The question is why can't these distro assholes use the
CLI utilities directly and eschew the unnecessary GUI?
The answer is because they are all dummies to the core and
desperately require the pretty ersatz "buttons" provided
by Asunder and many other similar GUI wrappers.
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
On 12/21/2023 4:48 AM, Lyin' Larry Piet aka "Lester Thorpe" wrote:
The question is why can't these distro assholes use the
CLI utilities directly and eschew the unnecessary GUI?
The answer is because they are all dummies to the core and
desperately require the pretty ersatz "buttons" provided
by Asunder and many other similar GUI wrappers.
The real question is "Why can't YOU?"
User-Agent: Pan/0.150 (All GUI, all the time)
Good one, dbl-talking idiot!
I don't get the point he tried to make, even in the abstract, there
are things I do with the command line and things I do with the GUI,
what the fuck does it matter?
Are they mutually exclusive? What a
retarded rant, Russell, as usual, made.
On 12/21/2023 4:48 AM, Lameass Larry Pietraskiewicz aka "Lester Thorpe" wrote:
The question is why can't these distro assholes use the
CLI utilities directly and eschew the unnecessary GUI?
If you were a "REAL MAN" you'd be posting from a GPL-licensed,
Linux-only, CLI news client of your own creation.
Instead, you're 100% dependent on the crutch of GUI newsreaders, like
Pan and Google Groups.
On Thursday, December 21, 2023 at 10:07:14 AM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
The real question is "Why can't YOU?"
The answer is because they are all dummies to the core and
desperately require the pretty ersatz "buttons" provided
by Asunder and many other similar GUI wrappers.
User-Agent: Pan/0.150 (All GUI, all the time)
Ahahahahaha! Another masterstroke of idiocy by the infinite idiot.
This clown has been on an idiot roll since 2002 -- B.C.E.!!!
Now, put your dunce cap on and sit in the corner while repeating
to yourself: "Pan is not a wrapper."
Got that? Pan is not a fucking *wrapper*.
Got that? This thread is about fucking GUI wrappers.
WRAPPERS. Got that? Pan does not "wrap" anything.
Sheesh! These idiots never sleep.
The question is why can't these distro assholes use the
CLI utilities directly and eschew the unnecessary GUI?
On Thursday, December 21, 2023 at 11:10:03 AM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
Folks, the Fail Machine just keeps on cranking them out.
Your lameass "programming is not coding" and "GUIs are different from
GUI wrappers" excuses will NEVER get by me, hypocrite.
Now, read and weep:
"In the context of software engineering, a wrapper is defined as an
entity that encapsulates and hides the underlying complexity of another entity by means of well-defined interfaces."
https://www.techopedia.com/definition/4389/wrapper-software-engineering
I hope that there are not too many syllables in the above exceprt for
the idiot to handle. Ahahahahahahahaha!
But as any non-idiot can clearly see, Asunder qualifies as a wrapper
whereas Pan does not.
On 12/21/2023 9:16 AM, DFS wrote:
If you were a "REAL MAN" you'd be
See, that's a female brain. And around Penismas, it gets packed with hormones.
It's the same with the DuFuS Supremus. He cannot even comprehend
the simple, though subtle, idea of a software "wrapper"
and he displays a technical blindness in everything that he utters.
The DuFuS Supremus definitely possesses a female brain.
On Thursday, December 21, 2023 at 11:10:03 AM UTC-5, DFS wrote:
Your lameass "programming is not coding" and "GUIs are different from
GUI wrappers" excuses will NEVER get by me, hypocrite.
Folks, the Fail Machine just keeps on cranking them out.
Now, read and weep:
"In the context of software engineering, a wrapper is defined as an
entity that encapsulates and hides the underlying complexity of
another entity by means of well-defined interfaces."
https://www.techopedia.com/definition/4389/wrapper-software-engineering
I hope that there are not too many syllables in the above exceprt for the idiot
to handle. Ahahahahahahahaha!
But as any non-idiot can clearly see, Asunder qualifies as a wrapper whereas Pan does not.
The case is closed.
Disagree?
You'll soon be chokin'.
You use a variety of tech terms VERY loosely, thinking you can justify whatever definition you give them at the time. "wrapper", for instance:
<snip various spurious quotations>
Female brain is wired differently from those of men, making them opt for different ways of handling any situation. It's been necessary to be so,
for both men and women.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:31:52 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
Female brain is wired differently from those of men, making them opt for
different ways of handling any situation. It's been necessary to be so,
for both men and women.
Another excellent statement!
Any even moderately perceptive male who has ever spent significant time
with various women
will inevitably come to that conclusion.
Women who are inclined to technical areas are obviously seriously
disturbed queers (they got their wires crossed) and should be avoided.
They are what psychoanalysts call the "castrating bitch."
The "progressive"
I hardly ever need to use my head.
Back then when we were mighty predator fuckers, I and an Iranian friend
in the Humanities Dept were seeking just such females to fuck them :-))))
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 09:06:14 -0500, DFS wrote:
You use a variety of tech terms VERY loosely, thinking you can justify
whatever definition you give them at the time. "wrapper", for instance:
<snip various spurious quotations>
Nope. Wrong yet again.
I never said ANY of those things. None. Zip. Nada.
So, for the record, I will make my one-and-only genuine statement
once again:
Asunder is a cheap GUI wrapper.
Pan is not a GUI wrapper.
chrisv wrote:
Farley Flud wrote:
The DuFuS Supremus definitely possesses a female brain.
I disagree. He's far too shitty.
Similar to the mentally-ill POS "flatfish", who used to troll cola and
who liked to pretend to be a woman. But no woman would spew such vile >>garbage as he did.
(kookery snipped)
I never said ANY of those things. None. Zip. Nada.
You said all 9 of them, verbatim, except for the few bracketed words I inserted for brevity.
They were just fuck pieces for me and him, and that's what they wanted
too, just being fuck pieces. But this was my conclusions that were made
then, before more experience or later thoughts.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 18:11:45 -0500, DFS wrote:
I never said ANY of those things. None. Zip. Nada.
You said all 9 of them, verbatim, except for the few bracketed words I
inserted for brevity.
Nope. I never said ANY of those things. None. Zip. Nada.
I keep a record of everything and I know.
Are you calling me a liar, you goddamned motherfucker?
In the world of REAL MEN, TRUE MEN, VIRILE MEN, impugning
another man's character calls for nothing less that a deadly
force response. That's a DEADLY FORCE RESPONSE.
But you do not inhabit such a world. You are a pansy, a sissy,
a fairy.
If you dare to imply that I am a liar, you'd best prepare
for a deadly force response.
And you're mistaken about those feminists, some of which were quite hot
as well. They were indeed the safest among women with which you could
have sex,
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
Farley Flud wrote:
The DuFuS Supremus definitely possesses a female brain.
I disagree. He's far too shitty.
Similar to the mentally-ill POS "flatfish", who used to troll cola and
who liked to pretend to be a woman. But no woman would spew such vile >garbage as he did.
Transgender women would not, either. But you're a phobe of them.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 03:42:57 |
| Calls: | 6,706 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 12,235 |
| Messages: | 5,350,197 |