On 12/1/2023 7:42 AM, Larry "Lester Thorpe" Pietraskiewicz wrote:
I propose that all FOSS developers withdraw any Microslop
versions if they have any.
I propose that all FOSS developers withdraw any Microslop
versions if they have any. Withholding fine FOSS software
may inspire Microslop users to jump ship.
On 12/1/2023 7:42 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
It's uncommon for a GuhNoo developer
Le 05-12-2023, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> a écrit :
On 12/1/2023 7:42 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
It's uncommon for a GuhNoo developer
You consider him to be a developer. I'm surprised.
On 12/9/2023 9:44 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 05-12-2023, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> a écrit :
On 12/1/2023 7:42 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
It's uncommon for a GuhNoo developer
You consider him to be a developer. I'm surprised.
Of course not. He doesn't have the skill to program anything but tiny, trivial programs (not that there's anything wrong with that).
The problem is Feeb's a loudmouth braggart:
* I can program ANYTHING
* programming wizard
* computing virtuoso
* computer scientist
* An x86 BIOS runs in 16-bit real mode, which is candy-ass, chicken-
shit programming.
* Perl guru
* C programmer extraordinaire
* Assembly language genius
* I program only in GNU C (but more and more assembly).
* Give me C, simple and unchanging C, and I shall bury these
Microslop cronies.
and a dozen more silly brags
And he often claims his short, faulty code snippets are "perfect,
infallible and efficient."
None of it is true. He's a very untalented, dishonest programming
fraud. That's why he denigrates actual programmers that do it for a
living.
Challenge him to a small programming contest. Watch him make an excuse
and run away, or just ignore you.
On 2023-12-09 10:19 p.m., DFS wrote:
On 12/9/2023 9:44 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 05-12-2023, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> a écrit :
On 12/1/2023 7:42 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
It's uncommon for a GuhNoo developer
You consider him to be a developer. I'm surprised.
Of course not. He doesn't have the skill to program anything but
tiny, trivial programs (not that there's anything wrong with that).
The problem is Feeb's a loudmouth braggart:
* I can program ANYTHING
* programming wizard
* computing virtuoso
* computer scientist
* An x86 BIOS runs in 16-bit real mode, which is candy-ass, chicken-
shit programming.
* Perl guru
* C programmer extraordinaire
* Assembly language genius
* I program only in GNU C (but more and more assembly).
* Give me C, simple and unchanging C, and I shall bury these
Microslop cronies.
and a dozen more silly brags
And he often claims his short, faulty code snippets are "perfect,
infallible and efficient."
None of it is true. He's a very untalented, dishonest programming
fraud. That's why he denigrates actual programmers that do it for a
living.
Challenge him to a small programming contest. Watch him make an
excuse and run away, or just ignore you.
I've come across a bunch of guys like Larry Pietraskiewicz throughout my life. Most of them thought that merely learning how to program was going
to give them some sort of superpower where they would create an
operating system to challenge and defeat Microsoft. It was rather sad, especially considering how other people I met, who were _truly_
brilliant people, ended up actually working at big companies like
Microsoft but worked on a component of the system at most.
These people
are so delusional that they are unable to comprehend how complicated an operating system actually is and how something as simple as Windows 1.0
still required years of development.
On 12/10/2023 9:15 AM, RabidPedagog wrote:
On 2023-12-09 10:19 p.m., DFS wrote:
On 12/9/2023 9:44 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 05-12-2023, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> a écrit :
On 12/1/2023 7:42 AM, Lester Thorpe wrote:
It's uncommon for a GuhNoo developer
You consider him to be a developer. I'm surprised.
Of course not. He doesn't have the skill to program anything but
tiny, trivial programs (not that there's anything wrong with that).
The problem is Feeb's a loudmouth braggart:
* I can program ANYTHING
* programming wizard
* computing virtuoso
* computer scientist
* An x86 BIOS runs in 16-bit real mode, which is candy-ass, chicken-
shit programming.
* Perl guru
* C programmer extraordinaire
* Assembly language genius
* I program only in GNU C (but more and more assembly).
* Give me C, simple and unchanging C, and I shall bury these
Microslop cronies.
and a dozen more silly brags
And he often claims his short, faulty code snippets are "perfect,
infallible and efficient."
None of it is true. He's a very untalented, dishonest programming
fraud. That's why he denigrates actual programmers that do it for a
living.
Challenge him to a small programming contest. Watch him make an
excuse and run away, or just ignore you.
I've come across a bunch of guys like Larry Pietraskiewicz throughout
my life. Most of them thought that merely learning how to program was
going to give them some sort of superpower where they would create an
operating system to challenge and defeat Microsoft. It was rather sad,
especially considering how other people I met, who were _truly_
brilliant people, ended up actually working at big companies like
Microsoft but worked on a component of the system at most. These
people are so delusional that they are unable to comprehend how
complicated an operating system actually is and how something as
simple as Windows 1.0 still required years of development.
You got it! Funny how you, a non-programmer, have a far better grasp on
the reality of building an OS than "GNU/Linux master, computing
virtuoso, and C programming wizard" Larry Pietraskiewicz AKA Feeb Russell.
You saw this exchange?
FitFreak: "it's a piece of cake to write an operating system."
Feeb: "Very nicely stated."
LMAO!
Lucky for those bozos there's no real-life repercussions for posting
lies and fantasies on Usenet. They also know they'll never be expected
to back up their ludicrous claims.
If you need reinforcement of how difficult an OS is, just look at some
of the Linux kernel code. There's a tiny, tiny few people in the world
that can actually code a file system on their own.
On 12/10/2023 8:15 AM, RabidPedagog wrote:
On 2023-12-09 10:19 p.m., DFS wrote:
The problem is Feeb's a loudmouth braggart:
I've come across a bunch of guys like Larry Pietraskiewicz throughout
my life. Most of them thought that merely learning how to program was
going to give them some sort of superpower where they would create an
operating system to challenge and defeat Microsoft. It was rather sad,
especially considering how other people I met, who were _truly_
brilliant people, ended up actually working at big companies like
Microsoft but worked on a component of the system at most. These
people are so delusional that they are unable to comprehend how
complicated an operating system actually is and how something as
simple as Windows 1.0 still required years of development.
Requiring "years of development" is not part of the job of creating an operating system after one is already created.
Requiring "years of development" is not part of the job of creating an
operating system after one is already created.
I thought it was pretty clear that I was referring to the fact that
Windows 1.0 took years to be developed from announcement to release.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 11:02:57 |
Calls: | 6,706 |
Files: | 12,236 |
Messages: | 5,350,918 |