• Re: Any progress on iOS allowing multiple users?

    From Sten deJoode@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Thu Feb 1 04:52:19 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:49:22 -0600, Hank Rogers wrote:

    Dammit, you're dense. Jughead has already told you that an
    iphone is a PERSONAL device only. You just don't get it. It's
    not part of the apple "ecosystem".

    Clearly, enterprise us of an iPhone is not needed.
    Nobody wants to use an iPhone in the corporate world.

    At least that's what the ghost of nospam would claim whenever thousands of things iPhones can't do that Android easily does come up for discussion.

    Apparently Apple terminated nospam's contract to contradict everything
    truthful said on this newsgroup, leaving Jolly Roger to take his place.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Sten deJoode on Thu Feb 1 08:49:03 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-02-01 01:52, Sten deJoode wrote:
    On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:49:22 -0600, Hank Rogers wrote:

    Dammit, you're dense. Jughead has already told you that an
    iphone is a PERSONAL device only. You just don't get it. It's
    not part of the apple "ecosystem".

    Clearly, enterprise us of an iPhone is not needed.
    Nobody wants to use an iPhone in the corporate world.

    Clearly, you are delusional.


    At least that's what the ghost of nospam would claim whenever thousands of things iPhones can't do that Android easily does come up for discussion.

    Apparently Apple terminated nospam's contract to contradict everything truthful said on this newsgroup, leaving Jolly Roger to take his place.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to Sten deJoode on Thu Feb 1 15:02:29 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2/1/2024 1:52 AM, Sten deJoode wrote:

    <snip>

    Apparently Apple terminated nospam's contract to contradict everything truthful said on this newsgroup, leaving Jolly Roger to take his place.

    LOL, I often wondered why "he who must not be named" did what he did. So
    you're saying he was actually being paid to state "that what was not so."

    I wonder what happened to him. I don't wish anything bad to happen to
    our favorite trolls but it's nice when they leave.

    --
    “If you are not an expert on a subject, then your opinions about it
    really do matter less than the opinions of experts. It's not
    indoctrination nor elitism. It's just that you don't know as much as
    they do about the subject.”—Tin Foil Awards

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)