• The IMP Saga Continues. Microslop Fails As Usual

    From Farley Flud@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 24 17:07:38 2024
    Since I am an assembly language guru, and since I never had before
    encountered the IMP operator, I was curious as to why this ridiculous abomination would ever be included in ANY programming language.

    Check this article from over 10 years ago:

    https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/184089/why-dont-languages-include-implication-as-a-logical-operator

    These are the definitive responses:

    "Implication is very counter-intuitive, even to logic-minded people
    such as programmers. The fact that three out of the four truth table
    entries are true surprises many people."

    "At the same time, there is an easy workaround: use operators ! and ||"

    That is, "A => B" is equivalent to "~A OR B."

    But Microslop included the IMP operator. Why?

    Because Microslop believed that they were the authority on
    everything digital. But no one ever used Microslop IMP.
    The "authority" thus failed big time.

    C does not have it, because C, like FOSS, is created by
    rational and competent people.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Farley Flud on Sun Mar 24 22:59:01 2024
    On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 17:07:38 +0000, Farley Flud wrote:

    Since I am an assembly language guru ...

    Did you figure out the bit about (not) all prime numbers being odd, yet?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)