PFA the latest logs.
I'm able to enter the PIN then this log is generated. Please let us
know what is the next step?
[...]
kinit: KDC reply did not match expectations while getting initial credentials
Hello Ken,
Thanks for your kind response!
I rectified the pkinit_kdc_hostname = blrdhcdev-ad.blrdhcdev.com
tested again but it throws error regarding "no acceptable EKU in KDC
cert"
I read the link you sent in the below mail, it says setting pkinit_eku_checking is not necessary.
What should we do now?
Regards,
Vikram
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Hornstein <kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:59 PM
To: Pal, Vikram
Cc: kerberos@mit.edu; Agrawal, Rajeev; Shastry, Shashiraja;
Rajagopalan, SrinivasaRagavan; Venkatesh, Ramanujam
Subject: Re: kinit failing when AD user joining using smaercard PIN on
ubuntu 20.04
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
PFA the Kerberos logs got while running kinit command. Could you
please help us understand as to where we ae going here & what should we
do to make it work?
Well, you COULD have included them as text rather than a picture :-)
But, fine. I see you get a PIN prompt, but I'm not clear if you
actually had the chance to enter in a PIN or not. Also, I see this:
PKINIT no anchor CA in file /etc/ssl/ca-pem/root//blrdhcdev.cer
And that file extension makes me think the certificate there is in DER format, not PEM. But I think your REAL problem is down below:
PKINIT client config accepts KDC dNSName SAN BLRDHCDEV.COM PKINIT
client found dNSName SAN in KDC cert: blrdhcdev-ad.blrdhcdev.com
PKINIT client found no acceptable SAN in KDC cert
You can read about the PKINIT client configuration here:
https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-1.17/doc/admin/pkinit.html
The key section is down where it says "Configuring the clients".
It looks like you have
pkinit_kdc_hostname = BLRDHCDEV.COM
But it really should be
pkinit_kdc_hostname = blrdhcdev-ad.blrdhcdev.com
(and you need one of those for each of your AD server hostnames).
This is the configuration that tells the client that it can trust the
KDC certificate. If you don't have the KDC certificate with the
special extensions that say, "This certificate is valid for your
realm", then your client needs to be configured to say, "This set of certificates is valid for a KDC certificate". And you need to
explicitly list every dNSName in your client. That's what pkinit_kdc_hostname does.
--Ken
PFA the latest logs.
I'm able to enter the PIN then this log is generated. Please let us
know what is the next step?
Regards,
Vikram
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 16:20, Vikram Yadav <vikrampal@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Ken,
Thanks for your kind response!
I rectified the pkinit_kdc_hostname = blrdhcdev-ad.blrdhcdev.com
tested again but it throws error regarding "no acceptable EKU in KDC
cert"
I read the link you sent in the below mail, it says setting pkinit_eku_checking is not necessary.
What should we do now?
Regards,
Vikram
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Hornstein <kenh@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:59 PM
To: Pal, Vikram
Cc: kerberos@mit.edu; Agrawal, Rajeev; Shastry, Shashiraja;
Rajagopalan, SrinivasaRagavan; Venkatesh, Ramanujam
Subject: Re: kinit failing when AD user joining using smaercard PIN on ubuntu 20.04
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
PFA the Kerberos logs got while running kinit command. Could you
please help us understand as to where we ae going here & what should we >do to make it work?
Well, you COULD have included them as text rather than a picture :-)
But, fine. I see you get a PIN prompt, but I'm not clear if you
actually had the chance to enter in a PIN or not. Also, I see this:
PKINIT no anchor CA in file /etc/ssl/ca-pem/root//blrdhcdev.cer
And that file extension makes me think the certificate there is in DER format, not PEM. But I think your REAL problem is down below:
PKINIT client config accepts KDC dNSName SAN BLRDHCDEV.COM PKINIT
client found dNSName SAN in KDC cert: blrdhcdev-ad.blrdhcdev.com
PKINIT client found no acceptable SAN in KDC cert
You can read about the PKINIT client configuration here:
https://web.mit.edu/kerberos/krb5-1.17/doc/admin/pkinit.html
The key section is down where it says "Configuring the clients".
It looks like you have
pkinit_kdc_hostname = BLRDHCDEV.COM
But it really should be
pkinit_kdc_hostname = blrdhcdev-ad.blrdhcdev.com
(and you need one of those for each of your AD server hostnames).
This is the configuration that tells the client that it can trust the
KDC certificate. If you don't have the KDC certificate with the
special extensions that say, "This certificate is valid for your
realm", then your client needs to be configured to say, "This set of certificates is valid for a KDC certificate". And you need to
explicitly list every dNSName in your client. That's what pkinit_kdc_hostname does.
--Ken
PFA the latest logs.
I'm able to enter the PIN then this log is generated. Please let us
know what is the next step?
[...]
kinit: KDC reply did not match expectations while getting initial credentials
Huh, JUST when you think you've seen every Kerberos error, you get a new
one.
So, I am kinda surprised your KDC certificate doesn't contain even an id-kp-serverAuth EKU. I wonder who created the server certificate? Was
this just a test realm that was deployed internally?
So, I am wondering ... is your realm name blrdhcdev.com or BLRDHCDEV.COM? (Case matters). Because in the kinit command you use the lower-case form
but some of the log messages that implies that it's the upper-case form.
I suspect you're getting tripped up by the code in get_in_tkt.c:verify_as_reply() that compares various fields in the request against the reply, so if your request is using the lower-case realm but
the reply is with an upper-case realm, that could cause this error. If
you put a bunch of config file entries in your krb5.conf based on
the lower-case realm, those should all be in upper case.
(In general, Kerberos realms are upper-case. The only person I know who deployed a lower-case realm said that if he had to do it all over again,
he wouldn't because too much code assumes an upper-case realm).
--Ken
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 113 |
Nodes: | 8 (1 / 7) |
Uptime: | 139:59:34 |
Calls: | 2,502 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 8,700 |
Messages: | 1,927,321 |