• Re: Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions

    From Nuno Silva@21:1/5 to Indira on Fri Feb 23 10:02:06 2024
    On 2024-02-23, Indira wrote:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.periphs.printers
    Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or
    subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

    An updated web-searchable no-login web-search archive that reports a unique URL will need to be located that allows people to search before posting to the c.p.p. newsgroup & which allows unique references to recent articles.

    Proper unique references for USENET posts were, BTW, not available from
    Google Groups for a while now (and, I'm guessing, still aren't). Those
    are Message-Ids. These days, I think all you can get from Google Groups
    is a link to the Google Groups interface, nothing "interoperable". At
    most, you can try to use the Date: and Subject: to look the post up in a
    proper archive.

    IMHO a decent web-based search/archival interface for posts should both
    support lookup by this ID and getting the ID for a given post, if it's
    not already built around these IDs as message identifiers in its own
    URLs and so on.

    --
    Nuno Silva

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indira@21:1/5 to Nuno Silva on Sat Feb 24 01:46:36 2024
    Nuno Silva wrote:

    Proper unique references for USENET posts were, BTW, not available from Google Groups for a while now (and, I'm guessing, still aren't). Those
    are Message-Ids. These days, I think all you can get from Google Groups
    is a link to the Google Groups interface, nothing "interoperable". At
    most, you can try to use the Date: and Subject: to look the post up in a proper archive.

    IMHO a decent web-based search/archival interface for posts should both support lookup by this ID and getting the ID for a given post, if it's
    not already built around these IDs as message identifiers in its own
    URLs and so on.

    +1

    While you're almost certainly aware of <http://al.howardknight.net/>
    there are other ways to construct a URL based on the Message-ID.

    http://news.chmurka.net/mid.php?mid=ur8tvu$2kvca$1@paganini.bofh.team http://usenet.ovh/index.php?article=ual&msgid=ur8tvu$2kvca$1@paganini.bofh.team

    Still... there was merit in having a Usenet-only keyword search engine that
    was provided by dejanews (which Google took over) and which was available
    to everyone with just a web browser, and which only searched Usenet and
    which cost nothing which allowed the user to read the entire thread - not
    just one post like Howard Knight does - and which allowed users to
    reference the post to others who also had only a web browser,
    etc).

    If you want to search before you post, then there will probably be new
    engines that come up, although none with the retention that Google had.

    For example
    http://comp.periphs.printers.narkive.com

    But that web site by David Cavion is no longer maintained once he got a full-time job and now has no time to maintain it.

    The Usenet-only replacement search engine needs to be free to all, with
    just a browser, not needing an account, and having infinite retention.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Computer Nerd Kev@21:1/5 to Indira on Sat Feb 24 09:55:32 2024
    Indira <indira@ghandi.net> wrote:
    Still... there was merit in having a Usenet-only keyword search engine that was provided by dejanews (which Google took over) and which was available
    to everyone with just a web browser, and which only searched Usenet and
    which cost nothing which allowed the user to read the entire thread - not just one post like Howard Knight does - and which allowed users to
    reference the post to others who also had only a web browser,
    etc).

    However I gave up on searching in Google Groups years ago when the
    search function mysteriously became less effective. I instead
    switched to searching it via web search engines.

    If you want to search before you post, then there will probably be new engines that come up, although none with the retention that Google had.

    For example
    http://comp.periphs.printers.narkive.com

    But that web site by David Cavion is no longer maintained once he got a full-time job and now has no time to maintain it.

    I saw that as a reason why he didn't finish implementing all his
    desired features such as posting support, but what's wrong with
    Narkive as-is for browsing/searching posts like in GG?

    Using "site:comp.periphs.printers.narkive.com" at the end of a web
    search query in DuckDuckGo (or probably others, but that's what I
    use), you can search the group via Narkive. Its archive doesn't
    include the earlier posts that Google got from Dejanews, but at
    least Google is keeping them online still too, for now.

    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _# | Note: I won't see posts made from Google Groups |

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indira@21:1/5 to Computer Nerd Kev on Sat Feb 24 07:14:08 2024
    Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

    I saw that as a reason why he didn't finish implementing all his
    desired features such as posting support, but what's wrong with
    Narkive as-is for browsing/searching posts like in GG?

    Using "site:comp.periphs.printers.narkive.com" at the end of a web
    search query in DuckDuckGo (or probably others, but that's what I
    use), you can search the group via Narkive. Its archive doesn't
    include the earlier posts that Google got from Dejanews, but at
    least Google is keeping them online still too, for now.

    There's another archive which isn't reported anywhere except in
    this very one thread, which is https://usenetarchives.com/

    But what is needed is a good set of search engines specifically tailored
    for Usenet newsgroups which takes into account their header information.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Computer Nerd Kev@21:1/5 to Indira on Sat Feb 24 12:49:04 2024
    Indira <indira@ghandi.net> wrote:
    Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    I saw that as a reason why he didn't finish implementing all his
    desired features such as posting support, but what's wrong with
    Narkive as-is for browsing/searching posts like in GG?

    Using "site:comp.periphs.printers.narkive.com" at the end of a web
    search query in DuckDuckGo (or probably others, but that's what I
    use), you can search the group via Narkive. Its archive doesn't
    include the earlier posts that Google got from Dejanews, but at
    least Google is keeping them online still too, for now.

    There's another archive which isn't reported anywhere except in
    this very one thread, which is https://usenetarchives.com/

    It seems to require Javascript, so that rules it out for me.

    But what is needed is a good set of search engines specifically tailored
    for Usenet newsgroups which takes into account their header information.

    OK, but that hasn't got much to do with Google Groups discontinuing
    their Usenet support. Its search hasn't been very good for a long
    time already.

    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _# | Note: I won't see posts made from Google Groups |

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andreas Kohlbach@21:1/5 to Indira on Fri Feb 23 21:41:37 2024
    On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:26:09 +0530, Indira wrote:

    https://groups.google.com/g/comp.periphs.printers
    Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or
    subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

    Suppose I can remove my "X-No-Archive: Yes" now to prevent from getting
    my postings archived?

    Although Gmane and others might still honor it.
    --
    Andreas

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indira@21:1/5 to Computer Nerd Kev on Sun Feb 25 09:43:39 2024
    Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

    But what is needed is a good set of search engines specifically tailored
    for Usenet newsgroups which takes into account their header information.

    OK, but that hasn't got much to do with Google Groups discontinuing
    their Usenet support. Its search hasn't been very good for a long
    time already.

    Let's put that into perspective, given I've been using the Google Groups Usenet-only search since the dejanews days, where I'd qualify that
    assessment by agreeing that it sucked - but it was the best we had.

    My assessment:
    1. The Google Groups web-based Usenet search, as you noted, stunk
    compared to the normal Google search engine everyone knows about.

    2. However... it was worlds better than *any* other Usenet-only
    web based no-account-needed anyone-can-use-it engine out there.

    This is all we've got now, that's updated, as far as I know, where
    what would be nice is if people who know more add to the list.

    No-account-needed web-paged general-use Usenet-only search engines:
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.periphs.printers> deprecated 22Feb24
    <https://comp.periphs.printers.narkive.com/>
    <https://pi-dach.dorfdsl.de/rocksolid/search.php>
    <https://www.novabbs.com/computers/thread.php?group=comp.periphs.printers>
    <https://archive.org/details/usenethistorical>
    <https://usenetarchives.com/>

    Message-ID search engines (which aren't even close to the same thing).
    <http://al.howardknight.net/>
    <http://news.chmurka.net/mid.php>
    <http://usenet.ovh/index.php?article=ual>
    <https://www.novabbs.com/SEARCH/search_nocem.php>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indira@21:1/5 to Andreas Kohlbach on Sun Feb 25 09:51:10 2024
    Andreas Kohlbach wrote:

    Suppose I can remove my "X-No-Archive: Yes" now to prevent from getting
    my postings archived?

    Good point!
    It's ironic. But it's now no longer needed for Google groups archives.

    Although Gmane and others might still honor it.

    Is Gmane still around?
    http://gmane.org/post.php

    I used to use gmane, years ago, via a normal nntp newsreader at news.gmane.org:119 blank/blank
    (i.e., I didn't use the mail-to-news gateway) in order to post to gmane.comp.gnome.apps.pan.user
    gmane.linux.centos.general
    etc.

    But I thought that died (along with the Mozilla nntp server atnews.mozilla.org:119 blank/blank
    for posting to mozilla.support.firefox & mozilla.support.thunderbird
    which, I think, no longer exists. https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.firefox https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.firefox/c/SxAJiCEQZAQ

    https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.thunderbird https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.thunderbird/c/LjUuhd9rYi8

    In summary - aren't they both already long dead?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Computer Nerd Kev@21:1/5 to Indira on Sun Feb 25 16:45:40 2024
    Indira <indira@ghandi.net> wrote:
    Andreas Kohlbach wrote:

    Suppose I can remove my "X-No-Archive: Yes" now to prevent from getting
    my postings archived?

    Good point!
    It's ironic. But it's now no longer needed for Google groups archives.

    Although Gmane and others might still honor it.

    Is Gmane still around?
    http://gmane.org/post.php

    Yes, but it's now at gmane.io instead of gmane.org. I don't know
    what it has to do with X-No-Archive though, because it doesn't
    carry Usenet groups (just mailing lists and RSS feeds).

    I used to use gmane, years ago, via a normal nntp newsreader at news.gmane.org:119 blank/blank
    (i.e., I didn't use the mail-to-news gateway) in order to post to gmane.comp.gnome.apps.pan.user
    gmane.linux.centos.general
    etc.

    But I thought that died (along with the Mozilla nntp server atnews.mozilla.org:119 blank/blank

    Gmane.org was sold, but the buyers didn't do anything with it, so
    its creator restarted it at gmane.io, now only via NNTP, without
    the Web interfaces.

    So replace news.gmane.org with news.gmane.io and it's just like old
    times. Except that mailing lists are almost as unpopular now as
    Usenet is.

    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _# | Note: I won't see posts made from Google Groups |

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nuno Silva@21:1/5 to Indira on Sun Feb 25 08:27:57 2024
    On 2024-02-25, Indira wrote:

    Andreas Kohlbach wrote:

    Suppose I can remove my "X-No-Archive: Yes" now to prevent from getting
    my postings archived?

    Good point!
    It's ironic. But it's now no longer needed for Google groups archives.

    Although Gmane and others might still honor it.

    Is Gmane still around?
    http://gmane.org/post.php

    I used to use gmane, years ago, via a normal nntp newsreader at news.gmane.org:119 blank/blank
    (i.e., I didn't use the mail-to-news gateway) in order to post to gmane.comp.gnome.apps.pan.user
    gmane.linux.centos.general
    etc.

    I think (I might be misremembering) that Gmane over network news always
    worked; Lars at some point might have decided not to work on the web
    interface anymore (possibly because of troll lawyers), but the service
    itself remained on-line (again IIRC, and except DNS issues and changes).

    Linking to posts on Gmane can be done like for other news servers

    news://gmane.io/message-id

    Although there might be another preferred format for such addresses, I
    think this format works both in lynx and SeaMonkey Navigator.

    But I thought that died (along with the Mozilla nntp server atnews.mozilla.org:119 blank/blank
    for posting to mozilla.support.firefox & mozilla.support.thunderbird
    which, I think, no longer exists.

    It lasted for a lot longer than the mozilla announcement, but at some
    point Giganews removed the DNS entry, and then decomissioned the
    server/setup that was serving news.mozilla.org. Near the end, I was
    accessing it via the IP address.

    https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.firefox https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.firefox/c/SxAJiCEQZAQ

    https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.thunderbird https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.thunderbird/c/LjUuhd9rYi8

    Now mozilla.support.seamonkey on Google Groups suffered the fate of
    being flagged because of SPAM. Can you guess which server injected the
    SPAM it most likely got flagged for?

    https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.seamonkey

    In summary - aren't they both already long dead?

    (Gmane is well alive, along with gwene; for the three news.mozilla.org
    groups mentioned above, there are three new groups under alt.*)

    --
    Nuno Silva

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indira@21:1/5 to Nuno Silva on Mon Feb 26 00:12:58 2024
    Nuno Silva wrote:

    Now mozilla.support.seamonkey on Google Groups suffered the fate of
    being flagged because of SPAM. Can you guess which server injected the
    SPAM it most likely got flagged for?

    https://groups.google.com/g/mozilla.support.seamonkey

    What was amazing (in a bad way) was how much the google groups spam
    increased a thousand fold in the past few months - as if someone found a
    way around google's filters and Google decided not to bother fixing them.

    All the news admins who offered no login posting access had to fold such as Steve Crook (mixmin) or Paolo Amaroso (aioe) or Netfront (chinese owner).

    The only one left is Ivo Gondanfo (paganini) and he restricts the number of posts severely by group and IP address and badword content filters.

    Others allow read only (like dizum or blueworld) without login/password
    but that's not going to ever be the cause of all that recent Usenet spam.

    The rest of the news admins who had login requirements managed to filter
    just fine - which is why it's strange to me that Google couldn't do it.

    I wonder if one or two spammers found a loophole & exploited it to its
    death? Why would they do that? It's like killing your own child?

    In summary - aren't they both already long dead?

    (Gmane is well alive, along with gwene; for the three news.mozilla.org
    groups mentioned above, there are three new groups under alt.*)

    Thanks. I didn't know that. I haven't used Gmane for a long time
    and when I want to post to the Firefox or Thunderbird groups, I use alt.comp.software.thunderbird & alt.comp.software.firefox

    I didn't even realize the "news.mozilla.org" groups still existed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nuno Silva@21:1/5 to Indira on Tue Feb 27 08:39:51 2024
    On 2024-02-23, Indira wrote:

    For example
    http://comp.periphs.printers.narkive.com

    But that web site by David Cavion is no longer maintained once he got a full-time job and now has no time to maintain it.

    Narkive is proving to be useless here: I was trying to check how much it
    had in the interface, if it had proper threading and so on... first few attempts to load threads gave me 500. After that I think it loaded
    correctly once or twice. After that, I keep being asked to prove I'm a
    human, which I guess will require javascript.

    This seems to repeat itself quite often. Once it was working again, I
    was able to load content only once, after that it once again calls me a
    "bot" with a 429.

    Let's say I'm not enjoying Narkive's current usability. It used to work
    much better several months/years ago.

    --
    Nuno Silva

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Computer Nerd Kev@21:1/5 to Nuno Silva on Wed Feb 28 07:36:40 2024
    Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-02-23, Indira wrote:
    For example
    http://comp.periphs.printers.narkive.com

    But that web site by David Cavion is no longer maintained once he got a
    full-time job and now has no time to maintain it.

    Narkive is proving to be useless here: I was trying to check how much it
    had in the interface, if it had proper threading and so on... first few attempts to load threads gave me 500. After that I think it loaded
    correctly once or twice. After that, I keep being asked to prove I'm a
    human, which I guess will require javascript.

    This seems to repeat itself quite often. Once it was working again, I
    was able to load content only once, after that it once again calls me a
    "bot" with a 429.

    Let's say I'm not enjoying Narkive's current usability. It used to work
    much better several months/years ago.

    Sounds like what happens when a website is trying to combat a DDoS
    attack. But I just tried it myself and it's working fast and
    efficiently as ever, so either the problem's fixed or it's
    something to do with your IP address or internet connection.

    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _# | Note: I won't see posts made from Google Groups |

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nuno Silva@21:1/5 to Computer Nerd Kev on Fri Mar 15 15:16:32 2024
    On 2024-02-27, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

    Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-02-23, Indira wrote:
    For example
    http://comp.periphs.printers.narkive.com

    But that web site by David Cavion is no longer maintained once he got a
    full-time job and now has no time to maintain it.

    Narkive is proving to be useless here: I was trying to check how much it
    had in the interface, if it had proper threading and so on... first few
    attempts to load threads gave me 500. After that I think it loaded
    correctly once or twice. After that, I keep being asked to prove I'm a
    human, which I guess will require javascript.

    This seems to repeat itself quite often. Once it was working again, I
    was able to load content only once, after that it once again calls me a
    "bot" with a 429.

    Let's say I'm not enjoying Narkive's current usability. It used to work
    much better several months/years ago.

    Sounds like what happens when a website is trying to combat a DDoS
    attack. But I just tried it myself and it's working fast and
    efficiently as ever, so either the problem's fixed or it's
    something to do with your IP address or internet connection.

    An update on this: it indeed seemed to be temporary, since then I've
    never had the same problem again.

    The threads in this group that were unavailable (showing 500 instead)
    have been fixed too.

    --
    Nuno Silva

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)