Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
*What kind of rather strange ?adult? repeatedly does such a thing?*
Is it what religious fanatics do?
Why?
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
*What kind of rather strange ?adult? repeatedly does such a thing?*
Is it what religious fanatics do?
Why?
On 2023-12-15 18:03, Wally J wrote:
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
*What kind of rather strange ?adult? repeatedly does such a thing?*
Is it what religious fanatics do?
Why?
As opposed to calling people "iKook"?
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
*What kind of rather strange ?adult? repeatedly calls people juvenile
names like "iKook"?*
Is it what religious fanatics do?
Why?
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
triggered you are. Precious!
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
triggered you are. Precious!
Hi Jolly Roger,
I study you just like Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar lemon-juice covered bank robber.
You interest me.
Hence, I read _everything_ that you write on these newsgroups, JR.
Having gone to the best schools in this country and subsequently having worked in high-tech startups in the Silicon Valley, I've never met in the flesh people like these strange iKooks are - only here - on Apple ngs.
These strange people only exist on the child-like Apple newsgroups for the most part, as almost nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups would send users on a futile wild-goose chase just because they asked a question
of an Apple product that Apple doesn't want that product to be able to do.
There are _many_ (many!) examples of this interaction; here's just one:
*Why are iKooks sadistically sending innocent users on wild-goose chases?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ynh0PE9lK_I/>
What normal person does that?
None, right?
So there's something rather strangely different about these Apple posters.
{JollyRoger,YourName,Haemactylus,nospam,AlanBrowne,AlanBaker,Snit, et al.}
They've lied for years about Apple support (or they were ignorant of everything that they claimed - you can choose which one but not both).
*Proof the iKooks have lied for years - or - more to the point - have been IGNORANT for years*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ZE8GboBUO3c/>
They constantly lie to cover up what Apple does, to claim it didn't happen.
*Why do the low IQ iKooks like nospam always lie to cover up Apple's faults?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/AiMYbSmplkw/>
What normal person does that?
None, right?
Only a small set of posters to the Apple newsgroups does that.
Why?
You REALLY need to get laid, Arlen.
Regardless of its needs, no woman or man should be called upon to
sacrifice their dignity to it.
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
*What kind of rather strange ?adult? repeatedly does such a thing?*
Is it what religious fanatics do?
Why?
Because those nuts consider themselves an it. So they think everybody
else is to. Very strange specimens indeed.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
triggered you are. Precious!
Hi Jolly Roger,
I study you just like Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar lemon-juice covered bank robber.
You interest me.
Hence, I read _everything_ that you write on these newsgroups, JR.
Having gone to the best schools in this country and subsequently having worked in high-tech startups in the Silicon Valley, I've never met in the flesh people like these strange iKooks are - only here - on Apple ngs.
These strange people only exist on the child-like Apple newsgroups for the most part, as almost nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups would send users on a futile wild-goose chase just because they asked a question
of an Apple product that Apple doesn't want that product to be able to do.
There are _many_ (many!) examples of this interaction; here's just one:
*Why are iKooks sadistically sending innocent users on wild-goose chases?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ynh0PE9lK_I/>
What normal person does that?
None, right?
So there's something rather strangely different about these Apple posters.
{JollyRoger,YourName,Haemactylus,nospam,AlanBrowne,AlanBaker,Snit, et al.}
They've lied for years about Apple support (or they were ignorant of everything that they claimed - you can choose which one but not both).
*Proof the iKooks have lied for years - or - more to the point - have
been IGNORANT for years*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ZE8GboBUO3c/>
They constantly lie to cover up what Apple does, to claim it didn't happen.
*Why do the low IQ iKooks like nospam always lie to cover up Apple's faults?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/AiMYbSmplkw/>
What normal person does that?
None, right?
Only a small set of posters to the Apple newsgroups does that.
Why?
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
*What kind of rather strange ?adult? repeatedly does such a thing?*
Is it what religious fanatics do?
Why?
On 2023-12-17 16:13, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
triggered you are. Precious!
Hi Jolly Roger,
I study you just like Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar
lemon-juice covered bank robber.
You interest me.
Hence, I read _everything_ that you write on these newsgroups, JR.
Having gone to the best schools in this country and subsequently having
worked in high-tech startups in the Silicon Valley, I've never met in the
flesh people like these strange iKooks are - only here - on Apple ngs.
These strange people only exist on the child-like Apple newsgroups for the >> most part, as almost nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups would >> send users on a futile wild-goose chase just because they asked a question >> of an Apple product that Apple doesn't want that product to be able to do. >>
There are _many_ (many!) examples of this interaction; here's just one:
*Why are iKooks sadistically sending innocent users on wild-goose chases?* >> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ynh0PE9lK_I/>
What normal person does that?
None, right?
So there's something rather strangely different about these Apple posters. >> {JollyRoger,YourName,Haemactylus,nospam,AlanBrowne,AlanBaker,Snit, et al.} >>
They've lied for years about Apple support (or they were ignorant of
everything that they claimed - you can choose which one but not both).
*Proof the iKooks have lied for years - or - more to the point - have
been IGNORANT for years*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ZE8GboBUO3c/>
They constantly lie to cover up what Apple does, to claim it didn't happen. >> *Why do the low IQ iKooks like nospam always lie to cover up Apple's faults?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/AiMYbSmplkw/>
What normal person does that?
None, right?
Only a small set of posters to the Apple newsgroups does that.
Why?
You REALLY need to get laid, Arlen.
Seriously... ...get out of your basement and meet a girl...
...or a guy if that's your thing.
On 2023-12-17 16:13, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
triggered you are. Precious!
Hi Jolly Roger,
I study you just like Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar lemon-juice covered bank robber.
You interest me.
Hence, I read _everything_ that you write on these newsgroups, JR.
Having gone to the best schools in this country and subsequently having worked in high-tech startups in the Silicon Valley, I've never met in the flesh people like these strange iKooks are - only here - on Apple ngs.
These strange people only exist on the child-like Apple newsgroups for the most part, as almost nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups would send users on a futile wild-goose chase just because they asked a question of an Apple product that Apple doesn't want that product to be able to do.
There are _many_ (many!) examples of this interaction; here's just one: *Why are iKooks sadistically sending innocent users on wild-goose chases?* <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ynh0PE9lK_I/>
What normal person does that?
None, right?
So there's something rather strangely different about these Apple posters. {JollyRoger,YourName,Haemactylus,nospam,AlanBrowne,AlanBaker,Snit, et al.}
They've lied for years about Apple support (or they were ignorant of everything that they claimed - you can choose which one but not both). *Proof the iKooks have lied for years - or - more to the point - have been IGNORANT for years* <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ZE8GboBUO3c/>
They constantly lie to cover up what Apple does, to claim it didn't happen. *Why do the low IQ iKooks like nospam always lie to cover up Apple's faults?* <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/AiMYbSmplkw/>
What normal person does that?
None, right?
Only a small set of posters to the Apple newsgroups does that.
Why?
You REALLY need to get laid, Arlen.
Seriously... ...get out of your basement and meet a girl...
...or a guy if that's your thing.
John <nospam@nospam.com> wrote
Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
*What kind of rather strange ?adult? repeatedly does such a thing?*
Is it what religious fanatics do?
Why?
Because those nuts consider themselves an it. So they think everybody
else is to. Very strange specimens indeed.
Well, I'm not sure, as what I'm sure about is all these strange people are far to the left of the first quartile delineation in Dunning-Kruger graphs.
Hence, they have no adult response to facts that they simply don't like.
A. When they're confronted with a fact they don't like...
B. They just want that fact to go away.
However, the fact doesn't go away.
a. Facts are the most dangerous enemy of an imaginary belief system.
b. Which is why these people are desperate to make all facts disappear.
The only way they can make facts disappear... is to make the messenger disappear, which is why in the past nospam asked for me to be killed.
Likewise, their fear of facts is why Jolly Roger said he would be happy if
I died - because then he wouldn't have to deal with facts about Apple.
The problem for them is that whether or not I exist, the facts will.
They don't understand that simple concept.
So they try to make me go away.
By calling me a "loser" (Jolly Roger), "gay" (Alan Baker) & "it" Alan
Browne (as if that child-like insult is their only response to facts).
This question really should be something akin to "Why do are these people
so deathly afraid of facts that they resort to kindergarten style insults
to make the bearer of facts go away?".
*What kind of rather oddly clearly rather strange person does that?*
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
Regardless of its needs, no woman or man should be called upon to
sacrifice their dignity to it.
*To the adults on these childish Apple OS newsgroups...*
a. [JR] The first person calls people "losers" & thinks that is clever.
b. [Baker] The next calls people gay & thinks that's really clever.
The most weaponized concept in psychology abused by a basement dwelling Morlock who uses tools but doesn't understand them. Ironic really. Maslow's law of the instrument in the flesh where he lashes out with what turns
out to be a wet noodle (D-K effect not what it's cracked up to be):
They didn˙t study that bank robber. That incident was used as an anecdote. From their Methods: ´Participants were 65 Cornell University undergraduates from a variety of courses in psychology who earned extra credit for their participationˇ which translates to WEIRD kids.
No surprise you can˙t distinguish an illustrative anecdote from actual research, which has been challenged as being nothing more than a
statistical exercise in seeing shapes in clouds.
You˙re not ´studyingˇ anything. You are again masturbating in public (as
seen below):
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
He could be furry or otherkin. Or into gadgetry.
What makes the iKooks iKooks is their religious fanaticism.
Not their ignorance, low IQ, and clear lack of education, per se.
Every iKook tries to make facts go away with their childish taunts.
a. iKook [JR] person calls people "losers" & he thinks that is clever.
b. iKook [Baker] calls people "gay" & thinks he's being very clever.
He could be furry or otherkin. Or into gadgetry.
The supply of girls (or guys) willing to put up with him and others like
him is quite limited, unless cash is involved. (In his case, a LOT of
cash.)
It rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose againˇKIt places the lotion in the basket.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
They didn´t study that bank robber. That incident was used as an anecdote. >> From their Methods: “Participants were 65 Cornell University undergraduates
from a variety of courses in psychology who earned extra credit for their
participation” which translates to WEIRD kids.
No surprise you can´t distinguish an illustrative anecdote from actual
research, which has been challenged as being nothing more than a
statistical exercise in seeing shapes in clouds.
You´re not “studying” anything. You are again masturbating in public (as
seen below):
I know exactly what they studied, Hemidactylus.
Here's a question for you which shows that you don't.
What's to the left of the first quartile line on English proficiency?
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wroteLOL!
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock. >> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in
clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
you haven't gotten the memo.
Don't worry Hemidactylus,
I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew
up as racing terms)
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.
If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
you haven't gotten the memo.
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
Regardless of its needs, no woman or man should be called upon to
sacrifice their dignity to it.
*To the adults on these childish Apple OS newsgroups...*
a. [JR] The first person calls people "losers" & thinks that is clever.
b. [Baker] The next calls people gay & thinks that's really clever.
b. [Browne] The third calls people an "it", thinking that's also clever.
Isn't that strange?
A. This doesn't happen on the adult operating systems newsgroups.
B. It's only on the child-like Apple operating system newsgroups.
C. Why?
Specifically:
*Why do you think these people repeatedly act & think like children do?*
NOTE: It's their _only_ response to facts about Apple that they hate.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock. >> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in
clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
you haven't gotten the memo.
Don't worry Hemidactylus,
I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew
up as racing terms) just as nospam constantly claims imaginary apps for iOS that don't exist, just as Alan Baker always claims every fact is a lie,
etc.
Hemidactylus, Alan Browne, Snit, Alan Baker, Lewis, nospam, et al.
You iKooks all _hate_ facts.
You iKooks all _fear_ facts, in fact.
Hence, you fear (and hate) anyone who presents facts to an Apple newsgroup.
Yes, I know you iKooks better than you know yourselves, Hemidactylus.
a. None of you iKooks has an IQ that even approaches normal
b. None of you iKooks has any education above high school as a result
c. But worse, you're all completely ignorant of everything you speak about
You have no idea what a quartile is and yet it's used many times in the seminal D-K papers, Hemidactylus, as it's an important inflection point.
Every one of you strange iKooks owns completely imaginary belief systems. None of you strange iKooks makes any assessment based on the facts.
*The iKooks is a religious zealot.*
Which, by the way, truth be told, is exactly the reason why Alan Browne thinks that anyone who is not a religious zealot is an "it", and why Jolly Roger thinks anyone who is not a religious zealot is a "loser", and why
Alan Baker thinks anyone who is not a religious zealot is "gay", etc.
On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wroteLOL!
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus? >>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock. >>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in >>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows >>> you haven't gotten the memo.
Don't worry Hemidactylus,
I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they
studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew >> up as racing terms)
Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
Here's my page at DriverDB:
<https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the instructors):
<https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg>
That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers Training Program page.
Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
Most committee members have won championships in their class while
others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:Hah! Arlen is an F1 driver so there! You will respect his authority on all things like he’s the know-it-all version of Cartman from South Park. He’s probably a pilot, yachtsman, and former Delta operator who spent a decade
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wroteLOL!
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus? >>>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock. >>>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in >>>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows >>>> you haven't gotten the memo.
Don't worry Hemidactylus,
I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they >>> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew >>> up as racing terms)
Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
Here's my page at DriverDB:
<https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the
instructors):
<https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg> >>
That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver
Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
Training Program page.
Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
Most committee members have won championships in their class while
others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee: >>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
in the Activity.
Or he’s just an empty braggart with no life and nothing to show for all the hours wasted in mommy’s basement being an obnoxious snot on usenet groups. He should thank us all profusely for even recognizing he exists.
Hah! He is an F1 driver so there!
You will respect his authority on all
things like he's the know-it-all version of Cartman from South Park. He's probably a pilot, yachtsman, and former Delta operator who spent a decade
in the Activity.
Or he˘s just an empty braggart with no life and nothing to show for all the hours wasted in mommy's basement being an obnoxious snot on usenet groups.
He should thank us all profusely for even recognizing he exists.
Somebody who brags about adulthood and expertise as you do is most likely neither an adult nor expert in anything.
The only reason you keep coming
here is to make up for some embarrassingly shameful shortcomings you must have. We are forced to suffer the effects of your inadequacies and insecurities. Nobody posts like you do without having some severe psychological issues. Glad I˘m not you. Schadenfreude is an amazing thing.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:Hah! Arlen is an F1 driver so there! You will respect his authority on all things like he’s the know-it-all version of Cartman from South Park. He’s probably a pilot, yachtsman, and former Delta operator who spent a decade
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wroteLOL!
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus? >>>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock. >>>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in >>>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows >>>> you haven't gotten the memo.
Don't worry Hemidactylus,
I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they >>> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew >>> up as racing terms)
Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
Here's my page at DriverDB:
<https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the
instructors):
<https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg> >>
That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver
Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
Training Program page.
Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
Most committee members have won championships in their class while
others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee: >>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
in the Activity.
Or he’s just an empty braggart with no life and nothing to show for all the hours wasted in mommy’s basement being an obnoxious snot on usenet groups. He should thank us all profusely for even recognizing he exists.
At a bar near him it's claimed he's also a Nobel Laureate in Physics, Economics and Literature as well as a Fields Medal double dipper.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Hah! He is an F1 driver so there!
Notice that you iKooks have to build an imaginary strawman, that I'm an F1 Driver, just so that you have something (anything!) to say to negate it.
*Facts mean absolutely nothing to you iKooks.*
I never said I was a racer; however I do own both a bimmer & a beemer.
And we can look up the cite which shows Alan Baker never heard of them.
Think about that.
Think real hard about that.
It's the _first_ think you learn about BMWs, Hemidactylus.
Yes. The first thing.
If you don't know the difference between a bimmer and a beemer, especially
in racing circuits, then people will immediately assess you as a moron.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Somebody who brags about adulthood and expertise as you do is most likely
neither an adult nor expert in anything.
Hi Hemidactylus,
I study all you strange iKooks so I likely know you better than you know yourself, especially I study why you hate the truth about Apple products.
What separates iKooks mostly from normal people is that iKooks are strange religious zealots who don't understand facts and who are ignorant of them.
Yet, iKooks form completely imaginary belief systems based on no facts.
*Which is why iKooks are so deathly afraid of facts.*
*And of the mere messenger bearing facts.*
Hence, you have to admit, iKooks are very strange people indeed, so when
you try to claim I don't have the education that I do, think again please.
Tell that to Chris who fabricated a PhD in the biological sciences and yet
he immediately ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in terms of immunology.
HINT: Nobody who took even one immunology class would say thats that.
Same as Alan Baker who insists that he "teaches racing" and owns a BMW and yet he doesn't even know the first thing about what BMW racing vehicles are called.
I posted multiple links showing the whole concept of D-K itself is flawed
and instead of acknowledging that you march out some trivial graphs and
still cling to the concept. This shows you are an uncritical ideologue. No surprise there. It˘s like me saying phrenology is flawed and pointing to
some expert debunkings and you asking me to examine a bump on your head because head bumps are fundamental to understanding your idee fixe of
iKooks.
On 2023-12-18 14:56, Wally J wrote:
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Somebody who brags about adulthood and expertise as you do is most likely >>> neither an adult nor expert in anything.
Hi Hemidactylus,
I study all you strange iKooks so I likely know you better than you know
yourself, especially I study why you hate the truth about Apple products.
What separates iKooks mostly from normal people is that iKooks are strange >> religious zealots who don't understand facts and who are ignorant of them. >>
Yet, iKooks form completely imaginary belief systems based on no facts.
*Which is why iKooks are so deathly afraid of facts.*
*And of the mere messenger bearing facts.*
Hence, you have to admit, iKooks are very strange people indeed, so when
you try to claim I don't have the education that I do, think again please. >>
Tell that to Chris who fabricated a PhD in the biological sciences and yet >> he immediately ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in terms of immunology.
HINT: Nobody who took even one immunology class would say thats that.
Same as Alan Baker who insists that he "teaches racing" and owns a BMW and >> yet he doesn't even know the first thing about what BMW racing vehicles are >> called.
Most of the people who race BMWs at Mission call them "Pro 3s"...
...because that's the name of the CLASS they almost all run.
:-)
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
I posted multiple links showing the whole concept of D-K itself is flawed
and instead of acknowledging that you march out some trivial graphs and
still cling to the concept. This shows you are an uncritical ideologue. No >> surprise there. Itขs like me saying phrenology is flawed and pointing to >> some expert debunkings and you asking me to examine a bump on your head
because head bumps are fundamental to understanding your idee fixe of
iKooks.
You don't even _understand_ the D-K papers, Hemidactylus.
And you claim they're flawed?
What kind of strange person does that?
You iKooks do.
But normal people don't do that.
Again. You need to read the seminal D-K papers, Hemidactylus.
HINT: Every single person with any skill is on those Dunning-Kruger graphs.Examples:
Note that if you don't even know _that_, then you know nothing about D-K. Which is my point.
You iKooks are so incredibly stupid that you "think" you know everything.
And yet... you know absolutely nothing.
a. Jolly Roger knows nothing about how Apple updates releases.
(but that doesn't stop him from claiming Apple fully updates all)
b. Alan Browne knows nothing about the walled garden.
(but that doesn't stop him from claiming it simply doesn't exist)
c. Alan Baker knows nothing about just about everything.
(but that doesn't stop him from calling absolutely all facts a lie)
etc.
What's no longer shocking about you iKooks, Hemidactylus, is that you are
so very confident that you think you know something - and yet - you know absolutely nothing.
It's so easy to prove you iKooks know absolutely nothing, Hemidactylus.
Look at this example where Alan Baker claimed header lines can't be changed
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
Who is _that_ stupid?
Nobody right?
But you iKooks are.
Alan Baker knows nothing about headers, yet he still confidently claims
(over and over again) that they can't be spoofed. Who is that stupid?
You are the same as Alan Baker, Hemidactylus.
You know nothing about D-K - and that's clearly shown many times over.
And yet, you feel so very confident to claim it's flawed?
What kind of strange person does that, Hemidactylus?
On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wroteLOL!
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus? >>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock. >>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in >>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows >>> you haven't gotten the memo.
Don't worry Hemidactylus,
I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they
studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew >> up as racing terms)
Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
Here's my page at DriverDB:
<https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the instructors):
<https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg>
That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers Training Program page.
Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
Most committee members have won championships in their class while
others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee:
<https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
He is an abusive serially nymshifting to bypass killfiles poseur who is obsessed with iKooks. A very sad yet amusing state for a person to be
in, and unaware of how ridiculous he looks to pretty much every one posting here, even those who are at odds with each other.
Does it diminish you in any way that Checo is ranked 3rd on that DriverDB
Top 100? I wonder if Arlen even knows who that is. My fave driver. I was
all set to watch him on his home turf on both TVs (one cockpit view) and he wrecked 1st lap! Sad.
Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:Oh wow open wheel! I have a Civic so I was expecting a tricked out street car. Nope!
<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
I think you established your bonafides. That he is hung up on what
people call BMWs is ridiculous. Who cares.
I am also at a loss as to why people do the stance car look.
Again. You need to read the seminal D-K papers, Hemidactylus.I have.
And where do you think I got the quote: "Participants were 65
Cornell University undergraduates from a variety of courses in psychology
who earned extra credit for their participation" and realized the lemon
juice guy was used merely as an illustrative anecdote.
McArthur Wheeler
wasn't a part of the study as you claimed since he wasn't one of the
Cornell undergrads. I called you on this ignorant comment "Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar lemon-juice covered bank robber" and you
lashed out at me.
I also read this, which you as a propagandist will continue to ignore: https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/persistent-irony-dunning-kruger-effect
Let that sink in.
You are a poster boy for namechecking and
weaponizing the DKE. You only illustrate your own ignorance of which you
are ironically very unaware. Why did you not now the DKE had been found wanting by so many independent researchers? Because you are an empty propagandist.
HINT: Every single person with any skill is on those Dunning-Kruger graphs.
What kind of strange person does that, Hemidactylus?Examples:
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1215&context=numeracy
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1188&context=numeracy
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840180/full https://gwern.net/doc/iq/2020-gignac.pdf
And yet you shoot the messenger.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Again. You need to read the seminal D-K papers, Hemidactylus.I have.
With all due respect, you have not.
This conversation is classic for what it's like to deal with you iKooks.
Like Alan Baker claiming to teach racing, he's a liar because _everything_
he says shows he doesn't know the simplest thing about what he claims.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Does it diminish you in any way that Checo is ranked 3rd on that DriverDB
Top 100? I wonder if Arlen even knows who that is. My fave driver. I was
all set to watch him on his home turf on both TVs (one cockpit view) and he >> wrecked 1st lap! Sad.
I don't know a damn thing about racing.
But then, I've never claimed to be a "racer" nor a "teacher" of racing.
Alan Baker doesn't know a damn thing about anything.
I think you established your bonafides. That he is hung up on what
people call BMWs is ridiculous. Who cares.
Heh heh heh... Chris tried the same trick when he ridiculed the use of the word "vehicle" in immunological contexts - because he was chilishly trying
to get out of the simple fact that he doesn't know the first thing about immunology - even after having "claimed" to have a PhD in the sciences.
It's the same with Alan Baker.
He doesn't know the first thing about BMWs.
He just doesn't.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:Does it diminish you in any way that Checo is ranked 3rd on that DriverDB
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wroteLOL!
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus? >>>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock. >>>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in >>>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows >>>> you haven't gotten the memo.
Don't worry Hemidactylus,
I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they >>> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew >>> up as racing terms)
Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
Here's my page at DriverDB:
<https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
Top 100? I wonder if Arlen even knows who that is. My fave driver. I was
all set to watch him on his home turf on both TVs (one cockpit view) and he wrecked 1st lap! Sad.
Oh wow open wheel! I have a Civic so I was expecting a tricked out street car. Nope!
Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
I think you established your bonafides. That Arlen is hung up on what
And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the
instructors):
<https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg> >>
That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver
Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
Training Program page.
Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
Most committee members have won championships in their class while
others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee: >>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
people call BMWs is ridiculous. Who cares.
I mostly like watching garage shows. There was one focused on modding JDMs.
I actually saw an old Skyline (I assume) a few months back locally with the driver on the passenger side. Was stock and not modded at all.
I am also at a loss as to why people do the stance car look. Or maybe it’s more the negative camber thing. Lowering was my thing in the late 80s with
a Nissan pickup (with some subwoofer bass but not competition). But the camber look makes no sense. I guess every generation tries to be more ridiculous than the preceding one. The mumble rap makes no sense either and
I grew up on hiphop.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Again. You need to read the seminal D-K papers, Hemidactylus.I have.
With all due respect, you have not.
That is clear from everything you claimed about it.
You don't know the first thing about what the seminal D-K papers said.
Just as...
a. nospam constantly fabricates imaginary functionality
b. But when asked to point out the app he claims exists...
c. He never can do something as simple as *name just one*
All you iKooks are the same, Hemidaqctylus.
As it's obvious you _never_ read the seminal Dunning-Kruger papers.
You iKooks are perfect examples of those to the left of the first quartile.
"People tend to hold overly favorable views of their abilities
in many social and intellectual domains. The authors suggest
that this overestimation occurs, in part, because people who
are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only
do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate
choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive
ability to realize it. Paradoxically, improving the skills of
participants, and thus increasing their metacognitive competence,
helped them recognize the limitations of their abilities."
If you accept, Hemidactylus, that I have higher degrees, you have to understand how frustrating it is to try to converse with you iKooks.
There's absolutely nothing even slightly complex you iKooks can comprehend. Nothing.
That's frustrating, because EVERYTHING you say, is always dead wrong.
Which, let's face is - is the epitome of the iKook's belief system.
And where do you think I got the quote: "Participants were 65
Cornell University undergraduates from a variety of courses in psychology
who earned extra credit for their participation" and realized the lemon
juice guy was used merely as an illustrative anecdote.
You are an idiot, Hemidactylus. An utter unfathomably ignorant idiot.
<https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10626367/>
Read the abstract, you idiot.
*Do you see "grammar" in that abstract, you idiot.*
My point isn't to call you an idiot, Hemidactylus; it's to show the world that EVERYTHING the iKooks say is out of their own sheer & utter ignorance.
You "think" you can dig up a quote and then that quote you think you understood well enough to dispute what I said, based on the facts.
This conversation is PERFECT for showing EXACTLY what the iKooks are.
McArthur Wheeler
wasn't a part of the study as you claimed since he wasn't one of the
Cornell undergrads. I called you on this ignorant comment "Dunning & Kruger >> studied that rather peculiar lemon-juice covered bank robber" and you
lashed out at me.
The seminal papers by Dunning & Kruger were about cognitive bias in
assessing one's own skills, Hemidactylus. You iKooks are in the low end.
The problem is you iKooks are hampered by
a. No education whatsoever
b. No ability to comprehend anything
c. No desire to understand anything either
All you iKooks ever do is guess.
a. Alan Browne guessed there's no walled garden
(because _he_ was ignorant that it exists)
b. JollY Roger guessed Apple fully patches older releases
(because _he_ was ignorant that they don't)
c. Alan Baker guessed how to race vehicles
(because _he_ is ignorant of the first things in racing)
etc.
All you iKooks always just guess because you do not own the mental capacity to comprehend something as simple as the Dunning Kruger seminal papers.
I also read this, which you as a propagandist will continue to ignore:
https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/persistent-irony-dunning-kruger-effect
Look Hemidactylus. I have higher degrees. You do not. Mine are in tough subjects. You could barely pass high school algebra.
I understand that science isn't always black and white, Hemidactylus.
You do not.
Hell, you don't even understand your own cite above for God's sake.
That's why it's no longer shocking how incredibly wrong you iKooks are.
Nor is it shocking that you're entire argument starts with Donald Trump.
Mine don't.
Here are mine:
<https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10626367/>
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992690/>
<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-021-01101-z>
etc.
None of my cites start with Donald Trump.
Yours do.
Let that sink in.
You are an ignorant iKook, Hemidactylus, which is why it's so frustrating dealing with people like you who can't comprehend even their own cites.
Your own cite says this, you iKook:
"For all four studies in the paper, and for many studies since,
the same general pattern emerged. Poor performers overestimated
themselves much more than did those who were truly competent.
This is the signature pattern of the DKE."
Let _that_ sink in, given iKooks are to the left of the 1st quartile mark.
a. Alan Baker is and was a "poor performer" his entire life
b. Alan Browne is and was a "poor performer" his entire life
c. Lewis is and was a "poor performer" his entire life
d. Jolly Roger is and was a "poor performer" his entire life
e. Chris is and was a "poor performer" his entire life
f. Snit is and was a "poor performer" his entire life
g. Rod Speed is and was a "poor performer" his entire life
etc.
I know this because you iKooks can't fathom the simplest of things.
a. No iKook has an IQ that even approaches normal
b. As a direct result, no iKook owns something as common as a degree
c. Nor does any iKooks know the first thing about what he speaks of
You're all unfathomably ignorant of EVERYTHING you speak of, Hemidactylus. Even when you try to lie and claim you've read the seminal D-K papers.
You are a poster boy for namechecking and
weaponizing the DKE. You only illustrate your own ignorance of which you
are ironically very unaware. Why did you not now the DKE had been found
wanting by so many independent researchers? Because you are an empty
propagandist.
You believe that and yet you don't even know what D-K effects are.
Do you realize I said EVERYONE fits on the D-K graphs, Hemidactylus?
You. Me. My mother. Your favorite college professor.
Hell, even a race-car driver fits on the D-K scale, you iKook.
What you do NOT realize is EVERYTHING you think is completely wrong.
Because you don't own a mental capacity to understand the simplest things.
It's the basic hallmark of all you low-IQ uneducated ignorant iKooks.
HINT: Every single person with any skill is on those Dunning-Kruger graphs.
That. That is what you do not understand.
What kind of strange person does that, Hemidactylus?Examples:
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1215&context=numeracy
https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1188&context=numeracy
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840180/full
https://gwern.net/doc/iq/2020-gignac.pdf
And yet you shoot the messenger.
You are an idiot. Or more precisely, you're a classic iKook.
a. You know nothing
b. Yet you don't realize that
c. So you guess
d. And when caught guessing, you lie
What you need to do _before_ you go about 'dissing the seminal D-K results
is you have to first _understand_ them. After that, you're welcome to come back and discuss why you disagree with the results, Hemidactylus.
All you're doing above is desperately googling for a cite (any cite, it doesn't matter to you) that says something about D-K and that's it.
It's what you iKooks do.
The fact is:
a. You have absolutely no idea what the D-K papers actually say.
b. Worse, you lied that you read them
c. Or, if you ever did, as with Alan Browne who says there's
no walled garden, you didn't understand a thing about them.
This conversation is classic for what it's like to deal with you iKooks.
Like Alan Baker claiming to teach racing, he's a liar because _everything_
he says shows he doesn't know the simplest thing about what he claims.
On 2023-12-18 17:22, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:Does it diminish you in any way that Checo is ranked 3rd on that DriverDB
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wroteLOL!
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus? >>>>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in >>>>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows >>>>> you haven't gotten the memo.
Don't worry Hemidactylus,
I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they >>>> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he >>>> doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew >>>> up as racing terms)
Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
Here's my page at DriverDB:
<https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
Top 100? I wonder if Arlen even knows who that is. My fave driver. I was
all set to watch him on his home turf on both TVs (one cockpit view) and he >> wrecked 1st lap! Sad.
Yep... ...and it was such a foolish wreck.
There's a saying in racing:
"You can't win a race on the first lap, but you can certainly lose it".
Oh wow open wheel! I have a Civic so I was expecting a tricked out street
Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
car. Nope!
From the moment I decided to go racing, I knew I really wanted to race
an open wheel class. And top of my list was definitely what was still commonly called "Formula Ford" (but by the time I got one, officially
called "Formula F" to reflect the /F/ord and Honda /F/it engines that
were legal by then).
I think you established your bonafides. That Arlen is hung up on what
And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the
instructors):
<https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg> >>>
That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver >>> Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
Training Program page.
Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
Most committee members have won championships in their class while
others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee: >>>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
people call BMWs is ridiculous. Who cares.
Are you kidding? I'm just amused by it.
:-)
I mostly like watching garage shows. There was one focused on modding JDMs. >> I actually saw an old Skyline (I assume) a few months back locally with the >> driver on the passenger side. Was stock and not modded at all.
I am also at a loss as to why people do the stance car look. Or maybe it’s >> more the negative camber thing. Lowering was my thing in the late 80s with >> a Nissan pickup (with some subwoofer bass but not competition). But the
camber look makes no sense. I guess every generation tries to be more
ridiculous than the preceding one. The mumble rap makes no sense either and >> I grew up on hiphop.
Like in so many things, "stance" is an example of taking something that
does make sense (a certain amount of negative camber DOES enhance
cornering grip) and taking it to ridiculous extremes. Look at any racing series and you'll see some degree of negative camber on both axles; more
for narrower tires, and less for wider. The tuner crowd just sees that
and turns it up to eleven.
:-)
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-18 17:22, *Hemidactylus* wrote:Thanks for your very knowledgable reply. I was wondering if the hellaflush look is because the popularity of drift racing.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:Does it diminish you in any way that Checo is ranked 3rd on that DriverDB >>> Top 100? I wonder if Arlen even knows who that is. My fave driver. I was >>> all set to watch him on his home turf on both TVs (one cockpit view) and he >>> wrecked 1st lap! Sad.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wroteLOL!
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus? >>>>>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in >>>>>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
you haven't gotten the memo.
Don't worry Hemidactylus,
I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they >>>>> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he >>>>> doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew
up as racing terms)
Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
Here's my page at DriverDB:
<https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
Yep... ...and it was such a foolish wreck.
There's a saying in racing:
"You can't win a race on the first lap, but you can certainly lose it".
Oh wow open wheel! I have a Civic so I was expecting a tricked out street >>> car. Nope!
Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
From the moment I decided to go racing, I knew I really wanted to race
an open wheel class. And top of my list was definitely what was still
commonly called "Formula Ford" (but by the time I got one, officially
called "Formula F" to reflect the /F/ord and Honda /F/it engines that
were legal by then).
I think you established your bonafides. That Arlen is hung up on what
And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the >>>> instructors):
<https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg>
That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver >>>> Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite >>>> to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles >>>> under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers >>>> Training Program page.
Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia. >>>> Most committee members have won championships in their class while
others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee: >>>>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
people call BMWs is ridiculous. Who cares.
Are you kidding? I'm just amused by it.
:-)
I mostly like watching garage shows. There was one focused on modding JDMs. >>> I actually saw an old Skyline (I assume) a few months back locally with the >>> driver on the passenger side. Was stock and not modded at all.
I am also at a loss as to why people do the stance car look. Or maybe it’s
more the negative camber thing. Lowering was my thing in the late 80s with >>> a Nissan pickup (with some subwoofer bass but not competition). But the
camber look makes no sense. I guess every generation tries to be more
ridiculous than the preceding one. The mumble rap makes no sense either and >>> I grew up on hiphop.
Like in so many things, "stance" is an example of taking something that
does make sense (a certain amount of negative camber DOES enhance
cornering grip) and taking it to ridiculous extremes. Look at any racing
series and you'll see some degree of negative camber on both axles; more
for narrower tires, and less for wider. The tuner crowd just sees that
and turns it up to eleven.
:-)
On 2023-12-18 21:36, Wally J wrote:
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Does it diminish you in any way that Checo is ranked 3rd on that
DriverDB Top 100? I wonder if Arlen even knows who that is. My fave
driver. I was all set to watch him on his home turf on both TVs (one
cockpit view) and he wrecked 1st lap! Sad.
I don't know a damn thing about racing. But then, I've never claimed
to be a "racer" nor a "teacher" of racing.
Alan Baker doesn't know a damn thing about anything.
I know enough about racing to have started in 2012...
...and been invited to instruct just 4 years later.
I think you established your bonafides. That he is hung up on what
people call BMWs is ridiculous. Who cares.
Heh heh heh... Chris tried the same trick when he ridiculed the use
of the word "vehicle" in immunological contexts - because he was
chilishly trying to get out of the simple fact that he doesn't know
the first thing about immunology - even after having "claimed" to
have a PhD in the sciences.
It's the same with Alan Baker.
Other than that you tried to claim that a facetious comment about
"bimmer" vs "beemer" meant that I couldn't possibly be telling the
truth about being a racing driver and race driving instructor.
He doesn't know the first thing about BMWs. He just doesn't.
I know I own one.
Unless you have photos of old racing books, he won't believe you
I know I own one.
It's not even an exclusive club. BMWs aren't huge fucking secrets.
I have only owned BMW cars since 2001, and while I don't do my own
repairs, I can certainly tell you where to connect jumper cables, how to
do routine maintenance, and so on. He acts like "knowing the first
thing about BMWs" is some huge achievement when it just isn't.
On 2023-12-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-18 21:36, Wally J wrote:
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Does it diminish you in any way that Checo is ranked 3rd on that
DriverDB Top 100? I wonder if Arlen even knows who that is. My fave
driver. I was all set to watch him on his home turf on both TVs (one
cockpit view) and he wrecked 1st lap! Sad.
I don't know a damn thing about racing. But then, I've never claimed
to be a "racer" nor a "teacher" of racing.
Alan Baker doesn't know a damn thing about anything.
I know enough about racing to have started in 2012...
...and been invited to instruct just 4 years later.
Unless you have photos of old racing books, Arlen won't believe you. 🤣
I think you established your bonafides. That he is hung up on what
people call BMWs is ridiculous. Who cares.
Heh heh heh... Chris tried the same trick when he ridiculed the use
of the word "vehicle" in immunological contexts - because he was
chilishly trying to get out of the simple fact that he doesn't know
the first thing about immunology - even after having "claimed" to
have a PhD in the sciences.
It's the same with Alan Baker.
Other than that you tried to claim that a facetious comment about
"bimmer" vs "beemer" meant that I couldn't possibly be telling the
truth about being a racing driver and race driving instructor.
He doesn't know the first thing about BMWs. He just doesn't.
I know I own one.
It's not even an exclusive club. BMWs aren't huge fucking secrets. I
have only owned BMW cars since 2001, and while I don't do my own
repairs, I can certainly tell you where to connect jumper cables, how to
do routine maintenance, and so on. Arlen acts like "knowing the first
thing about BMWs" is some huge achievement when it just isn't.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Unless you have photos of old racing books, he won't believe you
Hi Jolly Roger,
You again are completely wrong. All he'd have to do is say something about bimmers (or beemers) that showed he actually knew something about them.
He knows nothing about them.
He doesn't even know what EVERYONE calls them in racing circuits, JR.
Who is _that_ ignorant, Jolly Roger?
Nobody, right?
Yet iKooks are.
I know I own one.
It's not even an exclusive club. BMWs aren't huge fucking secrets.
It's no secret I've owned both a bimmer & beemer for years, Jolly Roger. They're not "secrets" to anyone.
Mine have never been to a mechanic, even as they have many miles on them.
I have all the BMW tools, even as many of them are literally in German.
What _is_ a secret to the iKooks is even the simplest things about them.
If you can't tell a carburetor from fuel injection, Jolly Roger, then you know nothing about the air:gas stoichiometric ratio either, Jolly Roger.
I have only owned BMW cars since 2001, and while I don't do my own
repairs, I can certainly tell you where to connect jumper cables, how to
do routine maintenance, and so on. He acts like "knowing the first
thing about BMWs" is some huge achievement when it just isn't.
There's a reason the iKooks are such rather strange people, Jolly Roger.
Your problems stem first from your low IQ but then you bought into the
Apple zealotry such that you lost any ability to think like an adult.
That's why you call anyone who tells you facts about Apple, an 'it'.
You're _afraid_ of that person.
Because you're _afraid_ of facts.
You're afraid of facts because your belief systems aren't based on them.
So facts are deadly dangerous weapons against you strange people, JR.
You iKooks don't know the first thing about _anything_, Jolly Roger.
a. Alan Browne doesn't even know there is a walled garden
b. Jolly Roger doesn't know how Apple updates/upgrades iOS
c. Nospam constantly claims imaginary functionality that doesn't exist
d. Alan Baker claims people are gay just for telling the truth about Apple
On 2023-12-19 10:30, Jolly Roger wrote:
Unless you have photos of old racing books, Arlen won't believe you. 🤣
Well...
...I COULD take a picture of the dozens of books I have on racing...
...but they're mostly about the design, construction and care and
feeding of race cars.
I do have the seminal work by Niki Lauda on driving:
"The Art and Science of Grand Prix Driving".
Does that count?
:-)
He doesn't know the first thing about BMWs. He just doesn't.
I know I own one.
It's not even an exclusive club. BMWs aren't huge fucking secrets. I
have only owned BMW cars since 2001, and while I don't do my own
repairs, I can certainly tell you where to connect jumper cables, how
to do routine maintenance, and so on. Arlen acts like "knowing the
first thing about BMWs" is some huge achievement when it just isn't.
The truly hilarious part is that he thinks that using two particular
slang terms means you know everything else about race driving.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Pics or it's fake news
What's interesting is Android updates security about monthly for all
devices on the Internet that are Android 10+, while iOS rarely updates.
Pics or it's fake news
No doubt you are gullible enough to see a face on Mars.
Unlike you I don't interpret these papers as Holy Gospel.
I am skeptical and in Popperian fashion think sacred cows need to
stand up to rigid treatment.
So I have gone much further than you in my intellectual
development and seen the emperor may not have clothes.
The DK effect appears as an artifact. We are pattern seeking creatures.
On 2023-12-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-19 10:30, Jolly Roger wrote:
Well...
Unless you have photos of old racing books, Arlen won't believe you. 🤣 >>
...I COULD take a picture of the dozens of books I have on racing...
...but they're mostly about the design, construction and care and
feeding of race cars.
I do have the seminal work by Niki Lauda on driving:
"The Art and Science of Grand Prix Driving".
Does that count?
:-)
Pics or it's fake news in Arlen's World! đź‰
On 2023-12-19 15:22, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Pics or it's fake news
What's interesting is Android updates security about monthly for all
devices on the Internet that are Android 10+, while iOS rarely updates.
It's more interesting that you're busily running away from the obvious
proof that I'm a race driving instructor...
...and for "interesting" read "hilarious"!
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Pics or it's fake news
Android updates blah blah blah...
Jolly Roger has claimed that iOS updates more frequently than Android.
What kind of person is that ignorant?
iKooks
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
No doubt you are gullible enough to see a face on Mars.
I've been called a lot of things in life, but "gullible" was never one
of those things
On 2023-12-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-19 14:57, Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2023-12-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-19 10:30, Jolly Roger wrote:
Well...
Unless you have photos of old racing books, Arlen won't believe you. 🤣 >>>>
...I COULD take a picture of the dozens of books I have on racing...
...but they're mostly about the design, construction and care and
feeding of race cars.
I do have the seminal work by Niki Lauda on driving:
"The Art and Science of Grand Prix Driving".
Does that count?
:-)
Pics or it's fake news in Arlen's World! đź‰
Well... ...I had all the books on a bookshelf right next to me so...
,https://drive.google.com/file/d/1685A0qiE2t0XtAsYXhq919dTm3WFaaWM/view?usp=share_link>
Nice spread!
He's a pathetic juvenile man child.
He then resorts to outright lies...
Nice spread!
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Nice spread!
While I don't claim to be a racer, I know what a catenary is.
Does Alan Baker?
Bearing in mind the IQ 40 Alan Baker thinks he's a genius and yet, he repeatedly insisted nobody could change the newsreader header line...
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Nice spread!
While I don't claim to be a racer, I know what a catenary is.
Does Alan Baker?
Bearing in mind the IQ 40 Alan Baker thinks he's a genius and yet, he repeatedly insisted nobody could change the newsreader header line...
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-19 16:36, Wally J wrote:The offspring of Sylvester and Tweety Bird?
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Nice spread!
While I don't claim to be a racer, I know what a catenary is.
Does Alan Baker?
As a matter of fact, I DO know what a catenary is.
LOL!
Bearing in mind the IQ 40 Alan Baker thinks he's a genius and yet, he
repeatedly insisted nobody could change the newsreader header line...
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing. >>
This should be good.
On 2023-12-19 16:36, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Nice spread!
While I don't claim to be a racer, I know what a catenary is.
Does Alan Baker?
As a matter of fact, I DO know what a catenary is.
Bearing in mind the IQ 40 Alan Baker thinks he's a genius and yet, he
repeatedly insisted nobody could change the newsreader header line...
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing.
LOL!
This should be good.
On 2023-12-19 16:08, Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2023-12-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-19 14:57, Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2023-12-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-19 10:30, Jolly Roger wrote:
Unless you have photos of old racing books, Arlen won't believe you. 🤣
Well...
...I COULD take a picture of the dozens of books I have on racing... >>>>>
...but they're mostly about the design, construction and care and
feeding of race cars.
I do have the seminal work by Niki Lauda on driving:
"The Art and Science of Grand Prix Driving".
Does that count?
:-)
Pics or it's fake news in Arlen's World! đź‰
Well... ...I had all the books on a bookshelf right next to me so...
,https://drive.google.com/file/d/1685A0qiE2t0XtAsYXhq919dTm3WFaaWM/view?usp=share_link>
Nice spread!
And I've read them all and do you know what?
Not ONE of them has the word "bimmer" or "beemer" in it?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
Nice spread!
While I don't claim to be a racer, I know what a catenary is.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
He then resorts to outright lies...
You're the one
On 2023-12-20, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
He then resorts to outright lies...
You're the one
How embarrassing for you. Lies are truly all you have.
Your addition of comp.sys.mac.advocacy is noted as well.
What a sad and useless troll you are.
On 20 Dec 2023 at 05:53:24 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-20, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
He then resorts to outright lies...
You're the one
How embarrassing for you. Lies are truly all you have.
Your addition of comp.sys.mac.advocacy is noted as well.
What a sad and useless troll you are.
So why feed it?
John.
That just means each of the authors don't know the first thing about
cars.
So why feed it?
+1
On 20 Dec 2023 at 05:53:24 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
On 2023-12-20, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
He then resorts to outright lies...
You're the one
How embarrassing for you. Lies are truly all you have.
Your addition of comp.sys.mac.advocacy is noted as well.
What a sad and useless troll you are.
So why feed it?
So why feed it?
You must be new here.
The offspring of Sylvester and Tweety Bird?Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing. >>LOL!
This should be good.
While I don't claim to be a racer, I know what a catenary is.
Is that what you will end up hanging yourself with, you sorry sack of
shit? We can dream...
Remember, Alan Browne is the same low-IQ ignorant child-like iKook who repeatedly claimed it was impossible to change newsreader headers, JR.
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
All you low-IQ iKooks greatly suffer from the D-K left-quartile flaws, JR.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
That just means each of the authors don't know the first thing about
cars.
It's always the same with you low-IQ ignorant child-like iKooks, JR.
Remember, Alan Browne is the same low-IQ ignorant child-like iKook who repeatedly claimed it was impossible to change newsreader headers, JR.
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
All you low-IQ iKooks greatly suffer from the D-K left-quartile flaws, JR.
For example, that you actually believe a technical book would use common slang is interesting. It might. But it just as likely might not. The mere fact they don't use slang isn't any indication that they're unaware of it.
Certainly NOBODY who is on a BMW forum would _ever_ be unaware, JR.
(They ridicule the hell out of any moron who doesn't know these words.)
Remember, Alan Baker "said" he's a racer & teacher - and yet - he clearly
did not know the simplest things about that which he claims excellence.
What's different is that someone who supposedly has been owning BMWs and racing cars (and even "teaching" racing, if you can believe that),
who doesn't know the first thing about those cars - is either extremely
a. ignorant - or -
b. a liar.
Pick one.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
The offspring of Sylvester and Tweety Bird?Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing. >>>LOL!
This should be good.
Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this newsgroup, Hemidactylus. The reason is I study you strange people as I've never met anyone like you.
You see the word "catenary".
You are told it has something to do with "racing".
Specifically something about "teaching" racing, right?
And your only response is to make silly childish kindergarten jokes?
Every response from you, Hemidactylus, shows your IQ is abnormally low.
Don't worry about your IQ.
You can't do anything about it (except prove it every time you post).
That abnormally low IQ is a trait of all the iKooks, Hemidactylus
Jolly Roger, Alan Browne, Alan Baker, Chris, Lewis, nospam, et al.
Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote
Remember, Alan Browne is the same low-IQ ignorant child-like iKook who
repeatedly claimed it was impossible to change newsreader headers, JR.
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
All you low-IQ iKooks greatly suffer from the D-K left-quartile flaws, JR.
Correction. I get these iKooks confused.
Alan Brown is the low-IQ ignorant iKook who has never seen the walled
garden (and, in fact, he claims because he is ignorant of it, it can't exist).
Who is that ignorant?
Nobody, right?
Nobody but iKooks.
Meanwhile...
Alan Baker is the low-IQ ignorant iKook who claims to teach racing and own BMWs and yet he doesn't know even the slightest about bimmers or beemers.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
While I don't claim to be a racer, I know what a catenary is.
Is that what you will end up hanging yourself with, you sorry sack of
shit? We can dream...
Hi Jolly Roger,
I love when all you iKooks post. I really do. I read EVERYTHING you say.
I learn (about you) from you, in fact, Jolly Roger. And from Alan Browne.
Also from Hemidactylus. It's only Joerg and Alan Baker that I plonked. Everything I post to the child-like Apple newsgroups has a purpose.
A. To disseminate (or learn) facts about Apple products, and,
B. To show the iKooks for what they are.
The reason for bringing up the fact Alan Baker claimed repeatedly that
nobody could change newsreader headers was to prove that the iKooks form
very strong belief systems which are based on exactly zero actual facts.
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
It's the same reason I bring up that Alan Baker claimed repeatedly that he "taught racing" and owns a BMW, and yet, he knows nothing about either.
That's why I brought up the word "catenary" which _every_ (real) racer
knows all about, as it's one of the most important words in racing schools.
Yet I'll be Alan Baker is, at this very moment, furiously googling what the word catenary means - and all he's finding is cites about bridge building.
This so-called "racer" is confused by that word. Bewildered. Flummoxed.
His low-IQ brain can't figure out what a catenary has to do with racing.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
The offspring of Sylvester and Tweety Bird?Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing. >>>LOL!
This should be good.
Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this newsgroup, Hemidactylus. The reason is I study you strange people as I've never met anyone like you.
You see the word "catenary".
You are told it has something to do with "racing".
Specifically something about "teaching" racing, right?
And your only response is to make silly childish kindergarten jokes?
Every response from you, Hemidactylus, shows your IQ is abnormally low.
Don't worry about your IQ.
You can't do anything about it (except prove it every time you post).
That abnormally low IQ is a trait of all the iKooks, Hemidactylus
Jolly Roger, Alan Browne, Alan Baker, Chris, Lewis, nospam, et al.
Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
The offspring of Sylvester and Tweety Bird?Please ask the iKook Alan Baker if he knows how a catenary affects racing.
LOL!
This should be good.
Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this newsgroup, Hemidactylus. >> The reason is I study you strange people as I've never met anyone like you. >>
You see the word "catenary".
You are told it has something to do with "racing".
Specifically something about "teaching" racing, right?
And your only response is to make silly childish kindergarten jokes?
Every response from you, Hemidactylus, shows your IQ is abnormally low.
Don't worry about your IQ.
You can't do anything about it (except prove it every time you post).
That abnormally low IQ is a trait of all the iKooks, Hemidactylus
Jolly Roger, Alan Browne, Alan Baker, Chris, Lewis, nospam, et al.
Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word
"catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?
Oh great an obsessive stalker.
Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word
"catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we?
Oh great an obsessive stalker.
On 2023-12-20, John Hill <watcombeman@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On 20 Dec 2023 at 05:53:24 GMT, "Jolly Roger" <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote: >>
On 2023-12-20, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
He then resorts to outright lies...
You're the one
How embarrassing for you. Lies are truly all you have.
Your addition of comp.sys.mac.advocacy is noted as well.
What a sad and useless troll you are.
So why feed it?
You must be new here.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word >>> "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we? >>Oh great an obsessive stalker.
No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if he desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing, particularly when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers depending on the track.
If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to hold yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms after all.
Yet he doesn't.
So he won't.
*You think I don't know how ignorant all you iKooks are Hemidactylus?*
Whether or not you quote his replies, my point is that all you iKooks are
a. Low IQ
b. Uneducated
c. Ignorant
Such that you iKooks are so far to the left of the D-K first quartile that you don't even realize how ignorant you are - as you think you're a genius.
Which is the point.
While I don't ever claim to be a racer, nor a teacher, I probably already know more about racing than the iKook Alan Baker will know in his life.
That's literally how incredibly ignorant all you iKooks are Hemidactylus.
A. *Who is so ignorant to claim Apple fully patches older releases?*
Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Jolly Roger says so all the time.
B. *Who is so ignorant to claim the famed walled garden doesn't exist?*
Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Alan Browne says so all the time.
C. *Who is so ignorant to claim imaginary graphical WiFi strength apps?*
Nobody right? Yet the ignorant nospam fabricates the apps all the time.
It's no longer shocking how utterly ignorant all iKooks are, Hemidactylus.
Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term even as it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in racing.
However, I suspect that Alan may have a point. I will continue to be amused by
the antics of the trolls and those who rise to their bait - silently.
No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.I was referring to your "Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on this newsgroup, Hemidactylus." creeper.
Such that you iKooks are so far to the left of the D-K first quartile that >> you don't even realize how ignorant you are - as you think you're a genius. >>So you make up some fictitious category "iKooks" lacking real application
in the world and still cling to the illusory statistical artifact of the
D-K graph.
Then you pretend to lecture me about anything. Silly ignorant kook.
It's no longer shocking how utterly ignorant all iKooks are, Hemidactylus. >>
Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term even as >> it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in racing.
How would you know?
Aren't you a mere dilettante at best?
Maybe you're way out of your league.
I don't trust you to convey much of anything accurately
as you're just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a GED and a mail-order degree from a diploma mill.
Aren't you a mere dilettante at best?Heh heh heh... like I said, Hemidactylus. I never claimed to be a racer.
But I do claim to have higher education.
Which means I understand what a catenary is.
And how it applies to racing.
By contrast, Alan Baker has never heard of a catenary in his entire life.
Even after desperately googling it, he still can't figure out what it is.
And yet, it's one of the most important racing terms there ever was.
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with the word >>> "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of racing"), shall we? >>Oh great an obsessive stalker.
No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if he desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing, particularly when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers depending on the track.
If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to hold yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms after all.
Yet he doesn't.
So he won't.
Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term even as it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in racing.
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wroteI was referring to your “Rest assured, I read EVERYTHING you write on
Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with
the word "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of
racing"), shall we?
Oh great an obsessive stalker.
No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
this newsgroup, Hemidactylus.” creeper.
So you make up some fictitious category “iKooks” lacking real
Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if
he desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing,
particularly when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers
depending on the track.
If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to
hold yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms
after all.
Yet he doesn't. So he won't.
*You think I don't know how ignorant all you iKooks are
Hemidactylus?*
Whether or not you quote his replies, my point is that all you iKooks
are a. Low IQ b. Uneducated c. Ignorant
Such that you iKooks are so far to the left of the D-K first quartile
that you don't even realize how ignorant you are - as you think
you're a genius.
application in the world and still cling to the illusory statistical
artifact of the D-K graph. Then you pretend to lecture me about
anything. Silly ignorant kook.
Which is the point.
While I don't ever claim to be a racer, nor a teacher, I probably
already know more about racing than the iKook Alan Baker will know in
his life.
That's literally how incredibly ignorant all you iKooks are
Hemidactylus. A. *Who is so ignorant to claim Apple fully patches
older releases?* Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Jolly Roger
says so all the time.
B. *Who is so ignorant to claim the famed walled garden doesn't
exist?* Nobody right? Yet the ignorant iKook Alan Browne says so all
the time.
C. *Who is so ignorant to claim imaginary graphical WiFi strength
apps?* Nobody right? Yet the ignorant nospam fabricates the apps all
the time.
It's no longer shocking how utterly ignorant all iKooks are,
Hemidactylus.
Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term
even as it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in
racing.
How would you know? Aren’t you a mere dilettante at best? Maybe you’re way out of your league. I don’t trust you to convey much of anything accurately as you’re just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a
GED and a mail-order degree from a diploma mill.
On 2023-12-21 00:40, Wally J wrote:
*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
Let's see what Alan Baker 40 IQ is capable of responding to with
the word "catenary" (given he's a self-proclaimed "instructor of
racing"), shall we?
Oh great an obsessive stalker.
No. It's the _opposite_ of a stalker, Hemidactylus. He's plonked.
Nonetheless, I'm sure one of you will quote the IQ 40 Alan Baker if
he desperately googles to see how a catenary applies to racing,
particularly when racing beemers, but it also applies to cagers
depending on the track.
1. I don't race a "beemer" or a BMW. I race a 1998 Formula F Van
Diemen RF98 Honda.
If he responds to the challenge, you childish iKooks won't be able to
hold yourselves back saying that Alan knew the simplest racing terms
after all.
2. The challenge is on YOU, Arlen.
Yet he doesn't. So he won't.
I'm pretty sure I know how YOU think it's significant...
...but you're wrong.
Which is why I'm positive Alan Baker has no idea of the racing term
even as it's one of the most significant and common terms to teach in
racing.
It really isn't.
I've:
Attended 3 racing schools.
Raced for a decade.
Taught racing since 2017.
And no one has ever used that term.
Not once.
It's crystal clear who the real "kook" is here.
They can't help but project their own weaknesses onto others.
How would you know? Aren˘t you a mere dilettante at best? Maybe you˘re
way out of your league. I don˘t trust you to convey much of anything
accurately as you˘re just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a
GED and a mail-order degree from a diploma mill.
Every single accusation from him is a confession.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
It's crystal clear who the real "kook" is here.
Hi Jolly Roger,
I agree with you. I'll agree with anyone who presents a sensible argument.
*Why do these rather strange iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/pSJ4OnxviWQ/m/KiMqn1w4AwAJ>
Alan Browne, for example, calls anyone bearing facts, an "it", which is his way of making all inconvenient facts about Apple products go away for him.
Likewise, you claimed many times that Apple fully supports older releases. Just as nospam constantly fabricated imaginary app store apps for iOS.
Alan Baker, admittedly the lowest IQ of all the iKooks, claimed many times that you can't change something as trivial as the newsreader header line.
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>
And even now, the IQ 40 iKook Alan Baker "claims" to "teach racing" and yet he doesn't know the simplest most basic of racing terms such as how a catenary applies to racing circuits when it's the most critical component
in terms of racing strategy.
At this moment, Alan is furiously desperately googling & yet he still can't comprehend what he sees because he has never taken Calculus or Physics.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
They can't help but project their own weaknesses onto others.
Actually it's Alan Browne, not me, who calls people bearing facts, an "it".
How would you know? Aren┤ you a mere dilettante at best? Maybe you┴e >>> way out of your league. I don┤ trust you to convey much of anything
accurately as youâ”´e just an arrogant blowhard who might have gotten a
GED and a mail-order degree from a diploma mill.
Every single accusation from him is a confession.
My point about you iKooks is you're all Dunning-Kruger 1st quartile, JR.
That's why I brought up one of the most important racing terms, which I'm sure that none of you low-IQ uneducated iKooks has any clue why it's so.
You iKooks can only google but it's like you googling the metric tensor.
The low IQ and lack of education means you can't understand what you find.
HINT: Anyone who took Physics would know EXACTLY how a catenary applies to racing in such a way as to make it one of racing's most important terms.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
It's crystal clear who the real "kook" is here.
*Why do these rather strange iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?*
*Why do these rather strange iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?*
*Why does he repeatedly call anyone who disagrees with him "iKooks"?*
Answer: Pure projection, as usual. He, like any other narcissistic
bully, can't help but project his own insecurities and weaknesses onto others. He calls everyone else a "kook" because he knows deep down
that *he* is a kook.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
*Why do these rather strange iKooks repeatedly call people an
"it"?*
*Why does he repeatedly call anyone who disagrees with him "iKooks"?*
Heh heh heh...You're actually too stupid to realize how stupid you
are.
typical juvenile response to being called out.
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
There isn't anyone intelligent in racing circuits who doesn't know the
significance of the catenary in terms of teaching basic racing skills.
I’m not a racer, but I would guess it has something to do with calculating how to enter and exit a curve. As a motorcycle rider there are some very
fine points of curve management one must learn to handle their bike safely.
My point about you iKooks is you're all Dunning-Kruger 1st quartile, JR.
Heh heh heh... You're actually too stupid to realize how stupid you are.
Even though your entire life, people have been calling you stupid, JR.
What's interesting is these iKooks are all to the far left of the Dunning-Kruger first quartile such that they can't even fathom why they're iKooks.
On 2023-12-21 18:20, badgolferman wrote:
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
There isn't anyone intelligent in racing circuits who doesn't know the
significance of the catenary in terms of teaching basic racing skills.
I’m not a racer, but I would guess it has something to do with calculating >> how to enter and exit a curve. As a motorcycle rider there are some very
fine points of curve management one must learn to handle their bike safely. >>
I am a racer... ...for the last 11 years.
And before I was a racer, I took a 3-day race driving school with Skip
Barber (look them up) followed by 2 2-day advance courses.
And now I myself am a certified senior race driving instructor.
And I can back up everything I say.
In all that time, no one has ever referred to the line that a car takes through a corner as being a catenary.
But Arlen is too cowardly to engage.
Do you know that spacetime is four dimensional and that it's and that mass and energy (which are equivalent) warp it such that gravity isn't a force?
My point about you iKooks is you're all Dunning-Kruger 1st quartile, JR.Dunning-Kruger is the most abused non-thing ever. You are a charlatan.
You're abusing people with a dubious psychological construct that has been shown statistically flawed. It's like the only weapon in your arsenal and
it is a dud.
There isn't anyone intelligent in racing circuits who doesn't know the
significance of the catenary in terms of teaching basic racing skills.
I˘m not a racer, but I would guess it has something to do with calculating how to enter and exit a curve. As a motorcycle rider there are some very
fine points of curve management one must learn to handle their bike safely.
badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote
There isn't anyone intelligent in racing circuits who doesn't know the
significance of the catenary in terms of teaching basic racing skills.
Iâ–Ś not a racer, but I would guess it has something to do with calculating >> how to enter and exit a curve. As a motorcycle rider there are some very
fine points of curve management one must learn to handle their bike safely.
Hi badgolferman,
Exactly. This is why I've never considered you (or Ant or Steve, et al.) an iKook but why _everyone_ knows that Alan Baker, for one, is an iKook.
You have the cognitive ability to comprehend that physical forces are the same in all directions, particularly the forces that suspend a bridge are
the same forces that act upon a motorcycle navigating a curve at speed.
As an aside (owning a K1200 myself as I believe you have a Gold Wing), it mostly applies in racing circuits (as the real world has opposing traffic).
The point of bringing up the catenary or the metric tensor or Christoffel symbols or even Dunning Kruger effects isn't so much what they are - but
that the iKooks are ignorant of them and yet they form strong opinions.
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
as I believe you have a Gold Wing),
Just a minor discrepancy…
It’s actually a Honda Goldwing, not Gold Wing. I know you will find both written versions on the internet and even at the website, but the logo, manual, and electronic screen all print it as Goldwing. The same holds true for the Honda Silverwing.
My mother who is from Germany, gets upset when people refer to the BMW as a Beemer or Bimmer and considers that disrespectful. I tried to tell her Americans shorten words because we’re lazy. Remember International House Of Pancakes (IHOP) and Dairy Queen (DQ) ? I’m sure you can think of many other companies that have given in to slang expressions.
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
as I believe you have a Gold Wing),
Just a minor discrepancy…
It’s actually a Honda Goldwing, not Gold Wing. I know you will find both written versions on the internet and even at the website, but the logo, manual, and electronic screen all print it as Goldwing. The same holds true for the Honda Silverwing.
My mother who is from Germany, gets upset when people refer to the BMW as a Beemer or Bimmer and considers that disrespectful. I tried to tell her Americans shorten words because we’re lazy. Remember International House Of Pancakes (IHOP) and Dairy Queen (DQ) ? I’m sure you can think of many other companies that have given in to slang expressions.
badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:I don’t know how it’s spelled but I have heard a certain crotch rocket referred to as “gixxer”. Hayabusa is a monstrosity derived from that infamous lineage.
as I believe you have a Gold Wing),
Just a minor discrepancy…
It’s actually a Honda Goldwing, not Gold Wing. I know you will find both >> written versions on the internet and even at the website, but the logo,
manual, and electronic screen all print it as Goldwing. The same holds true >> for the Honda Silverwing.
My mother who is from Germany, gets upset when people refer to the BMW as a >> Beemer or Bimmer and considers that disrespectful. I tried to tell her
Americans shorten words because we’re lazy. Remember International House Of
Pancakes (IHOP) and Dairy Queen (DQ) ? I’m sure you can think of many other
companies that have given in to slang expressions.
I was astounded to learn the Tesla Plaid can blow the fairings off these things 0-60. So an ebike is a scarier thought.
as I believe you have a Gold Wing),
Just a minor discrepancy...
It's actually a Honda Goldwing, not Gold Wing. I know you will find both written versions on the internet and even at the website, but the logo, manual, and electronic screen all print it as Goldwing. The same holds true for the Honda Silverwing.
My mother who is from Germany, gets upset when people refer to the BMW as a Beemer or Bimmer and considers that disrespectful.
I tried to tell her Americans shorten words because we're lazy.
Remember International House Of
Pancakes (IHOP) and Dairy Queen (DQ) ? I'm sure you can think of many other companies that have given in to slang expressions.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 299 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 50:10:26 |
Calls: | 6,689 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 12,225 |
Messages: | 5,344,484 |
Posted today: | 1 |