I wish to state that I am an advocate of the use and deployment of OS/2
for both specific and general computing tasks.
Thank you for your time,
Senor Pissflaps.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:13:14 -0700, Double-A wrote:
1050> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
1050> What a nice on topic post for this group!
Classic pontification.
1050> But what a peculiar name you have, Señor!
1050>
1050> Haven't you ever thought of getting it legally changed?
1050>
1050> Double-A
What do your names have to do with OS/2, Double-A?
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:15:24 -0700, Double-A wrote:
1051> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
1051> Because that might be just what OS/2 needs is a name change, to get a 1051> new image!
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
1051> Don't you think "OS/2" is awfully stodgy?
No, Double-A.
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:17:23 -0700, Double-A wrote:
1052> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
1052> Do you remember Big OS on the larger IBM 360s?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, Double-A?
1052> No, I don't suppose you would.
What does your supposition have to do with OS/2, Double-A?
1052> Before your time.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with OS/2, Double-A?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 432 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 21:22:26 |
Calls: | 9,080 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 13,407 |
Messages: | 6,021,322 |