have not be pessimistic about self-interest and egoism , since it can appears to you like a not correct way, and you can become pessimistic and more violent by thinking it, but as you are noticing, i am
explaining below how you have to be patience so that self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity that creates prosperity and happiness of nations, and i am explaining the way by wich self-interest and egoism becomes
collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity that creates
properity and happiness of nations, so reread my
previous thoughts since i have also corrected them more:
More of my philosophy about international relations between countries
and zones and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and i invite you to look at the following
video about politics:
Algérie - Maroc : la rupture ? • FRANCE 24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMBQZcXkVwg
And notice carefully that the video above is saying that
international relations between countries are cynical today, since they
are based mostly on self-interest and egoism , but i think we have not to be pessimistic about it, since from the individual self-interest and egoism and from the profit or big profit you create a smart competition and from this you can create a country
or society that is based on collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity and from self-interest and competition and egoism of countries you can build the self-interest and egoism of two countries or more that is based on collaboration and
cooperation and even solidarity and from this self-interest and egoism of the two countries or more you can build interesting values such as confidence and solidarity between countries and you can create a positive energy and create prosperity and
happiness, so i think that the way of self-interest and egoism is also a way that can build great things, but we have to be the right "patience" that allows it, and as i just said that capitalism allows it since capitalism is not a zero sum game, and
since with a "reasonable" level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, but of course you have to notice how i have just talked yesterday about
what is a civilization , read it in my thoughts below, and notice
how the self-interest has to be guided by the necessary self-improvement , and of course notice how i am saying below that
that the engines of a civilization are self-improvement and money,
and of course like in the Adam Smith model of economic Liberalism, competition regulates self-interest, but you have to read
my following thoughts so that you notice that we have to understand competition in a much broader view:
More of my philosophy about Adam Smith and corruption and more of my thoughts..
I say that in economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, so you have to understand what is competition in the Adam Smith philosophy, since i
think that Adam Smith also means competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress etc. and competition that fights efficiently corruption is also the
separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i
think that for example USA is much less corrupt than African countries or such countries since they lack this kind of "competition" that balances this way the powers.
More precision about more of my philosophy of what is a civilization and more of my thoughts..
I have just corrected my typos, since i have written fast my post,
so i invite you to reread it:
I think i am highly smart, and i will ask a so important question of:
What is the essence of a civilization or what is the important
ingredients that make a civilization ?
So as you notice, it is a so important question, so how do you think i will answer it ? so first i will make you understand two things:
There is the first thing that we call individual smartness
and there is the second thing that we call societal smartness,
so if you are really smart you will notice that Adam smith, the father of economic Liberalism, has said that in an economic system we have to specialize the individuals of a society so that to be efficient and productive, but i think that Adam Smith was
not so right, since the weakness of his model is that his model make like more stupid people that lack societal smartness, and we can easily notice it on internet that individuals lack societal smartness of understanding the right dose of philosophy or
the right dose of politics that makes them a good citizens, and more than that we can also easily notice that in our today world, the individuals are expressing too much there differences in a not correct way, such as being sadist or masochist or the
being negro or the being white or the being too sexual or too hot and the like, without giving the right importance to the being the right societal smartness that makes us good citizens that can live in harmony, and this of course requires knowing how to
live together in harmony, and this knowing how to live together in harmony requires the right and the good philosophy to follow, and so that to answer more smartly my above philosophical question, i invite you to look at the following video so that you
notice what is the problem with Africa:
Sénégal, le sage de l'Afrique - Dakar - Saint-Louis - Documentaire voyage - HD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqWluJkJZjI
So i think from looking at Africa in the above video, i am noticing
that it also lacks societal smartness that i am talking about, and to answer the above philosophical question of:
What is the essence of a civilization or what is the important
ingredients that make a civilization ?
I think that the engine of a civilization is not only money,
because big money doesn't add much individual happiness to having individually enough money ( look at the following video from a techlead so that to notice it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1kQmeIsCVs ),
so i think that the engines of a civilization is both self-improvement
and money , and this self-improvement has to know about the "goals"
that are also the being this well balance between the individual smartness and the societal smartness so that to give form to a civilization and so that to make the good citizen, and of course we have to know how to make loving the way of self-
improvement in such a way.
And here is my new proverb that explains more my views:
"Passion is not a good engine since it is much less powerful,
so if for example you have passion for sex, then can you make sex
a passion that guides you ? no, so then it is not a general or
much more general way of doing, so i think that individual
happiness comes from the satisfaction of self-improvement,
and does money = happiness? I think that big money doesn't
add much individual happiness to having individually enough money
( look at the following video from a techlead so that to notice it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1kQmeIsCVs ), but big money
can add much to societal happiness, and big money builds empires."
In my above smart new proverb , i am saying that individual happiness comes from satisfaction of self-improvement, and I invite you to read
my following thoughts of my philosophy that talks about it and
about how you become self-confidence and how you become this
positive energy and positive energy of hope:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM
And here is my other new proverb that also talks about how individual happiness comes from satisfaction of self-improvement:
"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."
And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:
"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."
So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world"
Also I have searched more on internet the most precise and correct Gödel's First incompleteness theorem, and here it is:
"Any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of elementary arithmetic can be carried out is incomplete; i.e., there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F"
And in mathematics, a statement is a declarative sentence that is either true or false but not both. A statement is sometimes called a proposition. The key is that there must be no ambiguity. To be a statement, a sentence "must" be true or false, and it
cannot be both.
So that means that we know that the statement is true or false but
it can not be proven true or false, so we then logically infer that
we can not prove the consistency of the system , so the statement can be that it is like an axiom in mathematics that is true but that we can not prove by such logical inference or deduction, so then the system
remains really useful even if it's incomplete by Gödel's incompleteness theorems, so i think that Gödel's incompleteness theorems are not so problematic.
More of my philosophy about quality control and more of my thoughts..
I have just looked and understood quickly the following paper about SPC(Statistical process control):
https://owic.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/pubs/EM8733.pdf
I think i am highly smart, but i think that the above paper doesn't speak about the fact that you can apply the central limit theorem as following:
The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the mean of any independent, random variable will be normal or nearly normal, if the sample size is large enough.
Also the above paper doesn't speak about the following very important things:
And I have quickly understood quality control with SPC(Statistical process control) and i have just discovered a smart pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that with SPC(Statistical process control) we can debug the process, like in software
programming, by looking at its variability, so if the variability doesn't follow a normal distribution, so it means that there are defects in the process, and we say that there is special causes that causes those defects, and if the variability follows a
normal distribution, we say that the process is stable and it has only common causes, and it means that we can control it much more easily by looking at the control charts that permit to debug and control the variability by for example changing the
machines or robots and looking at the control charts and measuring again with the control charts
And I have just put my thoughts below about the agile methodology, so i invite you to read my thoughts again carefully:
More precision about more of my philosophy about specialization and about quality and about Adam Smith and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system,
since i say that in an economic system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and productive, and
we have to minimize at best the idle time or the wasting of time doing a job, since i can also say that this average idle time or wasting time of the workers working in parallel can be converted to a contention like in parallel programming, so you have
to minimize it at best, and you have to minimize at best the coherency like in parallel programming so that to scale much better, and of course all this can create an economy of scale, and also i invite you to read my following smart and interesting
thoughts about scalability of productivity:
I will talk about following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:
https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/
Read more here his thoughts about productivity:
https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/
And i think he is making a mistake:
Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input
But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).
And it looks like the following:
About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..
Gustafson’s Law:
• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size
Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:
• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law
Load balance is also a crucial factor.
And more of my philosophy about the Post Graduate Program on lean Six Sigma and more..
I think i am really smart and i invite you to read carefully the following webpage of Alan Robinson Professor of Operations Management at University of Massachusetts and that is a full-time professor at the Isenberg School of Management of UMass and a
consultant and book author specializing in managing ideas (idea-generation and idea-driven organization) and building high-performance organizations, creativity, innovation, quality, and lean management:
https://www.simplilearn.com/pgp-lean-six-sigma-certification-training-course?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=&utm_content=11174393172-108220153863-506962883161&utm_device=c&utm_campaign=Display-MQL-DigitalOperationsCluster-PG-QM-CLSS-UMass-
YTVideoInstreamCustomIntent-US-Main-AllDevice-adgroup-QM-Desktop-CI&gclid=Cj0KCQiA3rKQBhCNARIsACUEW_ZGLHcUP2htLdQo46zP6Eo2-vX0MQYvc-o6GQP55638Up4tex85RBEaArn9EALw_wcB
And notice in the above webpage of the professor, that he is giving Post Graduate Program in Lean Six Sigma and on agile methodology, and i think that this Post Graduate Program is easy for me since i am really smart and i can easily understand lean Six
Sigma or Six Sigma and i can easily understand agile methodology, and notice that i am in my below thoughts also explaining much more smartly what is agile methodology, and i think that the more difficult part of Six Sigma or lean Six Sigma is to
understand the central limit theorem and to understand what is SPC(Statistical quality control) and how to use the control charts so that to control the variability of the defects, and notice that i am talking about it in my below thoughts, but i think
that the rest of lean Six Sigma and Six Sigma is easy for me.
More of my philosophy about Six Sigma and more..
I think i am really smart, and now i will talk more about Six Sigma
since i have just talked about SPC(Statistical quality control), so
you have to know that Six Sigma needs to fulfill the following steps:
1- Define the project goals and customer (external and internal)
deliverables.
2- Control future performance so improved process doesn't degrade.
3- Measure the process so that to determine current performance and
quantify the problem.
4- Analyze and determine the root cause(s) of the defects.
5- Improve the process by eliminating the defects.
And you have to know that those steps are also important steps toward attaining ISO 9000 certification, and notice that you can use SPC(Statistical process control) and the control charts on step [4] and step [5] above.
Other than that i have just read the following interesting important paper about SPC(Statistical process control) that explains all the process of SPC(Statistical process control), so i invite you to read it
carefully:
https://owic.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/pubs/EM8733.pdf
So as you notice in the above paper that the central limit theorem
in mathematics is so important, but notice carefully that the necessary and important condition so that the central limit theorem works is that you have to use independent and random variables, and notice in the above paper that you have to do two things
and it's that you have to reduce or eliminate the defects and you have to control the "variability" of the defects, and this is why the paper is talking about how to construct a control chart. Other than that the central limit theorem is not only related
to SPC(Statistical process control), but it is also related to PERT and my PERT++ software project below, and notice that in my software project below that is called PERT++, i have provided you with two ways of how to estimate the critical path, first,
by the way of CPM(Critical Path Method) that shows all the arcs of the estimate of the critical path, and the second way is by the way of the central limit theorem by using the inverse normal distribution function, and you have to provide my software
project that is called PERT++ with three types of estimates that are the following:
Optimistic time - generally the shortest time in which the activity
can be completed. It is common practice to specify optimistic times
to be three standard deviations from the mean so that there is
approximately a 1% chance that the activity will be completed within
the optimistic time.
Most likely time - the completion time having the highest
probability. Note that this time is different from the expected time.
Pessimistic time - the longest time that an activity might require. Three standard deviations from the mean is commonly used for the pessimistic time.
And you can download my PERT++ from reading my following below thoughts:
More of my philosophy about the central limit theorem and about my PERT++ and more..
The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the mean of any independent, random variable will be normal or nearly normal, if the sample size is large enough.
How large is "large enough"?
In practice, some statisticians say that a sample size of 30 is large enough when the population distribution is roughly bell-shaped. Others recommend a sample size of at least 40. But if the original population is distinctly not normal (e.g., is badly
skewed, has multiple peaks, and/or has outliers), researchers like the sample size to be even larger. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about my software
project that is called PERT++, and notice that the PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability
distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration.
And as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is also so important
for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)):
An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC)
https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx
Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So
PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration.
So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal
---
So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions:
function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single;
function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single;
function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended;
For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and
Bval.
For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a
cumulative distribution.
So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) becaus