• HP wants you to rent a printer it monitors

    From Retrograde@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 1 14:21:38 2024
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews
    Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors Author: Thom Holwerda
    Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:47:12 -0500
    Link: https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36-month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/


    HP launched a subscription service[1] today that rents people a printer,
    allots them a specific amount of printed pages, and sends them ink for a monthly fee. HP is framing its service as a way to simplify printing for families and small businesses, but the deal also comes with monitoring and a years-long commitment.

    Prices range from $6.99 per month for a plan that includes an HP Envy printer (the current model is the 6020e) and 20 printed pages. The priciest plan includes an HP OfficeJet Pro rental and 700 printed pages for $35.99 per
    month.
    ↫ Scharon Harding at Ars Technica[2]

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    Links:
    [1]: https://www.hp.com/us-en/all-in-plan/printers.html (link)
    [2]: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/02/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36-month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/ (link)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marco Moock@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 1 15:44:27 2024
    Am 01.03.2024 schrieb Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>:

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    I hope that this will stay a joke. :-)
    I hate such business models, because you don't own the stuff you pay
    for.

    I will continue to use the older HP and Samsung printers I have at home
    for the ~20 pages I need to print per year.
    Those printers don't have a NIC, they have USB or parallel, and they
    are supported in Linux.

    Such printers are widely available and ink is available from 3rd
    parties.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Marco Moock on Fri Mar 1 15:20:12 2024
    Marco Moock <mm+usenet@dorfdsl.de> wrote at 14:44 this Friday (GMT):
    Am 01.03.2024 schrieb Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>:

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    I hope that this will stay a joke. :-)
    I hate such business models, because you don't own the stuff you pay
    for.

    I will continue to use the older HP and Samsung printers I have at home
    for the ~20 pages I need to print per year.
    Those printers don't have a NIC, they have USB or parallel, and they
    are supported in Linux.

    Such printers are widely available and ink is available from 3rd
    parties.

    Cheers!
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From yeti@21:1/5 to Retrograde on Fri Mar 1 16:47:26 2024
    Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> writes:

    Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors

    I know a healthcare company that works with remote controlled printer/scanner/copier units.

    They either did not or refused to understand why I think that's scary.

    --
    I do not bite, I just want to play.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Retrograde on Fri Mar 1 15:20:13 2024
    Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote at 14:21 this Friday (GMT):
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews
    Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors Author: Thom Holwerda
    Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:47:12 -0500
    Link: https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36-month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/


    HP launched a subscription service[1] today that rents people a printer, allots them a specific amount of printed pages, and sends them ink for a monthly fee. HP is framing its service as a way to simplify printing for families and small businesses, but the deal also comes with monitoring and a years-long commitment.

    Prices range from $6.99 per month for a plan that includes an HP Envy printer (the current model is the 6020e) and 20 printed pages. The priciest plan includes an HP OfficeJet Pro rental and 700 printed pages for $35.99 per month.
    ↫ Scharon Harding at Ars Technica[2]

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    Links:
    [1]: https://www.hp.com/us-en/all-in-plan/printers.html (link)
    [2]: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/02/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36-month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/ (link)

    If you have to buy a bundle that includes one then you'd have to pay
    more for no printer.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich@21:1/5 to Marco Moock on Fri Mar 1 22:48:31 2024
    Marco Moock <mm+usenet@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Am 01.03.2024 schrieb Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>:

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    I hope that this will stay a joke. :-)

    Most of us here likely feel the same way.

    Reality is that enough lemmings will buy into it that HP will see it as
    a success, and this will encourage them to add more crap like this for
    other printers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Rich on Sat Mar 2 05:05:56 2024
    Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote at 22:48 this Friday (GMT):
    Marco Moock <mm+usenet@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Am 01.03.2024 schrieb Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>:

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    I hope that this will stay a joke. :-)

    Most of us here likely feel the same way.

    Reality is that enough lemmings will buy into it that HP will see it as
    a success, and this will encourage them to add more crap like this for
    other printers.

    "Money speaks" and stuff.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich@21:1/5 to candycanearter07@candycanearter07.n on Sat Mar 2 05:45:36 2024
    candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
    Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote at 22:48 this Friday (GMT):
    Marco Moock <mm+usenet@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Am 01.03.2024 schrieb Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>:

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    I hope that this will stay a joke. :-)

    Most of us here likely feel the same way.

    Reality is that enough lemmings will buy into it that HP will see it as
    a success, and this will encourage them to add more crap like this for
    other printers.

    "Money speaks" and stuff.

    That, and there will likely be some subset of the lemmings that will
    buy it, without realizing the 'subscription aspect', and afterward
    their own cognitive dissonance will kick in and they will rationalize
    the 'subscription' as somehow being better for them than the
    alternative, in order not to admit they had been duped.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Kettlewell@21:1/5 to Retrograde on Sat Mar 2 09:51:39 2024
    Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> writes:
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews
    Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors Author: Thom Holwerda
    Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:47:12 -0500
    Link: https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36-month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/

    HP have been offering leases on printers for years and so have many
    others businesses; there’s demonstrably a market for it. I suspect it
    makes more sense for businesses than individuals.

    --
    https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Rich on Sat Mar 2 10:34:28 2024
    On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Rich wrote:

    candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
    Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote at 22:48 this Friday (GMT):
    Marco Moock <mm+usenet@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Am 01.03.2024 schrieb Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>:

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    I hope that this will stay a joke. :-)

    Most of us here likely feel the same way.

    Reality is that enough lemmings will buy into it that HP will see it as
    a success, and this will encourage them to add more crap like this for
    other printers.

    "Money speaks" and stuff.

    That, and there will likely be some subset of the lemmings that will
    buy it, without realizing the 'subscription aspect', and afterward
    their own cognitive dissonance will kick in and they will rationalize
    the 'subscription' as somehow being better for them than the
    alternative, in order not to admit they had been duped.


    That reminds me, wasn't it that one of the big german car manufacturers
    started selling extra features as "services" you had to pay for month
    after month?

    I would expect them to stop doing that pretty quickly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marco Moock@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 2 12:38:10 2024
    On 01.03.2024 um 22:48 Uhr Rich wrote:

    Reality is that enough lemmings will buy into it that HP will see it
    as a success, and this will encourage them to add more crap like this
    for other printers.

    They can do that, but I will not buy/rent those printers.
    I have one working Samsung laser with one spare catridge,
    an HP OfficeJet J4585 (new ink needed) and an OfficeJet 350 (new ink
    needed).

    If the Samsung dies, I have those 2. I only need to refill the ink (if possible) or buy new ink patrons.

    And I know that people throw away perfectly working devices, so I have
    a look at them.

    There is no reason for me to buy a new printer.

    --
    kind regards
    Marco

    Send spam to 1709329711muell@cartoonies.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Sat Mar 2 16:38:24 2024
    D <nospam@example.net> wrote:


    On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Rich wrote:

    candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote: >>> Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote at 22:48 this Friday (GMT):
    Marco Moock <mm+usenet@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Am 01.03.2024 schrieb Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>:

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    I hope that this will stay a joke. :-)

    Most of us here likely feel the same way.

    Reality is that enough lemmings will buy into it that HP will see it as >>>> a success, and this will encourage them to add more crap like this for >>>> other printers.

    "Money speaks" and stuff.

    That, and there will likely be some subset of the lemmings that will
    buy it, without realizing the 'subscription aspect', and afterward
    their own cognitive dissonance will kick in and they will rationalize
    the 'subscription' as somehow being better for them than the
    alternative, in order not to admit they had been duped.


    That reminds me, wasn't it that one of the big german car manufacturers started selling extra features as "services" you had to pay for month
    after month?

    I would expect them to stop doing that pretty quickly.

    BMW - heated seats.

    You could order "heated seats" as a fixed-price option on a new car, or "subscribe" later if you didn't order the option when new (as the car
    seats included all the heater coils and control unit, the software just
    would not turn the resistive heaters on if you had not "purchased" the
    option). If I remember right, after a lot of "bad publicity" they
    backed off on this (for now, I expect them to try it again).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Rich on Sat Mar 2 18:32:17 2024
    On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Rich wrote:

    D <nospam@example.net> wrote:


    On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, Rich wrote:

    candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote: >>>> Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote at 22:48 this Friday (GMT):
    Marco Moock <mm+usenet@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
    Am 01.03.2024 schrieb Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>:

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    I hope that this will stay a joke. :-)

    Most of us here likely feel the same way.

    Reality is that enough lemmings will buy into it that HP will see it as >>>>> a success, and this will encourage them to add more crap like this for >>>>> other printers.

    "Money speaks" and stuff.

    That, and there will likely be some subset of the lemmings that will
    buy it, without realizing the 'subscription aspect', and afterward
    their own cognitive dissonance will kick in and they will rationalize
    the 'subscription' as somehow being better for them than the
    alternative, in order not to admit they had been duped.


    That reminds me, wasn't it that one of the big german car manufacturers
    started selling extra features as "services" you had to pay for month
    after month?

    I would expect them to stop doing that pretty quickly.

    BMW - heated seats.

    You could order "heated seats" as a fixed-price option on a new car, or "subscribe" later if you didn't order the option when new (as the car
    seats included all the heater coils and control unit, the software just
    would not turn the resistive heaters on if you had not "purchased" the option). If I remember right, after a lot of "bad publicity" they
    backed off on this (for now, I expect them to try it again).

    Thank you. Ah, that will be interesting. Plenty of competitors will likely
    not do that and try to get marketshare, so I think the car market is too competitive for foolishness such as this to get a hold. I guess printers
    are a more centralized and consolidated market.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dbnnet@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 2 20:59:52 2024
    In article <65e1e472$0$19594$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, fungus@amongus.com.invalid says...
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews
    Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it
    monitors
    Author: Thom Holwerda
    Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:47:12 -0500
    Link: https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36- month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/


    HP launched a subscription service[1] today that rents people a printer, >allots them a specific amount of printed pages, and sends them ink for a >monthly fee. HP is framing its service as a way to simplify printing for >families and small businesses, but the deal also comes with monitoring and
    a
    years-long commitment.

    Prices range from $6.99 per month for a plan that includes an HP Envy
    printer
    (the current model is the 6020e) and 20 printed pages. The priciest plan >includes an HP OfficeJet Pro rental and 700 printed pages for $35.99 per >month.
    ? Scharon Harding at Ars Technica[2]

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    Links:
    [1]: https://www.hp.com/us-en/all-in-plan/printers.html (link)
    [2]: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/02/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36- month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/ (link)


    It's not only HP who are determined to milk the customer dry.
    Epson are apparently using planned obsolescence to "Brick" certain printers after a fixed period of time: https://gizmodo.com/epson-printer-end-of-service-life-error-not-working- dea-1849384045

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to dbnnet on Sat Mar 2 21:59:48 2024
    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, dbnnet wrote:

    In article <65e1e472$0$19594$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, fungus@amongus.com.invalid says...
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews
    Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it
    monitors
    Author: Thom Holwerda
    Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:47:12 -0500
    Link: https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36-
    month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/


    HP launched a subscription service[1] today that rents people a printer,
    allots them a specific amount of printed pages, and sends them ink for a
    monthly fee. HP is framing its service as a way to simplify printing for
    families and small businesses, but the deal also comes with monitoring and
    a
    years-long commitment.

    Prices range from $6.99 per month for a plan that includes an HP Envy
    printer
    (the current model is the 6020e) and 20 printed pages. The priciest plan
    includes an HP OfficeJet Pro rental and 700 printed pages for $35.99 per
    month.
    ? Scharon Harding at Ars Technica[2]

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    Links:
    [1]: https://www.hp.com/us-en/all-in-plan/printers.html (link)
    [2]: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/02/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36-
    month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/ (link)


    It's not only HP who are determined to milk the customer dry.
    Epson are apparently using planned obsolescence to "Brick" certain printers after a fixed period of time: https://gizmodo.com/epson-printer-end-of-service-life-error-not-working- dea-1849384045



    Hmm, if that is proven, I'm pretty sure it would be illegal in some EU countries.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Computer Nerd Kev@21:1/5 to dbnnet on Sun Mar 3 09:16:24 2024
    dbnnet <dbnnet@invalid.com> wrote:
    It's not only HP who are determined to milk the customer dry.
    Epson are apparently using planned obsolescence to "Brick" certain printers after a fixed period of time: https://gizmodo.com/epson-printer-end-of-service-life-error-not-working- dea-1849384045

    That's nothing new. I think that trick's as old as cheap ink-jet
    printers themselves, because they all have the sponge that can't
    officially be replaced (even though it's often easy to access).

    Epson's mistake was obviously using their fancy modern LCD display
    to actually explain the error message. Old ink-jets like the ones
    I've owned before I got fed up with the technology entirely would
    just one day flash an LED in a patten which the manual explains as
    something like "hardware malfunction", and everyone just assumes
    something's actually broken rather than a mere soggy sponge. From
    lack of other symptoms I suspect that's what happened to an old
    (parallel port) Lexmark ink-jet I had.

    Canon do the same thing: https://www.canon.com.au/support/sims-content?pid=4895fb3b3d1d414dac1447260ed7920d&cid=67413794F30646D09D614333C720646C

    As they say, it might depend on how often the cleaning cycle is
    run. People who infrequently print buy ink-jets, yet such usage
    causes more cleaning cycles and therefore more wasted ink, and then
    the sponge fills up so the printer dies. So they're actually
    terrible for that sort of application.

    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _#

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Computer Nerd Kev on Sun Mar 3 11:07:06 2024
    On Sun, 3 Mar 2024, Computer Nerd Kev wrote:

    dbnnet <dbnnet@invalid.com> wrote:
    It's not only HP who are determined to milk the customer dry.
    Epson are apparently using planned obsolescence to "Brick" certain printers >> after a fixed period of time:
    https://gizmodo.com/epson-printer-end-of-service-life-error-not-working-
    dea-1849384045

    That's nothing new. I think that trick's as old as cheap ink-jet
    printers themselves, because they all have the sponge that can't
    officially be replaced (even though it's often easy to access).

    Epson's mistake was obviously using their fancy modern LCD display
    to actually explain the error message. Old ink-jets like the ones
    I've owned before I got fed up with the technology entirely would
    just one day flash an LED in a patten which the manual explains as
    something like "hardware malfunction", and everyone just assumes
    something's actually broken rather than a mere soggy sponge. From
    lack of other symptoms I suspect that's what happened to an old
    (parallel port) Lexmark ink-jet I had.

    Canon do the same thing: https://www.canon.com.au/support/sims-content?pid=4895fb3b3d1d414dac1447260ed7920d&cid=67413794F30646D09D614333C720646C

    As they say, it might depend on how often the cleaning cycle is
    run. People who infrequently print buy ink-jets, yet such usage
    causes more cleaning cycles and therefore more wasted ink, and then
    the sponge fills up so the printer dies. So they're actually
    terrible for that sort of application.

    It seems like I was lucky! I have a 10 year old officejet (if not older)
    and it just works.

    In my second home, I inherited an old used HP and if also works fine. It
    seems like I dodged a bullet by _not_ choosing to buy a new printer but inheriting an old one as well.

    Oh, and both of them work on linux!

    Best regards,
    Daniel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Richard Kettlewell on Mon Mar 4 15:55:09 2024
    Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote at 09:51 this Saturday (GMT):
    Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> writes:
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews
    Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors
    Author: Thom Holwerda
    Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:47:12 -0500
    Link:
    https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36-month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/

    HP have been offering leases on printers for years and so have many
    others businesses; there’s demonstrably a market for it. I suspect it
    makes more sense for businesses than individuals.

    LEASES? We really are entering the "You will own nothing" era..
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 4 16:47:33 2024
    On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:55:09 +0000, candycanearter07 wrote:

    Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote at 09:51 this
    Saturday (GMT):
    Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> writes:
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a
    printer that it monitors Author: Thom Holwerda Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024
    19:47:12 -0500 Link:
    https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36- month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/

    HP have been offering leases on printers for years and so have many
    others businesses; there’s demonstrably a market for it. I suspect it
    makes more sense for businesses than individuals.

    LEASES? We really are entering the "You will own nothing" era..

    Not uncommon on high end printers. My son works for Konica Minolta, and at
    that level that's all they do.

    --
    Using UNIX since v6 (1975)...

    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
    http://www.mirrorservice.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Alfter@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Mon Mar 4 16:58:03 2024
    In article <6c9a0246-7b6e-42f2-1602-31b8c29698c2@example.net>,
    D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 2 Mar 2024, dbnnet wrote:
    It's not only HP who are determined to milk the customer dry. Epson are
    apparently using planned obsolescence to "Brick" certain printers after a
    fixed period of time:
    https://gizmodo.com/epson-printer-end-of-service-life-error-not-working-
    dea-1849384045

    Hmm, if that is proven, I'm pretty sure it would be illegal in some EU >countries.

    Considering the source (Gizmodo was part of Gawker, which got sued into bankruptcy over its serial lies), it's almost certainly false. Epson inkjet printers have a "maintenance box" that's basically a sponge to soak up ink
    from printhead cleaning. When it gets full, the printer stops working until you replace it. Buy a new one (this 3rd-party unit was about $13 when I
    bought it: https://amzn.to/42ZJpSb), spend a few minutes removing the old
    one and installing the new one, and you're back in business.

    I've also heard of people disassembling the maintenance box, rinsing out the ink, putting it back together, and using something to fool the printer into thinking a new maintenance box has been installed. Considering the mess
    that ink makes when it goes where it shouldn't, you're better off just replacing it IMHO.

    --
    _/_
    / v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail)
    (IIGS( https://alfter.us/ Top-posting!
    \_^_/ >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to news0009@eager.cx on Mon Mar 4 17:34:15 2024
    Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> wrote:
    On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:55:09 +0000, candycanearter07 wrote:
    Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote at 09:51 this
    Saturday (GMT):
    Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> writes:
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a
    printer that it monitors Author: Thom Holwerda Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024
    19:47:12 -0500 Link:
    https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36- >month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/

    HP have been offering leases on printers for years and so have many
    others businesses; there’s demonstrably a market for it. I suspect it
    makes more sense for businesses than individuals.

    LEASES? We really are entering the "You will own nothing" era..

    Not uncommon on high end printers. My son works for Konica Minolta, and at >that level that's all they do.

    That is in fact how Xerox started out. IBM too. But we got away from that
    and now it looks like we are headed right back.
    --scott

    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich@21:1/5 to Scott Dorsey on Mon Mar 4 19:07:04 2024
    Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote:
    Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> wrote:
    On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:55:09 +0000, candycanearter07 wrote:
    Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote at 09:51 this
    Saturday (GMT):
    Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> writes:
    From the ??eat sh*t and die, HP?? department:
    Feed: OSnews Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a
    printer that it monitors Author: Thom Holwerda Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 >>>>> 19:47:12 -0500 Link:
    https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36- >>month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/

    HP have been offering leases on printers for years and so have
    many others businesses; there???s demonstrably a market for it. I
    suspect it makes more sense for businesses than individuals.

    LEASES? We really are entering the "You will own nothing" era..

    Not uncommon on high end printers. My son works for Konica Minolta,
    and at that level that's all they do.

    That is in fact how Xerox started out. IBM too. But we got away
    from that and now it looks like we are headed right back.

    The 'corporate' world never left that environment. Many larger
    printers and almost all standalone copiers are leased by the companies
    that utilize them. The companies do that because the lease also
    provides "service" (when things break) and "support" (sometime
    supplies, assistance integrating with the companies network/computers,
    etc.) and as well frees the company using the equipment from having to
    expense the equipment on their tax filings (the lessor would be the one
    having to handle that detail).

    What is different here is the push to bring "leased" to the
    home/retail market. For the obvious reasons of opening up a
    continuious revenue stream for the maker as opposed to a one time sales reciept.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Scott Dorsey on Mon Mar 4 18:30:09 2024
    Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote at 17:34 this Monday (GMT):
    Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> wrote:
    On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:55:09 +0000, candycanearter07 wrote:
    Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote at 09:51 this
    Saturday (GMT):
    Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> writes:
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a
    printer that it monitors Author: Thom Holwerda Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 >>>>> 19:47:12 -0500 Link:
    https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36- >>month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/

    HP have been offering leases on printers for years and so have many
    others businesses; there’s demonstrably a market for it. I suspect it >>>> makes more sense for businesses than individuals.

    LEASES? We really are entering the "You will own nothing" era..

    Not uncommon on high end printers. My son works for Konica Minolta, and at >>that level that's all they do.

    That is in fact how Xerox started out. IBM too. But we got away from that and now it looks like we are headed right back.
    --scott

    Classic.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Scott Alfter on Tue Mar 5 15:15:52 2024
    Scott Alfter <scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us> wrote:
    Considering the source (Gizmodo was part of Gawker, which got sued into bankruptcy over its serial lies), it's almost certainly false. Epson inkjet printers have a "maintenance box" that's basically a sponge to soak up ink from printhead cleaning. When it gets full, the printer stops working until you replace it. Buy a new one (this 3rd-party unit was about $13 when I bought it: https://amzn.to/42ZJpSb), spend a few minutes removing the old
    one and installing the new one, and you're back in business.

    I've also heard of people disassembling the maintenance box, rinsing out the ink, putting it back together, and using something to fool the printer into thinking a new maintenance box has been installed. Considering the mess
    that ink makes when it goes where it shouldn't, you're better off just replacing it IMHO.

    My printer has a replaceable maintenance box. It's otherwise identical to
    the previous version which didn't. On the old one, when the box would fill
    up it would stop with a 'waste ink pad full' message. Epson says this is a service visit ($$$) - because you don't just replace the pads, you have to reset the Waste Ink Counter with their special software. For a years-old printer that was a couple of hundred to buy, few are going to pay for a
    service visit to keep it going. It's constructive planned obsolescence.

    Of course, the aftermarket has come up with some third party ink pads and cracked the encryption on the ink counter. So no service visit required -
    but no thanks to Epson.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Mar 5 16:54:57 2024
    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Scott Alfter <scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us> wrote:
    I've also heard of people disassembling the maintenance box, rinsing
    out the ink, putting it back together, and using something to fool
    the printer into thinking a new maintenance box has been installed.
    Considering the mess that ink makes when it goes where it shouldn't,
    you're better off just replacing it IMHO.

    My printer has a replaceable maintenance box. It's otherwise
    identical to the previous version which didn't. On the old one, when
    the box would fill up it would stop with a 'waste ink pad full'
    message. Epson says this is a service visit ($$$) - because you
    don't just replace the pads, you have to reset the Waste Ink Counter
    with their special software. For a years-old printer that was a
    couple of hundred to buy, few are going to pay for a service visit to
    keep it going. It's constructive planned obsolescence.

    More than that, it is also wasting printer ink that (at, for example,
    HP pricing) cost on the order of hundreds or thousands of dollars an
    ounce. Every drop of expensive ink squirted into the "cleaning sponge"
    is ink you paid for that did not get used for a printout.

    So it is also in the makers best interest to do /more/ cleanings than necessary, and to squirt /more/ ink than necessary on each cleaning to
    produce a higher rate of ink sales.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ron Lauzon@21:4/137 to Marco Moock on Wed Mar 6 08:17:30 2024
    Such printers are widely available and ink is available from 3rd
    parties.

    And HP (and others) are doing the best to derail you from using 3rd party ink.

    I used 3rd party ink in one of my HP printers and it simply refused to print.
    A previous HP printer that I had actually got messed up after using 3rd party ink.

    BTW: My next printer will **not** be HP.

    ... Top secret! Burn before reading!

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: 8-Bit Boyz BBS! -=[ bbs.8bitboyz.com port:6502 ]=- (21:4/137)
  • From Marco Moock@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 8 09:12:21 2024
    Am 06.03.2024 schrieb Ron.Lauzon@f137.n4.z21.fsxnet (Ron Lauzon):

    And HP (and others) are doing the best to derail you from using 3rd
    party ink.

    I used 3rd party ink in one of my HP printers and it simply refused
    to print. A previous HP printer that I had actually got messed up
    after using 3rd party ink.

    They can do that only an newer printers.
    I have some older ones, they don't have network connection, so I doubt
    they will provide a firmware update for them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dbnnet@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 8 10:51:27 2024
    In article <65e1e472$0$19594$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, fungus@amongus.com.invalid says...
    From the «eat sh*t and die, HP» department:
    Feed: OSnews
    Title: HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it
    monitors
    Author: Thom Holwerda
    Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 19:47:12 -0500
    Link: https://www.osnews.com/story/138668/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36- month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/


    HP launched a subscription service[1] today that rents people a printer, >allots them a specific amount of printed pages, and sends them ink for a >monthly fee. HP is framing its service as a way to simplify printing for >families and small businesses, but the deal also comes with monitoring and
    a
    years-long commitment.

    Prices range from $6.99 per month for a plan that includes an HP Envy
    printer
    (the current model is the 6020e) and 20 printed pages. The priciest plan >includes an HP OfficeJet Pro rental and 700 printed pages for $35.99 per >month.
    ? Scharon Harding at Ars Technica[2]

    Can I pay them not to put a printer in my house?

    Links:
    [1]: https://www.hp.com/us-en/all-in-plan/printers.html (link)
    [2]: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/02/hp-wants-you-to-pay-up-to-36- month-to-rent-a-printer-that-it-monitors/ (link)


    In Today's The Register: www.theregister.com/2024/03/07/hp_ink_addicts/?td=rt-3a
    "HP print rental service seeks more users to become subscription addicts"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Aharon Robbins@21:1/5 to Ron Lauzon on Fri Mar 8 09:48:50 2024
    In article <1990991626@f137.n4.z21.fsxnet>,
    Ron Lauzon <Ron.Lauzon@f137.n4.z21.fsxnet> wrote:
    Such printers are widely available and ink is available from 3rd
    parties.

    And HP (and others) are doing the best to derail you from using 3rd party ink.

    I used 3rd party ink in one of my HP printers and it simply refused to print. >A previous HP printer that I had actually got messed up after using 3rd party >ink.

    BTW: My next printer will **not** be HP.

    It's well known that a laser printer has much lower cost per page
    than an ink jet printer. HP's laser printers have *excellent* Linux
    support, as well as network support. I've been using them exclusively
    for over 20 years.

    I haven't tested my most recent one if it takes a 3rd party toner
    or not, and HP toner is more expensive. OTOH, one cartridge prints
    thousands of pages, and the current models do duplexing and scanning
    as well.

    I'll agree, ink jet printers are a bad deal. Laser printers much less
    so.

    My two cents.
    --
    Aharon (Arnold) Robbins arnold AT skeeve DOT com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)