Huawei has unveiled its new in-house-developed operating system, HarmonyOS NEXT, which the Chinese tech giant expects to help it break with the
Android ecosystem.
The company last week announced plans to roll out a developer version of
the platform in the second quarter of the current year followed by the
full commercial version in the fourth quarter. The step comes as part of Huawei's ambitious plan to bolster its own software ecosystem.
The Shenzhen-based corporation first unveiled its proprietary Harmony
system back in 2019, and launched it on some smartphones a year later. However, shortly thereafter the US imposed restrictions aimed at cutting
the Harmony system's access to Google's technical support.
As a result, unlike previous consumer versions of the HarmonyOS, the new version is not compatible with Android. The company has opened its first developer beta test to acquire testers and experience key features.
Last year, Huawei launched its Mate60 series of smartphones that,
according to the company, will be powered by a domestically developed chip set. The release represented a remarkable comeback into the high-end smartphone market for Huawei, which has been struggling under US sanctions for years.
Huawei Attempting to Fully Break Free of the Google Prison
On 1/28/2024 1:08 AM, Here is the News wrote:
Huawei Attempting to Fully Break Free of the Google Prison
I am no Google fan, but I would much rather be in "Google Prison" than
in a Chinese prison.
That anyone even thinks of software as "prison" is absurd. You are an
idiot if you believe this drivel. That includes the fat blowhard in the picture.
On 1/28/2024 1:08 AM, Here is the News wrote:
Huawei Attempting to Fully Break Free of the Google Prison
I am no Google fan, but I would much rather be in "Google Prison"
than in a Chinese prison.
That anyone even thinks of software as "prison" is absurd. You
are an idiot if you believe this drivel. That includes the fat
blowhard in the picture.
On 2024-01-28, Nick Charles <the.thin@man> wrote:
On 1/28/2024 1:08 AM, Here is the News wrote:Same here.
Huawei Attempting to Fully Break Free of the Google Prison
I am no Google fan, but I would much rather be in "Google Prison" than
in a Chinese prison.
That anyone even thinks of software as "prison" is absurd. You are an
idiot if you believe this drivel. That includes the fat blowhard in the
picture.
I also wonder how many of our high tech electronics that are manufactured in China, are carrying
back doors that the Chinese can exploit?
At the beginning of the computer age, we should have listened to the very >smart people claiming that closed software was a prison being built around >us.
https://dailystormer.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/knj-1536x1024.jpg
/He tried to warn us./
On 1/28/2024 10:34 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-28, Nick Charles <the.thin@man> wrote:
On 1/28/2024 1:08 AM, Here is the News wrote:Same here. I also wonder how many of our high tech electronics that
Huawei Attempting to Fully Break Free of the Google Prison
I am no Google fan, but I would much rather be in "Google Prison"
than in a Chinese prison.
That anyone even thinks of software as "prison" is absurd. You are
an idiot if you believe this drivel. That includes the fat blowhard
in the picture.
are manufactured in China, are carrying back doors that the Chinese
can exploit?
Probably none. That is kooky konspiracy stuff. It would be found.
Which also explains why a Chinese company wants to create a Chinese OS.
It has nothing to do with the alleged "Google Prison". China just
wants all the info that Google currently collects to remain in China.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:08:09 +1100, Nick Charles <the.thin@man> wrote:
On 1/28/2024 10:34 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-28, Nick Charles <the.thin@man> wrote:
On 1/28/2024 1:08 AM, Here is the News wrote:Same here.
Huawei Attempting to Fully Break Free of the Google Prison
I am no Google fan, but I would much rather be in "Google Prison" than >>>> in a Chinese prison.
That anyone even thinks of software as "prison" is absurd. You are an >>>> idiot if you believe this drivel. That includes the fat blowhard in
the
picture.
I also wonder how many of our high tech electronics that are
manufactured in China, are carrying
back doors that the Chinese can exploit?
Probably none. That is kooky konspiracy stuff. It would be found.
Must explain why so many countrys
are banning Huawei 5G infrastructure.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:42:29 +1100, Nick Charles <the.thin@man> wrote:
On 1/28/2024 3:25 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:08:09 +1100, Nick Charles <the.thin@man> wrote:
On 1/28/2024 10:34 AM, pothead wrote:
On 2024-01-28, Nick Charles <the.thin@man> wrote:
On 1/28/2024 1:08 AM, Here is the News wrote:Same here.
Huawei Attempting to Fully Break Free of the Google Prison
I am no Google fan, but I would much rather be in "Google Prison"
than
in a Chinese prison.
That anyone even thinks of software as "prison" is absurd. You are >>>>>> an
idiot if you believe this drivel. That includes the fat blowhard in >>>>>> the
picture.
I also wonder how many of our high tech electronics that are
manufactured in China, are carrying
back doors that the Chinese can exploit?
Probably none. That is kooky konspiracy stuff. It would be found.
Must explain why so many countrys
are banning Huawei 5G infrastructure.
This is the reason:
Nope.
"U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on January 28, 2019, charged Huawei
with bank fraud and stealing trade secrets. In a 13-count indictment DOJ
charged Huawei, its chief financial officer, and two affiliated firms
with a laundry list of crimes including conspiracy, money laundering,
bank and wire fraud, flouting U.S. sanctions on Iran, and obstruction of
justice."
Nothing about spying via "back doors".
Only because those other crimes were easy to prove
and spying using back doors is impossible to prove.
THAT remains kooktard konspiracy stuff.
Nope.
The real issues have nothing to do with "back doors".
Wrong.
Australia has banned any govt employees or parliamentarians from having
their phones.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 07:42:29 +1100, Nick Charles <the.thin@man> wrote:
On 1/28/2024 3:25 PM, Rod Speed wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 03:08:09 +1100, Nick Charles <the.thin@man> wrote:
The real issues have nothing to do with "back doors".
Wrong.
Australia has banned any govt employees or parliamentarians from having
their phones.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 297 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 01:10:18 |
| Calls: | 6,666 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,212 |
| Messages: | 5,335,472 |
