• "Woke" is (hatred for)/(jealousy of) America, Whites and straight men.

    From Relf@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 14 08:21:55 2024
    Re: Ahlstrom saying: "Woke" is "unreasonable or extreme".

    "Woke" is (hatred for)/(jealousy of) America, Whites and straight men.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RabidPedagog@21:1/5 to Relf on Sun Jan 14 12:46:10 2024
    On 2024-01-14 11:21, Relf wrote:
    Re: Ahlstrom saying: "Woke" is "unreasonable or extreme".

    "Woke" is (hatred for)/(jealousy of) America, Whites and straight men.

    Ricky Gervais got it right in his latest comedy special. Woke is
    "puratical tyranny where you will get someone fired for speaking an
    honest opinion."

    --
    RabidPedagog
    Catholic paleoconservative

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to RabidPedagog on Sun Jan 14 14:17:38 2024
    RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-14 11:21, Relf wrote:
    Re: Ahlstrom saying: "Woke" is "unreasonable or extreme".

    "Woke" is (hatred for)/(jealousy of) America, Whites and straight men.

    Ricky Gervais got it right in his latest comedy special. Woke is
    "puratical tyranny where you will get someone fired for speaking an
    honest opinion."

    No it isn't. The word has been misappropriated and skunked. As if awareness
    and empathy were somehow ridiculous.

    And some "honest opinions" can be reprehensible.

    Better to use the term "politically correct".

    By the way, I did not say what Relf quotes above. It was some entity on the web. Relf is... mistaken.

    --
    Always the dullness of the fool is the whetstone of the wits.
    -- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to RonB on Mon Jan 15 07:46:58 2024
    RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-14, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-14 11:21, Relf wrote:
    Re: Ahlstrom saying: "Woke" is "unreasonable or extreme".

    "Woke" is (hatred for)/(jealousy of) America, Whites and straight men.

    Ricky Gervais got it right in his latest comedy special. Woke is
    "puratical tyranny where you will get someone fired for speaking an
    honest opinion."

    No it isn't. The word has been misappropriated and skunked. As if awareness >> and empathy were somehow ridiculous.

    And some "honest opinions" can be reprehensible.

    Better to use the term "politically correct".

    By the way, I did not say what Relf quotes above. It was some entity on the >> web. Relf is... mistaken.

    Woke is the proper word because, as with other words in the English
    language, its meaning has expanded to include a whole new movement. "Politically correct" is too limited and benign. "Woke" connotes shrillness, and an illogical insanity which throws reality out the window for the sake
    of a delusion. Like claiming a man can carry a baby in his non-womb. And it also includes a vicious intolerance. If you don't believe and affirm that a man can carry a baby in his non-womb you can be fired from your job (or jailed in some countries). It demands total compliance to this insane and delusional bullshit, as if reality doesn't exist and you must embrace the lie. This is sometimes called cognitive dissonance, it's an assault on reason, and an assault on my reason is an assault on me. Read the novel "1984" for some specific examples of this forced "affirmation" of lies. In the days of the Soviet Union they called this "brainwashing" and it was a
    way to break down the will of prisoners.

    Triggered! :-D

    When I say "Woke" people know what I mean. Now you know as well.

    Tell that to the black people who originated the use of the word.
    Like I said, the word has been skunked.

    --
    The man who sets out to carry a cat by its tail learns something that
    will always be useful and which never will grow dim or doubtful.
    -- Mark Twain

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RabidPedagog@21:1/5 to RonB on Mon Jan 15 08:47:48 2024
    On 2024-01-14 2:35 p.m., RonB wrote:
    On 2024-01-14, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-14 11:21, Relf wrote:
    Re: Ahlstrom saying: "Woke" is "unreasonable or extreme".

    "Woke" is (hatred for)/(jealousy of) America, Whites and straight men.

    Ricky Gervais got it right in his latest comedy special. Woke is
    "puratical tyranny where you will get someone fired for speaking an
    honest opinion."

    No it isn't. The word has been misappropriated and skunked. As if awareness >> and empathy were somehow ridiculous.

    And some "honest opinions" can be reprehensible.

    Better to use the term "politically correct".

    By the way, I did not say what Relf quotes above. It was some entity on the >> web. Relf is... mistaken.

    Woke is the proper word because, as with other words in the English
    language, its meaning has expanded to include a whole new movement. "Politically correct" is too limited and benign. "Woke" connotes shrillness, and an illogical insanity which throws reality out the window for the sake
    of a delusion. Like claiming a man can carry a baby in his non-womb. And it also includes a vicious intolerance. If you don't believe and affirm that a man can carry a baby in his non-womb you can be fired from your job (or jailed in some countries). It demands total compliance to this insane and delusional bullshit, as if reality doesn't exist and you must embrace the lie. This is sometimes called cognitive dissonance, it's an assault on reason, and an assault on my reason is an assault on me. Read the novel "1984" for some specific examples of this forced "affirmation" of lies. In the days of the Soviet Union they called this "brainwashing" and it was a
    way to break down the will of prisoners.

    When I say "Woke" people know what I mean. Now you know as well.

    Since I can't speak out too obviously against this in my own workplace
    (I'm surrounded by Marxist women, though less so than I used to be), I
    _can_ refuse to let the Marxist propagandists enter my classroom to
    condition the children. I don't even have to explain myself because I
    can claim that there's a test that day. In reality, I just don't want
    that trash in my room because I _will_ stick around and I _will_
    aggressively debate them and prove my points with links. You don't ever
    want to debate me face to face because I become very intense. My
    tolerance for absolutely bullshit is incredibly low and I've been known
    to tell professors that certain theories were stupid even back in
    university.

    --
    @RabidPedagog
    Anti-Marxist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chrisv@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Mon Jan 15 08:07:28 2024
    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    RonB wrote:

    Woke is the proper word because, as with other words in the English
    language, its meaning has expanded to include a whole new movement.
    "Politically correct" is too limited and benign. "Woke" connotes shrillness, >> and an illogical insanity which throws reality out the window for the sake >> of a delusion. Like claiming a man can carry a baby in his non-womb. And it >> also includes a vicious intolerance. If you don't believe and affirm that a >> man can carry a baby in his non-womb you can be fired from your job (or
    jailed in some countries). It demands total compliance to this insane and
    delusional bullshit, as if reality doesn't exist and you must embrace the
    lie. This is sometimes called cognitive dissonance, it's an assault on
    reason, and an assault on my reason is an assault on me. Read the novel
    "1984" for some specific examples of this forced "affirmation" of lies. In >> the days of the Soviet Union they called this "brainwashing" and it was a
    way to break down the will of prisoners.

    Triggered! :-D

    That's the typical "quality" of your retorts, recently, when faced
    with reason.

    When I say "Woke" people know what I mean. Now you know as well.

    Tell that to the black people who originated the use of the word.
    Like I said, the word has been skunked.

    Not as badly as the words "man" and "woman" and "he" and "she" have
    been "skunked".

    Did you know that it's "violence" to "misgender" somone, but possibly
    OK to call for genocide?

    --
    "And, of course, if Linux really does have no way to create such hard
    links then OS X offers more choice." - some thing

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to chrisv on Mon Jan 15 11:46:00 2024
    chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    RonB wrote:

    Woke is the proper word because, as with other words in the English
    language, its meaning has expanded to include a whole new movement.
    "Politically correct" is too limited and benign. "Woke" connotes shrillness,
    and an illogical insanity which throws reality out the window for the sake >>> of a delusion. Like claiming a man can carry a baby in his non-womb. And it >>> also includes a vicious intolerance. If you don't believe and affirm that a >>> man can carry a baby in his non-womb you can be fired from your job (or
    jailed in some countries). It demands total compliance to this insane and >>> delusional bullshit, as if reality doesn't exist and you must embrace the >>> lie. This is sometimes called cognitive dissonance, it's an assault on
    reason, and an assault on my reason is an assault on me. Read the novel
    "1984" for some specific examples of this forced "affirmation" of lies. In >>> the days of the Soviet Union they called this "brainwashing" and it was a >>> way to break down the will of prisoners.

    Triggered! :-D

    That's the typical "quality" of your retorts, recently, when faced
    with reason.

    When I say "Woke" people know what I mean. Now you know as well.

    Tell that to the black people who originated the use of the word.
    Like I said, the word has been skunked.

    Not as badly as the words "man" and "woman" and "he" and "she" have
    been "skunked".

    Did you know that it's "violence" to "misgender" somone, but possibly
    OK to call for genocide?

    Get a grip, man!

    --
    Kiss me, Kate, we will be married o' Sunday.
    -- William Shakespeare, "The Taming of the Shrew"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to RonB on Mon Jan 15 11:50:10 2024
    RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-15, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-14, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-14 11:21, Relf wrote:
    Re: Ahlstrom saying: "Woke" is "unreasonable or extreme".

    "Woke" is (hatred for)/(jealousy of) America, Whites and straight men. >>>>>
    Ricky Gervais got it right in his latest comedy special. Woke is
    "puratical tyranny where you will get someone fired for speaking an
    honest opinion."

    No it isn't. The word has been misappropriated and skunked. As if awareness
    and empathy were somehow ridiculous.

    And some "honest opinions" can be reprehensible.

    Better to use the term "politically correct".

    By the way, I did not say what Relf quotes above. It was some entity on the
    web. Relf is... mistaken.

    Woke is the proper word because, as with other words in the English
    language, its meaning has expanded to include a whole new movement.
    "Politically correct" is too limited and benign. "Woke" connotes shrillness,
    and an illogical insanity which throws reality out the window for the sake >>> of a delusion. Like claiming a man can carry a baby in his non-womb. And it >>> also includes a vicious intolerance. If you don't believe and affirm that a >>> man can carry a baby in his non-womb you can be fired from your job (or
    jailed in some countries). It demands total compliance to this insane and >>> delusional bullshit, as if reality doesn't exist and you must embrace the >>> lie. This is sometimes called cognitive dissonance, it's an assault on
    reason, and an assault on my reason is an assault on me. Read the novel
    "1984" for some specific examples of this forced "affirmation" of lies. In >>> the days of the Soviet Union they called this "brainwashing" and it was a >>> way to break down the will of prisoners.

    Triggered! :-D

    Meaning what, exactly?

    So I mention the original usage of "woke", and you go off on a non-relevant rant worthy of the Combover Caligula. Triggered! :-D

    That I despise delusional liars pushing their agenda
    on me? Oh well, "triggered" it is then. If standing up for the truth and opposing delusional insanity is being "triggered" I'll accept your label.

    If you find something wrong in what I write, why not respond to that instead of resorting to snark? For example, can men carry babies in their non-womb? Yes or no? If they can, explain exactly how they can do this. If they can't then explain why people can be fired or imprisoned for speaking the plain truth.

    When I say "Woke" people know what I mean. Now you know as well.

    Tell that to the black people who originated the use of the word.
    Like I said, the word has been skunked.

    A lot of words have been "skunked" (if by "skunked" you mean their meaning has shifted). Gay is one of them. I had a teacher in college (old already in the mid 70s) who insisted on using the word "gay" in its traditional sense. He didn't like that it had been appropriated to mean homosexual.

    If you're going to use the English language you're going to have to get used to words taking on new meanings. Just the way it works.

    Well duh.

    https://www.vox.com/culture/21437879/stay-woke-wokeness-history-origin-evolution-controversy

    Worth at least reading a bit of that long article.

    You guys have sure turned into a touchy bunch!

    --
    You are fighting for survival in your own sweet and gentle way.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chrisv@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Mon Jan 15 11:26:47 2024
    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    RonB wrote:

    If you find something wrong in what I write, why not respond to that instead >> of resorting to snark? For example, can men carry babies in their non-womb? >> Yes or no? If they can, explain exactly how they can do this. If they can't >> then explain why people can be fired or imprisoned for speaking the plain
    truth.

    Note: No response to the above from Chris A.

    You guys have sure turned into a touchy bunch!

    Because we understand the seriousness of the situation. For example,
    the left's assault on freedom of speech is despicable and extremely
    dangerous.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to chrisv on Mon Jan 15 16:14:07 2024
    chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    RonB wrote:

    If you find something wrong in what I write, why not respond to that instead
    of resorting to snark? For example, can men carry babies in their non-womb? >>> Yes or no? If they can, explain exactly how they can do this. If they can't >>> then explain why people can be fired or imprisoned for speaking the plain >>> truth.

    Note: No response to the above from Chris A.

    Because it's irrelevant to explaining the changes in the word "woke".

    You guys have sure turned into a touchy bunch!

    Because we understand the seriousness of the situation. For example,
    the left's assault on freedom of speech is despicable and extremely dangerous.

    :-D Yeah, the "left" is book-banning, curbing voting conveniences, complaining about being "canceled", preventing protests from pro-Palestinan people, criminalizing drag-queen readings, criminalizing miscarriages and traveling to a safe place to get medical care for unwanted or dangerous pregnancy, threatening public officials over "Trump", stomping on families of kids with gender dysphoria, passing laws to allow child marriage, ...

    --
    You've been leading a dog's life. Stay off the furniture.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RabidPedagog@21:1/5 to RonB on Mon Jan 15 18:00:43 2024
    On 2024-01-15 10:50, RonB wrote:
    On 2024-01-15, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-14, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-14 11:21, Relf wrote:
    Re: Ahlstrom saying: "Woke" is "unreasonable or extreme".

    "Woke" is (hatred for)/(jealousy of) America, Whites and straight men. >>>>>
    Ricky Gervais got it right in his latest comedy special. Woke is
    "puratical tyranny where you will get someone fired for speaking an
    honest opinion."

    No it isn't. The word has been misappropriated and skunked. As if awareness
    and empathy were somehow ridiculous.

    And some "honest opinions" can be reprehensible.

    Better to use the term "politically correct".

    By the way, I did not say what Relf quotes above. It was some entity on the
    web. Relf is... mistaken.

    Woke is the proper word because, as with other words in the English
    language, its meaning has expanded to include a whole new movement.
    "Politically correct" is too limited and benign. "Woke" connotes shrillness,
    and an illogical insanity which throws reality out the window for the sake >>> of a delusion. Like claiming a man can carry a baby in his non-womb. And it >>> also includes a vicious intolerance. If you don't believe and affirm that a >>> man can carry a baby in his non-womb you can be fired from your job (or
    jailed in some countries). It demands total compliance to this insane and >>> delusional bullshit, as if reality doesn't exist and you must embrace the >>> lie. This is sometimes called cognitive dissonance, it's an assault on
    reason, and an assault on my reason is an assault on me. Read the novel
    "1984" for some specific examples of this forced "affirmation" of lies. In >>> the days of the Soviet Union they called this "brainwashing" and it was a >>> way to break down the will of prisoners.

    Triggered! :-D

    Meaning what, exactly? That I despise delusional liars pushing their agenda on me? Oh well, "triggered" it is then. If standing up for the truth and opposing delusional insanity is being "triggered" I'll accept your label.

    If you find something wrong in what I write, why not respond to that instead of resorting to snark? For example, can men carry babies in their non-womb? Yes or no? If they can, explain exactly how they can do this. If they can't then explain why people can be fired or imprisoned for speaking the plain truth.

    It's so sad to see that Chris has fallen for this garbage.

    When I say "Woke" people know what I mean. Now you know as well.

    Tell that to the black people who originated the use of the word.
    Like I said, the word has been skunked.

    A lot of words have been "skunked" (if by "skunked" you mean their meaning has shifted). Gay is one of them. I had a teacher in college (old already in the mid 70s) who insisted on using the word "gay" in its traditional sense. He didn't like that it had been appropriated to mean homosexual.

    If you're going to use the English language you're going to have to get used to words taking on new meanings. Just the way it works.

    I refuse to use the word "gay" to refer to homosexuals. They're either homosexuals (respectable people who just happen to love penis), faggots
    (people who tell you about ant you to celebrate what they do in their
    bedrooms) and sissies (people who constantly turn a blind eye to the
    faggots). The fact that they are often very happy about having something
    rammed into their assholes doesn't mean that they earned the right to
    exclusive use of the word.

    --
    RabidPedagog
    Catholic paleoconservative

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chrisv@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Mon Jan 15 17:26:54 2024
    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    RonB wrote:

    If you find something wrong in what I write, why not respond to that instead
    of resorting to snark? For example, can men carry babies in their non-womb?
    Yes or no? If they can, explain exactly how they can do this. If they can't
    then explain why people can be fired or imprisoned for speaking the plain >>>> truth.

    Note: No response to the above from Chris A.

    Because it's irrelevant to explaining the changes in the word "woke".

    Oh, "the changes" in that word are what's really important?

    You guys have sure turned into a touchy bunch!

    Because we understand the seriousness of the situation. For example,
    the left's assault on freedom of speech is despicable and extremely
    dangerous.

    :-D Yeah, the "left" is book-banning,

    Like "Gender Queer" from elementary schools? Quite appropriate.

    curbing voting conveniences,

    Like the "onerous" requirement of a government ID?

    Just so "terrible" that some people want to make it harder to cheat.

    complaining about being "canceled",

    :-D Magically, the suppressed become the "bad guys", huh?

    preventing protests from pro-Palestinan people,

    Who advocate Jihad and genocide?

    criminalizing drag-queen readings,

    Are burlesque shows appropriate for children?

    criminalizing miscarriages

    Huh?

    and traveling to a safe place to get medical
    care for unwanted or dangerous pregnancy,

    Some of the anti-abortion laws go too far, I conceed. On the other
    hand, in some states you can abort up until the moment the kid is
    born. That ain't right, either.

    threatening public officials over "Trump",

    A few assholes are out there. How about leftists' rioting, or is that
    not a "threat" to anyone?

    stomping on families of kids with gender dysphoria,

    Again, those who want to protect children are magically the "bad
    guys".

    passing laws to allow child marriage, ...

    Haven't heard of that, must be an exceptional case.

    Meanwhile, leftists are loud and proud about wanting to allow child sterilization and mutilation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to RabidPedagog on Tue Jan 16 01:31:00 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:00:43 -0500, RabidPedagog wrote:

    I refuse to use the word "gay" to refer to homosexuals.

    Back in the '70s a friend had colorful laces in his Chuck Taylors rather
    than the standard white. His mother, of another generation, exclaimed 'Oh,
    what gay shoelaces!'

    I went to grade and high school with a girl named Gay. It looks like the popularity of that name has fallen off. I wonder why?

    https://www.babycenter.com/baby-names/details/gay-1808

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RabidPedagog@21:1/5 to RonB on Tue Jan 16 07:58:54 2024
    On 2024-01-16 2:42 a.m., RonB wrote:

    :-D Yeah, the "left" is book-banning, curbing voting conveniences, complaining
    about being "canceled", preventing protests from pro-Palestinan people,
    criminalizing drag-queen readings, criminalizing miscarriages and traveling to
    a safe place to get medical care for unwanted or dangerous pregnancy,
    threatening public officials over "Trump", stomping on families of kids with >> gender dysphoria, passing laws to allow child marriage, ...

    Now who's "triggered?"

    Yeah, the woke left is book banning,

    The left is cancelling books like Huckleberry Finn and To Kill A
    Mockingbird, novels of _value_ for "racism" all the while complaining
    that the right is not interested in having its _graphic_ propaganda
    about young homosexuals giving blowjobs and getting assfucked in school libraries.

    Don't worry Chris, you already know what getting assfucked looks and
    feels like. You don't need those comic books anymore.

    canceling social accounts, getting
    people fired,

    These usually go together, to be honest. If you make a public statement
    which suggests that you lean right, most of the Marxist sissies believe
    that you are incapable of doing your job properly and that you must be
    fired. It has worked so far, but it's starting to work both ways.

    getting people put in prison.

    They tried to put Kyle Rittenhouse in prison for defending himself from
    Marxist sissies. Fortunately, they failed. They also sought to destroy
    Nick Sandmann before adulthood because he dared to smile as an
    Indigenous troublemaker harassed him and his friends. The Marxist
    sissies have absolutely no remorse about it either.

    Happens every day. Drag queen
    "readings" (grooming bullshit) should DEFINITELY be canceled when forced on young kids. "Unwanted pregnancies" involve a human being who will be killed. "Dangerous pregnancies" (i.e., a life for a life) are not opposed, never
    have been — more Woke bullshit. Children aren't allowed to do a lot of things because they're not yet mature, but the Woke morons think they should have the right to mutilate themselves, even before they reach puberty — without their parent's consent.

    As far as threatening public officials. Do you mean arguing against their attempts to force their perverted bullshit on young kids? How about public officials threatening parents by having them investigated as "terrorists" because they oppose their sick agenda? How about a man who's daughter is raped by a student claiming to be "transgender" in the girl's bathroom being arrested because he's angry? Is that okay, so long as the "Woke" bullshit is shoved down the throats of people who do want it?

    How about trying to force someone to ignore logic, science and reason and demand they never say a man can't have a baby? And, if they oppose this delusional asininity, they can be fired or jailed?

    Or people being fired for not buying into the delusional bullshit of a "preferred agenda" and just sticking the reality of he and her for two genders, male and female?

    People are fed up with being force-fed this Woke bullshit. You're going to see a lot more blowback before it's over. Get used to it.

    And idiot corporations like Disney better pull back from being Woke or they'll go broke. (Pretty close to it already. They're just about to fire a third of their Pixar employees now, after firing sizable numbers in their other divisions.)

    I'm starting to think that Chris Ahlstrom needs to see the inside of
    your filter again, Ron.

    --
    @RabidPedagog
    Anti-Marxist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Joel on Tue Jan 16 08:10:55 2024
    Joel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    You guys have sure turned into a touchy bunch!

    Because we understand the seriousness of the situation. For example,
    the left's assault on freedom of speech is despicable and extremely
    dangerous.

    :-D Yeah, the "left" is book-banning, curbing voting conveniences, complaining
    about being "canceled", preventing protests from pro-Palestinan people, >>criminalizing drag-queen readings, criminalizing miscarriages and traveling to
    a safe place to get medical care for unwanted or dangerous pregnancy, >>threatening public officials over "Trump", stomping on families of kids with >>gender dysphoria, passing laws to allow child marriage, ...

    Well said.

    I'm done dealing with the crazed reaction-formation from chrisv and RonB.
    Jesus Christ!

    --
    Patch griefs with proverbs.
    -- William Shakespeare, "Much Ado About Nothing"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to RabidPedagog on Tue Jan 16 08:12:58 2024
    RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Don't worry Chris, you already know what getting assfucked looks and
    feels like. You don't need those comic books anymore.

    You may be rabid, but you're no pedagogue.

    Advice from fortune for you, chrisv, and RonB. It'll save you all from busting a blood vessel.

    --
    Avert misunderstanding by calm, poise, and balance.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chrisv@21:1/5 to RonB on Tue Jan 16 07:38:39 2024
    RonB wrote:

    The real "Woke" are actually delusional enough to try to defend the asinine >claim that men can have babies. He knows this is so stupid that he won't >touch it, instead he sidesteps the issue.

    He's also repeatedly dodged when I've pointed-out that doctors,
    counselors, etc now *must* "affirm" *all* confused children who claim
    to be what they are not, and how obviously wrong and sick and
    destructive that is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RabidPedagog@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Tue Jan 16 09:03:34 2024
    On 2024-01-16 8:12 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Don't worry Chris, you already know what getting assfucked looks and
    feels like. You don't need those comic books anymore.

    You may be rabid, but you're no pedagogue.

    Advice from fortune for you, chrisv, and RonB. It'll save you all from busting
    a blood vessel.

    And into my filter your sissy ass goes.


    --
    @RabidPedagog
    Anti-Marxist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RabidPedagog@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Tue Jan 16 09:02:50 2024
    On 2024-01-16 8:10 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    Joel wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    You guys have sure turned into a touchy bunch!

    Because we understand the seriousness of the situation. For example,
    the left's assault on freedom of speech is despicable and extremely
    dangerous.

    :-D Yeah, the "left" is book-banning, curbing voting conveniences, complaining
    about being "canceled", preventing protests from pro-Palestinan people,
    criminalizing drag-queen readings, criminalizing miscarriages and traveling to
    a safe place to get medical care for unwanted or dangerous pregnancy,
    threatening public officials over "Trump", stomping on families of kids with
    gender dysphoria, passing laws to allow child marriage, ...

    Well said.

    I'm done dealing with the crazed reaction-formation from chrisv and RonB. Jesus Christ!

    Ah, no wonder you're such a sissy. It turns out that the character of
    Mr. Slave from South Park is based on you.

    --
    @RabidPedagog
    Anti-Marxist

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to RonB on Tue Jan 16 18:42:27 2024
    On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:25:26 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    For some reason when I was young, the name "Bruce" was often associated
    with homosexuality. Dr. Demento used to play a song "Big Bruce" (a
    parody of the song "Big Bad John") where Bruce was a homosexual hair
    dresser.

    I went to grade school with a kid called Bruce and there wasn't an
    association but that would have been 10 or 15 years before Dr. Demento hit
    the airwaves. We did have a finely tuned gaydar that probably picked up a
    lot of false positives.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chrisv@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Tue Jan 16 15:39:25 2024
    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    I'm done dealing with the crazed reaction-formation from chrisv and RonB.

    If you're going to take pot-shots, you're going to get a response.

    Jesus Christ!

    Exactly what I thought, when I read your diatribe.

    --
    "Smith's words [https://tinyurl.com/Dumb-FSck] are meaningless unless
    MS open sources most of their products" - DumFSck, lying shamelessly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to rbowman on Tue Jan 16 19:04:30 2024
    rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:25:26 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

    For some reason when I was young, the name "Bruce" was often associated
    with homosexuality. Dr. Demento used to play a song "Big Bruce" (a
    parody of the song "Big Bad John") where Bruce was a homosexual hair
    dresser.

    I went to grade school with a kid called Bruce and there wasn't an association but that would have been 10 or 15 years before Dr. Demento hit the airwaves. We did have a finely tuned gaydar that probably picked up a
    lot of false positives.

    Monty Python used Bruce and Sheila as Aussie names for men and women.

    G'day Bruce! She's a good sheila and not at all stuck up.

    --
    You now have Asian Flu.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to RonB on Tue Jan 16 19:05:02 2024
    RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    On 2024-01-16, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
    RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Don't worry Chris, you already know what getting assfucked looks and
    feels like. You don't need those comic books anymore.

    You may be rabid, but you're no pedagogue.

    Advice from fortune for you, chrisv, and RonB. It'll save you all from busting
    a blood vessel.

    You're projecting the emotionally charged screeching of the unstable Woke on us. I try to write clearly and forcibly when I post on these subjects but, unlike the hyperventilating Woke, I'm not slobbering all over myself when I do it.

    Save your medical advice for the ones who need it, the Woke screechers who are often lined up behind Antifa and BLM signs and are lighting something on fire. These are the ones whose neck veins are bulging.

    Jesus Christ, calm down!

    --
    This will be a memorable month -- no matter how hard you try to forget it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Pandora on Tue Jan 16 19:05:42 2024
    Pandora wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote in
    news:X0wpN.191708$c3Ea.59802@fx10.iad:

    On 2024-01-16 8:12 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Don't worry Chris, you already know what getting assfucked looks and
    feels like. You don't need those comic books anymore.

    You may be rabid, but you're no pedagogue.

    Advice from fortune for you, chrisv, and RonB. It'll save you all
    from busting a blood vessel.

    And into my filter your sissy ass goes.

    Are you claiming he is a Fagala?
    Oy vey. That's mashugana.

    The Rabid man is meshuga.

    --
    In the space of one hundred and seventy-six years the Mississippi has
    shortened itself two hundred and forty-two miles. Therefore ... in the Old Silurian Period the Mississippi River was upward of one million three hundred thousand miles long ... seven hundred and forty-two years from now the Mississippi will be only a mile and three-quarters long. ... There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesome returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.
    -- Mark Twain

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to chrisv on Tue Jan 16 19:06:42 2024
    chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

    Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    I'm done dealing with the crazed reaction-formation from chrisv and RonB.

    If you're going to take pot-shots, you're going to get a response.

    Jesus Christ!

    Exactly what I thought, when I read your diatribe.

    "diatribe" :-D

    --
    Q: What's the difference between USL and the Titanic?
    A: The Titanic had a band.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Wed Jan 17 02:43:15 2024
    On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 19:04:30 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

    Monty Python used Bruce and Sheila as Aussie names for men and women.

    G'day Bruce! She's a good sheila and not at all stuck up.

    Sheila has been around for a long time but idk if Bruce was used in the
    same way before the sketch.

    https://www.macquariedictionary.com.au/blog/article/846/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Relf@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 21:10:56 2024
    You (Crump) replied ( to me ):
    Bing failed to notice that "Woke" is racist, offensive & illegal.


    Why would you think Woke is all of that ?

    "Woke" is (hatred for)/(jealousy of) America, Whites and straight men.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)