I'm less familiar with AMD processors, but if I'm not mistaken, the one
in question is quite a bit newer than the Intel one, right? When I
bought a first gen quad-core i5 in 2010 for my old computer, it was
pretty high end, but replacing it in 2021 with a 10th gen six-core i5
was more mid-range, despite being kind of comparable relative to their
eras.
The i5-4590 showed up yesterday and I put it in my old Dell box. I was looking for a quick and dirty benchmark and found 7zip has sort of an
Easter Egg.
'7z b' will do a test of all cores and threads, while '7z b -mmt1' will
do 1 thread using compression/decompression.
I wasn't surprised that the Ryzen 7 4700U box with 8 cores is faster than
a Core i5 with 4 cores, but testing 1 thread on each shows a slight
advantage to the 2 GHz Ryzen over the 3 GHz 4th gen i5.
I don't know why but the Windows 11 laptop with the Ryzen 7 4700U is quite
a bit faster decompressing.
I imagine all of this is done in RAM. Thanks for the tip!
The i5-4590 showed up yesterday and I put it in my old Dell box. I was looking for a quick and dirty benchmark and found 7zip has sort of an
Easter Egg.
'7z b' will do a test of all cores and threads, while '7z b -mmt1' will
do 1 thread using compression/decompression.
I wasn't surprised that the Ryzen 7 4700U box with 8 cores is faster than
a Core i5 with 4 cores, but testing 1 thread on each shows a slight
advantage to the 2 GHz Ryzen over the 3 GHz 4th gen i5.
I don't know why but the Windows 11 laptop with the Ryzen 7 4700U is quite
a bit faster decompressing.
On 2024-02-14, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:57:17 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
I imagine all of this is done in RAM. Thanks for the tip!
Yes. With the one thread flag it reports like below. On Windows I had to
hunt it down in C:Program Files\7-Zip\7z.exe. For all 8 threads it says
RAM usage: 1765 MB
7-Zip [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=en_US.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,8
CPUs AMD Ryzen 7 4700U with Radeon Graphics (860F01),ASM,AES-NI)
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U with Radeon Graphics (860F01)
CPU Freq: - - - 64000000 - - - - -
RAM size: 15397 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 8
RAM usage: 435 MB, # Benchmark threads: 1
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 4438 100 4319 4317 | 54284 100 4636 4635
23: 4111 100 4191 4189 | 53603 100 4641 4640
24: 3914 100 4211 4209 | 52536 100 4615 4612
25: 3720 100 4248 4248 | 50963 100 4537 4536
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 100 4242 4241 | 100 4607 4606
Tot: 100 4425 4423
It looks like my i5-4590T is about 1/4 or 1/5 the speed of your Ryzon...
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz (306C3)
CPU Freq: - - - - - - - - -
RAM size: 15903 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 4
RAM usage: 882 MB, # Benchmark threads: 4
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 11668 326 3479 11351 | 123335 380 2771 10522
23: 11369 333 3482 11584 | 123896 385 2783 10720
24: 11321 342 3560 12173 | 122215 385 2787 10729
25: 11515 351 3742 13147 | 119833 384 2777 10665 ---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 338 3566 12064 | 383 2780 10659
Tot: 361 3173 11362
(Well, in some categories anyhow. I wonder how it compares to your i5-4590?)
RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On 2024-02-14, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:57:17 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
I imagine all of this is done in RAM. Thanks for the tip!
Yes. With the one thread flag it reports like below. On Windows I had to >>> hunt it down in C:Program Files\7-Zip\7z.exe. For all 8 threads it says
RAM usage: 1765 MB
7-Zip [64] 16.02 : Copyright (c) 1999-2016 Igor Pavlov : 2016-05-21
p7zip Version 16.02 (locale=en_US.UTF-8,Utf16=on,HugeFiles=on,64 bits,8
CPUs AMD Ryzen 7 4700U with Radeon Graphics (860F01),ASM,AES-NI) >>>
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U with Radeon Graphics (860F01)
CPU Freq: - - - 64000000 - - - - -
RAM size: 15397 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 8
RAM usage: 435 MB, # Benchmark threads: 1
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 4438 100 4319 4317 | 54284 100 4636 4635
23: 4111 100 4191 4189 | 53603 100 4641 4640
24: 3914 100 4211 4209 | 52536 100 4615 4612
25: 3720 100 4248 4248 | 50963 100 4537 4536
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 100 4242 4241 | 100 4607 4606
Tot: 100 4425 4423
It looks like my i5-4590T is about 1/4 or 1/5 the speed of your Ryzon...
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4590T CPU @ 2.00GHz (306C3)
CPU Freq: - - - - - - - - -
RAM size: 15903 MB, # CPU hardware threads: 4
RAM usage: 882 MB, # Benchmark threads: 4
Compressing | Decompressing
Dict Speed Usage R/U Rating | Speed Usage R/U Rating
KiB/s % MIPS MIPS | KiB/s % MIPS MIPS
22: 11668 326 3479 11351 | 123335 380 2771 10522
23: 11369 333 3482 11584 | 123896 385 2783 10720
24: 11321 342 3560 12173 | 122215 385 2787 10729
25: 11515 351 3742 13147 | 119833 384 2777 10665
---------------------------------- | ------------------------------
Avr: 338 3566 12064 | 383 2780 10659
Tot: 361 3173 11362
(Well, in some categories anyhow. I wonder how it compares to your i5-4590?)
Only a tad slower than my old Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz (306C3)
(Well, in some categories anyhow. I wonder how it compares to your
i5-4590?)
well this is seriously important
Only a tad slower than my old Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz (306C3)
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:03:24 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Only a tad slower than my old Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710HQ CPU @ 2.50GHz
(306C3)
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000058567/ processors/intel-core-processors.html
HQ is 'High performance optimized for mobile, quad core' Is it a laptop?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 14:38:39 |
Calls: | 6,706 |
Files: | 12,237 |
Messages: | 5,351,098 |