• Push notifications on mobile phones used to spy on users

    From RabidPedagog@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 25 21:43:59 2024
    This might be slightly old, but it is no less relevant.

    <https://www.wired.com/story/apple-google-push-notification-surveillance/>

    The United States government and foreign law enforcement can demand
    Apple and Google share metadata associated with push notifications from
    apps on iOS and Android, according to a US senator and court records
    reviewed by WIRED. These notifications can reveal which apps a person
    uses, along with other information that may be pertinent to law
    enforcement investigations.

    US Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, highlighted the government surveillance technique in a letter sent to the US Department of Justice
    (DOJ) today. Wyden is specifically asking the DOJ to allow Apple and
    Google to discuss government requests for push notification records with
    their users, which Wyden says the US government has required them to
    keep secret thus far.

    “In the spring of 2022, my office received a tip that government
    agencies in foreign countries were demanding smartphone ‘push’
    notification records from Google and Apple,” Wyden wrote in the letter,
    which was first reported by Reuters. “My staff have been investigating
    this tip for the past year, which included contacting Apple and Google.
    In response to that query, the companies told my staff that information
    about this practice is restricted from public release by the government.”

    App developers deliver push notifications using Apple’s Push
    Notification Service on iOS or Google’s Firebase Cloud Messaging on
    Android. Each user of an app is assigned a “push token,” which is transferred between the app and the mobile operating system’s push notification service. Push tokens are not permanently assigned to a
    single user, and new tokens may be generated when a person reinstalls an
    app or switches to a new device.

    To identify a person of interest and whom they may have been
    communicating with, law enforcement must first go to an app developer to
    obtain the relevant push token and then bring it to the operating system maker—Apple or Google—and request information on which account the token
    is associated with. This puts the tech giants in “a unique position to facilitate government surveillance of how users are using particular
    apps,” Wyden writes.

    According to Wyden, the records that governments can obtain from Apple
    and Google include metadata that reveals which apps a person has used,
    when they’ve received notifications, and the phone associated with a particular Google or Apple account. The content of push notifications is
    not included in this information, but, for at least some apps, law
    enforcement could obtain information about the content of specific
    pushes through additional requests based on the information from the
    push tokens.

    While Wyden’s letter says that governments outside the US have requested people’s push notification records, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
    (FBI) has done so as well. A February 2021 search warrant application
    submitted by an FBI agent to the US District Court in Washington, DC,
    requested details for two accounts controlled by Meta (then Facebook), specifically citing a request for push notification tokens. The search
    warrant request related to an investigation into a person accused of
    taking part in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol.

    Meta, which owns Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram, did not immediately
    respond to WIRED’s request to comment. A spokesperson for Signal, the
    popular encrypted messaging app, also did not respond. The DOJ declined
    to comment.

    Although Wyden is asking the DOJ to allow Apple and Google to discuss government requests for push notification records, the senator’s letter appears to have enabled them to do just that.

    An Apple spokesperson tells WIRED that the company has updated its Law Enforcement Guidelines in its transparency report to reflect government requests for push notification records. The company will also begin to
    detail these requests in its next transparency report. Apple's updated
    rules for police requests say push notification records “may be obtained
    with a subpoena or greater legal process.”

    “Apple is committed to transparency and we have long been a supporter of efforts to ensure that providers are able to disclose as much
    information as possible to their users,” Apple says in a statement. “In this case, the federal government prohibited us from sharing any
    information and now that this method has become public we are updating
    our transparency reporting to detail these kinds of requests.”

    Google confirmed to WIRED that it receives requests for push
    notification records, but the company says it already includes these
    types of requests in its transparency reports. The company says requests
    from US-based law enforcement for push notification records require
    court orders with judicial approval.

    --
    RabidPedagog
    Catholic paleoconservative
    Linux Mint patron

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RabidPedagog@21:1/5 to RonB on Fri Jan 26 13:57:25 2024
    On 2024-01-26 04:19, RonB wrote:
    On 2024-01-26, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
    This might be slightly old, but it is no less relevant.

    <https://www.wired.com/story/apple-google-push-notification-surveillance/> >>
    The United States government and foreign law enforcement can demand
    Apple and Google share metadata associated with push notifications from
    apps on iOS and Android, according to a US senator and court records
    reviewed by WIRED. These notifications can reveal which apps a person
    uses, along with other information that may be pertinent to law
    enforcement investigations.

    US Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, highlighted the government
    surveillance technique in a letter sent to the US Department of Justice
    (DOJ) today. Wyden is specifically asking the DOJ to allow Apple and
    Google to discuss government requests for push notification records with
    their users, which Wyden says the US government has required them to
    keep secret thus far.

    “In the spring of 2022, my office received a tip that government
    agencies in foreign countries were demanding smartphone ‘push’
    notification records from Google and Apple,” Wyden wrote in the letter,
    which was first reported by Reuters. “My staff have been investigating
    this tip for the past year, which included contacting Apple and Google.
    In response to that query, the companies told my staff that information
    about this practice is restricted from public release by the government.” >>
    App developers deliver push notifications using Apple’s Push
    Notification Service on iOS or Google’s Firebase Cloud Messaging on
    Android. Each user of an app is assigned a “push token,” which is
    transferred between the app and the mobile operating system’s push
    notification service. Push tokens are not permanently assigned to a
    single user, and new tokens may be generated when a person reinstalls an
    app or switches to a new device.

    To identify a person of interest and whom they may have been
    communicating with, law enforcement must first go to an app developer to
    obtain the relevant push token and then bring it to the operating system
    maker—Apple or Google—and request information on which account the token >> is associated with. This puts the tech giants in “a unique position to
    facilitate government surveillance of how users are using particular
    apps,” Wyden writes.

    According to Wyden, the records that governments can obtain from Apple
    and Google include metadata that reveals which apps a person has used,
    when they’ve received notifications, and the phone associated with a
    particular Google or Apple account. The content of push notifications is
    not included in this information, but, for at least some apps, law
    enforcement could obtain information about the content of specific
    pushes through additional requests based on the information from the
    push tokens.

    While Wyden’s letter says that governments outside the US have requested >> people’s push notification records, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
    (FBI) has done so as well. A February 2021 search warrant application
    submitted by an FBI agent to the US District Court in Washington, DC,
    requested details for two accounts controlled by Meta (then Facebook),
    specifically citing a request for push notification tokens. The search
    warrant request related to an investigation into a person accused of
    taking part in the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol.

    Meta, which owns Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram, did not immediately
    respond to WIRED’s request to comment. A spokesperson for Signal, the
    popular encrypted messaging app, also did not respond. The DOJ declined
    to comment.

    Although Wyden is asking the DOJ to allow Apple and Google to discuss
    government requests for push notification records, the senator’s letter
    appears to have enabled them to do just that.

    An Apple spokesperson tells WIRED that the company has updated its Law
    Enforcement Guidelines in its transparency report to reflect government
    requests for push notification records. The company will also begin to
    detail these requests in its next transparency report. Apple's updated
    rules for police requests say push notification records “may be obtained >> with a subpoena or greater legal process.”

    “Apple is committed to transparency and we have long been a supporter of >> efforts to ensure that providers are able to disclose as much
    information as possible to their users,” Apple says in a statement. “In >> this case, the federal government prohibited us from sharing any
    information and now that this method has become public we are updating
    our transparency reporting to detail these kinds of requests.”

    Google confirmed to WIRED that it receives requests for push
    notification records, but the company says it already includes these
    types of requests in its transparency reports. The company says requests
    from US-based law enforcement for push notification records require
    court orders with judicial approval.

    This is why I keep trying to find something other than Android or iOS for my phones. I mostly use a flip phone, but even it runs a limited version of Android, AO... something — much more limited, though, I think.

    I would avoid phones altogether, but I've become a fan of podcasts and
    enjoy having them play in the background while I drive. I doubt any
    flip-phone would allow me to get podcasts. I barely ever get calls and
    rarely call people. I get texts, but they're mostly from my wife and my favourite colleague at my previous school board. Otherwise, the device
    is utterly useless to me. I only ever got one in 2003 because I was
    convinced that the girl I was dating at the time would want to call me
    all the time.

    --
    RabidPedagog
    Catholic paleoconservative
    Linux Mint patron

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to RabidPedagog on Sat Jan 27 02:46:35 2024
    On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:57:25 -0500, RabidPedagog wrote:

    I only ever got one in 2003 because I was convinced that the girl I was dating at the time would want to call me all the time.

    My boss tried to convince me to get one. He knew I hiked alone and
    stressed the safety aspect. I pointed out there was no cell coverage in
    most of my favorite areas anyway.

    When my brother's health started to fail, I finally got one. Most of my
    actual phone calls are with my wife. I've got a geocaching and step
    counter app I use, plus slack for work related messages. It's also a lot
    easier for 2FA.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RabidPedagog@21:1/5 to rbowman on Sat Jan 27 08:04:42 2024
    On 2024-01-26 21:46, rbowman wrote:
    On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:57:25 -0500, RabidPedagog wrote:

    I only ever got one in 2003 because I was convinced that the girl I was
    dating at the time would want to call me all the time.

    My boss tried to convince me to get one. He knew I hiked alone and
    stressed the safety aspect. I pointed out there was no cell coverage in
    most of my favorite areas anyway.

    When my brother's health started to fail, I finally got one. Most of my actual phone calls are with my wife. I've got a geocaching and step
    counter app I use, plus slack for work related messages. It's also a lot easier for 2FA.

    Ah yes, 2FA. Admittedly, I use that a lot. That is one good reason to
    have a smartphone on our person.

    --
    RabidPedagog
    Catholic paleoconservative
    Linux Mint patron

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)