• I just noticed that paypal uses whatsapp for 2FA now

    From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 8 22:57:10 2023
    Hi,

    I just made a payment using Paypal, and it asked to confirm my identity
    using WhatsApp, sending a sis digit confirmation code to it. :-)

    SMS was also possible.

    I chose WA this time :-)

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Thu Nov 9 01:50:38 2023
    On 08.11.23 22:57, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    Hi,

    I just made a payment using Paypal, and it asked to confirm my identity
    using WhatsApp, sending a sis digit confirmation code to it. :-)

    SMS was also possible.

    I chose WA this time :-)

    WTF cares?

    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Royal@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 09:21:12 2023
    On 8 Nov 2023 22:57:10 +0100 Carlos E. R. wrote:
    Hi,

    I just made a payment using Paypal, and it asked to confirm my identity
    using WhatsApp, sending a six digit confirmation code to it. :-)

    SMS was also possible.


    I can see why Meta would encourage that. And in soon...
    "WhatsApp Explores Ads in Chat App as Meta Seeks Revenue Boost" <https://m.slashdot.org/story/419088>

    But maybe the e2e encryption is worthwhile. Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_
    SMS and email which is about as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask
    which I prefer. (I'd prefer an OTP authenticator app but no financial
    company I know offers it.)
    --
    (Remove numerics from email address)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to Dave Royal on Thu Nov 9 11:39:49 2023
    On 2023-11-09 10:21, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 8 Nov 2023 22:57:10 +0100 Carlos E. R. wrote:
    Hi,

    I just made a payment using Paypal, and it asked to confirm my identity
    using WhatsApp, sending a six digit confirmation code to it. :-)

    SMS was also possible.


    I can see why Meta would encourage that. And in soon...
    "WhatsApp Explores Ads in Chat App as Meta Seeks Revenue Boost" <https://m.slashdot.org/story/419088>

    But maybe the e2e encryption is worthwhile. Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask
    which I prefer. (I'd prefer an OTP authenticator app but no financial
    company I know offers it.)

    I use one bank which uses confirmation via sms, and another via its own
    bank app. Push messages I think they said. Is that OTP?


    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Thu Nov 9 12:41:33 2023
    On 09.11.23 11:39, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 10:21, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 8 Nov 2023 22:57:10 +0100 Carlos E. R. wrote:
    Hi,

    I just made a payment using Paypal, and it asked to confirm my identity
    using WhatsApp, sending a six digit confirmation code to it. :-)

    SMS was also possible.


    I can see why Meta would encourage that. And in soon...
    "WhatsApp Explores Ads in Chat App as Meta Seeks Revenue Boost"
    <https://m.slashdot.org/story/419088>

    But maybe the e2e encryption is worthwhile. Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ >> SMS and email which is about as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask
    which I prefer. (I'd prefer an OTP authenticator app but no financial
    company I know offers it.)

    I use one bank which uses confirmation via sms, and another via its own
    bank app. Push messages I think they said. Is that OTP?

    Both highly insecure. Good banks use their own app that recognises
    patterns that generate numeric codes.

    --
    De gustibus non est disputandum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 13:05:40 2023
    On 2023-11-09 12:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 09.11.23 11:39, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 10:21, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 8 Nov 2023 22:57:10 +0100 Carlos E. R. wrote:
    Hi,

    I just made a payment using Paypal, and it asked to confirm my identity >>>> using WhatsApp, sending a six digit confirmation code to it. :-)

    SMS was also possible.


    I can see why Meta would encourage that. And in soon...
    "WhatsApp Explores Ads in Chat App as Meta Seeks Revenue Boost"
    <https://m.slashdot.org/story/419088>

    But maybe the e2e encryption is worthwhile. Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ >>> SMS and email which is about as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask
    which I prefer. (I'd prefer an OTP authenticator app but no financial
    company I know offers it.)

    I use one bank which uses confirmation via sms, and another via its own
    bank app. Push messages I think they said. Is that OTP?

    Both highly insecure. Good banks use their own app that recognises
    patterns that generate numeric codes.


    That's what I said, using their own app displaying a numeric code send
    over their encrypted and secure channel.

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to Dave Royal on Thu Nov 9 13:41:30 2023
    On 2023-11-09 13:36, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 11:39:49 +0100 Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 10:21, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 8 Nov 2023 22:57:10 +0100 Carlos E. R. wrote:
    Hi,

    I just made a payment using Paypal, and it asked to confirm my identity >>>> using WhatsApp, sending a six digit confirmation code to it. :-)

    SMS was also possible.


    I can see why Meta would encourage that. And in soon...
    "WhatsApp Explores Ads in Chat App as Meta Seeks Revenue Boost"
    <https://m.slashdot.org/story/419088>

    But maybe the e2e encryption is worthwhile. Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ >>> SMS and email which is about as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask
    which I prefer. (I'd prefer an OTP authenticator app but no financial
    company I know offers it.)

    I use one bank which uses confirmation via sms, and another via its own
    bank app. Push messages I think they said. Is that OTP?

    OTP: One Time Passcode

    Ah, of course. I forgot.

    Some bank apps generate OTPs
    My bank gives me a tiny device that generates an OTP, but it's being
    replaced by an app.

    No, I don't have that. Just that they send a code to the app, and you
    have to enter that code on the computer.


    But it doesn't have to be the bank's own app or device. There are
    standards, such as TOTP - where the code constantly changes. <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-time_password#Standardization>

    I use Open Source TOTP apps AndOTP on Android (and FreeOTP on iOS) for 2FA with some sites - eg github. I think Authy and Google Authenticator are
    also TOTP generators - not sure.

    I had one such hardware device at the job once. Year 2000.

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Royal@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 12:36:53 2023
    On 9 Nov 2023 11:39:49 +0100 Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 10:21, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 8 Nov 2023 22:57:10 +0100 Carlos E. R. wrote:
    Hi,

    I just made a payment using Paypal, and it asked to confirm my identity
    using WhatsApp, sending a six digit confirmation code to it. :-)

    SMS was also possible.


    I can see why Meta would encourage that. And in soon...
    "WhatsApp Explores Ads in Chat App as Meta Seeks Revenue Boost"
    <https://m.slashdot.org/story/419088>

    But maybe the e2e encryption is worthwhile. Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ >> SMS and email which is about as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask
    which I prefer. (I'd prefer an OTP authenticator app but no financial
    company I know offers it.)

    I use one bank which uses confirmation via sms, and another via its own
    bank app. Push messages I think they said. Is that OTP?

    OTP: One Time Passcode
    Some bank apps generate OTPs
    My bank gives me a tiny device that generates an OTP, but it's being
    replaced by an app.

    But it doesn't have to be the bank's own app or device. There are
    standards, such as TOTP - where the code constantly changes. <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-time_password#Standardization>

    I use Open Source TOTP apps AndOTP on Android (and FreeOTP on iOS) for 2FA
    with some sites - eg github. I think Authy and Google Authenticator are
    also TOTP generators - not sure.



    --
    (Remove numerics from email address)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Royal@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 14:27:04 2023
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:
    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_
    SMS and email which is about as insecure as you get. And it doesn't
    ask
    which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text, email, or a
    voice phone call. You might recheck yours, perhaps it's changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.
    --
    (Remove numerics from email address)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to AJL on Thu Nov 9 07:32:19 2023
    AJL <noemail@none.com> wrote:
    Dave Royal wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_
    SMS and email which is about as
    insecure as you get. And it doesn't
    ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a
    2FA CHOICE between text, email, or a
    voice phone call. You might recheck
    yours, perhaps it's changed...


    Just stuck my old Android Groundhog
    newsreader on an old Amazon
    tablet. First post. Newer tablets break
    it into read only. So lets see his this
    one does...

    Ah. I see the quote strings were broken.
    I think I can fix that in this and future
    posts but it's a PITA. None of my old
    stuff works anymore, even when used
    on my old stuff. Test over...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Dave Royal on Thu Nov 9 07:16:19 2023
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:
    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_
    SMS and email which is about as insecure as you get. And it doesn't
    ask
    which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text, email, or a
    voice phone call. You might recheck yours, perhaps it's changed...

    Just stuck my old Android Groundhog newsreader on an old Amazon
    tablet. First post. Newer tablets break it into read only. So lets
    see his this one does...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Dave Royal on Thu Nov 9 08:10:33 2023
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about as
    insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text, email, or a
    voice phone call. You might recheck yours, perhaps it's changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.

    I just checked it on my AMEX website. They still gave me the same three
    CHOICES (text, email, or voice). I'm in the US. Perhaps that's the
    difference?

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's the big
    security risk?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Royal@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 15:50:13 2023
    On 9 Nov 2023 08:10:33 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about as
    insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text, email, or a
    voice phone call. You might recheck yours, perhaps it's changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.

    I just checked it on my AMEX website. They still gave me the same three >CHOICES (text, email, or voice). I'm in the US. Perhaps that's the >difference?

    Maybe.

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's the big >security risk?

    SIM swap fraud.


    --
    (Remove numerics from email address)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Royal@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 15:57:39 2023
    On 9 Nov 2023 15:50:13 -0000 (UTC) Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 08:10:33 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about as
    insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text, email, or a
    voice phone call. You might recheck yours, perhaps it's changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.

    I just checked it on my AMEX website. They still gave me the same three >>CHOICES (text, email, or voice). I'm in the US. Perhaps that's the >>difference?

    Maybe.

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's the big >>security risk?

    SIM swap fraud.

    ... but I meant email was particularly insecure - unencrypted,
    interceptable...


    --
    (Remove numerics from email address)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Dave Royal on Thu Nov 9 09:07:41 2023
    On 11/9/2023 8:50 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 08:10:33 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about
    as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text, email,
    or a voice phone call. You might recheck yours, perhaps it's
    changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.

    I just checked it on my AMEX website. They still gave me the same
    three CHOICES (text, email, or voice). I'm in the US. Perhaps
    that's the difference?

    Maybe.

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's the
    big security risk?

    SIM swap fraud.

    How would a SIM swap get a perp into my AMEX account? He would need my
    AMEX user name and password to even get the text code. And where does he
    get that?

    So I ask again, where's the big security risk in texting a 2FA code?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Royal@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 16:35:19 2023
    On 9 Nov 2023 09:07:41 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 8:50 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 08:10:33 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about
    as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text, email,
    or a voice phone call. You might recheck yours, perhaps it's
    changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.

    I just checked it on my AMEX website. They still gave me the same
    three CHOICES (text, email, or voice). I'm in the US. Perhaps
    that's the difference?

    Maybe.

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's the
    big security risk?

    SIM swap fraud.

    How would a SIM swap get a perp into my AMEX account? He would need my
    AMEX user name and password to even get the text code. And where does he
    get that?

    So I ask again, where's the big security risk in texting a 2FA code?

    The point of two factor authentication is to add a _second_ layer of
    security so that if your account/password is stolen - which happens a lot
    in data breaches - there must be a second 'token' - something you _have_.
    With SIM swap fraud the malefactors effectively have your phone and can
    get the code.

    I wouldn't say it's a /big/ risk but it's a risk if a large financial
    tranfer depends on it. Banks implemented it 'cos it was cheap to do.

    SIM swap fraud was becoming serious a year or so back in the UK but I
    think operators are supposed to carry out more checks now before providing replacement SIMs.

    As for WhatsApp, an account can have up to 6(?) linked devices, so
    presumably the code will appear on all of them. I can imagine a new attack
    - 'clandestine WA device linking' whereby someone with brief physical
    access to your mobile links another device to it.
    --
    (Remove numerics from email address)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Dave Royal on Thu Nov 9 09:21:18 2023
    On 11/9/2023 8:57 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 15:50:13 -0000 (UTC) Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 08:10:33 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about
    as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text,
    email, or a voice phone call. You might recheck yours,
    perhaps it's changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.

    I just checked it on my AMEX website. They still gave me the same
    three CHOICES (text, email, or voice). I'm in the US. Perhaps
    that's the difference?

    Maybe.

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's
    the big security risk?

    SIM swap fraud.

    ... but I meant email was particularly insecure - unencrypted, interceptable...

    Not for me, though I don't use email for 2FA. With a SIM swap Google
    would sense a new device and use Google Authenticator to one of MY
    authentic devices to verify. No verification, no email...

    If you mean just no encryption, again even if intercepted what can
    anyone do with a code only good for a few minutes without a user name
    and password...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Dave Royal on Thu Nov 9 10:43:50 2023
    On 11/9/2023 9:35 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 09:07:41 -0700 AJL wrote:

    So I ask again, where's the big security risk in texting a 2FA
    code?

    The point of two factor authentication is to add a _second_ layer of
    security so that if your account/password is stolen - which happens a
    lot in data breaches - there must be a second 'token' - something you
    _have_. With SIM swap fraud the malefactors effectively have your
    phone and can get the code.

    I wouldn't say it's a /big/ risk but it's a risk

    Everythings a risk. Your risk scenario is infinitesimal IMO...

    if a large financial tranfer depends on it.

    Not a problem. I'm covered for any fraudulent bank transactions that ARE
    NOT MY FAULT...

    Banks implemented it 'cos it was cheap to do.

    And also it was one more layer of security.

    SIM swap fraud was becoming serious a year or so back in the UK but
    I think operators are supposed to carry out more checks now before
    providing replacement SIMs.

    I have a security code registered with my phone provider. No business transacted without that code. Course I suppose there's always the inside
    job thing to worry about for the risk paranoid...

    As for WhatsApp, an account can have up to 6(?) linked devices, so
    presumably the code will appear on all of them. I can imagine a new
    attack - 'clandestine WA device linking' whereby someone with brief
    physical access to your mobile links another device to it.

    Have never used WhatsApp. My whole extended family here uses text... ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to AJL on Thu Nov 9 20:15:36 2023
    On 2023-11-09 17:21, AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 8:57 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 15:50:13 -0000 (UTC) Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 08:10:33 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about
    as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text,
    email, or a voice phone call. You might recheck yours,
    perhaps it's changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.

    I just checked it on my AMEX website. They still gave me the same
    three CHOICES (text, email, or voice). I'm in the US. Perhaps
    that's the difference?

    Maybe.

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's
    the big security risk?

    SIM swap fraud.

    ... but I meant email was particularly insecure - unencrypted,
    interceptable...

    Not for me, though I don't use email for 2FA. With a SIM swap Google
    would sense a new device and use Google Authenticator to one of MY
    authentic devices to verify. No verification, no email...

    If you mean just no encryption, again even if intercepted what can
    anyone do with a code only good for a few minutes without a user name
    and password...

    They could pose as you in their machines. Then the email would be sent
    to you, which they could intercept and use to login in their machine.

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to Dave Royal on Thu Nov 9 20:20:58 2023
    On 2023-11-09 17:35, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 09:07:41 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 8:50 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 08:10:33 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:

    ...

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's the
    big security risk?

    SIM swap fraud.

    How would a SIM swap get a perp into my AMEX account? He would need my
    AMEX user name and password to even get the text code. And where does he
    get that?

    So I ask again, where's the big security risk in texting a 2FA code?

    The point of two factor authentication is to add a _second_ layer of
    security so that if your account/password is stolen - which happens a lot
    in data breaches - there must be a second 'token' - something you _have_. With SIM swap fraud the malefactors effectively have your phone and can
    get the code.


    Right.

    So imagine I use the app in the phone to connect to the bank. The bank
    sends a code by SMS to the *same* phone, the app reads automatically the message and logins.

    Now suppose my phone is stolen...

    I wouldn't say it's a /big/ risk but it's a risk if a large financial
    tranfer depends on it. Banks implemented it 'cos it was cheap to do.

    SIM swap fraud was becoming serious a year or so back in the UK but I
    think operators are supposed to carry out more checks now before providing replacement SIMs.

    They were fined here for not verifying the identity of the person
    getting the sim. So I suppose now they are stricter.


    As for WhatsApp, an account can have up to 6(?) linked devices, so
    presumably the code will appear on all of them. I can imagine a new attack
    - 'clandestine WA device linking' whereby someone with brief physical
    access to your mobile links another device to it.

    Ah. True.

    The code would appear in my phone and in my computer.

    Mind, SMS can also be read in the computer if you want. At least with
    Google messages. I have not tried, but read about it.


    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Thu Nov 9 19:49:52 2023
    On 11/9/23 12:15 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 17:21, AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 8:57 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 15:50:13 -0000 (UTC) Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 08:10:33 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about
    as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text,
    email, or a voice phone call. You might recheck yours,
    perhaps it's changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.

    I just checked it on my AMEX website. They still gave me the same
    three CHOICES (text, email, or voice). I'm in the US. Perhaps
    that's the difference?

    Maybe.

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's
    the big security risk?

    SIM swap fraud.

    ... but I meant email was particularly insecure - unencrypted,
    interceptable...

    Not for me, though I don't use email for 2FA. With a SIM swap Google
    would sense a new device and use Google Authenticator to one of MY
    authentic devices to verify. No verification, no email...

    If you mean just no encryption, again even if intercepted what can
    anyone do with a code only good for a few minutes without a user name
    and password...

    They could pose as you in their machines.

    How if no user/password info? And if they had it somehow and tried to log in
    I'd get a uncalled for text code that'd tell me someone had my UN/PW and
    was trying to break in my AMEX account and I'd change it.

    Then the email would be sent
    to you, which they could intercept and >use to login in their machine.

    Since I use text 2FA notification guess they'd need my phone too? Unlikely
    to the 1000000th degree...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to AJL on Thu Nov 9 21:30:17 2023
    On 2023-11-09 20:49, AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/23 12:15 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 17:21, AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 8:57 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 15:50:13 -0000 (UTC) Dave Royal wrote:
    On 9 Nov 2023 08:10:33 -0700 AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 7:27 AM, Dave Royal wrote:
    On 09 Nov 2023 07:16:19 -0700 AJL wrote:
    Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> wrote:

    Amex sends 2FA codes by _both_ SMS and email which is about
    as insecure as you get. And it doesn't ask which I prefer.

    My Android AMEX app gives me a 2FA CHOICE between text,
    email, or a voice phone call. You might recheck yours,
    perhaps it's changed...

    I don't use an Amex app - this is with their website.

    I just checked it on my AMEX website. They still gave me the same
    three CHOICES (text, email, or voice). I'm in the US. Perhaps
    that's the difference?

    Maybe.

    BTW I use text. A one time code good for only minutes. Where's
    the big security risk?

    SIM swap fraud.

    ... but I meant email was particularly insecure - unencrypted,
    interceptable...

    Not for me, though I don't use email for 2FA. With a SIM swap Google
    would sense a new device and use Google Authenticator to one of MY
    authentic devices to verify. No verification, no email...

    If you mean just no encryption, again even if intercepted what can
    anyone do with a code only good for a few minutes without a user name
    and password...

    They could pose as you in their machines.

    How if no user/password info?

    Obtained earlier "somehow".

    And if they had it somehow and tried to
    log in
    I'd get a uncalled for text code that'd tell me someone had my UN/PW and
    was trying to break in my AMEX account and I'd change it.

    There is a window of opportunity. They do it fast and reconfigure so you
    get no more warnings and your phone invalidated.


    The fact is that SIM swap fraud is a thing, not a rumour. People have
    lost money.


    Then the email would be sent to you, which they could intercept and
    use to login in their machine.

    Since I use text 2FA notification guess they'd need my phone too? Unlikely
    to the 1000000th degree...

    They ask the system to send the 2FA via email.

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Thu Nov 9 14:23:27 2023
    On 11/9/2023 1:30 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 20:49, AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/23 12:15 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:

    They could pose as you in their machines.

    How if no user/password info?

    Obtained earlier "somehow".

    "Somehow" = magic?

    And if they had it somehow and tried to log in I'd get a uncalled
    for text code that'd tell me someone had my UN/PW and was trying to
    break in my AMEX account and I'd change it.

    There is a window of opportunity. They do it fast and reconfigure so
    you get no more warnings and your phone invalidated.

    How would they get my username/password. Please no more magic...

    The fact is that SIM swap fraud is a thing, not a rumour. People
    have lost money.

    Yup. That's why I have a security code registered with my phone
    provider. No code, no business transacted.

    They ask the system to send the 2FA via email.

    No username/password no email/text 2FA. And if they break into the AMEX
    servers to get them no biggie. As long as it's NOT MY FAULT I'm covered
    there too...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to AJL on Thu Nov 9 22:28:45 2023
    On 2023-11-09 22:23, AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 1:30 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 20:49, AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/23 12:15 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:

    They could pose as you in their machines.

    How if no user/password info?

    Obtained earlier "somehow".

    "Somehow" = magic?

    No. Criminals do those things. I'm not one of them, so I don't know how.
    Sites are breached, passwords sold and circulated. Seems to be just a
    matter of time.


    And if they had it somehow and tried to log in I'd get a uncalled
    for text code that'd tell me someone had my UN/PW and was trying to
    break in my AMEX account and I'd change it.

    There is a window of opportunity. They do it fast and reconfigure so
     you get no more warnings and your phone invalidated.

    How would they get my username/password. Please no more magic...

    Ask them bad guys.


    The fact is that SIM swap fraud is a thing, not a rumour. People
    have lost money.

    Yup. That's why I have a security code registered with my phone
    provider. No code, no business transacted.

    They ask the system to send the 2FA via email.

    No username/password no email/text 2FA. And if they break into the AMEX servers to get them no biggie. As long as it's NOT MY FAULT I'm covered
    there too...



    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to AJL on Thu Nov 9 22:31:34 2023
    On 2023-11-09 22:23, AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 12:20 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:

    imagine I use the app in the phone to connect to the bank. The bank
    sends a code by SMS to the *same* phone,

    the app reads automatically the message and logins.

    Doesn't work that way on any of my apps. The 2FA code is sent by text as
    a number that I then have to then reenter into the app.

    Now suppose my phone is stolen...

    Hopefully your phone AND your phone bank app are BOTH LOCKED. That way
    the thief has to go through TWO LOCKS to enter your bank app. Pretty unlikely, don't you think...

    I hope, but could happen.

    Some bank apps here use a 4 digit pin code. Others use 8.


    On my phone the 2FA text code only had to authorize the AMEX app ONCE.
    After that only the user name and PW is required to open the app.
    (Though AMEX can be set to require a 2FA code on every app entry I find
    that a bit too much of a hassle for what little added security it may
    give (IMO-YMMV).

    I'm still waiting to see why SMS is a poor way to send a 2FA codes.
    Though I'll admit that pushing "Yes" on a Google Authenticator screen to authorize an app is sure a lot easier...

    Well, experts in the field have said so.

    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Thu Nov 9 15:08:17 2023
    On 11/9/2023 2:31 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 22:23, AJL wrote:

    Hopefully your phone AND your phone bank app are BOTH LOCKED. That
    way the thief has to go through TWO LOCKS to enter your bank app.
    Pretty unlikely, don't you think...

    I hope, but could happen.

    By the time a thief could break your locks you could have your passwords changed.

    My Google stuff (like Gmail) doesn't have a password once you get past
    my phone lock screen lock. If my phone were stolen I'm counting on that
    lock screen lock to hold at least an hour or so until I can change my
    Google password...

    Some bank apps here use a 4 digit pin code. Others use 8.

    Same as above. Change the password quickly if stolen. Then the pin will
    no longer work.

    I'm still waiting to see why SMS is a poor way to send a 2FA
    codes.

    Well, experts in the field have said so.

    Got me there. But still waiting for a reason why. Though text is
    unencrypted what good would a timed 6 digit number intercept do anyone?
    And the good part of using a text is that I'd know IMMEDIATELY if
    someone's trying to log in to one of my accounts and can take immediate
    action. Not so with encrypted email...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E. R.@21:1/5 to AJL on Thu Nov 9 23:23:56 2023
    On 2023-11-09 23:08, AJL wrote:
    On 11/9/2023 2:31 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 22:23, AJL wrote:

    Hopefully your phone AND your phone bank app are BOTH LOCKED. That
    way the thief has to go through TWO LOCKS to enter your bank app.
    Pretty unlikely, don't you think...

    I hope, but could happen.

    By the time a thief could break your locks you could have your passwords changed.

    My Google stuff (like Gmail) doesn't have a password once you get past
    my phone lock screen lock. If my phone were stolen I'm counting on that
    lock screen lock to hold at least an hour or so until I can change my
    Google password...

    How? I am on the street, probably, far from home and with no phone.


    Some bank apps here use a 4 digit pin code. Others use 8.

    Same as above. Change the password quickly if stolen. Then the pin will
    no longer work.

    I'm still waiting to see why SMS is a poor way to send a 2FA
    codes.

    Well, experts in the field have said so.

    Got me there. But still waiting for a reason why. Though text is
    unencrypted what good would a timed 6 digit number intercept do anyone?

    If they got your user and password in advance, a lot.

    And the good part of using a text is that I'd know IMMEDIATELY if
    someone's trying to log in to one of my accounts and can take immediate action. Not so with encrypted email...



    --
    Cheers,
    Carlos E.R.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Carlos E. R. on Thu Nov 9 15:43:44 2023
    On 11/9/2023 3:23 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:
    On 2023-11-09 23:08, AJL wrote:

    By the time a thief could break your [phone] locks you could have
    your passwords changed.

    How? I am on the street, probably, far from home and with no phone.

    Guess you're outta luck then. I normally have an (gasp) iPhone nearby
    (wife's). Then I'm also usually within 30 minutes of home. Guess YMMV
    (your mileage is a lot bigger than mine) fits better than usual here... ;)

    still waiting for a reason why [text 2FA is bad].

    If they got your user and password in advance, a lot.

    So how do they get my user name and password? Wait isn't this is where
    we came in. You can have the last word. It's nap time for me...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)