• Re: Encryption Under 'Full-Frontal Nuclear Assault' By U.S. Bills

    From Pepe LePew@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Thu Nov 25 10:55:36 2021
    XPost: alt.privacy, sci.crypt, talk.politics.crypto

    On 9/3/20 11:08 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:

    People would start transmitting terabytes of genuinely random data to
    provide the NSA with something to do.

    Um, funny that you mention it. I already do exactly this. I have set up
    scripts to send fake data that looks like encrypted goodies. I've been
    doing it for years.

    It is easy to set up several tor hidden services and have them talk to
    each other with randomly-timed, random gibberish while I do my browsing
    from one of them through a double Tor tunnel.

    Sending PGP-encrypted, fake messages to government email addresses
    through anonymous remailers is another tactic. Put 'leaked' or
    'classified' or 'top secret' or 'whistleblower report' in the subject or
    in the clear with the message and you're good to go. Encrypt them to a temporary public key then scrub the keys.

    I presume (and I hope) that I have wasted a lot of the spooks' time over
    the years.

    Ain't I a stinker?

    --

    Pepe LePew

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Heathfield@21:1/5 to Pepe LePew on Thu Nov 25 17:41:31 2021
    XPost: alt.privacy, sci.crypt, talk.politics.crypto

    On 25/11/2021 16:55, Pepe LePew wrote:
    On 9/3/20 11:08 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:

    People would start transmitting terabytes of genuinely random data to
    provide the NSA with something to do.

    Um, funny that you mention it. I already do exactly this. I have set up scripts to send fake data that looks like encrypted goodies. I've been
    doing it for years.

    If it's distinguishable from random, it doesn't look like encrypted
    goodies. And if it isn't, it doesn't look like anything.


    It is easy to set up several tor hidden services and have them talk to
    each other with randomly-timed, random gibberish

    Randomly re-opening an 18-month-old thread is easy too. That doesn't
    mean it's bright.

    <snip>

    I presume (and I hope) that I have wasted a lot of the spooks' time over
    the years.

    They're not interested. If they want to know your secrets, they have
    more cost-effective (and painful) techniques to find them out than
    trying to decrypt your gibberish.

    --
    Richard Heathfield
    Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
    "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
    Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pepe LePew@21:1/5 to Richard Heathfield on Thu Nov 25 12:46:00 2021
    XPost: alt.privacy, sci.crypt, talk.politics.crypto

    On 11/25/21 11:41 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
    On 25/11/2021 16:55, Pepe LePew wrote:
    On 9/3/20 11:08 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:

    People would start transmitting terabytes of genuinely random data to
    provide the NSA with something to do.

    Um, funny that you mention it. I already do exactly this. I have set up
    scripts to send fake data that looks like encrypted goodies. I've been
    doing it for years.

    If it's distinguishable from random, it doesn't look like encrypted
    goodies. And if it isn't, it doesn't look like anything.


    It is easy to set up several tor hidden services and have them talk to
    each other with randomly-timed, random gibberish

    Randomly re-opening an 18-month-old thread is easy too. That doesn't
    mean it's bright.

    Does it then mean mean commenting about the obvious is bright? Do you
    tend to nitpick as a means of trying to elevate yourself above other people?

    Do you spend your time isolating and attacking the village idiot so you
    can look clever? Do you fill this group up with critique of the usual
    crank's drivel while you are not innovating any thing?

    Do your comments here are add anything of value to the art of
    cryptology? Or do your comments distract from fruitful labor in that regard?

    Is the purpose of your posts here is to elevate yourself over others who
    are already in the gutter? If one can't be king of Rome can he at least
    be king of the royal outhouse?

    <snip>

    I presume (and I hope) that I have wasted a lot of the spooks' time over
    the years.

    They're not interested. If they want to know your secrets, they have
    more cost-effective (and painful) techniques to find them out than
    trying to decrypt your gibberish.

    "They're not interested?" Since when did you become an apologist and propagandist for the empire? Are you a moldy Angloid Canzcuck? serious question. Are you?

    Everyone in here with two brain cells to rub together knows that the intelligence services don't just look for the needle in the haystack.
    They take the whole haystack. If they're not interested in everyone's communication then why are they taking the whole haystack?

    If "they're not interested" in people's encrypted gibberish then what of
    PRISM, XKeyScore, Echelon, Shadownet, Operation Glowing Symphony, and billion-dollar IIA protocols? Do you believe everyone in this group is
    that ignorant? Or are you that ignorant? Big reveal, people. Choose one.

    --

    Pepe LePew

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Heathfield@21:1/5 to Pepe LePew on Thu Nov 25 19:46:25 2021
    XPost: alt.privacy, sci.crypt, talk.politics.crypto

    On 25/11/2021 18:46, Pepe LePew wrote:

    <snip>


    Do your comments here are add anything of value to the art of
    cryptology?

    37 09 0B 53 1C 4F 01 57 1B 45 0C 16 16 53 00 17
    04 01 4B 00

    --
    Richard Heathfield
    Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
    "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
    Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Blake@21:1/5 to Stefan Claas on Sat Jan 8 20:49:19 2022
    XPost: alt.privacy, sci.crypt, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.crypto

    On 2020-09-05, Stefan Claas <sac@300baud.de> wrote:
    Maybe visionaries like Elon Musk could give us such devices, in case
    he would be interest in this huge market segment ...

    Elon Musk is more of a carnival huckster and confidence trickster
    than he is a "visionary". I certainly have no interest in going
    where his "vision" would take me.

    -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    18 Reasons I won't be vaccinated -- https://tinyurl.com/ebty2dx3
    Covid vaccines: experimental biology -- https://tinyurl.com/57mncfm5
    The fraud of "Climate Change" -- https://RealClimateScience.com
    There is no "climate crisis" -- https://climatedepot.com
    Don't talk to cops! -- https://DontTalkToCops.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris M. Thomasson@21:1/5 to Siri Cruise on Sat Jan 8 14:24:38 2022
    XPost: alt.privacy, sci.crypt, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.crypto

    On 9/4/2020 4:31 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
    In article <20200904120315.0000021e@300baud.de>,
    Stefan Claas <sac@300baud.de> wrote:

    Exactly! Add on top of that the motto 'supremacy&leadership' and everybody, >> old enough, should ask themselves why Bill Clinton an AlGore 'invented' the >> Internet. Before they 'invented' the Internet, the Internet was a friendly >> place.

    And the parents of those everybodies knows Gore never claimed to
    have invented the internet. What Gore did do is get congress to
    subsidise the internet between the time it was a tool for
    programmers using 1200 bps async or 9600 bps sync into the Mbps
    commercial necessity used by much of the world's population.

    Back when in the good old pre-Gore days the friendly internet
    generally forbade commercial (ie for profit) use. Encryption
    wasn't that important because money wasn't being transferred. In
    the friendly days people included US mail addresses until the
    unabomber started killing people with no discerned pattern or
    motive.
    [...]

    What about using encryption to protect trade secrets... If I need to communicate with a colleague across the internet, and the content of the communication involved sensitive company secrets... Why not encrypt the
    shit out of it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruise@21:1/5 to Stefan Claas on Tue Jan 25 12:10:37 2022
    XPost: alt.privacy, sci.crypt, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.crypto

    In article <20200904173938.000064ea@300baud.de>,
    Stefan Claas <sac@300baud.de> wrote:

    If this would be not the case, what guaranties have U.S. citizens
    that other parties, from overseas, are not capable of doing the
    same to U.S. citizens?

    NSA spies on the UK and shares with UK. GHQ spies on the US and
    shares with the US.

    --
    :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post / \
    I am an Andrea Doria sockpuppet. insults Islam. Mohammed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sn!pe@21:1/5 to Siri Cruise on Tue Jan 25 20:32:47 2022
    XPost: alt.privacy, sci.crypt, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.crypto

    Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:

    In article <20200904173938.000064ea@300baud.de>,
    Stefan Claas <sac@300baud.de> wrote:

    If this would be not the case, what guaranties have U.S. citizens
    that other parties, from overseas, are not capable of doing the
    same to U.S. citizens?

    NSA spies on the UK and shares with UK. GHQ spies on the US and
    shares with the US.


    s/GHQ/GCHQ

    Hi, BTW.

    --
    ^Ï^ <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E>

    My pet rock Gordon just is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)