From the «WWW Wut the hell» department:
Feed: OSnews
Title: Students don’t know what files and folders are, professors say
Author: Thom Holwerda
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:54:23 -0400
Link: https://www.osnews.com/story/133994/students-dont-know-what-files-and-folders-are-professors-say/


Strange as it may seem to older generations of computer users who grew up maintaining an elaborate collection of nested subfolders, thanks to powerful search functions now being the default in operating systems, as well as the
way phones and tablets obfuscate their file structure, and cloud storage, high school graduates don’t see their hard drives the same way[1].

As anyone who has had to sift through a relative’s landfill organization technique can attest, most people shouldn’t be in charge of organizing their files. The machine should sort files based on metadata about the file, and people can select options and provide search criteria to filter the data. We’re
power users here, but even I rely on fd, locate, and ripgrep quite often.

I guess this most surprising part is this is surprising. Computing is application focused. People open MS Office Word, Apple Pages, or LibreOffice Writer; they don’t open a file. Operating systems don’t have pluggable extensions which let people manipulate various file types; they have applications which run on them.

On top of that, files and folders are a meta-construct so humans can grok filesystem semantics and, ultimately, blocks on a storage device.

Links:
[1]: https://www.pcgamer.com/students-dont-know-what-files-and-folders-are-professors-say/ (link)



--
Port 80 is overrated.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 01:51:05 +0000, RS Wood wrote:

From the «WWW Wut the hell» department:
Feed: OSnews Title: Students don’t know what files and folders are, professors say Author: Thom Holwerda Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:54:23
-0400 Link: https://www.osnews.com/story/133994/students-dont-know-what-files-and-

folders-are-professors-say/

Strange as it may seem to older generations of computer users who grew
up maintaining an elaborate collection of nested subfolders, thanks to powerful search functions now being the default in operating systems, as
well as the way phones and tablets obfuscate their file structure, and
cloud storage, high school graduates don’t see their hard drives the
same way[1].

I still call them directories...!



--
Using UNIX since v6 (1975)...

Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Am Mon, 1 Nov 2021 01:51:05 -0000 (UTC)
schrieb RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>:

I guess this most surprising part is this is surprising. Computing is application focused. People open MS Office Word, Apple Pages, or
LibreOffice Writer; they don’t open a file. Operating systems don’t
have pluggable extensions which let people manipulate various file
types; they have applications which run on them.

I think the reason is the usage of smartphones. Mostly people only use
apps there and don't understand the file system behind it.
They also save their files in the cloud (just other people's computers).
They don't need to understand a file system's structure anymore to use
the services.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Bob Eager wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 01:51:05 +0000, RS Wood wrote:

From the «WWW Wut the hell» department:
Feed: OSnews Title: Students don?t know what files and
folders are, professors say Author: Thom Holwerda Date:
Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:54:23 -0400 Link:
https://www.osnews.com/story/133994/students-dont-know-what-files-and-

folders-are-professors-say/

Strange as it may seem to older generations of computer
users who grew up maintaining an elaborate collection of
nested subfolders, thanks to powerful search functions
now being the default in operating systems, as well as
the way phones and tablets obfuscate their file
structure, and cloud storage, high school graduates don?t
see their hard drives the same way[1].

I still call them directories...!

Me too!

Directories and sub-directories.

I never liked or understood why Microsoft decided for
the world to rename them "folders." Or why even most
non-Win folks (and professionals in CS) allowed the
renaming to take over.

Nyssa, who has never seen a hard drive that would fold

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Nyssa <Nyssa@logicalinsight.net> wrote:

Bob Eager wrote:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 01:51:05 +0000, RS Wood wrote:

From the «WWW Wut the hell» department:
Feed: OSnews Title: Students don?t know what files and
folders are, professors say Author: Thom Holwerda Date:
Fri, 29 Oct 2021 20:54:23 -0400 Link:
https://www.osnews.com/story/133994/students-dont-know-what-files-and-

folders-are-professors-say/

Strange as it may seem to older generations of computer
users who grew up maintaining an elaborate collection of
nested subfolders, thanks to powerful search functions
now being the default in operating systems, as well as
the way phones and tablets obfuscate their file
structure, and cloud storage, high school graduates don?t
see their hard drives the same way[1].

I still call them directories...!

Me too!

Directories and sub-directories.

I never liked or understood why Microsoft decided for
the world to rename them "folders." Or why even most
non-Win folks (and professionals in CS) allowed the
renaming to take over.

Nyssa, who has never seen a hard drive that would fold

I'm not so sure this one was Microsoft. Remember, they (MS) were late
to the GUI party by quite some time. The Apple Lisa showed the world
outside of Xerox Parc what a GUI looked like, and I think Apple called
them folders on the original Lisa (later Mac) OS.

They were, at the time, trying an analogize the computer "desktop" to a
real "desk" in an office, and in an office one's storage (if one was
organized) was file cabinents containing "folders" (of either the
hanging folder or manilla folder variety) and those "folders" contained documents.

On the Lisa OS, the icon for a folder was actually drawn to look just
like a closed manilla folder, including the raised tab for finding it
in the "filing cabinent".

So it wasn't so much MS renaming them folders as it was Apple naming
them folders, and then a year later when MS finally released a GUI
competitor to the then Mac, they also named them folders (and also made
the icon's look like little manilla file folders from a filing
cabinent).

Those of us that call them directories were using computers, and
directories, long before the Lisa appeared, and via the command lines,
and all the CLI's called them directories. The "renaming" to folders
occurred when Apple (and chasing Apple's tail Microsoft) decided to use
the file cabinent containing folders analogy to, in their opinions,
make the directories easier to understand for the non-techie computer
users.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> writes:

Directories and sub-directories.

Me too and why not, I don't have a command to make folders or remove
them, I just have mkdir and rmdir. And chdir. Even Windows 10 today
still has the same commands, even in the newfangled "Power" shell.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> wrote:

Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

I'm not so sure this one was Microsoft. Remember, they (MS) were late
to the GUI party by quite some time. The Apple Lisa showed the world
outside of Xerox Parc what a GUI looked like, and I think Apple called
them folders on the original Lisa (later Mac) OS.

Um, considering the Xerox Star outsold the Lisa over two to one, I think credit and blame for "folders" is to Xerox. Credit for being successful copycats to Apple and Microsoft.

Did the Xerox Star call them "folders"?

The Lisa did, but I don't know on the Star. If it also called them
"folders" then I agree, credit goes to Xerox. But making the name
popular enough to "stick" would be the hoards of Mac and Windows users
that overran the gates.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> wrote:

Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> writes:

Directories and sub-directories.

Me too and why not, I don't have a command to make folders or remove
them, I just have mkdir and rmdir. And chdir. Even Windows 10 today
still has the same commands, even in the newfangled "Power" shell.

The fact that you even know of the existence of mkdir, rmdir, chdir,
etc. means you are more knowledgable about computers than 99% of
windows, macos, android, or iOS users.

That's why the got renamed. That 99% learned them as "folders" (well,
at least the 99% that are also windows/macos users) and those of us in
the other 1% were just too small a minority to stop those floodwaters
from overrunning everything.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 01/11/2021 09:59, Marco Moock wrote:

Am Mon, 1 Nov 2021 01:51:05 -0000 (UTC)
schrieb RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com>:

I guess this most surprising part is this is surprising. Computing is
application focused. People open MS Office Word, Apple Pages, or
LibreOffice Writer; they don’t open a file. Operating systems don’t
have pluggable extensions which let people manipulate various file
types; they have applications which run on them.

I think the reason is the usage of smartphones. Mostly people only use
apps there and don't understand the file system behind it.
They also save their files in the cloud (just other people's computers).
They don't need to understand a file system's structure anymore to use
the services.

In the very early days of MSDOS, it was common to find a numpty user's
PC drive filled with thousands of files that should have been organised
a bit better, so not to offend the OCD tendencies of the tech dealing
with it when they ran out of space (or FAT table entries)

As it was difficult for some to type commands to move items, so
graphical systems came about. XTree, Norton Commander etc...

And so did Windows and other desktop OSs. Containers within containers, multiple document interfaces, etc...

Mobile phones are kind of single document interface, and often the
application hides the document - facts are only exposed if you enter
suitable meta searches peculiar to the internals of the application.

One disaster of Microsoft's Vista operating system launch was that it
was released without the WinFS file system, which would have nicely
moved folks away from explicit directories to a meta label defined
structure of storing information by type.

This still needs work on.

GMail is a good example of meta labelling structure in use. It doesn't
really put things in folders. They just look like that.

--
Adrian C

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

I'm not so sure this one was Microsoft. Remember, they (MS) were late
to the GUI party by quite some time. The Apple Lisa showed the world
outside of Xerox Parc what a GUI looked like, and I think Apple called
them folders on the original Lisa (later Mac) OS.

Um, considering the Xerox Star outsold the Lisa over two to one, I think
credit and blame for "folders" is to Xerox. Credit for being successful copycats to Apple and Microsoft.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 11/01/2021 07:33 AM, Anssi Saari wrote:

Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

I'm not so sure this one was Microsoft. Remember, they (MS) were late
to the GUI party by quite some time. The Apple Lisa showed the world
outside of Xerox Parc what a GUI looked like, and I think Apple called
them folders on the original Lisa (later Mac) OS.

Um, considering the Xerox Star outsold the Lisa over two to one, I think credit and blame for "folders" is to Xerox. Credit for being successful copycats to Apple and Microsoft.

Some of us still call them subdirectories.

--
Cheers, Bev
Never argue with a woman holding a torque wrench.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <slopu0$mfj$1@dont-email.me>,
Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:

I never liked or understood why Microsoft decided for
the world to rename them "folders."

On second thought, while you might've misspelled "Apple," I might've
misspelled "Xerox."

_/_
/ v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail)
(IIGS( https://alfter.us/ Top-posting!
\_^_/ >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <slopu0$mfj$1@dont-email.me>,
Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:

I never liked or understood why Microsoft decided for
the world to rename them "folders."

You misspelled "Apple."

_/_
/ v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail)
(IIGS( https://alfter.us/ Top-posting!
\_^_/ >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:14:50 +0200, Anssi Saari wrote:

Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> writes:

Directories and sub-directories.

Me too and why not, I don't have a command to make folders or remove
them, I just have mkdir and rmdir. And chdir. Even Windows 10 today
still has the same commands, even in the newfangled "Power" shell.

One system I used in the 70s called them a catalogue.



--
Using UNIX since v6 (1975)...

Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> writes:

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 01:51:05 +0000, RS Wood wrote:

[...]

Strange as it may seem to older generations of computer users who grew
up maintaining an elaborate collection of nested subfolders, thanks to
powerful search functions now being the default in operating systems, as
well as the way phones and tablets obfuscate their file structure, and
cloud storage, high school graduates don’t see their hard drives the
same way[1].

I still call them directories...!

Same here. It is the best word given the context.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
%cd nonsense
[...] cd: nonsense: No such file or directory
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

A student who knows only ``folder'' will have trouble understanding this
clear error situation.

It's not quite different from the problem most people go through with ``logarithm''. They know what an exponent is, but they have no idea
what a logarithm is. You then tell them what it is, but next week
they've forgotten already, though they still remember what an exponent
is. It gets pretty interesting.

It's currently disputed that languages are *primarily* a tool for
thinking, rather than for communication. But a moment's thinking about
oneself reveals that one hypothesis is much better bet than the other.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Am Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:14:50 +0200
schrieb Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi>:

Even Windows 10 today still has the same commands, even in the
newfangled "Power" shell.

Because every script needs such functionality.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> wrote:

Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

I'm not so sure this one was Microsoft. Remember, they (MS) were late
to the GUI party by quite some time. The Apple Lisa showed the world
outside of Xerox Parc what a GUI looked like, and I think Apple called
them folders on the original Lisa (later Mac) OS.

Um, considering the Xerox Star outsold the Lisa over two to one, I think
credit and blame for "folders" is to Xerox. Credit for being successful
copycats to Apple and Microsoft.

Did the Xerox Star call them "folders"?

Looks like. For example http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/xerox/8010_dandelion/OSD-R8203A_Xerox_Office_System_Technology_Jan1984.pdf
indicates that, there's an article The star user interface: an overview starting on page 10.

Under "The Desktop" it explains:

"Every user's initial view of Star is the Desktop, which resembles the
top of an office desk, together with surrounding furniture and
equipment. It represents a working environment, where current projects
and accessible resources reside. On the screen (Figure 3) are displayed pictures of familiar office objects, such as documents, folders, file
drawers, in-baskets, and out-baskets. These objects are displayed as
small pictures, or icons."

It's interesting that they made a distinction between folders and file
drawers. https://guidebookgallery.org/articles/thestaruserinterfaceanoverview explains each, folder seems like an abstract collection of "data icons"
and file drawer corresponds to an actual directory with permissions and sharing. Must've been really confusing to people who don't bother with
details.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote:

I guess this most surprising part is this is surprising. Computing is application focused. People open MS Office Word, Apple Pages, or LibreOffice Writer; they don’t open a file. Operating systems don’t have pluggable extensions which let people manipulate various file types; they have applications which run on them.

Arguably that's a bug, not a feature. I note that Macs and Windows are application focused, and mobiles have inherited that worldview. But it's
not really something innate.

Unix isn't application focused: it's data centric. Files are files. You
can open files in different apps depending on what you want to do with them. You can chain together 'apps' using pipes. The filesystem is the space
users inhabit (at the command line anyway). The ability to easily share
data between apps and link them together is what makes it powerful.

RISC OS is a platform that inherited a lot of the Unix worldview but implemented it for the GUI: the primary interface for launching apps is the file manager, and you open files in apps by dragging them to the running app icon or window (or there is a default app association for double clicks).
You can chain apps together by dragging a file from the save dialogue of one app to load into another app, without having to go via the filesystem. It's the Unix philosophy of 'do one thing well' implemented on a GUI.

I find the Windows/Mac/iOS/Android way of doing things very frustrating
because often the task in hand intersects multiple apps, but the window
manager is app centric not task centric. MacOS probably the most, with its per-app menu bar. You're doing a task with two apps (eg email and document viewer), and another task with three apps (eg editor, document viewer and drawing program). But the window manager mixes those tasks up, eg not
keeping track of which document viewer window relates to what. You can manually separate that with virtual desktops, but often window switching (eg Alt-Tab and friends) don't comply because they're focused on switching apps, not switching tasks.

And of course the app-centric worldview plays into the hands of commercial software. They would much rather usher customers into their plush nicely curated restaurant - and can we recommend Sir some bottles from the wine
list? - rather than the Unix model which is a street market where you can
pick and mix tasty food from different vendors to suit your wishes.

On top of that, files and folders are a meta-construct so humans can grok filesystem semantics and, ultimately, blocks on a storage device.

I agree that 99 levels deep of perfectly curated hierarchy is
unnecessary, just like Usenet's classification of the world's topics in a
rigid hierarchy (and the endless naming wars it spawns) is too.

The trouble with app-based silos is that people lose control of their data, because it's not something they can manipulate any more. So they enter
their data into some mobile or cloud app, but then they can't get it out
again because it's not a file, it's just an entry in a database owned by somebody else on the other side of the planet.

Theo

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> writes:

On 11/01/2021 07:33 AM, Anssi Saari wrote:

Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

I'm not so sure this one was Microsoft. Remember, they (MS) were late
to the GUI party by quite some time. The Apple Lisa showed the world
outside of Xerox Parc what a GUI looked like, and I think Apple called
them folders on the original Lisa (later Mac) OS.

Um, considering the Xerox Star outsold the Lisa over two to one, I think
credit and blame for "folders" is to Xerox. Credit for being successful
copycats to Apple and Microsoft.

Some of us still call them subdirectories.

As do I. Manilla folders don't normally have a hierarchy of other
folders inside them.

Neal Stephenson fans will think of "Bücherradradradrad...."

--
Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 13:32:31 -0300, Meredith Montgomery wrote:

It's not quite different from the problem most people go through with ``logarithm''. They know what an exponent is, but they have no idea
what a logarithm is. You then tell them what it is, but next week
they've forgotten already, though they still remember what an exponent
is. It gets pretty interesting.

I've been doing some work on IBM floating point formats (hex ones).

I have now learned the difference between an exponent and a
characteristic.

--
Using UNIX since v6 (1975)...

Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
http://www.mirrorservice.org

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 01-Nov-21 12:51 pm, RS Wood wrote:

From the «WWW Wut the hell» department:
Feed: OSnews
Title: Students don’t know what files and folders are, professors say

When "computer literate" means knowing how to navigate the UI of a
smartphone.

Sylvia.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> wrote:

Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> wrote:

Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

I'm not so sure this one was Microsoft. Remember, they (MS) were late >>>> to the GUI party by quite some time. The Apple Lisa showed the world
outside of Xerox Parc what a GUI looked like, and I think Apple called >>>> them folders on the original Lisa (later Mac) OS.

Um, considering the Xerox Star outsold the Lisa over two to one, I think >>> credit and blame for "folders" is to Xerox. Credit for being successful
copycats to Apple and Microsoft.

Did the Xerox Star call them "folders"?

Looks like. For example http://www.bitsavers.org/pdf/xerox/8010_dandelion/OSD-R8203A_Xerox_Office_System_Technology_Jan1984.pdf
indicates that, there's an article The star user interface: an overview starting on page 10.

Under "The Desktop" it explains:

"Every user's initial view of Star is the Desktop, which resembles the
top of an office desk, together with surrounding furniture and
equipment. It represents a working environment, where current projects
and accessible resources reside. On the screen (Figure 3) are displayed pictures of familiar office objects, such as documents, folders, file drawers, in-baskets, and out-baskets. These objects are displayed as
small pictures, or icons."

It's interesting that they made a distinction between folders and file drawers. https://guidebookgallery.org/articles/thestaruserinterfaceanoverview explains each, folder seems like an abstract collection of "data icons"
and file drawer corresponds to an actual directory with permissions and sharing. Must've been really confusing to people who don't bother with details.

Ok, the that moves back the genesis of calling directories "folders" in
the GUI OS'es to at least the Xerox Star. And it also looks like Xerox
may have been the genesis of the physical paper office metaphor that
was created to try to make them seem "familiar".

That distinction between folders and file drawers is interesting. I'd
have thought a "file drawer" might have mapped to a "disk volume"
(i.e. a floppy would be a drawer, different mounted hard drives might
have one drawer per partition, etc.). Mapping "file drawer" to a
directory and the folders to just "data icons" is interesting to say
the least.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:

The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> writes:

On 11/01/2021 07:33 AM, Anssi Saari wrote:

Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

I'm not so sure this one was Microsoft. Remember, they (MS) were late >>>> to the GUI party by quite some time. The Apple Lisa showed the world
outside of Xerox Parc what a GUI looked like, and I think Apple called >>>> them folders on the original Lisa (later Mac) OS.

Um, considering the Xerox Star outsold the Lisa over two to one, I think >>> credit and blame for "folders" is to Xerox. Credit for being successful
copycats to Apple and Microsoft.

Some of us still call them subdirectories.

As do I. Manilla folders don't normally have a hierarchy of other
folders inside them.

Not normally, but nothing physically prevented one from placing one
manilla folder containing some papers into another containing other
papers. It just usually was not done in any physical file-cabinet
based org. system.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Scott Alfter <scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us> wrote:

In article <slopu0$mfj$1@dont-email.me>,
Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> wrote:

I never liked or understood why Microsoft decided for
the world to rename them "folders."

You misspelled "Apple."

IIRC, Xerox started folders?
--
Dang Moderna booster shot took me down again with the same symptoms, but longer! Horror for Halloween time! Worst COVID-19 shot ever so far. :( It's November and cold winter again! :O
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
/ /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:

Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> wrote:

Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> writes:

Directories and sub-directories.

Me too and why not, I don't have a command to make folders or remove
them, I just have mkdir and rmdir. And chdir. Even Windows 10 today
still has the same commands, even in the newfangled "Power" shell.

The fact that you even know of the existence of mkdir, rmdir, chdir,
etc. means you are more knowledgable about computers than 99% of
windows, macos, android, or iOS users.

That's why the got renamed. That 99% learned them as "folders" (well,
at least the 99% that are also windows/macos users) and those of us in
the other 1% were just too small a minority to stop those floodwaters
from overrunning everything.

Folders is a GUI term. How do you make icons to symbolize directories? Folders. ;P
--
Dang Moderna booster shot took me down again with the same symptoms, but longer! Horror for Halloween time! Worst COVID-19 shot ever so far. :( It's November and cold winter again! :O
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
/ /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Ant <ant@zimage.comant> wrote:

Folders is a GUI term. How do you make icons to symbolize directories? Folders. ;P

Surely folders are the container and directories are the index to the container? You pick up a thick collection of papers: the papers are held in
a folder, and the first page might be the directory to what's inside. (at least if you were in some mid 20th century organisation with a paper filing system - like the 'FBI files' and such)

Both analogies work, but people who don't live in a corporate world are less familiar with directories (beyond the telephone directory) because they
don't have a paper filing system with organised directories, they just have
a loose container of papers. Which is roughly how we store things today:
with less rigorous top-down organisation.

Theo

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:

On 01-Nov-21 12:51 pm, RS Wood wrote:

From the «WWW Wut the hell» department:
Feed: OSnews
Title: Students don’t know what files and folders are, professors say

When "computer literate" means knowing how to navigate the UI of a smartphone.

As opposed to knowing how to operate Windows XP?
(and anything designed to be familiar to people who learnt to use computers
in the Windows 95/98/XP era)

For better or worse, people no longer need to go to classes to learn how to operate a computer, even the one in their pocket.

Theo

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:

Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:

On 01-Nov-21 12:51 pm, RS Wood wrote:

From the WWW Wut the hell department:
Title: Students don't know what files and folders are, professors say

When "computer literate" means knowing how to navigate the UI of a
smartphone.

As opposed to knowing how to operate Windows XP? (and anything
designed to be familiar to people who learnt to use computers in the
Windows 95/98/XP era)

For better or worse, people no longer need to go to classes to learn how to operate a computer, even the one in their pocket.

I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my
telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure
out how to use my telephone.
-- Bjarne Stroustrup


--
Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote:

Strange as it may seem to older generations of computer users who grew up maintaining an elaborate collection of nested subfolders, thanks to powerful search functions now being the default in operating systems, as well as the way phones and tablets obfuscate their file structure, and cloud storage, high school graduates don???t see their hard drives the same way[1].

I wish this was only high school graduates. The amount of people in the
general population that can't find a file is staggering. I have
witnessed Jane of accounting calling the Helpdesk and being escalated
up, because she stored $File in her Recycling Bin, and complained it
being gone. (Same goes for e-Mail)

The only people I remember being very good with file organization and
storage were the people that used to run the old Solaris workstations,
rather than DOS/Windows.

We???re power users here, but even I rely on fd, locate, and ripgrep quite often.

I might as well also mention my good friend "find $DIR > files" here. I'd
then save that file somewhere I remember, especially if they normally
use a non-*NIX-OS, as I really can't be bothered using Windows Search.

I guess this most surprising part is this is surprising. Computing is application focused. People open MS Office Word, Apple Pages, or LibreOffice Writer; they don???t open a file. Operating systems don???t have pluggable extensions which let people manipulate various file types; they have applications which run on them.

IF they find the application /s.
On that note, I'd argue computing was never that file-focused to begin
with. "vi /etc/motd" also technically opens vi(m) first, and then tells
it the file to edit.

On top of that, files and folders are a meta-construct so humans can grok filesystem semantics and, ultimately, blocks on a storage device.

To be fair, modern Systems (especially Android and iOS, which don't
really let you access the full Filesystem by design) are another way of abstracting Files/Data to users. If you want a really absurd
abstraction, IIRC Microsoft stores Files on OneDrive in a SQL Database.

Also, relevant XKCD:
https://xkcd.com/378/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 11/02/2021 01:44 AM, Ant wrote:

Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:

Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> wrote:

Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> writes:

Directories and sub-directories.

Me too and why not, I don't have a command to make folders or remove
them, I just have mkdir and rmdir. And chdir. Even Windows 10 today
still has the same commands, even in the newfangled "Power" shell.

The fact that you even know of the existence of mkdir, rmdir, chdir,
etc. means you are more knowledgable about computers than 99% of
windows, macos, android, or iOS users.

That's why the got renamed. That 99% learned them as "folders" (well,
at least the 99% that are also windows/macos users) and those of us in
the other 1% were just too small a minority to stop those floodwaters
from overrunning everything.

Folders is a GUI term. How do you make icons to symbolize directories? Folders. ;P

OTOH, what's wrong with actual words? I have serious problems with
icons, especially tiny ones. "Grey blob with red splotch in the lower
right corner" means... uh... oh crap, now I have to mouse over it to get
the WORD :-("

--
Cheers, Bev
STRESS MANAGEMENT

Picture yourself near a stream.
Birds are singing in the crisp, cool mountain air.
Nothing can bother you here.
No one knows this secret place.
You are in total seclusion from
that place called the world.
The soothing sound of a gentle waterfall
fills the air with a cascade of serenity.
The water is crystal clear.
You can easily make out the face of the person
whose head you're holding under the water.
-- KevinT

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote:

On 11/02/2021 01:44 AM, Ant wrote:

Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote:

Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> wrote:

Nyssa <Nyssa@LogicalInsight.net> writes:

Directories and sub-directories.

Me too and why not, I don't have a command to make folders or remove
them, I just have mkdir and rmdir. And chdir. Even Windows 10 today
still has the same commands, even in the newfangled "Power" shell.

The fact that you even know of the existence of mkdir, rmdir, chdir,
etc. means you are more knowledgable about computers than 99% of
windows, macos, android, or iOS users.

That's why the got renamed. That 99% learned them as "folders" (well,
at least the 99% that are also windows/macos users) and those of us in
the other 1% were just too small a minority to stop those floodwaters
from overrunning everything.

Folders is a GUI term. How do you make icons to symbolize directories? Folders. ;P

OTOH, what's wrong with actual words?

Nothing. And GUI's used to include the word with the icon:

+----+
|icon|
+----+
folder

And that worked well. Very well actually. If you (etheral "you") were unfamiliar with the meaning of the icon, the word was present to help
you become familiar (of course you needed familarity with the meaning
of the word). Once you learned the pictorial association to the
function, you no longer needed to "read the word" and could ignore it.

But then some GUI artist, in need to making changes to save their job
from oblivion, decided that having words present was too "cluttered"
and started creating layouts with just the icons. Which worked ok in
their tests, because all their recruits knew the pictorial association
to the function. But they failed to test with users who were
unfamiliar with the picture to function mapping, because removing the
words meant it became significantly harder for those unfamiliar users
to learn the pictorial meanings. And so was developed the mouse hover
word, so the "word" could still be present, but invisible, until you
hovered your mouse pointer over it.

I have serious problems with icons, especially tiny ones. "Grey blob
with red splotch in the lower right corner" means... uh... oh crap,
now I have to mouse over it to get the WORD :-("

Yup, and take up even more time "hovering" out the meanings.

And, then, when one goes to touch interfaces (smartphones), there is no
"hover" a mouse pointer, so no way to "get the WORD"....

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> writes:

OTOH, what's wrong with actual words? I have serious problems with
icons, especially tiny ones. "Grey blob with red splotch in the lower
right corner" means... uh... oh crap, now I have to mouse over it to get
the WORD :-("

()()()()()


In another follow-up post, Rich <rich@example.invalid> answers your
question with, "Nothing" and offers an account of how they went away.

I'd say, "Words are hard". A large number of people are far weaker on
words that we'uns text fans realize. The TV generation has segued
smoothly into the GUI/U-Tube/touchscreen generation. I've become
increasingly puzzled by the fact that well educated friends (some with
PhDs in non-STEM subjects) have difficulty with words. The ca. 50%
alleged to read at the 5th grade level can't be expected to be better.
But we've all (barring dysfunction in visual cortex) inherited the
highly developed pattern recognition skill our remote ancestors
evolved for survival. Design of GUIs, advertising and other media
have shaken down across decades and heterogeneous studios, workshops
and labs to conventional wisdom that reflects and exploits that.

--
Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada

The command line is like language. The GUI is like shopping.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 11/05/2021 10:10 PM, Mike Spencer wrote:

The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> writes:

OTOH, what's wrong with actual words? I have serious problems with
icons, especially tiny ones. "Grey blob with red splotch in the lower
right corner" means... uh... oh crap, now I have to mouse over it to get
the WORD :-("

()()()()()

In another follow-up post, Rich <rich@example.invalid> answers your
question with, "Nothing" and offers an account of how they went away.

I'd say, "Words are hard". A large number of people are far weaker on
words that we'uns text fans realize. The TV generation has segued
smoothly into the GUI/U-Tube/touchscreen generation. I've become increasingly puzzled by the fact that well educated friends (some with
PhDs in non-STEM subjects) have difficulty with words. The ca. 50%
alleged to read at the 5th grade level can't be expected to be better.

I blame our K-12 schools for that, and the unions that prevent
incompetent teachers from being fired, as well as the laws/regulations
that require time to be spent on useless PC crap rather than actual
education. The smart kids will get by (it's assumed) so the lower half
gets all the attention, no matter how useless it is.

What's worse, I don't see any mechanism for changing this. </rant>

But we've all (barring dysfunction in visual cortex) inherited the
highly developed pattern recognition skill our remote ancestors
evolved for survival. Design of GUIs, advertising and other media
have shaken down across decades and heterogeneous studios, workshops
and labs to conventional wisdom that reflects and exploits that.

It's evil to exploit the stupid and ignorant, but it works pretty well!

--
Cheers, Bev
Ride faster, I hear banjo music!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)