• Phone call recording app

    From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 22 12:32:39 2023
    Hi,

    In Spain, recording a phone call in which you are one of the
    participants is legal. What is illegal is publishing it without permission.

    And with recent changes in regulation about spam calls, the authorities
    want a recording of the phone call in order to reprimand the company responsible for the call.

    But Android universally disallows recording of phone calls. At most, you
    can manage what goes on the speaker, but not your own mike.

    One alternative would be a headphone that did the recording on its own hardware.

    But another alternative was mentioned on one of the many articles
    (click-bait mostly). All of them describe the situation, none says how
    to actually do the recording.

    The alternative that I read about the other day was application on apk
    form, ie, not distributed by google play.

    Does any one have suggestions, preferably with actual experience?


    (my purpose is recording spam calls, and business calls that the other
    side say they are recording).

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Wed Nov 22 12:12:19 2023
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    In Spain, recording a phone call in which you are one of the
    participants is legal. What is illegal is publishing it without
    permission.

    And with recent changes in regulation about spam calls, the
    authorities want a recording of the phone call in order to reprimand
    the company responsible for the call.

    But Android universally disallows recording of phone calls. At most,
    you can manage what goes on the speaker, but not your own mike.

    One alternative would be a headphone that did the recording on its
    own hardware.

    But another alternative was mentioned on one of the many articles
    (click-bait mostly). All of them describe the situation, none says
    how to actually do the recording.

    The alternative that I read about the other day was application on
    apk form, ie, not distributed by google play.

    Does any one have suggestions, preferably with actual experience?

    (my purpose is recording spam calls, and business calls that the
    other side say they are recording).

    https://support.google.com/phoneapp/answer/9803950?hl=en

    Google cracked down on phone recording apps, so I didn't bother to
    search their Play Store. I use Google Voice which has the option to
    record calls, but GV isn't available for free in Spain. You can get GV
    in Spain, UK, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy,
    Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, and Switzerland, but perhaps not for
    free. There are other PBX-like services that have similar GV features
    that may operate in Spain, but they may not be free, plus you have start publishing your new PBX phone number wherever you previously published
    your old phone number to get spammers to start calling your old phone
    number, or see if the PBX service lets you port your old phone number to
    their PBX service. Ringblaze, Ooma, and Skype have call recording.
    RingCentral has call recording, but it's on-demand for their $20/mo
    plan, more for automatic recording.

    I've used Call Recording with GV (hit 4 to start and end), but have
    rarely used it. I've probably used it accidentally more than
    intentionally. There's a beep that both parties on a call can hear.
    Whether you have to announce you started recording depends on the laws
    in your locality. I've read the max limit is 3 hours for a recordeding. Recorded calls can be downloaded to your computer.

    Did you check with your cellular carrier to see if they have the option
    to record calls? Might have to pay them to up your service tier.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Wed Nov 22 14:26:48 2023
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote

    But Android universally disallows recording of phone calls. At most, you
    can manage what goes on the speaker, but not your own mike.

    Hi Carlos,
    Last I wrote on this subject, that wasn't the case as it's model specific.

    *Is there any way to get 3rd-party call recording (ACR) apps working after tomorrow, May 11th, 2022?*
    <https://xdaforums.com/t/is-there-any-way-to-get-3rd-party-call-recording-acr-apps-working-after-tomorrow-may-11th-2022.4444061/>

    As always, if you (or anyone) knows more about manual or automatic call recording, please add value to this thread so that everyone benefits.
    --
    Most people guess at everything - which is why they're wrong most of the time. I don't guess; I look for the data - and then I make an assessment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Wed Nov 22 14:57:22 2023
    VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote

    Google cracked down on phone recording apps

    Like you, I haven't checked in years since these threads were authored:

    *Automatic call recorder freeware (best)*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/Tb8wf4fJu_A/>

    *Plan now for May 11 2022 removal of call recording apps*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/azDZNzK33Hk/m/SfiwzwUeCQAJ>

    But at the time, Google did NOT crack down on phone recording apps, per se.
    a. Google cracked down on *non-native automatic phone recording (ACR) apps*
    b. But (AFAIK) Google left the _existing_ non-native ACR apps alone (AFAIR)
    c. And, as far as I'm aware (but I haven't checked), manual recording works

    But that's only my recollection as I didn't re-read my threads above since
    ACR isn't something I worry about given it's easy to record phone calls.
    --
    Most people just guess all the time - which is why they're often wrong.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Wed Nov 22 20:12:14 2023
    On 2023-11-22 19:12, VanguardLH wrote:
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    In Spain, recording a phone call in which you are one of the
    participants is legal. What is illegal is publishing it without
    permission.

    And with recent changes in regulation about spam calls, the
    authorities want a recording of the phone call in order to reprimand
    the company responsible for the call.

    But Android universally disallows recording of phone calls. At most,
    you can manage what goes on the speaker, but not your own mike.

    One alternative would be a headphone that did the recording on its
    own hardware.

    But another alternative was mentioned on one of the many articles
    (click-bait mostly). All of them describe the situation, none says
    how to actually do the recording.

    The alternative that I read about the other day was application on
    apk form, ie, not distributed by google play.

    Does any one have suggestions, preferably with actual experience?

    (my purpose is recording spam calls, and business calls that the
    other side say they are recording).

    https://support.google.com/phoneapp/answer/9803950?hl=en

    Google cracked down on phone recording apps, so I didn't bother to
    search their Play Store. I use Google Voice which has the option to

    No, I am seeking for apps outside of the Google Pay Store. The article
    said they exists, so somebody may know them.

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Wed Nov 22 13:28:55 2023
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-11-22 19:12, VanguardLH wrote:
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    In Spain, recording a phone call in which you are one of the
    participants is legal. What is illegal is publishing it without
    permission.

    And with recent changes in regulation about spam calls, the
    authorities want a recording of the phone call in order to reprimand
    the company responsible for the call.

    But Android universally disallows recording of phone calls. At most,
    you can manage what goes on the speaker, but not your own mike.

    One alternative would be a headphone that did the recording on its
    own hardware.

    But another alternative was mentioned on one of the many articles
    (click-bait mostly). All of them describe the situation, none says
    how to actually do the recording.

    The alternative that I read about the other day was application on
    apk form, ie, not distributed by google play.

    Does any one have suggestions, preferably with actual experience?

    (my purpose is recording spam calls, and business calls that the
    other side say they are recording).

    https://support.google.com/phoneapp/answer/9803950?hl=en

    Google cracked down on phone recording apps, so I didn't bother to
    search their Play Store. I use Google Voice which has the option to

    No, I am seeking for apps outside of the Google Pay Store. The article
    said they exists, so somebody may know them.

    The PBX-like services that I mentioned do not require an app. Perhaps
    you don't want to port your old phone number to a PBX service which
    would eliminate any disruption and having to update everyone that has
    your old phone number.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Wed Nov 22 15:34:45 2023
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote

    No, I am seeking for apps outside of the Google Pay Store. The article
    said they exists, so somebody may know them.

    You're not the only one looking for them as I just skimmed my old XDA
    article on the subject (which you have the URL to) as they suggested some.

    Me?

    I record whenever I want to record, but like Vanguard, I use Google Voice
    (GV) usually in a way different than he does - but the results are that I
    have no problem recording phone calls when I'm using GV at home.

    The reason I use GV is...
    a. Since I live in the boonies, GV has much better clarity than Ooma
    b. Plus, incoming GV calls ring all my phones (e.g., home & cell)
    c. So I use GV for many (most?) of my phone calls when I'm at home

    When I want to record a particular phone call, after informing
    participants, I just press the recorder button on my Android phone.

    Of course that only works when I'm at home and using Google Voice (which I
    only use on the iPad because GV will _create_ an account on Android).

    When I'm away, I too could use a call recording solution, which I used to
    have running just fine until Google started their shenanigans in May 11 of
    2022 where only _native_ apps would continue to work in future Androids.

    Notice the "native" component there?
    And the "Automatic Call Recording" (ACR) component perhaps also?

    Details matter.
    a. Native versus 3rd party
    b. Automatic versus manual
    c. Internal mechanisms versus external (mic & speaker) methods

    As far as I can recall, Google only made it miserable for _third-party_ internal-mechanism ACR apps - but I'd have to check again to be sure.
    --
    Often when seeking a solution that the mothership is trying to break,
    it helps to hone the detail to exactly what each problem set comprises.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sat Nov 25 14:29:26 2023
    On 2023-11-22 20:28, VanguardLH wrote:
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    On 2023-11-22 19:12, VanguardLH wrote:
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    In Spain, recording a phone call in which you are one of the
    participants is legal. What is illegal is publishing it without
    permission.

    And with recent changes in regulation about spam calls, the
    authorities want a recording of the phone call in order to reprimand
    the company responsible for the call.

    But Android universally disallows recording of phone calls. At most,
    you can manage what goes on the speaker, but not your own mike.

    One alternative would be a headphone that did the recording on its
    own hardware.

    But another alternative was mentioned on one of the many articles
    (click-bait mostly). All of them describe the situation, none says
    how to actually do the recording.

    The alternative that I read about the other day was application on
    apk form, ie, not distributed by google play.

    Does any one have suggestions, preferably with actual experience?

    (my purpose is recording spam calls, and business calls that the
    other side say they are recording).

    https://support.google.com/phoneapp/answer/9803950?hl=en

    Google cracked down on phone recording apps, so I didn't bother to
    search their Play Store. I use Google Voice which has the option to

    No, I am seeking for apps outside of the Google Pay Store. The article
    said they exists, so somebody may know them.

    The PBX-like services that I mentioned do not require an app. Perhaps
    you don't want to port your old phone number to a PBX service which
    would eliminate any disruption and having to update everyone that has
    your old phone number.

    That's correct, I do not want that.

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to Wally J on Sat Nov 25 14:33:05 2023
    On 2023-11-22 20:34, Wally J wrote:
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote

    No, I am seeking for apps outside of the Google Pay Store. The article
    said they exists, so somebody may know them.

    You're not the only one looking for them as I just skimmed my old XDA
    article on the subject (which you have the URL to) as they suggested some.

    Me?

    I record whenever I want to record, but like Vanguard, I use Google Voice (GV) usually in a way different than he does - but the results are that I have no problem recording phone calls when I'm using GV at home.

    There is no GV in Europe, AFAIK.


    When I'm away, I too could use a call recording solution, which I used to have running just fine until Google started their shenanigans in May 11 of 2022 where only _native_ apps would continue to work in future Androids.

    I have been told that only apps on Google Play are restricted, but apps downloaded externally are not. I don't have verification for this.

    So I am asking if somebody has tried such an external app.

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Sat Nov 25 09:11:49 2023
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote

    I record whenever I want to record, but like Vanguard, I use Google Voice
    (GV) usually in a way different than he does - but the results are that I
    have no problem recording phone calls when I'm using GV at home.

    There is no GV in Europe, AFAIK.

    That matters for Vanguard's method but not for mine as Google Voice is just being used as a speakerphone. The fact it's GV changes nothing in my model.

    When I'm away, I too could use a call recording solution, which I used to
    have running just fine until Google started their shenanigans in May 11 of >> 2022 where only _native_ apps would continue to work in future Androids.

    I have been told that only apps on Google Play are restricted, but apps downloaded externally are not. I don't have verification for this.

    So I am asking if somebody has tried such an external app.

    I have not recently tried call recording apps even though I've tested
    _every single one_ that was free and wrote up my summaries years ago.

    That's probably something like twenty or thirty automatic call recorders.
    But unfortunately for the team, I haven't tested any of them recently.

    Hopefully someone else has tested them since the May 11 2022 moratorium on 3rd-party Google Play Store repository automatic call recording apps.

    Good luck!

    REFERENCES:
    *Automatic call recorder freeware (best)*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/Tb8wf4fJu_A/>

    *Plan now for May 11 2022 removal of call recording apps*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/azDZNzK33Hk/>

    *Is there any way to get 3rd-party call recording (ACR) apps working after tomorrow, May 11th, 2022?*
    <https://xdaforums.com/t/is-there-any-way-to-get-3rd-party-call-recording-acr-apps-working-after-tomorrow-may-11th-2022.4444061/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Sat Nov 25 10:57:12 2023
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    There is no GV in Europe, AFAIK.

    There is, but might not be free. I have not investigated if free or
    what is the cost in other countries. GV lists Spain as a supported
    country.

    https://support.google.com/a/answer/12743190?hl=en

    However, since you don't want to port your old phone number to another
    service, the PBX-like services would mean you'd have 2 phone numbers:
    your old one, and a new one. The GV number would get little traffic
    unless you gradually migrate to it by updating your phone records for
    your callers. I know some folks that don't migrate to the GV number,
    but instead use it as a 2nd number, like for business or work use.

    Something to consider: how long do you keep your cell phone number(s)?
    Average turnaround on cell phones is 2.5 years, but the user may
    continue with the same carrier to keep their old phone number with them,
    or port their old phone number when switching to a new carrier if
    allowed.

    A caveat with GV is that once you port a phone number to them, you
    cannot port it elsewhere later. If you ever consider switching carriers
    is when you might consider GV to port your old phone number. I had a GV
    number since 2014, but waited 2 years before I decided to port my old
    phone number to them (which was also when I bought a new smartphone).

    GV isn't for everyone. For one thing, a recent update to the GV app no
    longer supported separate support of the main ringtone and ringtones
    assigned to contacts. I wanted a soft main ringtone that would be easy
    to ignore for spam and wrong-dial calls, and a much louder ringtone for
    my contacts. Took 2 weeks of working with their tech support before
    they admitted supporting only the main ringtone on my ancient Android
    8.0.0. I had to move to Android 8.0.1 to get dual ringtone support in
    their GV app, but my phone (c.2016) was discontinued in 2019, and its
    maker (LG) left the smartphone market in 2021, so no chance of ever
    getting an OS update. Tis the tribulations of keeping an old phone with
    an old OS. The world moves on. I figured out a trick, but prefer not
    to use workarounds. Have my phone's Phone app answer incoming calls.
    GV calls all my phone via landline, cellular, and data (the latter uses
    the GV app). The Phone app supports multiple ringtones for incoming
    calls. Just an example how apps can eventually require a later OS. I
    have no interest in jail breaking or rooting my old phone even if and
    when I get a new phone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Wally J on Sat Nov 25 13:10:53 2023
    Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote

    This article, dated September 4, 2023, makes the following claim:
    "We can confirm that every app on the list below worked on both of
    our test devices, and we made over 140 phone calls in total to
    test apps for this. Here are the best call recorder apps for Android."

    Ooops. I forgot to provide the URL in my previous help for Carlos...

    *The 10 best call recorder apps for Android - Fall 2023*
    Dated September 4, 2023
    <https://www.androidauthority.com/best-call-recorder-apps-android-1001838/>

    Apparently there are two solutions to the problem.

    a. "The first is downloading an app from outside the Play Store
    that ​still allows accessibility."
    ​
    b. "The second method uses a plug-in or secondary app that uses
    the​ Accessibility API while connecting to the original app
    to record calls,​ thus bypassing the Google Play ban."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Sat Nov 25 12:52:06 2023
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote

    That's correct, I do not want that.

    Hi Carlos,
    This article, dated September 4, 2023, makes the following claim:
    "We can confirm that every app on the list below worked on both of
    our test devices, and we made over 140 phone calls in total to
    test apps for this. Here are the best call recorder apps for Android."

    They tested those 140 call-recording apps on a Galaxy S23 Ultra & a Pixel
    6, both running Android 13, all testing done in the United States from both apps inside the Google Play Store repository, and those sideloaded instead.

    Interestingly, they noted "call recording apps don't work with Wi-Fi
    calling", which, if anyone knows why, let me know why as that's weird.

    They give a bit of history, which I'll just post verbatim sans editing:
    "Call recording is one of the stickiest topics on mobile.
    It should be relatively easy, but it¡¦s not.
    It worked well until Android 9, when Google turned it off
    for the first time. It stayed turned off until Android 11.
    Technically, the functionality is still there with Android 13.
    Some OEMs, like Google and Samsung, package call recording
    in the native dialer app, but only in some regions.

    In 2022, Google changed a Google Play policy that prevents apps
    from using the accessibility permission for call recording.
    That¡¦s how the developers enabled the feature.
    Since this was the easiest method, developers have scrambled
    for workarounds since the May 2022 ban.

    So, in short, four things prevent people from recording calls.
    The version of Android your phone runs can prevent it entirely.
    Secondly, the region you live in can cause features to be turned off.
    Google Play policies make it hard for developers to release products
    that actually work. Finally, the lack of root access limits a
    person¡¦s ability to bypass the previous three issues.

    These days, there seem to be three major workarounds.

    The first is downloading an app from outside the Play Store that
    still allows accessibility.

    The second method uses a plug-in or secondary app that uses the
    Accessibility API while connecting to the original app to record calls,
    thus bypassing the Google Play ban.

    The third is root access.
    Rooting isn¡¦t the most popular thing anymore, so we focus on
    the other two methods below."

    1. ACR Phone + APH
    2. Call Recorder by Lucky Mobile Apps
    3. Automatic Call Recorder Pro (formerly CallU)
    4. Cube ACR
    5. Pixelify Magisk Manager module (root)
    6. All Call Recorder
    7. Your stock phone dialer (regional restrictions apply)
    8. Blackbox
    9. Call Recorder ¡V Auto Recording
    10. Call Recorder ¡V Talker ACR

    There are other references claiming similar functionality.
    *Best Android 13 Call Recording Apps That Actually Work*
    Dated March 31, 2023
    <https://teamandroid.com/call-recording-apps/>

    *How to Record Calls on Your Android Phone*
    Updated August 7, 2023
    <https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/record-calls-on-your-android-phone>

    Anyone have success with any of these Android 13 ACR solutions?
    And why is Wi-Fi calling specifically excluded?
    --
    Those with a good heart are the ones who continually add value to Usenet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Wally J on Sat Nov 25 13:14:21 2023
    Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote

    a. "The first is downloading an app from outside the Play Store
    that ​still allows accessibility."
    ​
    b. "The second method uses a plug-in or secondary app that uses
    the​ Accessibility API while connecting to the original app
    to record calls,​ thus bypassing the Google Play ban."

    OT Maybe Andy Burns can explain why those funny characters happened.
    It's likely due to a mixup in the character encoding header directive.
    How would I fix that?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sat Nov 25 13:21:13 2023
    VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote

    GV isn't for everyone.

    I use Google Voice (GV) every day in the USA for send/receive but I agree
    with anyone sensible as there are caveats to using GV on an Android phone.

    1. For one, GV _creates_ a Google Account on the Android phone (but it does
    _not_ create a Google Account on the iPad) which is why I use it on iOS.

    2. For another, GV _requires_ an account on Google servers.

    3. What I like about GV is that it sends an email of any message to your
    Google Account (which you can read on your computer if you like).

    4. And what I love best is the clarity is a billion times better'n Ooma is
    (at least on my WISP connections which go ten miles LOS over the air).

    There are other advantages, of course (e.g., free phone calls to/from the
    USA & about 2 cents a minute to Europe) & texting, but those are the best.

    Back to Carlos' problem, I think he already has the solution.
    <https://xdaforums.com/t/is-there-any-way-to-get-3rd-party-call-recording-acr-apps-working-after-tomorrow-may-11th-2022.4444061/>

    All Carlos needs to do is test it out and let us know how it worked.
    --
    Every Usenet thread should strive to add value so that all always benefit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Wally J on Sat Nov 25 13:19:54 2023
    Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote

    a. "The first is downloading an app from outside the Play Store
    that ​still allows accessibility."
    ​
    b. "The second method uses a plug-in or secondary app that uses
    the​ Accessibility API while connecting to the original app
    to record calls,​ thus bypassing the Google Play ban."

    OT Maybe Andy Burns can explain why those funny characters happened.
    It's likely due to a mixup in the character encoding header directive.
    How would I fix that?

    My guess not an issue if you quit using OE as your NNTP client.
    Alternatively, as I recall, you could configure features differently
    between e-mail and newsgroup accounts, like quoted-printable. If so,
    you could configure your NNTP accounts to use us-ascii or UTF-8 and
    plain text (no quoted-printable) separate of however you configure the
    e-mail accounts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Wally J on Sat Nov 25 13:15:32 2023
    Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    ...
    3. What I like about GV is that it sends an email of any message to your
    Google Account (which you can read on your computer if you like).
    ...

    Google has announced they will removed the feature of sending texts and transcripts of voicemail to an e-mail address. Their argument is that
    they don't want to be seen as a pipe of spam texts or voicemails to
    e-mail accounts. They made the announcement many months ago, but the
    feature still exists.

    To be clear, when you get an e-mail copy of a text, you cannot simply
    reply to that e-mail to send a text back to the sender. You have to use
    the GV app's messaging or go to the GV web site to send a reply to a
    text. Replying via e-mail to a text has the reply go into the bit
    bucket. I was replying to texts by replying to the e-mail copy, but the recipients never got those texts. Once I used the GV app (instead of an
    e-mail client) or used the GV web site then the recipients got my
    replies.

    For voicemail, those that are sent via e-mail that have no transcription
    are those where the caller hung up. A spammer, wrong-dialer, or someone
    that chooses not to leave a message ends up with no transcription to
    include in the e-mailed copy. So, I know those are garbage calls.
    Besides hearing the OGM (OutGoing Message) for voicemail, and the beep
    to start recording to alert the caller to abort, I have screening
    enabled. The caller has to say their name, or something, before their
    call is accepted. Sure gets rid of a hell of alot of spam and wrong
    dialers. Google has their own spam filtering, too. So far, I've not
    seen any false positives, and only few false negatives. I still get the
    one ring on the incoming call, but wait until the 2nd ring to answer.
    The first ring is needed to see from where the call comes. This is very similar to the NoMoRobo free service I added to my aunt's landline.
    NoMoRobo doesn't work with GV, so I cannot compound those spam filters.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sat Nov 25 16:31:46 2023
    VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote

    OT Maybe Andy Burns can explain why those funny characters happened.
    It's likely due to a mixup in the character encoding header directive.
    How would I fix that?

    My guess not an issue if you quit using OE as your NNTP client. Alternatively, as I recall, you could configure features differently
    between e-mail and newsgroup accounts, like quoted-printable. If so,
    you could configure your NNTP accounts to use us-ascii or UTF-8 and
    plain text (no quoted-printable) separate of however you configure the
    e-mail accounts.

    Thanks for the advice that my 'newsreader' sucks. I'm sure it does.

    Did you also see the characters messed up in this post from me?

    From: Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam>
    Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
    Subject: Re: Phone call recording app
    Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 13:10:53 -0400
    Message-ID: <ujt9qs$2e340$1@paganini.bofh.team>

    Or was it only I who saw the few funky characters as messed up?

    Characters were messed up in my view but they seem OK in the archives:
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/-UD_qZVBBik/m/Ku0yMiFWAQAJ>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Wally J on Sat Nov 25 20:52:54 2023
    Wally J wrote:

    Wally J wrote

    a. "The first is downloading an app from outside the Play Store
    that ​still allows accessibility."
    ​
    b. "The second method uses a plug-in or secondary app that uses
    the​ Accessibility API while connecting to the original app
    to record calls,​ thus bypassing the Google Play ban."

    OT Maybe Andy Burns can explain why those funny characters happened.

    you used fancy double-quotes " instead of plain ASCII ones " was the
    text copied from MS-Word, or a web page?

    Normally a newsreader would add headers for UTF-8 to show the character encoding it was using, e.g.

    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Sat Nov 25 21:18:24 2023
    Andy Burns wrote:

    Wally J wrote:

    OT Maybe Andy Burns can explain why those funny characters happened.

    you used fancy double-quotes " instead of plain ASCII ones "

    Actually it wasn't the quotes, but other "stray" characters with wrong encoding, I can't see them within the android authority page, assuming
    that was the source?

    <https://www.i18nqa.com/debug/utf8-debug.html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Sat Nov 25 17:59:27 2023
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote

    OT Maybe Andy Burns can explain why those funny characters happened.

    you used fancy double-quotes " instead of plain ASCII ones "

    Actually it wasn't the quotes, but other "stray" characters with wrong encoding, I can't see them within the android authority page, assuming
    that was the source?

    <https://www.i18nqa.com/debug/utf8-debug.html>

    Hi Andy,

    First off, I solved the OP's problem, which is the most important fact.
    *Tutorial: Installing open-source automatic call recording (ACR) on Android 13+ Samsung Galaxy*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/7mCHCktUuKw>

    It took me a few hours as I had to write up the entire thing
    after researching which was the best solution to attempt first.

    What takes the hours is writing it up, which if it only helps
    Carlos, isn't worth it as the goal is to help thousands of people.

    If you get a chance, it would be nice for you to test it out on
    your Pixel (but maybe the Pixel has a native automatic call recorder?).

    Now for the off topic discussion...
    a. Yes. I copied and pasted from the web page
    b. Clearly, the web page had funky characters
    c. You know that my headers are meaningless

    Given that, I guess that you are saying I "could" have put in my
    headers the character encoding directives, so that recipients'
    newsreaders would know there are UTF-8 characters in the body.

    Is that correct?

    Since my headers are random, as you know, I can _insert_ that UTF-8, but
    before I do that, is that the "most universal" character encoding directive
    I can insert into the headers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sat Nov 25 22:22:50 2023
    VanguardLH <V@nguard.lh> wrote:
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    There is no GV in Europe, AFAIK.

    There is, but might not be free. I have not investigated if free or
    what is the cost in other countries. GV lists Spain as a supported
    country.

    https://support.google.com/a/answer/12743190?hl=en

    There's no personal GV outside the US, but there's GV for Google Workspace
    in 'select markets', which that might be a list of. Minimum pricing for UK Workspace is £5 per user per month, and than GV starts at $10 per user per month on top of that.

    (I have no idea why the mix of currencies, that's the en_uk GV page)

    That makes it quite pricey, given I pay £1.44pm for a VOIP service (which
    does support call recording). I suppose GV could make sense if you make a
    lot of calls, but then you might already have them included by your mobile carrier.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sun Nov 26 00:46:37 2023
    On 2023-11-25 17:57, VanguardLH wrote:
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

    There is no GV in Europe, AFAIK.

    There is, but might not be free. I have not investigated if free or
    what is the cost in other countries. GV lists Spain as a supported
    country.

    https://support.google.com/a/answer/12743190?hl=en

    However, since you don't want to port your old phone number to another service, the PBX-like services would mean you'd have 2 phone numbers:
    your old one, and a new one. The GV number would get little traffic
    unless you gradually migrate to it by updating your phone records for
    your callers. I know some folks that don't migrate to the GV number,
    but instead use it as a 2nd number, like for business or work use.

    Something to consider: how long do you keep your cell phone number(s)?

    For ever.

    ...

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to Wally J on Sun Nov 26 00:40:59 2023
    On 2023-11-25 21:31, Wally J wrote:
    VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote

    OT Maybe Andy Burns can explain why those funny characters happened.
    It's likely due to a mixup in the character encoding header directive.
    How would I fix that?

    My guess not an issue if you quit using OE as your NNTP client.
    Alternatively, as I recall, you could configure features differently
    between e-mail and newsgroup accounts, like quoted-printable. If so,
    you could configure your NNTP accounts to use us-ascii or UTF-8 and
    plain text (no quoted-printable) separate of however you configure the
    e-mail accounts.

    Thanks for the advice that my 'newsreader' sucks. I'm sure it does.

    Did you also see the characters messed up in this post from me?

    From: Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam>
    Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
    Subject: Re: Phone call recording app
    Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 13:10:53 -0400
    Message-ID: <ujt9qs$2e340$1@paganini.bofh.team>

    Or was it only I who saw the few funky characters as messed up?

    Yes.

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to Wally J on Sun Nov 26 00:54:31 2023
    On 2023-11-25 22:59, Wally J wrote:
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote

    ...

    Hi Andy,

    First off, I solved the OP's problem, which is the most important fact.
    *Tutorial: Installing open-source automatic call recording (ACR) on Android 13+ Samsung Galaxy*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/7mCHCktUuKw>

    It took me a few hours as I had to write up the entire thing
    after researching which was the best solution to attempt first.

    What takes the hours is writing it up, which if it only helps
    Carlos, isn't worth it as the goal is to help thousands of people.

    If you get a chance, it would be nice for you to test it out on
    your Pixel (but maybe the Pixel has a native automatic call recorder?).


    Thanks.

    Looks complicated... that will take me some time.

    ...

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Sat Nov 25 22:16:45 2023
    "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote

    First off, I solved the OP's problem, which is the most important fact.
    *Tutorial: Installing open-source automatic call recording (ACR) on Android 13+ Samsung Galaxy*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/7mCHCktUuKw>

    Looks complicated... that will take me some time.

    Hi Carlos,

    It's actually pretty easy as they walk you through all the steps.
    In fact, it took far longer to write it up than to actually do it.

    I'm a naturally purposefully helpful person (which is why the iKooks
    incense me to no end, as does Joerg & similarly unprepossessing souls.

    When you were having problems, initially I felt for you but I knew it would
    be a lot of work to find the solution - even as I was sure it existed.

    After I did a bit of research (see prior cites), I latched onto the most
    likely candidate being <https://acr.app> because of what they wrote up.

    For example, any time an article says "it works" or "it doesn't work" but
    they don't speak about the details (as it depends on the Android version),
    then the article is garbage (and it's pretty much what the iKooks do).

    This <https://acr.app> site went into the kind of detail that showed me
    they knew what versions of Android needed which version of ACR Phone.

    Bear in mind I was on Android 13, where Android 13 and 14 needed more
    effort than Android 10 to Android 13, and that needed more than Android 9, which itself needed more than Android 7 and Android 8 did.

    Notice there is no possibility of a blanket statement of whether or not the automatic call recording apps work or not if you don't know that detail.

    As for the "automatic" part, I tested the _manual_ call recording, where I
    was surprised to note how perfect the fidelity was (for a phone call).

    I did not test the _automatic_ call recording because it brought ads with
    it, so when I get a round tuit, I'll look for ad-free automatic recording.

    In summary, it appears that ACR works fine for all versions of Android.
    You just have to know how to do it - which is why I wrote that tutorial.

    Obviously there are other methods which I haven't tested, but the method I tested worked the first time and it was pretty simple to do, as summarized:

    1. Install what they call the "ACR Store" (but it's just a simple browser).
    2. Using the ACR Store browser, install both the "ACR Phone" & "APH" apps.
    3. Start "ACR Phone" and follow the prompts.

    Bear in mind you end up making "ACR Phone" your default phone dialer.
    I'll use it for a while to see how it differs from Samsung's dialer.
    --
    It's almost worthless to solve a problem and only help one person doing it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sat Nov 25 22:24:48 2023
    VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> wrote

    3. What I like about GV is that it sends an email of any message to your
    Google Account (which you can read on your computer if you like).
    ...

    Google has announced they will removed the feature of sending texts and transcripts of voicemail to an e-mail address.

    Hi Vanguard,

    Bummer. That's one of the main features I liked about GV (other than the clarity of the free phone calls over my WISP with high jitter numbers).

    BTW, I solved the OP's problem, and wrote up a tutorial for you to try.
    Tutorial <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/7mCHCktUuKw>
    *Installing automatic call recording (ACR) on Android 13+ Samsung Galaxy*

    The method I used, I think, works on all versions of Android but if you
    have an older version than mine, it's even easier than what I wrote up.

    1. Install what they call the "ACR Store" (but it's just a downloader app).
    2. Using the ACR Store downloaqder, install the "ACR Phone" & "APH" apps.
    3. Start "ACR Phone" and follow the prompts for one-time setup steps.

    Then, whenever you want to record, either turn on the manual recorder, or,
    if you're willing to put up with advertisements, set the automatic switch.

    The one thing that is weird is the help said it doesn't work with "Wi-Fi Calling" which I find odd - as it worked for me while on Wi-Fi.

    I can't see how Wi-Fi calling could possibly matter anyway.
    It's just recording the sound from the mic and speaker, right?

    Any ideas why the instructions say it shouldn't work with Wi-Fi calling?
    <https://acr.app/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Pozharski@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Tue Nov 28 10:20:19 2023
    with <ks676nFc3tjU2@mid.individual.net> Carlos E. R. wrote:

    *SKIP* [ 8 lines 1 level deep]
    But Android universally disallows recording of phone calls. At most,
    you can manage what goes on the speaker, but not your own mike.

    I would say -- The G prohibitevely discourages such recordings. For
    instance, mine (no-brand, niche product) with
    com.android.server.telecom APK (aka -- "Call Management") (besides two
    other c.a.s.components.*) introduces com.mediatek.telecom.recording.PhoneRecorderServices . Then I guessed
    what that rightmost circled dot (during outgoing phone call) does.

    *SKIP* [ 7 lines 1 level deep]
    The alternative that I read about the other day was application on apk
    form, ie, not distributed by google play.
    Does any one have suggestions, preferably with actual experience?

    Well, hold yout breath. Fdroid distributes such thing as com.github.axet.callrecorder . OOH it suffers recent active(?)
    development. Whatever it means -- I can't say, because, OTOH on A7 it's capable to record mic only. It has bunch of methods(?) on board,
    doesn't seek root, and then mic only. So there's that.

    *CUT* [ 5 lines 1 level deep]

    --
    Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination
    Stallman's goal for GNU is even simpler: Freedom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Real Bev@21:1/5 to Eric Pozharski on Tue Nov 28 07:40:38 2023
    On 11/28/23 2:20 AM, Eric Pozharski wrote:
    with <ks676nFc3tjU2@mid.individual.net> Carlos E. R. wrote:

    *SKIP* [ 8 lines 1 level deep]
    But Android universally disallows recording of phone calls. At most,
    you can manage what goes on the speaker, but not your own mike.

    I would say -- The G prohibitevely discourages such recordings. For instance, mine (no-brand, niche product) with
    com.android.server.telecom APK (aka -- "Call Management") (besides two
    other c.a.s.components.*) introduces com.mediatek.telecom.recording.PhoneRecorderServices . Then I guessed
    what that rightmost circled dot (during outgoing phone call) does.

    *SKIP* [ 7 lines 1 level deep]
    The alternative that I read about the other day was application on apk
    form, ie, not distributed by google play.
    Does any one have suggestions, preferably with actual experience?

    Well, hold yout breath. Fdroid distributes such thing as com.github.axet.callrecorder . OOH it suffers recent active(?)
    development. Whatever it means -- I can't say, because, OTOH on A7 it's capable to record mic only. It has bunch of methods(?) on board,
    doesn't seek root, and then mic only. So there's that.

    What about a separate 'recorder' app and then putting your phone on speaker?


    --
    Cheers, Bev
    "We're from the Government. We're here to help."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wally J@21:1/5 to The Real Bev on Tue Nov 28 13:05:49 2023
    XPost: alt.privacy

    The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote

    What about a separate 'recorder' app and then putting your phone on speaker?

    Just like they can't stop us from recording an image that displays on the screen (even if they disallow screenshotting in the latest Android
    versions), they can't stop you from recording any phone call.

    The _easiest_ way I know of I've been testing for a few days for you, and
    (so far) it works beautifully (surprisingly so as I had expected glitches).
    *Tutorial: Installing open-source automatic call recording (ACR) on Android 13+ Samsung Galaxy*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/7mCHCktUuKw>

    The dozen or so recorded phone calls I've done since are all crystal clear.

    Having said that, there are a bunch of other methods, so all I want people
    to do is STOP saying that it can't be done. It can be done.

    People are concluding the wrong thing from the facts.
    a. The facts show Google is hindering call recording, that's for sure.
    b. But the facts show that you _can_ do call recording on any Android.

    You just have to know how to do it.
    --
    Usenet is a venue for intelligent people to widely share their knowledge.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)