• No More USB-A Ports

    From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 8 02:21:40 2024
    The machine I’m using right now, which is just about a year old, is practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    Here is a concept that does away with USB-A completely, and ends up
    bristling with USB-C ports instead.

    <https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/7/24173741/a-motherboard-with-no-usb-a-ports-but-10-usb-c-instead>

    What do you think? Ready for them to bring it on?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From v55@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Fri Jun 7 23:46:13 2024
    On 6/7/2024 10:21:38 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    The machine I’m using right now, which is just about a year old, is practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    Here is a concept that does away with USB-A completely, and ends up
    bristling with USB-C ports instead.

    <https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/7/24173741/a-motherboard-with-no-usb-a-ports-but-10-usb-c-instead>

    What do you think? Ready for them to bring it on?


    I'm still old school...I want a motherboard that has half a dozen *simultaneously usable* PCIe slots.

    Yes, they *technically exist*...I can spend $1,000 on a Threadripper CPU and another $1,000 on a motherboard to fit it.

    But if there's enough throughput for all eight of those USB-C ports, there's room to fit a useful number of PCIe slots that gracefully throttle down but
    let the devices actually-work.

    ..or it's basically a USB 3.0 hub with a slightly different form factor but doesn't *actually* have the ability to feed all of those ports simultaneously in a way that's any better than the type-A solutions present on all of the other motherboards on the shelf.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to alittlespam@arandommailserver.tk on Sat Jun 8 06:10:03 2024
    v55 <alittlespam@arandommailserver.tk> wrote at 04:59 this Saturday (GMT):
    On 6/7/2024 10:21:38 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    The machine I’m using right now, which is just about a year old, is
    practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    Here is a concept that does away with USB-A completely, and ends up
    bristling with USB-C ports instead.

    <https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/7/24173741/a-motherboard-with-no-usb-a-ports-but-10-usb-c-instead>

    What do you think? Ready for them to bring it on?


    I'm still old school...I want a motherboard that has half a dozen *simultaneously usable* PCIe slots.


    Something went /REALLY/ wrong with your newsreader..
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan van den Broek@21:1/5 to alittlespam@arandommailserver.tk on Sat Jun 8 08:11:37 2024
    2024-06-08, v55 <alittlespam@arandommailserver.tk> schrieb:

    [Schnipp]

    I'm still old school...I want a motherboard that has half a dozen *simultaneously usable* PCIe slots.

    You've said that before.
    --
    Jan van den Broek
    balglaas@xs4all.nl 0xAFDAD00D
    http://huizen.dds.nl/~balglaas/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mm0fmf@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 8 09:29:14 2024
    On 08/06/2024 07:10, candycanearter07 wrote:
    v55 <alittlespam@arandommailserver.tk> wrote at 04:59 this Saturday (GMT):
    On 6/7/2024 10:21:38 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    The machine I’m using right now, which is just about a year old, is
    practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    Here is a concept that does away with USB-A completely, and ends up
    bristling with USB-C ports instead.

    <https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/7/24173741/a-motherboard-with-no-usb-a-ports-but-10-usb-c-instead>

    What do you think? Ready for them to bring it on?


    I'm still old school...I want a motherboard that has half a dozen
    *simultaneously usable* PCIe slots.


    Something went /REALLY/ wrong with your newsreader..


    V55 *ker-plonked*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Computer Nerd Kev@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Sun Jun 9 09:08:37 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    The machine I'm using right now, which is just about a year old, is practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    In my house just a couple of weeks - I used my first USB-C device
    last month, via a cable to a USB-A plug. Another flimsy little
    connector that I'm likely to break, like devices with MicroUSB
    connectors, when I accidentally catch the cable with my arm and
    yank them about.

    The USB-PD standards are interesting. Upon first reading about them
    I was keen to find/design a device to just break out the outputs
    and have a mini variable power supply for general use, even battery
    powered from one of those power bank devices. But as with most
    things USB3/C it turns out the power supplies that are actually
    available only implement the bare minimum range of voltage outputs
    that the manufacturers think most people will need.

    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blue-Maned_Hawk@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Sun Jun 9 22:11:05 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    The machine I’m using right now, which is just about a year old, is practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    Here is a concept that does away with USB-A completely, and ends up
    bristling with USB-C ports instead.

    <https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/7/24173741/a-motherboard-with-no-usb-a-
    ports-but-10-usb-c-instead>

    What do you think? Ready for them to bring it on?



    Yes, simply because a single standard will drastically simplify a lot of things.

    --
    Blue-Maned_Hawk│shortens to Hawk│/blu.mɛin.dʰak/│he/him/his/himself/Mr. blue-maned_hawk.srht.site

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anssi Saari@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Mon Jun 10 10:18:26 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

    The machine I’m using right now, which is just about a year old, is practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    It was in my previous phone and I kept it for three years and the
    current phone is also about three years, so more than six years? Looks
    like ten years since the spec was released.

    Here is a concept that does away with USB-A completely, and ends up
    bristling with USB-C ports instead.

    <https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/7/24173741/a-motherboard-with-no-usb-a-ports-but-10-usb-c-instead>

    It seems there are headers for front panel USB, so type-A if one wants,
    just not on the back panel.

    What do you think? Ready for them to bring it on?

    I don't really see the point of putting a lot of USB ports in the back
    of a computer in general. Aren't they a little hard to reach? And do you
    really need 10?

    Then again, I don't understand the SPDIF connector either. Sure I love
    it, so great for me but do people really use that?

    In my desktop computer I have just two back panel USB ports (type-A) in
    use, mouse and keyboard via a hub and an old wireless game controller
    receiver I don't much use any more. I think I've used the single type-C
    port in the back a few of times to image an SSD.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Anssi Saari on Mon Jun 10 07:22:54 2024
    On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:18:26 +0300, Anssi Saari wrote:

    I don't really see the point of putting a lot of USB ports in the back
    of a computer in general. Aren't they a little hard to reach? And do you really need 10?

    I have a about a dozen type-A ports on the back of this machine I’m using now. Plus one type-C. And two more type-As on the front.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Purgert@21:1/5 to Computer Nerd Kev on Sun Jun 16 13:03:05 2024
    On 2024-06-08, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    The machine I'm using right now, which is just about a year old, is
    practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    In my house just a couple of weeks - I used my first USB-C device
    last month, via a cable to a USB-A plug. Another flimsy little
    connector that I'm likely to break, like devices with MicroUSB
    connectors, when I accidentally catch the cable with my arm and
    yank them about.

    The USB-PD standards are interesting. Upon first reading about them
    I was keen to find/design a device to just break out the outputs
    and have a mini variable power supply for general use, even battery
    powered from one of those power bank devices. But as with most
    things USB3/C it turns out the power supplies that are actually
    available only implement the bare minimum range of voltage outputs
    that the manufacturers think most people will need.

    Mine here are all 5/9/15/20V. I "think" they're missing only 1 or 2
    voltages, but that's enough for my laptops and cell phones. Not really
    sure what'd ask for 9 or 15 volts ...

    Bear in mind that it's ONE output, and you negotiate the voltage on the
    wire as part of the connection handshaking (IIRC CC1/2 or maybe
    something more active later on, been a bit since I read up on how PD
    works)


    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Computer Nerd Kev@21:1/5 to Dan Purgert on Mon Jun 17 08:41:42 2024
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-06-08, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    The USB-PD standards are interesting. Upon first reading about them
    I was keen to find/design a device to just break out the outputs
    and have a mini variable power supply for general use, even battery
    powered from one of those power bank devices. But as with most
    things USB3/C it turns out the power supplies that are actually
    available only implement the bare minimum range of voltage outputs
    that the manufacturers think most people will need.

    Mine here are all 5/9/15/20V. I "think" they're missing only 1 or 2 voltages, but that's enough for my laptops and cell phones. Not really
    sure what'd ask for 9 or 15 volts ...

    9V plugpacks are pretty common for stuff I use, it's typical for
    devices that reduce that to 5V internally. Similarly 5V devices
    generally use 3.3V internally. My laptop's power supply is 16V, so
    15V might work.

    But really what excited me were the newer PPS power supplies (USB-C
    3.0 PD PPS, to use their full title). These are supposed to supply
    a requested voltage in 20mV steps between 3.3V and 21V+. The idea
    is to allow optimised battery charging by supplying a charge
    voltage/current specific to the state of charge that the battery is
    in. I just liked the idea of completely universal plugpacks, but
    when I went shopping for them (and granted they're quite new to the
    market in Australia) the models on offer had a much more limited voltage/current range.

    Bear in mind that it's ONE output, and you negotiate the voltage on the
    wire as part of the connection handshaking (IIRC CC1/2 or maybe
    something more active later on, been a bit since I read up on how PD
    works)

    Yes it's all rather complicated, but in theory a device to allow
    manual control of the output could be quite cheap because there
    are chips designed for doing that in relatively dumb USB-C-powered
    devices. However I found a project online from someone who'd tried
    making a bench power supply adapter from a wide-range USB-PD PPS
    power supply and they found the outputs were so far off what was
    requested that they ended up setting it to a fixed output and used
    another regulator for the final output. So not using the voltage
    programming ability of the USB power supply after all. I realised
    then that I was probably wasting my time - it's a standard for a
    perfect power supply, which might only be used to make barely-good-enough-to-sell power supplies. I shouldn't really have
    been surprised.

    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Purgert@21:1/5 to Computer Nerd Kev on Mon Jun 17 12:00:22 2024
    On 2024-06-16, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-06-08, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    The USB-PD standards are interesting. Upon first reading about them
    I was keen to find/design a device to just break out the outputs
    and have a mini variable power supply for general use, even battery
    powered from one of those power bank devices. But as with most
    things USB3/C it turns out the power supplies that are actually
    available only implement the bare minimum range of voltage outputs
    that the manufacturers think most people will need.

    Mine here are all 5/9/15/20V. I "think" they're missing only 1 or 2
    voltages, but that's enough for my laptops and cell phones. Not really
    sure what'd ask for 9 or 15 volts ...

    9V plugpacks are pretty common for stuff I use, it's typical for
    devices that reduce that to 5V internally. Similarly 5V devices
    generally use 3.3V internally. My laptop's power supply is 16V, so
    15V might work.

    Not sure what a "9v plugpack" is -- maybe something leaning a little
    more "professional grade", like what photographers tend to carry about?
    All of my "5v(tm) devices" are certainly running lower voltages inside
    -- batteries are only 3.7 to 4.2 volts (or thereabouts) anyway, and I
    know my phone has a lot of 1.8 volt things inside.

    I was more saying that I couldn't really think of anything that'd take
    the middle voltages, given what I'm familiar with.


    But really what excited me were the newer PPS power supplies (USB-C
    3.0 PD PPS, to use their full title). These are supposed to supply
    a requested voltage in 20mV steps between 3.3V and 21V+. The idea
    is to allow optimised battery charging by supplying a charge
    voltage/current specific to the state of charge that the battery is
    in. I just liked the idea of completely universal plugpacks, but
    when I went shopping for them (and granted they're quite new to the
    market in Australia) the models on offer had a much more limited voltage/current range.

    Bear in mind that it's ONE output, and you negotiate the voltage on the
    wire as part of the connection handshaking (IIRC CC1/2 or maybe
    something more active later on, been a bit since I read up on how PD
    works)

    Yes it's all rather complicated, but in theory a device to allow
    manual control of the output could be quite cheap because there
    are chips designed for doing that in relatively dumb USB-C-powered
    devices. However I found a project online from someone who'd tried
    making a bench power supply adapter from a wide-range USB-PD PPS
    power supply and they found the outputs were so far off what was
    requested that they ended up setting it to a fixed output and used
    another regulator for the final output. So not using the voltage
    programming ability of the USB power supply after all. I realised
    then that I was probably wasting my time - it's a standard for a
    perfect power supply, which might only be used to make barely-good-enough-to-sell power supplies. I shouldn't really have
    been surprised.

    Happen to have a link to the project? Or was it something you came
    across ages ago?

    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich@21:1/5 to Dan Purgert on Mon Jun 17 15:44:25 2024
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-06-16, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-06-08, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    The USB-PD standards are interesting. Upon first reading about
    them I was keen to find/design a device to just break out the
    outputs and have a mini variable power supply for general use,
    even battery powered from one of those power bank devices. But as
    with most things USB3/C it turns out the power supplies that are
    actually available only implement the bare minimum range of
    voltage outputs that the manufacturers think most people will
    need.

    Mine here are all 5/9/15/20V. I "think" they're missing only 1 or
    2 voltages, but that's enough for my laptops and cell phones. Not
    really sure what'd ask for 9 or 15 volts ...

    9V plugpacks are pretty common for stuff I use, it's typical for
    devices that reduce that to 5V internally. Similarly 5V devices
    generally use 3.3V internally. My laptop's power supply is 16V, so
    15V might work.

    Not sure what a "9v plugpack" is -- maybe something leaning a little
    more "professional grade", like what photographers tend to carry
    about?

    I interpreted "plugpack" in this context to be Kev's word for what most
    of the rest of us refer to as a "wall-wart".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Dan Purgert on Mon Jun 17 17:37:52 2024
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    Not sure what a "9v plugpack" is -- maybe something leaning a little
    more "professional grade", like what photographers tend to carry about?
    All of my "5v(tm) devices" are certainly running lower voltages inside
    -- batteries are only 3.7 to 4.2 volts (or thereabouts) anyway, and I
    know my phone has a lot of 1.8 volt things inside.

    I was more saying that I couldn't really think of anything that'd take
    the middle voltages, given what I'm familiar with.

    A number of things which charge at medium speeds - 20-45W use the 9 or 12v rails.

    I have a Dell 130W USB-C charger which doesn't do full PD - it's only 5V or
    20V (at 6.5A each). They skip the 9V and 15V modes because their laptops
    only really care about 20V (and they provide 5V because that's compulsory). However that will only slow charge a Pixel phone (which fast charges on a
    45W brick).

    The reasoning is that you get 3A out of the 5/9/15V rails, so the Dell
    charger is only able to provide max 15W, meanwhile the 45W charger can do
    3A@9V (=27W) and 3A@15V (45W). The phone is I think selecting the 9V rail
    to charge faster, and presumably can't handle the 20V input.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Computer Nerd Kev@21:1/5 to Dan Purgert on Tue Jun 18 09:33:21 2024
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-06-16, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    Mine here are all 5/9/15/20V. I "think" they're missing only 1 or 2
    voltages, but that's enough for my laptops and cell phones. Not really
    sure what'd ask for 9 or 15 volts ...

    9V plugpacks are pretty common for stuff I use, it's typical for
    devices that reduce that to 5V internally. Similarly 5V devices
    generally use 3.3V internally. My laptop's power supply is 16V, so
    15V might work.

    Not sure what a "9v plugpack" is -- maybe something leaning a little
    more "professional grade", like what photographers tend to carry about?

    As Rich suggests others call them wall warts, though I thought
    plugpack was actually the more universal term for them. Power
    supplies with a mains connector built into the enclosure, including
    USB ones. Not only supplied with things that charge batteries or
    perform computer functions.

    Yes it's all rather complicated, but in theory a device to allow
    manual control of the output could be quite cheap because there
    are chips designed for doing that in relatively dumb USB-C-powered
    devices. However I found a project online from someone who'd tried
    making a bench power supply adapter from a wide-range USB-PD PPS
    power supply and they found the outputs were so far off what was
    requested that they ended up setting it to a fixed output and used
    another regulator for the final output. So not using the voltage
    programming ability of the USB power supply after all. I realised
    then that I was probably wasting my time - it's a standard for a
    perfect power supply, which might only be used to make
    barely-good-enough-to-sell power supplies. I shouldn't really have
    been surprised.

    Happen to have a link to the project? Or was it something you came
    across ages ago?

    It was a while ago and if it's the one I found now in my bookmarks
    then it's not clear if they were actually using a PPS USB supply
    anyway. I've probably been mis-remebering again: https://tokarski.dev/posts/bench-power-supply-usb-c/

    Likely it was just the limited specs of the PPS power supplies
    available in Australia put me off the idea, but that was probably
    at least six months ago so I should look again.

    This article describes charging Li-Ion cells by using a USB-C development/testing tool to control a PPS one: https://ripitapart.com/2022/12/31/directly-charging-li-ion-batteries-with-a-usb-c-pd-tester/

    That does suggest their current regulation can't be relied on:

    "Although the PPS specification allows a device to set a maximum
    current level, my own testing revealed that there was too much
    variation amongst all my different adapters that I could not rely
    on the hardware to perform the constant-current regulation with
    enough precision for my liking"

    But it seems the voltage regulation from the ones he tested was
    acceptable.

    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Purgert@21:1/5 to Computer Nerd Kev on Wed Jul 3 12:49:15 2024
    On 2024-06-17, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-06-16, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    Mine here are all 5/9/15/20V. I "think" they're missing only 1 or 2
    voltages, but that's enough for my laptops and cell phones. Not really >>>> sure what'd ask for 9 or 15 volts ...

    9V plugpacks are pretty common for stuff I use, it's typical for
    devices that reduce that to 5V internally. Similarly 5V devices
    generally use 3.3V internally. My laptop's power supply is 16V, so
    15V might work.

    Not sure what a "9v plugpack" is -- maybe something leaning a little
    more "professional grade", like what photographers tend to carry about?

    As Rich suggests others call them wall warts, though I thought
    plugpack was actually the more universal term for them. Power

    OHHHH. Yeah, never heard them as "plugpack", but I guess "regional
    dialect differences" comes heavily into play with talking online :)

    Happen to have a link to the project? Or was it something you came
    across ages ago?

    It was a while ago and [...]


    Thanks for the links :) . Finally got around to reading them --
    interesting stuff.


    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From v55@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 3 22:08:32 2024
    On 6/8/2024 4:29:16 AM, mm0fmf wrote:
    On 08/06/2024 07:10, candycanearter07 wrote:
    v55 <alittlespam@arandommailserver.tk> wrote at 04:59 this Saturday (GMT): >>> On 6/7/2024 10:21:38 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    The machine I’m using right now, which is just about a year old, is
    practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    Here is a concept that does away with USB-A completely, and ends up
    bristling with USB-C ports instead.

    <https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/7/24173741/a-motherboard-with-no-usb-a-ports-but-10-usb-c-instead>

    What do you think? Ready for them to bring it on?


    I'm still old school...I want a motherboard that has half a dozen
    *simultaneously usable* PCIe slots.


    Something went /REALLY/ wrong with your newsreader..


    V55 *ker-plonked*


    I definitely did.

    My Newsreader had the message stuck in the outbox and on a retry loop...and I didn't realize it was posting with each failed attempt. I left it running,
    and I just sorted it out.

    I can't believe how much spam I accidentally created.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to alittlespam@arandommailserver.tk on Thu Jul 4 14:30:03 2024
    v55 <alittlespam@arandommailserver.tk> wrote at 02:08 this Thursday (GMT):
    On 6/8/2024 4:29:16 AM, mm0fmf wrote:
    On 08/06/2024 07:10, candycanearter07 wrote:
    v55 <alittlespam@arandommailserver.tk> wrote at 04:59 this Saturday (GMT): >>>> On 6/7/2024 10:21:38 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    The machine I’m using right now, which is just about a year old, is >>>>> practically overflowing with USB-A ports. But it only has one USB-C
    port. How long has USB-C been around?

    Here is a concept that does away with USB-A completely, and ends up
    bristling with USB-C ports instead.

    <https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/7/24173741/a-motherboard-with-no-usb-a-ports-but-10-usb-c-instead>

    What do you think? Ready for them to bring it on?


    I'm still old school...I want a motherboard that has half a dozen
    *simultaneously usable* PCIe slots.


    Something went /REALLY/ wrong with your newsreader..


    V55 *ker-plonked*


    I definitely did.

    My Newsreader had the message stuck in the outbox and on a retry loop...and I didn't realize it was posting with each failed attempt. I left it running, and I just sorted it out.

    I can't believe how much spam I accidentally created.


    Well, does your reader have a logs section?
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)