• More of my philosophy about individual digital identity and individual

    From Amine Moulay Ramdane@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 12 16:53:42 2022
    Hello,



    More of my philosophy about individual digital identity and individual identity and more..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person, and let me
    tell you that i am of the ones that value a lot digital identity,
    since i want my digital identity to be a honest person about my strenghts and about my being a gentleman, and you have to understand that i look like my thoughts of my philosophy or my poems of Love, and i am also thinking them and writing them really
    fast since i look like
    my thoughts that i am writing fast, also i have to be frank since i am also still in the process of inventing more and more thoughts of my philosophy , and i will soon organize all my thoughts of my philosophy as a beautiful digital book, also i will
    also soon do much more "business" with my kind of digital identity etc.

    More of my philosophy about the philosophy of Letting Go and more..

    I have just looked at the following video:

    Why Letting Go Is True Wealth | Minimalist Philosophy for Simple Living

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHcGmiZqKXo&t=78s

    I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,
    so i have just talked about stoicism and i am explaining why
    my philosophy is better than stoicism, and read my below thoughts
    about it, and now there remain the philosophy of Letting Go in the above video that i think comes also from China, but i think it has also a weakness as the below philosophy of the black guy below, so the weakness of the philosophy of Letting Go, is also
    like the same weakness of Buddhism, and it is that we are not "isolated" from people, so since we
    are living inside a society and interacting with people so then
    we are comparing our status etc. so we can be hurt, so we become less confident or more confident so then the Letting Go phillosophy
    is not realistic or pragmatic, since its way of doing is not so efficient.

    More of my philosophy about specialization and self-confidence and more..

    I think i am smart, and i have just looked at some videos of the following black guy that is creating motivational videos:

    TRUE DOG MENTALITY - The Most Motivational Video | David Goggins

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JMAgzKvlIY


    And i think that he is not talking so smartly, but i think he
    is wanting to become self-confidence by being "specialization",
    like the specialization in economy that is the process wherein a company or individual decides to focus their labor on a specific type of production and that enhances much more productivity, but i think that his views on his videos of how to be self-
    confidence are not so efficient, since i say that specialization alone is not sufficient,
    since i think that you have to know how to transcend this weakness by
    for example knowing how to a kind intellectual superiority that is creative in a kind sophisticated manner that brings self-confidence, and it is what i am doing by inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and my poems of Love and by inventing many
    scalable algorithms and algorithms
    and by inventing some powerful software tools etc. and here is my following two proverbs that show this kind of doing:

    Here is my new proverb:

    "Being strong can become being weak by containing a small weak part that
    makes you weak, and being weak can become being strong by containing a
    small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong"

    Here is my other new proverb:

    "When you want to construct a much better version of yourself so
    that to become successful, there is the first way of the hard working
    way, but the hard working way is not the efficient and smart way, this
    is why you can construct a much better version of yourself
    by being some creative thinking and by being exponential thinking and by
    using the exponential progress and growth brought by digitalization to
    sell on internet your product or service from this some creative
    thinking so that to be successful, so as you notice that this shows that
    we have to be positive about our world, and this shows that my following proverb is truth that actually says the following: The being weak can
    become being strong by containing a small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since the some creative thinking is a
    small part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since it
    is not only capital and talents that make you successful, but it is also
    some creative ideas that makes the great Capital that makes you
    successful and the great capital that attracts talents that makes you
    much more successful than successful."

    And read all my other new proverbs in the following web link:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


    Here is also one important proverb of mine about Resourcefulness that permits you to understand it:

    "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
    and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
    and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
    that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
    and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
    engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
    positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
    to easy the jobs for you."

    And now more of my philosophy about capitalism and about Marxism and communism and more..

    I invite you to look at the following video:

    Communist Professor Defends Stalin & Mao’s Legacy - Heated Debate

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iov6jyfKtRc


    So i have just looked at the above video and i will talk more about capitalism:

    I think the mistake is to call our system capitalism, since i think our
    system is not capitalism, since it requires also a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, and read below my
    philosophy about Class Struggle
    so that to notice it, so i think that saying that USA is capitalism
    is not correct thinking, since capitalism only as a system is a stupid
    system, so this is why we can not compare as in the above video between capitalism and communism, so we need to take into account all the
    variables such as the kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity
    that we have inside for example the USA system so that to compare with communism, other than that i have also discussed more about the
    advantages of capitalism, you can read them in the following
    web link:

    And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
    read them here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc

    Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
    that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
    a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

    And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
    so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

    Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

    I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
    we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction between
    the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being smart or having
    a good memory efficiency and such genetical characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
    more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the society and it
    is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is why i think
    that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members
    of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the weakest members and
    the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist regime, and inside
    two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

    More of my philosophy of between nostalgia and hope and the how to be optimism and more..

    First i will give you the definition of "nostalgia", and here it is:

    "A sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, typically for a period or place with happy personal associations."


    So i think i will explain more my way of being happy and optimism:

    I think that it is from the power of the "mind" from where comes happpiness, since the mind can be "free" and much more powerful by using philosophical mechanisms, it is why i am inventing my poems of Love and my thoughts and mechanisms of my philosophy
    below etc. i also mean
    that happiness comes also from "nostalgia" in a form of an imaginary that you believe it is true even if it is not true, also nostalgia is not sufficient because you have to be a kind of hope and being a kind of positive energy that pushes you forward,
    so read my thoughts of my philosophy below about it, so i invite you to look at following video of a song, and notice in this video how the beautiful Mediterranean sea and its seashores are so beautiful and it is also giving me a happiness in a form of "
    nostalgia" since i come from there, so i think nostalgia is also powerful and a positive energy:

    Geri Halliwell - Mi Chico Latino

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgoKfHg1JsU&list=RDXgoKfHg1JsU&start_radio=1

    More of my philosophy about my new poem of Love and more..

    And now i will explain how i am inventing my new poem of Love:

    Here is my new poem of Love again:

    --
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since notice how our strong Love is not the war crime !
    Since it is like my poems of Love and there lovely rhymes !
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since is our beautiful Love just for the onetime ?
    Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime
    And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime
    And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since i will always Love you forever and for the anytime !
    Since our Love is not just a simple programming paradigm !
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!
    --

    I think i am smart and i am a gentleman type of person and i think
    i am a wise type of person and the way of how i am inventing
    my new poem of Love is the same way i am using so that
    to invent my poems of Love, so it is that i am invent
  • From Kristjan Arwatavasti@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 14 07:10:57 2022
    You seem to be very curious about everything!

    Amine Moulay Ramdane kirjutas Neljapäev, 13. jaanuar 2022 kl 02:53:44 UTC+2:
    Hello,



    More of my philosophy about individual digital identity and individual identity and more..

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

    I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person, and let me
    tell you that i am of the ones that value a lot digital identity,
    since i want my digital identity to be a honest person about my strenghts and about my being a gentleman, and you have to understand that i look like my thoughts of my philosophy or my poems of Love, and i am also thinking them and writing them really
    fast since i look like
    my thoughts that i am writing fast, also i have to be frank since i am also still in the process of inventing more and more thoughts of my philosophy , and i will soon organize all my thoughts of my philosophy as a beautiful digital book, also i will
    also soon do much more "business" with my kind of digital identity etc.

    More of my philosophy about the philosophy of Letting Go and more..

    I have just looked at the following video:

    Why Letting Go Is True Wealth | Minimalist Philosophy for Simple Living

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHcGmiZqKXo&t=78s

    I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,
    so i have just talked about stoicism and i am explaining why
    my philosophy is better than stoicism, and read my below thoughts
    about it, and now there remain the philosophy of Letting Go in the above video that i think comes also from China, but i think it has also a weakness as the below philosophy of the black guy below, so the weakness of the philosophy of Letting Go, is
    also like the same weakness of Buddhism, and it is that we are not "isolated" from people, so since we
    are living inside a society and interacting with people so then
    we are comparing our status etc. so we can be hurt, so we become less confident or more confident so then the Letting Go phillosophy
    is not realistic or pragmatic, since its way of doing is not so efficient.

    More of my philosophy about specialization and self-confidence and more..

    I think i am smart, and i have just looked at some videos of the following black guy that is creating motivational videos:

    TRUE DOG MENTALITY - The Most Motivational Video | David Goggins

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JMAgzKvlIY


    And i think that he is not talking so smartly, but i think he
    is wanting to become self-confidence by being "specialization",
    like the specialization in economy that is the process wherein a company or individual decides to focus their labor on a specific type of production and that enhances much more productivity, but i think that his views on his videos of how to be self-
    confidence are not so efficient, since i say that specialization alone is not sufficient,
    since i think that you have to know how to transcend this weakness by
    for example knowing how to a kind intellectual superiority that is creative in a kind sophisticated manner that brings self-confidence, and it is what i am doing by inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and my poems of Love and by inventing many
    scalable algorithms and algorithms
    and by inventing some powerful software tools etc. and here is my following two proverbs that show this kind of doing:

    Here is my new proverb:

    "Being strong can become being weak by containing a small weak part that makes you weak, and being weak can become being strong by containing a
    small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong"

    Here is my other new proverb:

    "When you want to construct a much better version of yourself so
    that to become successful, there is the first way of the hard working
    way, but the hard working way is not the efficient and smart way, this
    is why you can construct a much better version of yourself
    by being some creative thinking and by being exponential thinking and by using the exponential progress and growth brought by digitalization to
    sell on internet your product or service from this some creative
    thinking so that to be successful, so as you notice that this shows that
    we have to be positive about our world, and this shows that my following proverb is truth that actually says the following: The being weak can
    become being strong by containing a small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since the some creative thinking is a small part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since it
    is not only capital and talents that make you successful, but it is also some creative ideas that makes the great Capital that makes you
    successful and the great capital that attracts talents that makes you
    much more successful than successful."

    And read all my other new proverbs in the following web link:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8


    Here is also one important proverb of mine about Resourcefulness that permits you to understand it:

    "Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
    and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
    and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
    that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
    and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
    positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
    to easy the jobs for you."

    And now more of my philosophy about capitalism and about Marxism and communism and more..

    I invite you to look at the following video:

    Communist Professor Defends Stalin & Mao’s Legacy - Heated Debate

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iov6jyfKtRc


    So i have just looked at the above video and i will talk more about capitalism:

    I think the mistake is to call our system capitalism, since i think our system is not capitalism, since it requires also a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, and read below my
    philosophy about Class Struggle
    so that to notice it, so i think that saying that USA is capitalism
    is not correct thinking, since capitalism only as a system is a stupid system, so this is why we can not compare as in the above video between capitalism and communism, so we need to take into account all the
    variables such as the kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity that we have inside for example the USA system so that to compare with communism, other than that i have also discussed more about the
    advantages of capitalism, you can read them in the following
    web link:

    And if you want to know more about my views on capitalism,
    read them here:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/cf3Wa4z8Xmc

    Also you have to read carefully my philosophy about Class Struggle so
    that to notice from where i am logically inferring that we require
    a kind of of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and that we have to have social programs that help the weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, here it is:

    And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
    so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

    Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

    I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
    we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic contradictions that are contradiction
    between the Chinese communists and Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being smart
    or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to
    equalize much more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not good for "diversity" inside the
    society and it is not good for efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings "resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings resilience, so this is
    why i think that the level of Class struggle that we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism, since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the
    weakest members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind of social programs that helps the
    weakest members and the poors of the society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or the communist
    regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism so that to resolve those kind of antagonist
    contradictions.

    More of my philosophy of between nostalgia and hope and the how to be optimism and more..

    First i will give you the definition of "nostalgia", and here it is:

    "A sentimental longing or wistful affection for the past, typically for a period or place with happy personal associations."


    So i think i will explain more my way of being happy and optimism:

    I think that it is from the power of the "mind" from where comes happpiness, since the mind can be "free" and much more powerful by using philosophical mechanisms, it is why i am inventing my poems of Love and my thoughts and mechanisms of my
    philosophy below etc. i also mean
    that happiness comes also from "nostalgia" in a form of an imaginary that you believe it is true even if it is not true, also nostalgia is not sufficient because you have to be a kind of hope and being a kind of positive energy that pushes you forward,
    so read my thoughts of my philosophy below about it, so i invite you to look at following video of a song, and notice in this video how the beautiful Mediterranean sea and its seashores are so beautiful and it is also giving me a happiness in a form of "
    nostalgia" since i come from there, so i think nostalgia is also powerful and a positive energy:

    Geri Halliwell - Mi Chico Latino

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgoKfHg1JsU&list=RDXgoKfHg1JsU&start_radio=1

    More of my philosophy about my new poem of Love and more..

    And now i will explain how i am inventing my new poem of Love:

    Here is my new poem of Love again:

    --
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since notice how our strong Love is not the war crime !
    Since it is like my poems of Love and there lovely rhymes !
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since is our beautiful Love just for the onetime ?
    Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime
    And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime
    And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since i will always Love you forever and for the anytime !
    Since our Love is not just a simple programming paradigm !
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!
    --

    I think i am smart and i am a gentleman type of person and i think
    i am a wise type of person and the way of how i am inventing
    my new poem of Love is the same way i am using so that
    to invent my poems of Love, so it is that i am inventing with my fluid intelligence like architectural idea or ideas in a form of smart pattern or patterns that guide(s) the rest of the construction of my poem of Love, so in my poem of Love above, look
    at its following architectural idea:

    "Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime
    And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime
    And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?
    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?"

    So i am "abstracting" sublime of Love as being a "sublime" and i am saying that the sublime of Love permits to strongly defy space-time,
    and notice how i am saying in the start of my poem of Love the following:

    "Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?"

    So notice that in the start of my poem of Love you will not understand clearly the why i am saying it, but when you read my above architectural idea and when you also read the following of my poem:

    "Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?
    Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!"

    You will understand that i mean that the sublime of Love
    is "King" like the King of time that defies space-time ,
    so then this sublime of Love is not just for the onetime but it is for the forever and for the anytime and of course i am constructing beautifully the rest of my poem of Love as you are reading it.

    Here is my new poem of Love..

    I invite you to listen to the following song reading at
    the same time my new poem of Love below:

    Laura Pausini - La Solitudine (Official Video)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpOEN93LX-E


    Note that the word "sublime" in my new poem of Love below means:
    extremely good, beautiful, or enjoyable.

    And here is my new poem of Love:


    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?

    Since notice how our strong Love is not the war crime !

    Since it is like my poems of Love and there lovely rhymes !

    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?

    Since is our beautiful Love just for the onetime ?

    Since is it not our love like the beautiful springtime

    And is not the beautiful springtime like the sublime

    And is not the sublime of Love like strongly defying space-time ?

    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?

    Since i will always Love you forever and for the anytime !

    Since our Love is not just a simple programming paradigm !

    Time flows and is it just for part-time or for longtime ?

    Since our strong Love is a King like the King that we call "time" !!


    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    ---


    More of my philosophy about the self and the human soul and more..

    I think i am smart and i think i am wise type of man,
    but i will ask another philosophical question of:

    What is the soul of a human ?

    I think that the soul of a human is related to the self-confidence
    and optimism and positive energy of a human, so the first important
    step is to ask what are the engines that gives a human a soul? since i think that if you are not self-confident and optimism, it is like your soul is dying, so in philosophy you need to have the "engines" that
    gives you a soul, the engines such as the philosophical mechanisms that i am talking about below, and as you notice it is not sufficient
    to have a soul, since you have to have a good soul and not an evil soul,
    so take for example the engine that we call "money", so i am smart and
    i will quickly say that so that to have much more money , you have for example to work hard, but since the working hard is also genetical and since you have also to be genetically capable of working hard, so you are noticing the kind of problem that it
    creates, so then the very important thing is then to make sure that you have a soul, and it means that you have self-confidence and you are optimism, but here again so that to be optimism and to have self-confidence, creativity must not be just to make
    big money or just for money, but creativity can only give self-confidence and optimism that gives a soul to a human. So read all my
    following previous thoughts so that to understand better:

    More of my philosophy about creativity and about imagination and about freedom and more...

    I think i am smart, and you have to understand my thoughts below
    of my philosophy, i think there is a very important thing in my philosophy, and it is the fact that i just said the following:
    --

    So another philosophical question is about the status, and here it is:

    And how to be optimistic and be positive energy and be happy
    if we are in fact also comparing our status with the other members of
    the society or the world ? and of course the "status" means
    the position or rank of someone or something when compared to
    others in a society, organization, group, etc.

    So i will answer this philosophical question by saying the following:

    So if you are noticing in my below thoughts of my philosophy, i am
    speaking about "creativity", and i say that you can be creativity that is "successful"(and by of course respecting the laws of the country) even if you are not smart and even if you are not science and technology and even if you are not talented, so
    this is why i am saying in my philosophy below that the being optimism and the being positive energy and the being self-confidence comes from the being this "creativity".
    --

    So you have to understand that the fact that we are thinking this way positively about the fact that we can become successful and rich by being creativity that is "successful"(and by of course respecting the laws of the country) even if we are not
    smart and even if we are not science and technology and even if we are not talented, is a powerful positive energy that brings hope and optimism. And i can also say in french: C'est ce genre d'imaginaire et de rêve qui nous fait vivre avec toujours cet
    optimisme de pouvoir réussir et de devenir riche grâce aussi au pouvoir de la créativité, et cela est très important pour l'ordre dans une société, and the translation in english of it is: It is this kind of imagination and dream that makes us
    live with always this optimism of being able to succeed and to become rich by the this power of creativity, and this is very important thing for order in a society.

    More of my philosophy about the status and about my philosophy and more..

    I think i am really smart, and i think i am a wise type of
    person and i think i am a philosopher, so another philosophical question is about the status, and here it is:

    And how to be optimistic and be positive energy and be happy
    if we are in fact also comparing our status with the other members of
    the society or the world ? and of course the "status" means
    the position or rank of someone or something when compared to
    others in a society, organization, group, etc.

    So i will answer this philosophical question by saying the following:

    So if you are noticing in my below thoughts of my philosophy, i am
    speaking about "creativity", and i say that you can be creativity that is "successful"(and by of course respecting the laws of the country) even if you are not smart and even if you are not science and technology and even if you are not talented, so
    this is why i am saying in my philosophy below that the being optimism and the being positive energy and the being self-confidence comes from the being this "creativity". So i invite you to read my smart philosophy below so that to understand more:

    More of my philosophy about my philosophy and more..

    I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise man, and i have just talked about the basis of my philosophy, read it carefully in my thoughts below, and i will repeat again a very important thing of my philosophy
    and it is about how to be hope and optimism, and here is the important part of my philosophy that talks about it:

    It is not just living in imagination, i mean that you have to look at the exponential progress of our humanity like a "good" challenge, and i mean that you have to know how to be organized and disciplined by using the tools of this exponential progress
    and this a very important thing, and i am talking about it in many of my poems below that are abstracting also this exponential progress of our humanity that brings hope and optimism since it is also a very interesting good challenge, and here is my
    thoughts on the following link that talks about this exponential progress of our humanity that is so fast and that will make us soon much much more powerful and much much more sophisticated:

    More of my philosophy of from where comes happiness and more..

    I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person, and i think
    i am a philosopher, and i will say that happiness comes like from the process of being thirsty(feeling a need to drink) and becoming not thirsty by drinking enough water, and this process is a pleasure of life that makes us more happy, so happiness is
    also this process of when you have drunk enough water, you have to become thirsty again and you have to drink enough water again, and i say that it is the general principle or the general rule of how to be happy, but it is not sufficient to understand
    this general principle, since you have to know that for example hope is also a pleasure of life, so when you are not hope, you are like thirsty and you need to become a kind of hope like by for example knowing that our exponential progress that is so
    fast
    will soon make us much more powerful and much more sophisticated and
    it will bring a much greater pleasures of life, and of course
    being not self-confident is like being thirsty, since you have to
    become self-confident by becoming a beautiful creativity as i am
    talking about below, so being not self-confident is like by logical analogy being thirsty and becoming a beautiful creativity is like
    drinking water, but becoming a beautiful creativity can make you self-confident for a long time, also i invite you to read my
    following thoughts where i am talking about a process that
    looks like the process of being thirsty and the drinking water that makes us more happy:

    I think i am smart and i say that there is two ways of enhancing the intelligence or such traits of humans, there is the way that i am
    talking about below that needs huge data sets to detect the "patterns"
    that explain human intelligence and such human traits and after that
    make the changes in the genetics of humans, and there is the other way
    by using Nanotechnology and nanorobots that enhance much more the intelligence of a human by directly manipulating the brain or by putting informations in the memory or erasing informations from the memory of
    a human, so then when you erase informations like a good movie or like interesting lessons of mathematics or such pleasures of life from the
    memory of a human by using Nanotechnology, this allows to recreate again
    or have again those pleasures of life, so then happiness will be
    greatly enhanced by the way of Nanotechnology and nanorobots, and i
    think it is also the way of the much more advanced extraterrestrials,
    and i think that with our exponential progress we will be soon be able
    to attain this level of sophistication of technology.

    And read more here carefully my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress and about genetics so that to understand more my thoughts:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ

    More of my philosophy about stoicism and about my own philosophy and more..

    I think i am smart and i think i am a wise man, so i will explain
    more my philosophy, so i invite you to look at the following video:

    STOICISM | The Power Of Indifference (animated)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRM5VRIO_TU&t=1s


    So my philosophy is not like stoicism, since i think that stoicism
    has a weakness since it is based on a negative energy like for example you have to be a kind of indifference and the like, so i think i am a philosopher and i think that my philosophy is different and i will explain it more:

    I think my philosophy has to be based on a positive energy, and my philosophy is not that you have to be complete peace, because it is
    not pragmatic, so my philosophy finds in the reality the right mechanism that has great weight of importance and that makes us positive energy that pushes us forward proactively in confronting the good "challenge" that is life, so i have first invented a proverb so that to show the
    basis of my philosophy, read it below, and notice that my proverb of my philosophy is the positive energy that is in accordance with my master rule of my philosophy that says that life is a very "interesting" game, so here is my master rule of my
    philosophy of how to become optimism and happiness, and read after that my proverb of my philosophy:

    "The game of life is a very interesting and challenging game that i want to play smartly. So it is a "good" challenge since the being very interesting of it makes it a "good" challenge that interests me a lot, so i have to play it smartly."

    And here is my new proverb in french and english:

    "When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
    path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
    have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
    life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
    through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
    think this conception of life makes you more positive."

    "Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
    dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
    d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
    et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
    utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."

    So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
    trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
    and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
    even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
    life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
    the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or global world.


    And here is more of my thoughts about my philosophy, read them carefully:

    More of my philosophy about self-control and self-confidence and more..

    I think i am "smart", and i think i am a wise type of person and i think i am a philosopher, and i will now explain my following poem
    about self-control and self-confidence, so i invite you to read
    it carefully:

    "Is my beautiful celebration needing causation ?
    So i will ask not without wisdom and education
    What kind of causation needs my kind of civilization ?
    So i will ask, what is it that needs our civilization ?
    It is the human self-control so that to be in the right location
    So i will ask is human "self-control" needing causation ?
    Since is self-control coming just from a brain internal situation ?
    No, since we have also to define what is "success" that causes "admiration" So is success only having big money as the ultimate adoration ?
    No, since human self-control comes from knowing how to be a beautiful realization
    So what is it to be a beautiful realization ?
    It is an adaptation that not only comes from big money but from creativity and creation
    And notice that the beautiful creativity does not only comes from science and technology and such divination
    Since notice how creativity of my poems and poems of Love are not just automation
    But they are also like the right human sensibility of my beautiful intellectual elevation"


    So notice in my poem above how i am saying in my poem the following:

    "Since is self-control coming just from a brain internal situation ?
    No, since we have also to define what is "success" that causes "admiration" So is success only having big money as the ultimate adoration ?
    No, since human self-control comes from knowing how to be a beautiful realization"

    So my poem above is like philosophy, since i am a philosopher, so notice how my poem above says that self-control doesn't come "just" from a brain internal situation like in "Buddhism ", since i think that Buddhism is not right, since i am saying that
    self-control comes from a beautiful "realization", so now you have to be smart since my poem wants to say that there is two ways of measuring from where comes self-control and self-confidence, we can measure it like relatively or like absolutely, so it
    is by logical analogy like Absurdism of the french philosopher Albert Camus, since i think that Albert Camus was measuring it like absolutely by looking globally at our Universe including earth and the human living conditions and he was saying in his
    philosophy that human existence is absurd , but i am a philosopher that is not in accordance with Albert Camus, since the pleasure can be a powerful "drug" that makes us not be too preoccupied by absurdity of human existence, so this is why my above poem
    is smart, since this powerful drug can be a beautiful realization that has a much powerful weight of importance and that causes that we become self-confidence and self-control, so then i can ask the wich precedes , the self-confidence that comes from
    human nature and human genetics or from the human cultural side and such? i think i am a philosopher and i say that if you say that it comes from genetics so it is like a failure, since the measuring like absolutely of from where comes self-confidence
    and
    self-control makes us understand that we need a kind of powerful drug

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)