In comp.mobile.android, on Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:50:42 -0500, Oscar Mayer <nobody@oscarmayer.com> wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2023 08:05:09 +0000, Jeff Layman wrote:
I believe all/most phones require the earphone cable for an antenna. >>>> I don't use an earphone !
And I doubt that many carry wired earphones around. Even if you did,
there are plenty of wireless Android earbuds around. Those would make FM >>> unusable. I've never tried testing to see if a loose piece of insulated
wire just placed in the earphone socket would act as an antenna and
allow FM radio to be heard over the phone's internal speaker. Perhaps
the coupling would work, but perhaps not if it needs a physical connection. >>>
I rarely use the sockets for anything, but one small advantage to not
having them would be better water resistance. However, I doubt many
people swim or surf with their smartphone on them, and a waterproof bag
would be a more reliable choice (and a considerably cheaper one than an
iPhone).
It's for emergencies. You don't carry it around.
You use it when needed. Like you use a flashlight.
Exactly.
I keep wired earbuds in my car and in my suitcase and in my home. The
last two are sometimes the same ones!
The only problem is when the battery goes dead on the wired earbuds.
Wait! That doesn't happen, like it does to wireless.
In a real emergency, you will be frantic to be using that wired headphone.
Not having the radio is like not having a flashlight when you need it.
In a real emergency, you will be frantic to be using that wired headphone. >>
Not having the radio is like not having a flashlight when you need it.
This is what's so very strange about the Apple iKooks
On 2023-11-19, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
In a real emergency, you will be frantic to be using that wired headphone. >>>
Not having the radio is like not having a flashlight when you need it.
This is what's so very strange about the Apple iKooks
"People who aren't scared shitless of society breaking down 24/7 to the extent that theypitch a shit fit if their smartphones don't have FM
radio capability are iKooks, y'all. #IAmVerySmart!" 🤡
"People who aren't scared shitless of society breaking down 24/7 to the extent that theypitch a shit fit if their smartphones don't have FM
radio capability are iKooks, y'all. #IAmVerySmart!"
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
"People who aren't scared shitless of society breaking down 24/7 to the
extent that theypitch a shit fit if their smartphones don't have FM
radio capability are iKooks, y'all. #IAmVerySmart!"
Hi Jolly Roger,
I study you very strange people, Jolly Roger so I understand how you feel.
You would think they'd go over their Android phones not having an
AM radio built in - that's much more useful in an emergency as the transmission range is typically higher - notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that cover several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be charged with the
built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than the
built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when the SHTF!?!?
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than Wally).
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
You would think they'd go 頎柬綄頎柬綄頎柬綄 over their Android phones not having an
AM radio built in - that's much more useful in an emergency as the
transmission range is typically higher - notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that cover
several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be charged with the
built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than the
built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when the SHTF!?!?
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than Wally).
On the basis of logic alone, no amount of MARKETING is going to convince an intelligent person how "courageous" only Apple claims it is, for them to remove basic functional hardware - whose loss is what cripples the iPhone.
How many _thousands_ of Israeli civilians who were inside their
safe rooms and hiding under beds in bedrooms and even some hiding inside kitchen cabinets for half a day were there who would have given anything
for an FM radio in addition to that almost worthless iPhone without it.
On 2023-11-19 14:01, Wally J wrote:
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
You would think they'd go 頎柬綄頎柬綄頎柬綄 over their Android >>> phones not having an
AM radio built in - that's much more useful in an emergency as the
transmission range is typically higher - notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that cover
several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be charged with the
built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than the
built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when the SHTF!?!? >>>
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than Wally).
On the basis of logic alone, no amount of MARKETING is going to
convince an
intelligent person how "courageous" only Apple claims it is, for them to
remove basic functional hardware - whose loss is what cripples the
iPhone.
How many _thousands_ of Israeli civilians who were inside their
safe rooms and hiding under beds in bedrooms and even some hiding inside
kitchen cabinets for half a day were there who would have given anything
for an FM radio in addition to that almost worthless iPhone without it.
Riiiiiiiight.
FM radio one-way communication is so much better than the two-way communication offered by every smartphone...
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
"People who aren't scared shitless of society breaking down 24/7 to the
extent that theypitch a shit fit if their smartphones don't have FM
radio capability are iKooks, y'all. #IAmVerySmart!"
Hi Jolly Roger,
I study you very strange people, Jolly Roger so I understand how you feel.
Lots of people are like you and Alan Browne, Jolly Roger, who are always making buying decisions wholly influenced by MARKETING to believe a product that does not have basic functionality is better than one that does.
You actually believe that not having something is better than having it.
Why?
Because Marketing told you it was "courageous" to not have it.
Now you _feel_ courageous, Jolly Roger. Don't you.
*You feel so very _courageous_ not having what everyone else has*, JR.
Am I right or am I right!
On 2023-11-19, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
In a real emergency, you will be frantic to be using that wired headphone. >>>
Not having the radio is like not having a flashlight when you need it.
This is what's so very strange about the Apple iKooks
"People who aren't scared shitless of society breaking down 24/7 to the extent that theypitch a shit fit if their smartphones don't have FM
radio capability are iKooks, y'all. #IAmVerySmart!" 🤡
I have access to FM radio in my car, my home entertainment center, a neglected boombox and maybe a few devices I long forgot about. I still
don't listen to FM or AM for that matter. Last I cared AM was infested by political kooks. FM got taken over by love sponges. So functional.
On 2023-11-19 14:01, Wally J wrote:
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
You would think they'd go 頎柬綄頎柬綄頎柬綄 over their Android phones not having an
AM radio built in - that's much more useful in an emergency as the
transmission range is typically higher - notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that cover
several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be charged with the
built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than the
built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when the SHTF!?!? >>>
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than Wally).
On the basis of logic alone, no amount of MARKETING is going to convince an >> intelligent person how "courageous" only Apple claims it is, for them to
remove basic functional hardware - whose loss is what cripples the iPhone. >>
How many _thousands_ of Israeli civilians who were inside their
safe rooms and hiding under beds in bedrooms and even some hiding inside
kitchen cabinets for half a day were there who would have given anything
for an FM radio in addition to that almost worthless iPhone without it.
Riiiiiiiight.
FM radio one-way communication is so much better than the two-way communication offered by every smartphone...
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-11-19 14:01, Wally J wrote:Emergency management on Shitter worked ok before sociopathic manbaby
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
You would think they'd go 頎柬綄頎柬綄頎柬綄 over their Android >>>> phones not having an AM radio built in - that's much more useful in
an emergency as the transmission range is typically higher -
notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that
cover several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be charged
with the built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than
the built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when the
SHTF!?!?
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than Wally).
On the basis of logic alone, no amount of MARKETING is going to
convince an intelligent person how "courageous" only Apple claims it
is, for them to remove basic functional hardware - whose loss is
what cripples the iPhone.
How many _thousands_ of Israeli civilians who were inside their safe
rooms and hiding under beds in bedrooms and even some hiding inside
kitchen cabinets for half a day were there who would have given
anything for an FM radio in addition to that almost worthless iPhone
without it.
Riiiiiiiight.
FM radio one-way communication is so much better than the two-way
communication offered by every smartphone...
took over with his flamethrower. Without an account trying to keep up
to date with Shitter is a joke. Is it any better with an account?
Nationalize that shit as a public resource.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
I could give a shit less about the aux jack but FM radio doesn’t sound
"People who aren't scared shitless of society breaking down 24/7 to
the extent that theypitch a shit fit if their smartphones don't have
FM radio capability are iKooks, y'all. #IAmVerySmart!" 🤡
like a horrible idea. I’ve listened to FM radio zero seconds per year
for forever, but ifartradio might stop working if the zombies arise.
On 2023-11-19 11:44, Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2023-11-19, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
In a real emergency, you will be frantic to be using that wired headphone. >>>>
Not having the radio is like not having a flashlight when you need it.
This is what's so very strange about the Apple iKooks
"People who aren't scared shitless of society breaking down 24/7 to the
extent that theypitch a shit fit if their smartphones don't have FM
radio capability are iKooks, y'all. #IAmVerySmart!" 🤡
You would think they'd go 🍌🍌🍌 over their Android phones not having an
AM radio built in - that's much more useful in an emergency as the transmission range is typically higher - notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that cover several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be charged with the
built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than the
built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when the SHTF!?!?
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than Wally).
I could give a shit less about the aux jack but FM radio doesn't sound like
a horrible idea. I've listened to FM radio zero seconds per year for
forever, but ifartradio might stop working if the zombies arise.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-11-19 14:01, Wally J wrote:Emergency management on Shitter worked ok before sociopathic manbaby took over with his flamethrower. Without an account trying to keep up to date
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
You would think they'd go 頎柬綄頎柬綄頎柬綄 over their Android phones not having an
AM radio built in - that's much more useful in an emergency as the
transmission range is typically higher - notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that cover >>>> several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be charged with the >>>> built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than the
built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when the SHTF!?!? >>>>
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than Wally).
On the basis of logic alone, no amount of MARKETING is going to convince an >>> intelligent person how "courageous" only Apple claims it is, for them to >>> remove basic functional hardware - whose loss is what cripples the iPhone. >>>
How many _thousands_ of Israeli civilians who were inside their
safe rooms and hiding under beds in bedrooms and even some hiding inside >>> kitchen cabinets for half a day were there who would have given anything >>> for an FM radio in addition to that almost worthless iPhone without it.
Riiiiiiiight.
FM radio one-way communication is so much better than the two-way
communication offered by every smartphone...
with Shitter is a joke. Is it any better with an account? Nationalize that shit as a public resource.
*Hemidactylus* wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-11-19 14:01, Wally J wrote:Emergency management on Shitter worked ok before sociopathic manbaby took
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wroteRiiiiiiiight.
You would think they'd go 頎柬綄頎柬綄頎柬綄 over their Android phones not having an
AM radio built in - that's much more useful in an emergency as the
transmission range is typically higher - notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that cover >>>>> several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be charged with the >>>>> built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than the >>>>> built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when the SHTF!?!? >>>>>
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than Wally).
On the basis of logic alone, no amount of MARKETING is going to convince an
intelligent person how "courageous" only Apple claims it is, for them to >>>> remove basic functional hardware - whose loss is what cripples the iPhone. >>>>
How many _thousands_ of Israeli civilians who were inside their
safe rooms and hiding under beds in bedrooms and even some hiding inside >>>> kitchen cabinets for half a day were there who would have given anything >>>> for an FM radio in addition to that almost worthless iPhone without it. >>>
FM radio one-way communication is so much better than the two-way
communication offered by every smartphone...
over with his flamethrower. Without an account trying to keep up to date
with Shitter is a joke. Is it any better with an account? Nationalize that >> shit as a public resource.
Sounds good to me! Since the First Amendment would then apply, Andrew Anglin and Nick Fuentes will promptly have their accounts unbanned.
Wally, could you do those of us using newsreaders on small devices a
favour and make all your subject lines shorter, so they're comprehensible when truncated?
'As of November 2023' is superfluous.
'Android models' > Androids
'Portable memory slot' - SD card?
On 2023-11-20 19:45, Anonymous wrote:
*Hemidactylus* wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-11-19 14:01, Wally J wrote:Emergency management on Shitter worked ok before sociopathic manbaby
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
You would think they'd go 頎柬綄頎柬綄頎柬綄 over their Android >>>>>> phones not having an AM radio built in - that's much more useful
in an emergency as the transmission range is typically higher -
notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that
cover several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be
charged with the built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than
the built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when
the SHTF!?!?
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than
Wally).
On the basis of logic alone, no amount of MARKETING is going to
convince an intelligent person how "courageous" only Apple claims
it is, for them to remove basic functional hardware - whose loss
is what cripples the iPhone.
How many _thousands_ of Israeli civilians who were inside their
safe rooms and hiding under beds in bedrooms and even some hiding
inside kitchen cabinets for half a day were there who would have
given anything for an FM radio in addition to that almost
worthless iPhone without it.
Riiiiiiiight.
FM radio one-way communication is so much better than the two-way
communication offered by every smartphone...
took over with his flamethrower. Without an account trying to keep
up to date with Shitter is a joke. Is it any better with an account?
Nationalize that shit as a public resource.
Sounds good to me! Since the First Amendment would then apply, Andrew
Anglin and Nick Fuentes will promptly have their accounts unbanned.
You get that private businesses are not bound by the first amendment,
right?
However, to explain... I was taught to document using long titles.
My Subject is long for the same reason scientific paper titles are long.
Paper titles aren't long, they average 12.3 words. https://blog.oup.com/2018/09/efficient-titles-research-articles/
Titles need to be succinct and meaningful.
This thread's OP certainly isn't.
So they can be found in a title search on an automated web archive, e.g.,
<http://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android>
Google searches much more than titles.
It's not worth doing all the immense efforts I do in any given thread to
document things (URLs, facts, APKs, screenshots, etc.) unless leveraged.
However, I can make titles shorter if that's what people want.
How many characters do you prefer?
10-12 words is the recommendation for papers. No reason why your posts
should be any longer than that.
I don't know what other people want. I think the subject should be as long
as it needs to be, but no longer. Take a critical look at it: is it
concise, can you delete words without losing anything important, or use well-known (for the NG) abbreviations?
Be aware that mobile newsreaders may truncate the subject in the middle -
see screenshot of PiaoHong on a this 10" tablet. Mine does the same.
<https://www.cjoint.com/data/MKvqGGSDy5v_Screenshot-20231121-163021-NewsReader.jpg>
And I have a tablet; I don't know what it looks like on a phone. So don't waste the first few words. It's like writing a good newspaper headline.
Just my view. If I don't know what it's about I don't bother to tap on it.
On 2023-11-20 19:45, Anonymous wrote:
*Hemidactylus* wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-11-19 14:01, Wally J wrote:Emergency management on Shitter worked ok before sociopathic manbaby took >>> over with his flamethrower. Without an account trying to keep up to date >>> with Shitter is a joke. Is it any better with an account? Nationalize that >>> shit as a public resource.
Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wroteRiiiiiiiight.
You would think they'd go 頎柬綄頎柬綄頎柬綄 over their Android phones notOn the basis of logic alone, no amount of MARKETING is going to convince an
having an
AM radio built in - that's much more useful in an emergency as the >>>>>> transmission range is typically higher - notably at night.
Of course real preppers have real emergency radio receivers that cover >>>>>> several bands, have long lasting batteries and can be charged with the >>>>>> built in crank.
Many preppers have transmitters too.
Oh my! Did you see what I wrote there?
The Android phones can't transmit on radio frequencies other than the >>>>>> built in cell co/WiFi/Blutooth! How will they survive when the SHTF!?!?
(It occurs to me that flat earthers are more cohernent than Wally). >>>>>
intelligent person how "courageous" only Apple claims it is, for them to >>>>> remove basic functional hardware - whose loss is what cripples the iPhone.
How many _thousands_ of Israeli civilians who were inside their
safe rooms and hiding under beds in bedrooms and even some hiding inside >>>>> kitchen cabinets for half a day were there who would have given anything >>>>> for an FM radio in addition to that almost worthless iPhone without it. >>>>
FM radio one-way communication is so much better than the two-way
communication offered by every smartphone...
Sounds good to me! Since the First Amendment would then apply, Andrew Anglin >> and Nick Fuentes will promptly have their accounts unbanned.
You get that private businesses are not bound by the first amendment, right?
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial factually
incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled wireless setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of comprehension.
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial factually incorrect post.
On 11/22/2023 9:16 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2023-11-23, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:192/24 bit is not possible even with wired headphones. Therefore my statement was completely accurate.
On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial
factually incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already
knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of
comprehension.
Here is his entire first post on the subject:
'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs.
Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone
15 Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to buy
an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best music
high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate gripe with
Apple from an Apple fan. '
Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
That would be great!
He won't because he *can't*, because the weak troll is weak. Their
emotional and intellectual intelligence is woefully inept, because they
are mental weaklings.
On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial
factually incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already
knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of
comprehension.
Here is his entire first post on the subject:
'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs.
Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone
15 Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to buy
an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best music
high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate gripe with
Apple from an Apple fan. '
Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
That would be great!
On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial factually
incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless
setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of
comprehension.
Here is his entire first post on the subject:
'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs.
Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone 15
Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to buy an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best music high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate gripe with Apple
from an Apple fan. '
Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
That would be great!
On 2023-11-23, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial
factually incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already
knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of
comprehension.
Here is his entire first post on the subject:
'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs.
Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone
15 Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to buy
an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best music
high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate gripe with
Apple from an Apple fan. '
Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
That would be great!
He won't because he *can't*, because the weak troll is weak. Their
emotional and intellectual intelligence is woefully inept, because they
are mental weaklings.
On 11/22/2023 8:13 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial factually
incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless
setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of
comprehension.
Here is his entire first post on the subject:
'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs.
Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone
15 Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to buy
an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best music
high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate gripe with
Apple from an Apple fan. '
Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
That would be great!
A certain miniumum level of technical competence was assumed since
nobody uses wired headphones anymore. Even using wired headphones
192/24 bit is not possible. Only 48k.
On 2023-11-22 21:42, John wrote:
On 11/22/2023 8:13 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial factually >>>>> incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already knew? >>>>
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless
setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of
comprehension.
Here is his entire first post on the subject:
'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs.
Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone
15 Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to buy
an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best music
high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate gripe with
Apple from an Apple fan. '
Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
That would be great!
A certain miniumum level of technical competence was assumed since
nobody uses wired headphones anymore. Even using wired headphones
192/24 bit is not possible. Only 48k.
You said the PHONE couldn't do it.
It can.
You were wrong.
Deal with it.
On 2023-11-22 21:43, John wrote:
On 11/22/2023 9:16 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2023-11-23, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:192/24 bit is not possible even with wired headphones. Therefore my
On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us >>>>>> didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial
factually incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already
knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of >>>>> comprehension.
Here is his entire first post on the subject:
'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs.
Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone
15 Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to buy >>>> an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best music
high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate gripe with >>>> Apple from an Apple fan. '
Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
That would be great!
He won't because he *can't*, because the weak troll is weak. Their
emotional and intellectual intelligence is woefully inept, because they
are mental weaklings.
statement was completely accurate.
Nope.
Still wrong!
'To listen to songs at sample rates higher than 48 kHz, you need an
external digital-to-analog converter'
On 11/22/2023 9:58 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2023-11-22 21:43, John wrote:
On 11/22/2023 9:16 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
On 2023-11-23, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:192/24 bit is not possible even with wired headphones. Therefore my
On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us >>>>>>> didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial
factually incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already
knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of >>>>>> comprehension.
Here is his entire first post on the subject:
'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs. >>>>> Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone >>>>> 15 Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to buy >>>>> an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best music >>>>> high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate gripe with >>>>> Apple from an Apple fan. '
Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
That would be great!
He won't because he *can't*, because the weak troll is weak. Their
emotional and intellectual intelligence is woefully inept, because they >>>> are mental weaklings.
statement was completely accurate.
Nope.
Still wrong!
'To listen to songs at sample rates higher than 48 kHz, you need an
external digital-to-analog converter'
Android requires NO ADDITIONAL equipment to support 192/24 bit straight
out of the box. You just have provided further demonstration of the inadequacy of the Apple implantation.
On 11/22/2023 9:59 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2023-11-22 21:42, John wrote:
On 11/22/2023 8:13 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2023-11-22 19:41, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us >>>>>> didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial factually >>>>>> incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already
knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless
setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of
comprehension.
Here is his entire first post on the subject:
'One area where iPhones fail is in support of lossless audio codecs.
Apple Music has lossless support for up to 192khz/24 bits but iPhone
15 Pro and other models do not support it. Therefore you have to
buy an Android Phone or Android based music player to get the best
music high fidelity off of Apple Music. There is a legitimate
gripe with Apple from an Apple fan. '
Point out the part that mentions "wireless setup" at all.
That would be great!
A certain miniumum level of technical competence was assumed since
nobody uses wired headphones anymore. Even using wired headphones
192/24 bit is not possible. Only 48k.
You said the PHONE couldn't do it.
It can.
You were wrong.
Deal with it.
The iPhone cannot do 192/24 bit without adding additional external
equipment - which Android does not require. Face it you're full of shit.
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial factually
incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled wireless setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of comprehension.
It seems "John" made a sensible case, where, yet again, for the umpteenth time, the crippled iPhone lacks basic high standards Android always had.
On 11/22/23 7:41 PM, Wally J wrote:
Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
the iPhone uses Bluetooth to transmit the audio to external
headphonesi
Not to wired headphones, it doesn't. And don't think the rest of us
didn't notice you didn't mention "wireless" in your initial factually
incorrect post.
Why are you trying to make excuses for what everyone else already knew?
It was clear from the start he was talking about Apple's crippled
wireless
setup, Jolly Roger - so don't blame "John" for your lack of
comprehension.
It seems "John" made a sensible case, where, yet again, for the umpteenth
time, the crippled iPhone lacks basic high standards Android always had.
What is really hilarious is that Android works better with Apples own
music service for lossless audio than what Apple products do. That
should be an embarrassment to Apple and means Apple needs to get its act together.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 299 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 52:29:05 |
| Calls: | 6,690 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 12,225 |
| Messages: | 5,344,816 |
| Posted today: | 1 |
