• The truth about Elizabot's Ex-lover Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll

    From tmelmosfire@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 4 14:11:43 2017
    Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll

    Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is single, broke and has no skills. He blames Snit for his loss of his wife and girlfriend. Steven is jealous of what Snit has and in a narcissistic rage repeatedly works to take it away
    from him. For over 10 years he has failed at even this. Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is an utter failure in life.

    Of his online life Steven says

    I've been booted off by past providers before because people
    complain about me and all my bullshit. I don't want to lose my ISP
    *again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually
    search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted

    Some examples where Steven has been booted

    X10 Hosting booted Steven for inappropriate activity

    Comcast booted Steven for inappropriate activity

    FreeHostingEU booted Steven for copyright infringement http://devsite.eu.pn

    AwardSpace (atwebpages.com) booted Steven for breaking terms of service http://demsites.atwebpages.com/pokeman

    Imgur took down an image for breaking terms of service http://imgur.com/yv2XppE

    Had a GigaNews account which was removed for harassing Snit

    Stopped posting from his fretwizzen Google account since shortly after I complained. Seems he lost that too.

    His wife booted Steven to the curb for cheating on her

    Only site Steven Petruzzellis has pointed to that has ever been available http://www.oldneighborhoodrestaurant.net

    Made by the Go Daddy Website builder and is utter crap. Later he denied he said he was merely taking credit for someone else's work but Steven is the contact person http://tinyurl.com/hcw6dul http://tinyurl.com/hc7ee9q

    He also bragged he was working on an update and showed it here https://vid.me/u6RK

    The business still failed.

    He likely went to the Go Daddy Website Builder after he failed to get WordPress installed.


    This is why Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll attacks Snit.

    Steven Petruzzellis was is divorced because his wife caught him screwing another woman.

    Snit is married and by all appearances happily so.
    He never complains about his wife in COLA.

    Steven Petruzzellis is living on charity of a friend in a single room.

    Snit does not live in a mansion or even a high end home but has a house and a yard.

    Steven Petruzzellis has two kids but no respect. He repeatedly called Ryan his "little screwup" and refers to his son Steve as a "dick" and worse. He says at least one of them likely hacked his computer and is a "mentally deficient child." He mocks his
    possible future daughter-in-law as someone who takes too many selfies and is focused only on herself

    Snit has two kids (or more) and never speaks poorly of them in public.
    No reason to think they are not a happy family.

    Steven Petruzzellis claims to be a stay at home dad who pays thousands of dollars for day care. Steven has no job and no purpose in life. Steven has given up and now seeks a mother-figure to date.

    Snit has his own business doing technical work and also teaches.
    Snit offers a true contribution to society.
    Teachers are truly under appreciated.

    Linux is a very user-friendly operating system. It's just picky about who it's friendly with.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From fretwizzer@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 20 11:45:37 2017
    On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 3:11:46 PM UTC-7, Snit, using his 'TickleMe Elmo' sock puppet, spewed a bunch of BS as usual.

    Hi, Snit! How are all your 'pals'?

    1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member
    area and a login. If you forget your password, you can ask it
    to e-mail it to you, and a bot will send an e-mail. *That*
    is the e-mail Snit got from Sandman's website, and yes he's
    that fucked in the head and starved for attention that he'd
    claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself. So, don't get
    sucked into his little circus. The e-mail, in this particular
    instance, did probably originate from Sandman.net." 27 Feb 2007


    2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed*
    by behaviour and not withstanding your occasional on topic
    posts, I wish you'd leave too. Please note that despite the
    amazing silliness that is Edwin, I have never made the same
    wish of him." 27 Feb 2005


    3- amicus_curious (COLA): "Where on earth do you get the
    idea that I am arguing with you, little man? Is your name
    "Hadron"? Shoo! Go back to your mail order business!"
    29 May 2011


    4- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the
    truth, you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep
    disrupting the newsgroup." 27 Feb 2005


    5- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers
    to weasel out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole."
    25 Jun 2007


    6- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why
    not just let them go away and show how responsible a member
    of CSMA you are? You could show your enemies up by being
    better than them, rise above the low level you so obviously
    dislike. Anything, just stop...." 26 Apr 2007


    7- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If
    yes, then troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on
    you set to expire, but it's fixed now." 13 Mar 2005


    8- BaJoRi: "You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who
    has read your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed
    it to be wrong, then added even more, just to be a dick and
    REALLY show you to be a fool. You need to judiciously snip
    out pertinent points because you are an intellectually dwarfed
    turd-burglar." 11 Nov 2008


    9- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this
    group can be if you kill file Snit. I have never understood
    why more people don't do the same.." 5 Aug 2006


    10- Bob B.: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all
    group, but since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible
    to have a decent discussion about anything. The solution is
    to NOT REPLY TO SNIT. But for some reason, some people just
    can't stop feeding him." 27 Dec 2004


    11- bunny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really actually
    =3D:-( 9 Oct 2004


    12- Brian: "LOL, Has anyone ever been more universally hated on
    the USENET than Snit? Too bad he craves the hatred and negative
    attention. We will read about him in the news some day soon
    going on a shooting rampage. Somebody should get the pychopath
    some help before he VT's a bunch of people. 29 May 2007


    13- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill, but you and
    Steve don't help. You encourage him to post, which he doesn't
    need to do. We would all be better off if you just ignore him.
    17 Nov 2004


    14- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls'
    ... in the groups he trolls in, that is. I wondered if the
    idiotrollers like snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I
    didn't see his posts, only your reply". 07 Aug 2006


    15- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time
    for you to learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of
    course, that your Usenet browser has a kill-filter." 5 Mar 2005


    16- cc (COLA): "You are incapable of letting anything go. In
    fact, I guarantee you will respond to this post in under 3
    hours. Hell, I'd be surprised if it takes longer than 30
    minutes. If I really wanted to, I could make this little
    side topic go on forever, because you are a complete moron
    who just has to respond to anything written about or to you,
    even if it just means repeating yourself." 1 Feb 2010


    17- Chance Furlong: "HPT, Wally, Sandman, C Lund, Steve
    Carroll and Tim Adams are not trolls and do not troll. You,
    on the other hand, are a troll." 27 Aug 2009


    18- Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "I try to go more by the contents
    of the posts. Although some clowns (e.g. Snit) spew out so
    much chaff it is not worth the effort." 14 Feb 2010


    Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "Actually, many of the advocates are
    sick to death of Snit's never-ending puerile blather about
    trivialities. The occasional reasonable conversations are
    too few and far between." 6 Mar 2011


    19- Chris Clement: "ugh....geez man.....let it go" 5 Jul 2006


    20- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so,
    for they way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at
    the bus depot, and simply refused to die, despite repeated
    flushes. It's now far too late to *flush* him, but we can
    still *plonk* him..." 12 Sep 2005


    21- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for
    you to "win" an argument? They don't like you, you don't
    like them. Why must you keep this up? What results are you

    22- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The
    archives show my answers and your inability to process
    them. Keep posting your list and proving that you are an idiot
    troll. I will not address it any further- you being too stupid
    to realize and accept that is not my problem". 22 Nov 2007


    23- cshenk: "I happen to believe him over you... and I doubt
    I'd be the only person in this ng to do so. You have given
    people a lot of 'evidence' that you are dishonest... as
    'evidenced' by the quotes list." .... "Why stop with
    Jonas? Why not call the entire list of people on your quotes
    list 'liars'? After all, they have all labeled you a liar,
    troll or worse." 27 Nov 2010


    24- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care
    to read] Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do
    something, but please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!!" 2 Jun 2006


    25- Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux
    advocates. Almost all of them are making similar claims about
    Snit. When you have so many diverse people who share a common
    perception where do you think the problem lies? With Snit? Or
    almost everyone else? The answer doesn't require an advanced
    degree to figure out." 30 Dec 2004


    26- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought
    you knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it
    was presented to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you."
    30 Nov 2006


    27- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar
    and loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me
    where i stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time,
    then start up responding as if you were a normal person. i
    suppose it's tough for the magnitude of your 'loserdom'
    to stick, so it loses some of it's sharpness when i stop
    responding to you. you almost always start responding back
    in a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's once
    again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences
    to your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such
    a dishonest fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser
    as well, just pass those condolences to the rug-rat to be;
    if not, double condolences to her)." 30 Apr 2005


    28- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to
    honest and honorable people apply to him. That is absurd.
    He is the biggest liar in Usenet history. Mackay posted the
    email to prove Snit was using sock puppets and he still is.
    Snit can not give up his socks puppets and shills. They are
    the only ones who ever support him." 28 Jan 2009


    29- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're
    the worst troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar
    and a forger, and you've almost destroyed this group
    single-handedly. For you to post a list of out of context
    arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies labled
    as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
    pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need
    to be center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd
    if you thought it would make people look at you." 18 May 2007


    30- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric
    help. Go see a doctor." 24 Aug 2006


    31- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to
    the points in my post and you are back to your repetitious
    regurgitation mode. How childishly typical of you, Snit."
    16 Nov 2004


    32- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled
    since the first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do
    like Snit'. As far as I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist."
    15 Aug 2009


    33- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been
    coming to CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among
    people, besides the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I
    feel that it is like being in a room of really young children
    trying there best to best the other person. The one common
    thing among all of this seems to be you. I hate to be like
    this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the middle of a
    great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about Macs
    and more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no
    end then all this picking at each other on such a personal
    level. CSMA has always been al little adversarial but you
    have personally crank it up to the point that this place is
    no longer fun. Congratulations on stopping CSMA and making
    this place your own personal circus." 12 Jan 2006


    34- Geezer: Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality"
    Geezer: "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those
    who uncover his lies and deceit;)" Snit: "and no clue about
    the law." Geezer: 'Said the guy who believes his unsupported
    opinions are "proof". LOL! (snip more of Snit's unsupported
    lies)' 1 Jan 2009


    35- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still*
    showing how stupid he is... What a mar00n". 30 Aug 2008


    36- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with
    the Snit (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He
    will drive you crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted
    need to be ALWAYS right at any cost. He will move goalposts,
    set up strawmen, and bore you into submission with his endless
    pedanticism. The only way to engage him is to hit and run. NEVER
    engage him, it's a futile, empty procedure that will only anger
    you and feed him. Take my advice and STAY AWAY!" 27 Oct 2004


    37- gimme_this_gimme_that: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?"
    4 Mar 2007


    38- Glenn Hall (COLA): "That person is like a constantly running
    toilet that won't stop. Does he ever stop talking about UI
    consistency? No matter what anyone replies, he adds a few more
    branches to the spider web as it grows and grows. It's a waste
    of time." 31 Oct 2010


    39- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone
    else notices that you are not honest and you have no honor."
    21 Jan 2006


    40- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate
    threads, are you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I
    dont ever censor people cause that's just retarded but if you
    dont fix it I'm gonna have to cause I dont wanna see your name
    40 times in a row. So uh, change your client or something".
    12 Sep 2004


    41- Hadron (COLA): "Would you please stop the whining. FFS he
    has you jumping to his every post. How many more fucking times
    are you going to post the same repetitive garbage? Please ..at
    least change the record sometimes!!!!!!!" 13 Aug 2010


    41- Hadron (COLA): "I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I
    have Snit killfiled for his repeated reposts of the same text
    time and time again." 24 Aug 2011


    41- Hadron (COLA): Snit: "Anyone who denies this is a part of
    the herd. Period. This is a simple black and white issue where
    there is no middle ground - anyone who lies to defend Stallman's
    repulsive support of child abuse *is* a part of the herd."
    Hadron: "Constantly posting this dirge about Stallman and his
    views is about to get you back in the killfile. Stop it. Its
    repulsive and vindictive on your part." 25 Sep 2011


    42- Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must be a deeply
    troubled individual who has a fragile ego. I needn't agree
    nor disagree with the points above. I don't care about
    them. Your constant complaints, whines, rages, etc., wars
    with the regular Mac advocates, whom you mislabel as trolls,
    arise from your sense that any conversation or thread must
    orbit around you. People have pointed that out to you but you
    don't accept that. Snit I feel sorry for you. Please go and
    see a doctor about your solipsism. There must be a cure for
    you deep psychological travail." 18 Aug 2006


    43- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*" Aug 19 2004


    44- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the
    definition of "synonymous". It is, however, a very clear
    example of how you attempt to maliciously debase against anyone
    who disagrees with you. As such, I consider this to be a
    purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me. This is your only
    warning to consider rescinding your remark, with the reminder
    that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
    both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the
    word "responsible".' 25 Feb 2008


    45- High Plains Thumper: "Agreed except for Snit and socks (Joe
    Crump and ad nauseum). I've got Snit kill binned, because he
    is the classic ad hominem troll. At first he seems reasonable,
    but then it always degrades into name calling bullying, the
    responder is a liar, etc. AKA the Snit Circus of Pathological
    Lies. Perhaps the times he seems reasonable are when he is
    properly controlled by medication." 21 Sep 2010


    46- Homer (COLA): "I don't mean this as a personal insult,
    but I'm perfectly serious when I say 'Snit' (Michael Glasser)
    is obviously mentally ill, and needs help. I was going to
    suggest that someone alerts his wife to the problem, but I
    have to assume she's already aware of his condition, if she
    is in fact still living with him. It's possible, I suppose,
    that he's already undergoing counselling and/or on medication,
    but if he is then it doesn't seem to be helping much. Maybe he
    just missed his 'meds' today (again, I mean that sincerely)."
    26 Jan 2009


    Homer: "Word of advice for anyone concerned: don't be tempted
    to get drawn into a Snit circus, it's literally a waste of
    time. He's just an attention seeker who'll keep stringing you
    along, in a never-ending circle of obtuse questions, for which
    he has no genuine interest in the answers." 14 Oct 2010


    47- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting
    to CSMA for a long time now, since 1995 at least. There have
    always been trolls and morons, but I've never seen anything
    quite so disruptive as the Snit circus. Snit will *never*
    back down or stop, and neither will most of his opponents.
    A good kill file is your only hope." 20 Aug 2009


    48- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable
    to offer support for your statements, you're reduced to
    personal attacks on me. Incidentally, anyone reading this
    post can see that I have offered no straw men, and have only
    asked you to explain how the things you state as facts can
    be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this attitude,
    the topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have
    some insights. I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long
    posts and avoid answering any of the questions I asked by
    saying everything was just repeated." 6 Dec 2006


    49- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid
    people on usenet that should be confined most likely. You
    sit there and refresh your screen endlessly. You post the
    same nonsense over and over. Either you're a super troll,
    or you're a super mess." 1 Nov 2004


    50- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit." 27 Feb 2006


    51- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."
    23 Dec 2005


    52- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not
    a 12-step recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions
    won't help me achieve a greater understanding of my Mac. In
    fact, it detracts from it and those kinds of discussions have
    no place in a newsgroup such as this." 18 Nov 2004


    53- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you
    accomplishing besides being annoying? Is that your goal?"
    25 Apr 2007


    54- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush
    mentioned in it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on
    topic and not hijack threads."

    55- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're
    involved in seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens
    of responses to OT things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone
    has to take the lead and stop this crap. Try. How about it?"
    25 Apr 2006


    56- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away,
    rather than actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for
    the course I suppose."

    "Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce
    evidence for his claims. At least come up with some
    original insults Snit! I mean, you *are* capable of original
    thoughts! Right? Snit?" 8 Feb 2008


    57- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to
    fall - in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight,
    yelling at passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'" 23 Mar 2005


    58- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What
    are you bitching about?" 1 Dec 2005


    59- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice-
    more like a black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never
    again even entertain an unkind thought re Apple, will you take
    it back and lock it up? Please??" 11 Mar 2005


    60- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's
    postings since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to
    filter his posts, I just consider the source and skip to the
    next one when I see his name." 7 Jan 2004


    61- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be
    shocked that he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff
    about being a computer repairman and teacher. He's just plain
    loony and best ignored. Let him deal with his disorder by
    medication. He's here to do one thing, get attention from
    people. He says the crazy stuff just to get a reaction.
    You say you like to beat him over the head. Well that's what
    he's counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in hopes
    to get a rise out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't
    regret it." 3 Apr 2007


    John Slade: "Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without
    adding drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage
    to get out of my killfile? Oh well back into the cage you
    go, PLONK." 13 Oct 2007


    62- Josh McKee: "I have no strawman so therefore it has to be in
    your mind. .... What is obnoxious are your posts." 26 Jul 2006


    63- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that
    even though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll
    of the lot is mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If
    the few stragglers that keep replying to him would just stop
    responding to Snit at all this place could be worth coming back
    to. There's a good chance he'll pack up and take his trolling
    to more fertile ground." 22 Oct 2006


    64- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man. You started off your
    sentence with "Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.'
    29 Oct 2008


    65- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother
    reading the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding
    gobbets of putrid excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how
    to support your position, instead of sticking your fingers in
    your ears and humming, hoping it'll all go away." 7 Mar 2006


    66- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for
    ad hominem attacks while in the same sentence make your own
    ad hominem attacks. You make silly claims and then avoid the
    subject of your silliness. You're a liar and a hypocrite and
    you always have been." 14 Jul 2005


    67- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid." 7 Jan 2006


    68- Lawrence D'Oliveiro (COLA): "You seem to be full of
    complaints about your inability to hold up your end of the
    argument, aren't you?" 6 Mar 2011


    69- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long
    time, but the few times you post something worth reading just
    aren't worth it anymore. *plonk*" 16 Dec 2006


    70- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact
    you've been an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out
    with the pretense of trying to be fair, but lately all there
    is from you in COLA is trashtalk about Linux and you acting
    every bit the troll." 16 Jul 2005


    71-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors
    CBS News and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent! Any time
    Snit is cornered, he changes the subject and will never admit
    he's wrong." 28 Jan 2009


    72- libsnightmare: "You're a sore loser who has resorted to
    fifth grade tactics. How fucking sad - all this clown has left
    is to edit posts and post fake bullshit. You can't debate... so
    you lie. Once again, you have proved Steve Carroll right about
    you. Sad..." 4 May 2009


    73- Linonut (cola): "Snit may be the first retraction of my
    general killfile amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining,
    foot-stomping, back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance
    generated by that effete candy-ass beggars belief". 30 Aug 2008


    74- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most
    cretinous, I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)"
    18 Mar 2005


    75- Lewis: "hasn't this fight been going on for like 8 years
    now? I don't think anything is ever going to fix snit."
    02 Mar 2010


    76- Lusotec (COLA): "You can't resist being a liar, it is
    pathological, just like you can't resist trolling these forums
    day after day, week after week, month after month, year after
    year, decade after decade. A pathetic waste of life."
    Jun 20 2012


    77- Marious Barrier (COLA): "I must recognize that it is the
    first time I see that kind of troll, once that start asking
    moderately serious questions and since the first answer,
    gradually starts to degenerate it by, in many failed attempts of
    being sarcastic, inserting various indirect insults and calling
    all people ignorant and unable to answer what he asks for."
    14 Oct 2010


    78- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser
    is the same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest
    now, it would be impossible to determine where the honesty
    starts and the usual dishonesty ends. In my primary school,
    one of the teachers was very keen on proverbs, and I recall her
    going over the "cry wolf" story. Mr Glasser could "cry wolf"
    over and over now, and I would not come to help him with his
    sheep, because I do not know any way of determining if he's
    ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has." 2 Dec 2006


    79- Marti Van Lin (COLA): "I paid enough attention to Snit
    IMHO. I killfiled him the very first month I started lurking
    COLA. I find his nitpicking and immature behavior extremely
    annoying. I am not going to torture myself reading his
    bullshit. Snit is also a proven liar. Remember his retarded
    exif debacle." 08 Jul 2011


    80- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it
    to this post since its all about him and he managed to make me
    think about him today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went
    over to her house and videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute
    toddler stuff then burned a DVD of it for her. While we were
    watching the DVD her kid got mad. He got mad because we quit
    making him the center of attention and made that kid on the tv
    the center of attention. He even ran up to the tv and tried to
    block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole life."
    30 Sep 2006


    81- McGarnagle: "And you know when Snit is endorsed by two of
    the biggest nutjobs in AGA - RichL and El Kabong - you know
    he's not very bright and a loon." 31 Oct 2008


    82- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone
    refutes your 'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting
    your 'facts' is easily done in this case. I did it, and you
    ignored it." 9 Feb 2007


    83- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All
    I see you doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with
    everyone. You're the TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not*
    a compliment!" 8 Jul 2006


    84- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying
    here. Instead I can only say that you are a complete and
    delusional kook that happens to inhabit CSMA for the time
    being. That you are unaware of how deranged you actually behave
    further reinforces this notion. Please seek professional help."

    "The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot
    made no threat to you before you went to the police. She
    made a promise. Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out
    paranoiac view point, Elizabot was suddenly "threatening"
    to you. In so much as you had to take your kooky self down to
    your local police shop and blub on their shoulders about how
    much in danger you were in [sob, whine], and they had to waste
    valuable policing time consoling you over your stupidity. I
    bet they have Kook with a capital "K" written at the top of
    your profile, Snit." 2 Sep 2005


    85- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are
    all rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely
    curious. Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on."
    18 Aug 2006


    86- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because

    [continued in next message]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)