I just got a Brother ADS-2700W sheet-fed scanner and am trying
to access it from xsane.
The Brother got a lot of good reviews so I decided to give it a try.
It offers many options, such as e-mail, [S]FTP, etc. over Ethernet,
wi-fi, and USB. But so far, I haven't been able to get xsane to
recognize it.
Have you tried looking for a Brother driver? In the past they've done
a good job of supporting Linux with their printers.
I just got a Brother ADS-2700W sheet-fed scanner and am trying to access
it from xsane.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 02:22:01 +0000, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
I just got a Brother ADS-2700W sheet-fed scanner and am trying to access
it from xsane.
As far as I can see it is not listed at http://www.sane-project.org/sane-mfgs.html#Z-BROTHER
So most likely you will have to resort to some other solution than sane/ xsane to scan documents from that scanner.
I just got a Brother ADS-2700W sheet-fed scanner and am trying...
to access it from xsane.
I'm beginning to wonder, though, whether fashions are changing.
Scanners nowadays seem to want to push data to a server, rather
than being commanded to scan by a computer. Is this really
happening? If so, whither (or should that be "wither") xsane?
If anyone has gotten one of these newfangled machines to work
as a slave, rather than a master, please share your secrets.
On 31/03/2021 04.22, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
I just got a Brother ADS-2700W sheet-fed scanner and am trying...
to access it from xsane.
I'm beginning to wonder, though, whether fashions are changing.
Scanners nowadays seem to want to push data to a server, rather
than being commanded to scan by a computer. Is this really
happening? If so, whither (or should that be "wither") xsane?
What type of server? If it is just a file server of some type, that will probably means a Windows shared directory, that is, Samba. Or maybe a
NAS. You could prepare this in Linux, if they document it somewhere.
Or is it a server "in the cloud out there"?
If anyone has gotten one of these newfangled machines to work
as a slave, rather than a master, please share your secrets.
Sorry, no. But I'm curious about that "server" idea. It would make sense
for an office, as a shared independent machine, same as the office printer.
On 2021-04-01, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 31/03/2021 04.22, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
I just got a Brother ADS-2700W sheet-fed scanner and am trying...
to access it from xsane.
I'm beginning to wonder, though, whether fashions are changing.
Scanners nowadays seem to want to push data to a server, rather
than being commanded to scan by a computer. Is this really
happening? If so, whither (or should that be "wither") xsane?
What type of server? If it is just a file server of some type, that will
probably means a Windows shared directory, that is, Samba. Or maybe a
NAS. You could prepare this in Linux, if they document it somewhere.
Or is it a server "in the cloud out there"?
Take your pick. It can also do e-mail and [S]FTP.
If anyone has gotten one of these newfangled machines to work
as a slave, rather than a master, please share your secrets.
Sorry, no. But I'm curious about that "server" idea. It would make sense
for an office, as a shared independent machine, same as the office printer.
That's why I'm wondering whether there's been a philosophical shift
in people's view of a scanner. I've tried to get SFTP going, but
I haven't managed to get it to accept my server's public key yet.
I worry about my wife and her Macbook, though. It seems to be
into the old computer-driven mindset. I'll have to dig deeper
to find out whether the gods, looking down from their Olympian
mountain top near Cupertino, approve of the server paradigm.
If all else fails it scans to a thumb drive just fine.
All things considered, it might be indeed easier to setup FTP/SFTP or
CIFS (Samba) server on your PC and create a scanner profile to scan
directly into FTP directory or SMB share.
"CG" == Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes:
That's why I'm wondering whether there's been a philosophical shift
in people's view of a scanner. I've tried to get SFTP going, but
I haven't managed to get it to accept my server's public key yet.
Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> writes:
That's why I'm wondering whether there's been a philosophical shift
in people's view of a scanner. I've tried to get SFTP going, but
I haven't managed to get it to accept my server's public key yet.
AFAICT the scanner is incompatible with modern versions of openssh.
they probably only tested vs archaic versions or windows stuff...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 56:33:41 |
Calls: | 6,652 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,330,869 |