• Qt and Falkon

    From baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 7 21:01:11 2020
    I just read the other day that Bitwise has succeeded
    in porting a recent Qt engine to OS/2 which should
    allow porting the Falkon browser over.

    I thought I would check Falkon out on Win10, and I
    was very impressed, as my expectations were minimal.
    The stability hammers M$ Edge/Explore and Firefox.
    This is exactly what the OS/2 community needs. I hope
    there will be sustained maintenance for the browser, so
    we need not worry about its continuity.

    Does anyone know what the release time frame for a
    useable Falkon on OS/2 will be? I will have no problem
    donating substantially to the cause, as this is
    essential to OS/2's continued existence.

    thanks,
    Baden

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Yeo@21:1/5 to baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com on Sat Feb 8 00:05:57 2020
    On 02/07/20 09:01 PM, baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com wrote:
    ...
    Does anyone know what the release time frame for a
    useable Falkon on OS/2 will be? I will have no problem
    donating substantially to the cause, as this is
    essential to OS/2's continued existence.

    They were hoping that it would already be released but it turned out
    that our GCC 4.92 was too old to compile the webkit part of QT5 so they
    got side tracked with porting GCC 9.2. This is close to done and once
    done shouldn't take to long for the first builds.
    Latest news at http://articles.os2voice.org/category/software/25-voice-bitwise-works-new-browser-update-10.html
    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Dave Yeo on Sat Feb 8 07:21:36 2020
    On Saturday, 8 February 2020 02:05:54 UTC-6, Dave Yeo wrote:
    On 02/07/20 09:01 PM, baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com wrote:
    ...
    Does anyone know what the release time frame for a
    useable Falkon on OS/2 will be? I will have no problem
    donating substantially to the cause, as this is
    essential to OS/2's continued existence.

    They were hoping that it would already be released but it turned out
    that our GCC 4.92 was too old to compile the webkit part of QT5 so they
    got side tracked with porting GCC 9.2. This is close to done and once
    done shouldn't take to long for the first builds.
    Latest news at http://articles.os2voice.org/category/software/25-voice-bitwise-works-new-browser-update-10.html
    Dave

    Hi Dave:

    I was assuming the port was completed: https://www.os2world.com/cms/index.php/past-news/80-news/software/22725-gcc-9-2-released-new-milestone-for-os-2-development


    Baden

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Smedley@21:1/5 to Dave Yeo on Sun Feb 16 18:57:03 2020
    On 8/2/20 6:35 pm, Dave Yeo wrote:
    On 02/07/20 09:01 PM, baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com wrote:
    ...
       Does anyone know what the release time frame for a
    useable Falkon on OS/2 will be?  I will have no problem
    donating substantially to the cause, as this is
    essential to OS/2's continued existence.

    They were hoping that it would already be released but it turned out
    that our GCC 4.92 was too old to compile the webkit part of QT5 so they
    got side tracked with porting GCC 9.2. This is close to done and once
    done shouldn't take to long for the first builds.
    Latest news at http://articles.os2voice.org/category/software/25-voice-bitwise-works-new-browser-update-10.html

    Given I gave Dmitry the latest diffs for GCC 9.2.0 it shouldn't have
    been too big a distraction!

    Cheers,

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From warpos2@gmail.com@21:1/5 to baden.k...@gmail.com on Thu Apr 2 12:40:21 2020
    On Friday, February 7, 2020 at 10:01:12 PM UTC-7, baden.k...@gmail.com wrote:
    Does anyone know what the release time frame for a
    useable Falkon on OS/2 will be? I will have no problem
    donating substantially to the cause, as this is
    essential to OS/2's continued existence.

    Seems to be a couple to 6 mo off per VOICE. Donations accepted to get it paid for.
    Matt W.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com@21:1/5 to war...@gmail.com on Sat Apr 4 11:57:46 2020
    On Thursday, 2 April 2020 13:40:22 UTC-6, war...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, February 7, 2020 at 10:01:12 PM UTC-7, baden.k...@gmail.com wrote:
    Does anyone know what the release time frame for a
    useable Falkon on OS/2 will be? I will have no problem
    donating substantially to the cause, as this is
    essential to OS/2's continued existence.

    Seems to be a couple to 6 mo off per VOICE. Donations accepted to get it paid for.
    Matt W.

    Does anyone know if there is a schedule and budget for this project?

    thanks,
    Baden

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pete@21:1/5 to baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com on Sun Apr 5 00:24:50 2020
    Hi baden

    baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, 2 April 2020 13:40:22 UTC-6, war...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, February 7, 2020 at 10:01:12 PM UTC-7, baden.k...@gmail.com wrote:
    Does anyone know what the release time frame for a
    useable Falkon on OS/2 will be? I will have no problem
    donating substantially to the cause, as this is
    essential to OS/2's continued existence.

    Seems to be a couple to 6 mo off per VOICE. Donations accepted to get it paid for.
    Matt W.

    Does anyone know if there is a schedule and budget for this project?

    thanks,
    Baden



    I am sure I have seen a budget and timeframe sometime in the past but
    cannot find a link to it at the moment...

    Have a read of latest os2voice news https://articles.os2voice.org/


    Regards

    Pete

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LSoens@21:1/5 to baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com on Sun Apr 5 10:04:38 2020
    On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 18:57:46 UTC, "baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com" <baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com> wrote:

    Does anyone know if there is a schedule and budget for this project?

    https://www.bitwiseworks.com/ and scroll down.
    The roadmap is qt5 -> new browser. All I know about it's finished when
    it's finished :-) Hope sooon.

    Regards
    Lothar

    --
    lothar .dot. soens .at. t .minus. online .dot. de

    Wegen Unregelmäßigkeiten im Betrieb fährt die Bahn heute pünktlich.
    Due to irregular service all trains go on schedule today.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com@21:1/5 to LSoens on Thu Jun 18 14:37:19 2020
    On Sunday, 5 April 2020 05:04:39 UTC-5, LSoens wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 18:57:46 UTC, "baden.kudenecky@gmail.com" <baden.kudenecky@gmail.com> wrote:

    Does anyone know if there is a schedule and budget for this project?

    https://www.bitwiseworks.com/ and scroll down.
    The roadmap is qt5 -> new browser. All I know about it's finished when
    it's finished :-) Hope sooon.


    I just encountered a discouraging development. I was previously suspicious of relying on Falkon, as it even though it is good, it appears to be a one man show with limited resources and minimal updates. Relying on it would be risky at best.

    Today, I went to renew a registration, and none of the browsers on my OS/2 (ArcaOS) would work. I then went to the Win10 netbook, and used Falkon to process the renewal. I then wanted to mail the completed PDF form using Gmail. But, Gmail would not
    work on Falkon. I instead used Firefox. I checked, and the Falkon Win10 version is the latest from over a year ago.

    I really think any remaining development interests should seriously reevaluate the browser path and situation in OS/2. An OS without a functional browser has no viable future.

    Baden

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Yeo@21:1/5 to baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com on Fri Jun 19 23:40:34 2020
    On 06/18/20 02:37 PM, baden.kudrenecky@gmail.com wrote:
    On Sunday, 5 April 2020 05:04:39 UTC-5, LSoens wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 18:57:46 UTC, "baden.kudenecky@gmail.com"
    <baden.kudenecky@gmail.com> wrote:

    Does anyone know if there is a schedule and budget for this project?

    https://www.bitwiseworks.com/ and scroll down.
    The roadmap is qt5 -> new browser. All I know about it's finished when
    it's finished :-) Hope sooon.


    I just encountered a discouraging development. I was previously suspicious of relying on Falkon, as it even though it is good, it appears to be a one man show with limited resources and minimal updates. Relying on it would be risky at best.

    Today, I went to renew a registration, and none of the browsers on my OS/2 (ArcaOS) would work. I then went to the Win10 netbook, and used Falkon to process the renewal. I then wanted to mail the completed PDF form using Gmail. But, Gmail would not
    work on Falkon. I instead used Firefox. I checked, and the Falkon Win10 version is the latest from over a year ago.

    I really think any remaining development interests should seriously reevaluate the browser path and situation in OS/2. An OS without a functional browser has no viable future.


    Google was/is blocking Falkon with the claim that it is insecure.
    Considering Gmail works with FF45ESR, which likely has its share of vulnerabilities, it seems like a BS solution.
    Unluckily, we have a shortage of developers, so have to take what we
    can. What is really going to be a killer is as we move to a 64bit world,
    all browsers are getting impossible to port as they just need too much
    address space to link.
    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lars Erdmann@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 21 09:44:43 2020
    Hi Dave,

    are you talking about building the browser or running the browser ?


    Google was/is blocking Falkon with the claim that it is insecure.
    Considering Gmail works with FF45ESR, which likely has its share of vulnerabilities, it seems like a BS solution.
    Unluckily, we have a shortage of developers, so have to take what we
    can. What is really going to be a killer is as we move to a 64bit world,
    all browsers are getting impossible to port as they just need too much address space to link.
    Dave



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Yeo@21:1/5 to Lars Erdmann on Sun Jun 21 23:22:54 2020
    On 06/21/20 12:44 AM, Lars Erdmann wrote:
    Hi Dave,

    are you talking about building the browser or running the browser ?

    Right now it is linking the browser. To quote dmik,
    ...
    The link command included 3426 object files and 545 static libraries
    (which in total include around 10 000 object files). It took around 6
    hours before emxomfld did its work and passed execution to wl.exe which
    just hung (causing a cold reboot).
    ...
    Given that there are 1487454 weak aliases, there must be many million of symbols that are put in the hash table.
    ...
    He did optimize emxomfld to bring it down to 5 minutes :) but wlink is
    still crashing.
    Even linking Mozilla's xul.dll was taking the full address space here
    for a while, without VIRTUALADDRESSLIMIT=3072, wlink would fail with an
    out of memory error. Also with only 1.5 GBs of ram, I discovered our
    swap file has a 2GB limit, giving a swap file full error.
    Mozilla eventually started concatting cpp files together and
    disassembling static libraries, so feeding the linker about 10,000
    object files IIRC.
    Dave

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)