In article <upm882$39eam$1@dont-email.me>, noway@nowhere.com says...
On 2/3/2024 12:10 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 2/3/2024 5:04 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
On 2/2/2024 9:12 PM, Lou Bricano wrote:
I have never understood why this topic has become your hobby horse.
Why do you keep insisting that someone imagining s/he's something
s/he is not is not mental illness? It is mental illness, exactly the
same as someone imagining s/he is Napoleon/Josephine or a giraffe or
a Martian is a mental illness. The person is imagining something
contrary to fact. No human is a giraffe or Martian, and no living
human possibly can be Napoleon or Josephine. People imagining
themselves to be are mentally ill.
Since you have already concluded that the research into clinical
results is political bullshit, nothing anyone can say to you will
change your mind. But those of us who accept the research conclude a
person with gender dysphoria isn't imagining they are something they
are not. Instead, we would conclude there are three different
legitimate bases for what "man" or "woman" means: genotype, phenotype
and cerebrotype. They almost always agree, but sometimes they do not.
No man is a woman.
You are begging the question what "man" and "woman" mean by assuming it
is genotype or phenotype (I'm not sure which one you assumed).
Dick = Man
Pussy = Woman
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 07:34:57 |
Calls: | 6,706 |
Files: | 12,236 |
Messages: | 5,350,636 |