• Using SMS for password reset.

    From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 30 19:22:29 2024
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to
    hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't
    otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a
    system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere.

    Except that the banks insist on having a password reset option,
    validated using an SMS. This undermines my attempts at ensuring that the account remains secure.

    I've tried telling banks (and other entities, indeed) that I don't want
    the ability to reset the password. No go, because such an option is not implemented in their systems.

    Telcos in Australia have some quite strict rules regarding transfer of
    mobile phone numbers, but the rules still get broken, and frauds
    committed thereby.

    If someone perpetrated a fraud as a consequence of the SMS password
    reset, I'd have a good case that it was a fraud against the bank, rather
    than against me, and that it was therefore the bank's loss.

    Still, I'd rather not have to deal with it.

    I looked at having a SecurIDĀ® device as 2FA. But guess what? It can be
    used to reset the password.

    So I'm tearing my hair out. Why do banks have this huge blind-spot when
    it comes to resetting passwords?

    Sylvia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to Dan Purgert on Tue Jan 30 21:57:02 2024
    On 30-Jan-24 9:39 pm, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to
    hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't
    otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a
    system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere.

    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.


    If I say I won't forget, you've no real reason to doubt me. There are
    many things that I've remembered for decades.

    In the event that I really did forget, then I'd have to show up at one
    of the bank's offices with physical identity documents.

    Sylvia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Purgert@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Tue Jan 30 10:39:28 2024
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to
    hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a
    system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere.

    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.

    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Spiros Bousbouras on Tue Jan 30 16:38:00 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Spiros Bousbouras wrote:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:39:28 -0000 (UTC)
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to
    hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't
    otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a
    system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere.

    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.

    That's a very presumptuous thing to say. I have my own ways of storing and retrieving passwords (which may include just my memory) and I'm confident they are secure and reliable enough. So don't include me in your "we".

    I share Sylvia's frustration and it's not just with banks. Pretty much any online site with an option to create an account , will also have some kind
    of password reminder , usually sent to your email. Very often I have wished for sites to offer the option when creating an account to disable any password reminders but I have yet to see a site which does this.


    Just for the record, please add me to the "we". When it comes to password reset, I've never had a bank that does not have go to their office in
    person to setup accounts and change passwords.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Tue Jan 30 16:39:54 2024
    Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to
    hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a
    system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere.

    Except that the banks insist on having a password reset option,
    validated using an SMS. This undermines my attempts at ensuring that the account remains secure.

    True in a general security sense.

    I've tried telling banks (and other entities, indeed) that I don't want
    the ability to reset the password. No go, because such an option is not implemented in their systems.

    Your request is the one odd one in a sea of others that all /rely/ on
    the ability to reset passwords, and as banks are, well, /banks/ and not security researchers, they simply will not understand why you want to
    be "so different from everyone" -- and the result is a "can't do that"
    answer (because, likely, they really can't do that).

    Telcos in Australia have some quite strict rules regarding transfer of
    mobile phone numbers, but the rules still get broken, and frauds
    committed thereby.

    The US /supposedly/ has rules to prevent it as well, but an 'insider'
    can always work around the rules, and so it happens here too.

    If someone perpetrated a fraud as a consequence of the SMS password
    reset, I'd have a good case that it was a fraud against the bank, rather
    than against me, and that it was therefore the bank's loss.

    Still, I'd rather not have to deal with it.

    Agreed.

    I looked at having a SecurIDĀ® device as 2FA. But guess what? It can be
    used to reset the password.

    So I'm tearing my hair out. Why do banks have this huge blind-spot when
    it comes to resetting passwords?

    Because banks are not "security researchers" and are instead simply
    following the "best practices playbook" (which is also not written by
    "security researchers" but may be written by "govt. regulators"). And
    if the playbook says "provide abililty to reset password with 2FA
    security" and a separate chapter lists "SMS" as a valid 2FA method,
    then they are "protected" (which in this environment means protected
    from a charge of negligence for not following "best practices"). But
    they are not in the business of "protecting" you -- they are in the
    business of "protecting" themselves from negligence charges. The
    amount of "protection" you receive as a secondary result of them
    protecting themselves is what you end up seeing as your protection.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Julieta Shem@21:1/5 to Spiros Bousbouras on Tue Jan 30 13:39:59 2024
    Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> writes:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:39:28 -0000 (UTC)
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to
    hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't
    otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a
    system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere. >>
    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.

    That's a very presumptuous thing to say. I have my own ways of storing and retrieving passwords (which may include just my memory) and I'm confident they are secure and reliable enough. So don't include me in your "we".

    I share Sylvia's frustration and it's not just with banks.

    I share Sylvia's frustration as well. It's not just with banks. Things
    are become ever more centralized. Centralization designs products and
    services to the average customer and business invest in shaping people
    so that if fits their business model. Along with that new cultural
    values appear. People seem a lot less interested in serving people. We
    have to fit in with the system now. People who keep their individuality
    are nuisance to the system.

    I wonder what happens in the limiting case.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From newsmaster@ausics.net@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Wed Jan 31 07:02:36 2024
    Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to
    hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a
    system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.

    Although probably a higher risk of running software that's missing
    the latest security bug fixes, and therefore _might_ be vulnerable
    to snooping on the encrypted data, or page content in web browsers
    via Javascript. I suppose you could run updates each time after
    booting though.

    Except that the banks insist on having a password reset option,
    validated using an SMS. This undermines my attempts at ensuring that the account remains secure.

    Yes the SMS requirement annoys me too, although for different
    reasons related to me not frequently using a mobile at all. But I
    only have online banking enabled for accounts from which I want to
    make payments for online purchases, where I transfer the required
    amount into them before-hand. Otherwise money is kept in accounts
    that don't have online banking and I don't have to provide a mobile
    phone number for them, although I believe it is an option for
    verification with phone banking.

    I've tried telling banks (and other entities, indeed) that I don't want
    the ability to reset the password. No go, because such an option is not implemented in their systems.

    Telcos in Australia have some quite strict rules regarding transfer of
    mobile phone numbers, but the rules still get broken, and frauds
    committed thereby.

    I wonder if there's an equivalent to 127.0.0.1 for mobile phone
    numbers, where you _know_ they can't call anyone with that number
    (even yourself)? CBA requires the SMS code while setting up and
    using their online banking funtions too though (rather annoying for
    me because I keep my mobile phone in the car all the time).

    If someone perpetrated a fraud as a consequence of the SMS password
    reset, I'd have a good case that it was a fraud against the bank, rather
    than against me, and that it was therefore the bank's loss.

    Still, I'd rather not have to deal with it.

    Yes I've had bank staff tell me about similar protections
    when I say I don't want online banking, but it ignores the
    immediate difficulty of finding that all your money's gone and
    then having to wait penniless until the bank gets around to looking
    into it (and hoping they're competent at doing so).

    --
    __ __
    #_ < |\| |< _# | Note: I won't see posts made from Google Groups |

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 31 09:45:36 2024
    Just as an aside, when I created my online account for the bank, it told
    me my user id, expressed as two four digit groups separated by a space.

    But will it accept the user id in that format? No, of course not.

    Sylvia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Spencer@21:1/5 to Julieta Shem on Tue Jan 30 19:56:58 2024
    Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> writes:

    Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> writes:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:39:28 -0000 (UTC)
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to >>>> hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't
    otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a >>>> system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere. >>>
    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.

    That's a very presumptuous thing to say. I have my own ways of storing and >> retrieving passwords (which may include just my memory) and I'm confident
    they are secure and reliable enough. So don't include me in your "we".

    I share Sylvia's frustration and it's not just with banks.

    I share Sylvia's frustration as well. It's not just with banks. Things
    are become ever more centralized. Centralization designs products and services to the average customer and business invest in shaping people
    so that if fits their business model. Along with that new cultural
    values appear. People seem a lot less interested in serving people. We
    have to fit in with the system now. People who keep their individuality
    are nuisance to the system.

    From the POV of finance (see "financialization of everything",
    elsewhere) employees, customers, clients and also product, tangible or otherwise, are externalities.

    I wonder what happens in the limiting case.

    The ultimate promise of the computer, from the earliest days that its development attracted corporate money, was, "Turn it on; money comes
    out". Cryptocurrency is the closest we've come to this ideal but it's
    not without problems. Morphing everything that everybody does into a
    digital transaction, to the internal mechanisms of which no one [1] has
    access, gradually expunging other routines for "what everybody does",
    appears to be the leading candidate.

    [1] Except for the digital priesthood within any given corporation.
    Contemporary AI is offering some promise that systems for
    extracting money from the biomass will soon be impenetrable
    even to them.


    --
    Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Tue Jan 30 23:39:09 2024
    Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
    Just as an aside, when I created my online account for the bank, it
    told me my user id, expressed as two four digit groups separated by a
    space.

    But will it accept the user id in that format? No, of course not.

    This is far too common.

    What it means is developer team 1, possibly at time 1, created the
    "onboard a new user account" web pages, while developer team 2, likely
    at different time 2, created the actual "log an existing user on" web
    pages, and neither team talked or interacted with each other to learn
    what the other team had done.

    This is the same symptom that gives "password" fields that (if a
    description is even privided) says "use any characters except $ and %
    for your password" [1] yet when you actually try to use a password with
    ^ or # you mysteriously discover that # or ^ is also on the "you can't
    use that" list, but not mentioned in the visible documentation. And
    sometimes discover that the documented $ or % is actually acceptable.




    [1] yes, a code smell for a developer that does not know what they are
    doing

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Eager@21:1/5 to Rich on Wed Jan 31 00:10:33 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 23:39:09 +0000, Rich wrote:

    Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
    Just as an aside, when I created my online account for the bank, it
    told me my user id, expressed as two four digit groups separated by a
    space.

    But will it accept the user id in that format? No, of course not.

    This is far too common.

    What it means is developer team 1, possibly at time 1, created the
    "onboard a new user account" web pages, while developer team 2, likely
    at different time 2, created the actual "log an existing user on" web
    pages,
    and neither team talked or interacted with each other to learn what the
    other team had done.

    I had a lot of trouble initially with the NHS app. It turned out that the password I was using was too long. I think it stored the long version, but truncated the one I typed in when logging in.




    --
    Using UNIX since v6 (1975)...

    Use the BIG mirror service in the UK:
    http://www.mirrorservice.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Julieta Shem@21:1/5 to Scott Dorsey on Tue Jan 30 23:09:58 2024
    kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) writes:

    In article <87o7d2s30v.fsf@yaxenu.org>, Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> wrote:

    Interesting that the richest industry is not actually able to hire a >>competent professional.

    "Rich people did not get rich by spending money."
    -- my uncle Paul

    I think it's more profound than that. I think (1) the craft is a lot
    more difficult than the average professional is able to understand; (2)
    not to mention the average entrepeneur who hired the professional; (3) a
    rich industry that targets poor people doesn't care: they have numbers
    that say that they won't make more money by having some respect.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Julieta Shem@21:1/5 to Rich on Tue Jan 30 22:30:24 2024
    Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

    Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
    Just as an aside, when I created my online account for the bank, it
    told me my user id, expressed as two four digit groups separated by a
    space.

    But will it accept the user id in that format? No, of course not.

    This is far too common.

    [...]

    Interesting that the richest industry is not actually able to hire a
    competent professional.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to jshem@yaxenu.org on Wed Jan 31 01:41:42 2024
    In article <87o7d2s30v.fsf@yaxenu.org>, Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> wrote:

    Interesting that the richest industry is not actually able to hire a >competent professional.

    "Rich people did not get rich by spending money."
    -- my uncle Paul
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to Rich on Wed Jan 31 13:32:26 2024
    On 31-Jan-24 10:39 am, Rich wrote:
    Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:

    This is the same symptom that gives "password" fields that (if a
    description is even privided) says "use any characters except $ and %
    for your password" [1] yet when you actually try to use a password with
    ^ or # you mysteriously discover that # or ^ is also on the "you can't
    use that" list, but not mentioned in the visible documentation. And sometimes discover that the documented $ or % is actually acceptable.


    I once came across a site that validated the password against a set of permitted characters at the time of login (why on Earth would it do
    that?), and the set of characters was different from the set used to
    validate the password when setting it.

    So, of course, I'd set a password, and then found it rejected at login
    because it contained an unacceptable character.

    Sylvia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Julieta Shem on Wed Jan 31 10:58:34 2024
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Julieta Shem wrote:

    kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) writes:

    In article <87o7d2s30v.fsf@yaxenu.org>, Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> wrote:

    Interesting that the richest industry is not actually able to hire a
    competent professional.

    "Rich people did not get rich by spending money."
    -- my uncle Paul

    I think it's more profound than that. I think (1) the craft is a lot
    more difficult than the average professional is able to understand; (2)
    not to mention the average entrepeneur who hired the professional; (3) a
    rich industry that targets poor people doesn't care: they have numbers
    that say that they won't make more money by having some respect.


    It's actually easily explained. There is no market or regulatory pressure.
    As long as that does not exist they won't do it.

    Also remember that banks are an extension of the government, and therefore
    have a massive say in the rules that will govern them. So what they do is
    to develop rules and laws that are expensive for newcomers to follow but
    easy for them.

    Newcomers who design their solutions from scratch will have higher
    security. Therefore there is no law that demands this since it would be
    very costly for legacy banks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Purgert@21:1/5 to Spiros Bousbouras on Wed Jan 31 11:10:34 2024
    On 2024-01-30, Spiros Bousbouras wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:39:28 -0000 (UTC)
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to
    hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't
    otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a
    system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere. >>
    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.

    That's a very presumptuous thing to say. I have my own ways of storing and retrieving passwords (which may include just my memory) and I'm confident they are secure and reliable enough. So don't include me in your "we".

    So if I was to sit you down at any freshly installed PC of your choice,
    you could log-in to *any* random service to which you have a
    username/password combination *from memory* ?

    Because if there is even a single service to which the truthful answer
    (which, admittedly I will never know; because this is Usenet, and you
    can vehemently deny it to your last post) is "well, actually, I'd
    have to use [password-tool-of-choice] for that site"; then you are
    solidly in the group of "people who have forgotten the password".


    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to Dan Purgert on Wed Jan 31 22:34:58 2024
    On 31-Jan-24 10:10 pm, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Spiros Bousbouras wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:39:28 -0000 (UTC)
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to >>>> hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't
    otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a >>>> system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere. >>>
    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.

    That's a very presumptuous thing to say. I have my own ways of storing and >> retrieving passwords (which may include just my memory) and I'm confident
    they are secure and reliable enough. So don't include me in your "we".

    So if I was to sit you down at any freshly installed PC of your choice,
    you could log-in to *any* random service to which you have a username/password combination *from memory* ?

    Because if there is even a single service to which the truthful answer (which, admittedly I will never know; because this is Usenet, and you
    can vehemently deny it to your last post) is "well, actually, I'd
    have to use [password-tool-of-choice] for that site"; then you are
    solidly in the group of "people who have forgotten the password".


    Just need to remember the one username and password for site where the
    backup copy of the encrypted password database is stored, and the
    passphrase to decrypt that database. Not that hard.

    Sylvia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Julieta Shem@21:1/5 to Mike Spencer on Wed Jan 31 17:57:09 2024
    Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> writes:

    Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> writes:

    Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> writes:

    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:39:28 -0000 (UTC)
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to >>>>> hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't >>>>> otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a >>>>> system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks. >>>>> I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere. >>>>
    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.

    That's a very presumptuous thing to say. I have my own ways of storing and >>> retrieving passwords (which may include just my memory) and I'm confident >>> they are secure and reliable enough. So don't include me in your "we".

    I share Sylvia's frustration and it's not just with banks.

    I share Sylvia's frustration as well. It's not just with banks. Things
    are become ever more centralized. Centralization designs products and
    services to the average customer and business invest in shaping people
    so that if fits their business model. Along with that new cultural
    values appear. People seem a lot less interested in serving people. We
    have to fit in with the system now. People who keep their individuality
    are nuisance to the system.

    From the POV of finance (see "financialization of everything",
    elsewhere) employees, customers, clients and also product, tangible or otherwise, are externalities.

    That's a paragraph to the expert. I had to read on ``financialization
    of everything'' and get a definition of externality. But, okay, I
    understand the connection now. If customers and products are
    externalities, then I think we are in agreement---businesses are not
    really interested in what they're doing, which explains why so many of
    them try various things until they finally ``succeeed''. It doesn't
    really matter how they get there.

    I wonder what happens in the limiting case.

    The ultimate promise of the computer, from the earliest days that its development attracted corporate money, was, "Turn it on; money comes
    out". Cryptocurrency is the closest we've come to this ideal but it's
    not without problems. Morphing everything that everybody does into a
    digital transaction, to the internal mechanisms of which no one [1] has access, gradually expunging other routines for "what everybody does",
    appears to be the leading candidate.

    You might be quite right.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Purgert@21:1/5 to Spiros Bousbouras on Thu Feb 1 15:48:43 2024
    On 2024-01-31, Spiros Bousbouras wrote:
    On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:10:34 -0000 (UTC)
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Spiros Bousbouras wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:39:28 -0000 (UTC)
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to >> >> > hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't >> >> > otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a >> >> > system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks. >> >> > I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere.

    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.

    That's a very presumptuous thing to say. I have my own ways of storing and >> > retrieving passwords (which may include just my memory) and I'm confident >> > they are secure and reliable enough. So don't include me in your "we".

    So if I was to sit you down at any freshly installed PC of your choice,
    you could log-in to *any* random service to which you have a
    username/password combination *from memory* ?

    No. I will note in passing that even a yes answer would not necessarily
    be unrealistic. It depends on how many online accounts one has. Someone
    may only have an email online account and nothing more so would only
    need to remember one password.

    Because if there is even a single service to which the truthful answer
    (which, admittedly I will never know; because this is Usenet, and you
    can vehemently deny it to your last post) is "well, actually, I'd
    have to use [password-tool-of-choice] for that site"; then you are
    solidly in the group of "people who have forgotten the password".

    No , I am in the group of people who never memorised the password.
    [...]
    In any case , I see now that I read in your post more than what you
    intended. You said "then what?" and I interpreted that as suggesting
    that we all need help from the website in retrieving passwords and
    that's what I found especially presumptuous.

    I actually figured you were taking issue with the second line; since
    it's the more explicit/direct statement that "everyone forgets the
    password".

    For a bank or other "very public institution that is generally very easy
    to access", I can completely agree that "look, if/when you forget your web-access password, come to the nearest branch" is (probably) a better solution than a "forgot password" link and answering a couple of
    questions about my dog.

    But then, what about services that aren't "very public institutions that
    are generally very easy to access" (Netflix / Amazon / Google / CC
    Company / etc.)?

    What would a viable "general" solution be? Call them? Email? Too bad,
    create a new account?

    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dan Purgert@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Thu Feb 1 15:16:19 2024
    On 2024-01-31, Sylvia Else wrote:
    On 31-Jan-24 10:10 pm, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Spiros Bousbouras wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:39:28 -0000 (UTC)
    Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to >>>>> hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't >>>>> otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a >>>>> system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks. >>>>> I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere. >>>>
    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.

    That's a very presumptuous thing to say. I have my own ways of storing and >>> retrieving passwords (which may include just my memory) and I'm confident >>> they are secure and reliable enough. So don't include me in your "we".

    So if I was to sit you down at any freshly installed PC of your choice,
    you could log-in to *any* random service to which you have a
    username/password combination *from memory* ?

    Because if there is even a single service to which the truthful answer
    (which, admittedly I will never know; because this is Usenet, and you
    can vehemently deny it to your last post) is "well, actually, I'd
    have to use [password-tool-of-choice] for that site"; then you are
    solidly in the group of "people who have forgotten the password".


    Just need to remember the one username and password for site where the
    backup copy of the encrypted password database is stored, and the
    passphrase to decrypt that database. Not that hard.

    You might want to re-read what was written.



    --
    |_|O|_|
    |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
    |O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1 E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce Horrocks@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Tue Feb 6 23:47:35 2024
    On 30/01/2024 10:57, Sylvia Else wrote:
    On 30-Jan-24 9:39 pm, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to
    hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't
    otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a
    system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere.

    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.


    If I say I won't forget, you've no real reason to doubt me. There are
    many things that I've remembered for decades.

    I don't doubt you, but your ability to remember a password that isn't
    easily guessable and isn't re-used on multiple sites puts you in the top
    0.1% of the population. Banks, however, have to deal with the remaining
    99.9% as well.

    In the event that I really did forget, then I'd have to show up at one
    of the bank's offices with physical identity documents.

    That's the last thing they want people doing. Imagine going into the
    bank to find that there are 15 people ahead of you in the queue, all
    waiting to go through a 5 minute process of showing documents to prove
    their identity to get their password changed.

    The banks don't want to pay their staff to change passwords, they want
    to pay them to sell you a new savings account or to take out a loan.

    FWIW my bank in the UK gives out a free card reader device, a bit like a
    pocket calculator, for their 2FA system. To use it you insert your bank
    card, enter your card pin, which it validates using the chip in the chip
    & pin card and then displays an 8 digit number to enter into the website.

    You use this to log in initially (so no password to remember) and then
    to re-authenticate prior to carrying out any sensitive actions such as
    making a payment or changing personal details.

    --
    Bruce Horrocks
    Surrey, England

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@21:1/5 to Bruce Horrocks on Wed Feb 7 10:31:28 2024
    On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 23:47:35 +0000
    Bruce Horrocks <07.013@scorecrow.com> wrote:

    On 30/01/2024 10:57, Sylvia Else wrote:
    On 30-Jan-24 9:39 pm, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure to >>> hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I don't
    otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a live-DVD on a >>> system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers or other hacks.
    I'd remember the strong password, and not have it written down anywhere. >>
    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.


    If I say I won't forget, you've no real reason to doubt me. There are
    many things that I've remembered for decades.

    I don't doubt you, but your ability to remember a password that isn't
    easily guessable and isn't re-used on multiple sites puts you in the top
    0.1% of the population. Banks, however, have to deal with the remaining
    99.9% as well.

    In the event that I really did forget, then I'd have to show up at one
    of the bank's offices with physical identity documents.

    That's the last thing they want people doing. Imagine going into the
    bank to find that there are 15 people ahead of you in the queue, all
    waiting to go through a 5 minute process of showing documents to prove
    their identity to get their password changed.

    The banks don't want to pay their staff to change passwords, they want
    to pay them to sell you a new savings account or to take out a loan.

    FWIW my bank in the UK gives out a free card reader device, a bit like a pocket calculator, for their 2FA system. To use it you insert your bank
    card, enter your card pin, which it validates using the chip in the chip
    & pin card and then displays an 8 digit number to enter into the website.

    You use this to log in initially (so no password to remember) and then
    to re-authenticate prior to carrying out any sensitive actions such as
    making a payment or changing personal details.

    These are being deprecated by my bank; they much prefer to sms a
    code to your phone.

    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ian@21:1/5 to Bruce Horrocks on Wed Feb 7 15:03:23 2024
    Bruce Horrocks wrote:

    On 30/01/2024 10:57, Sylvia Else wrote:
    On 30-Jan-24 9:39 pm, Dan Purgert wrote:
    On 2024-01-30, Sylvia Else wrote:
    This is really a rant - venting to release some of the frustration.

    I'm in the process of selling my house, and I need somewhere secure
    to hold the proceeds. I decided I'd create a account with a bank I
    don't otherwise bank with, and interact online with it using a
    live-DVD on a system that has no storage. So no risk of key loggers
    or other hacks. I'd remember the strong password, and not have it
    written down anywhere.

    Until you don't remember it, then what?

    Because let's face it, eventually we all forget the password.


    If I say I won't forget, you've no real reason to doubt me. There are
    many things that I've remembered for decades.

    I don't doubt you, but your ability to remember a password that isn't
    easily guessable and isn't re-used on multiple sites puts you in the
    top 0.1% of the population. Banks, however, have to deal with the
    remaining 99.9% as well.

    In the event that I really did forget, then I'd have to show up at
    one of the bank's offices with physical identity documents.

    That's the last thing they want people doing. Imagine going into the
    bank to find that there are 15 people ahead of you in the queue, all
    waiting to go through a 5 minute process of showing documents to prove
    their identity to get their password changed.

    The banks don't want to pay their staff to change passwords, they want
    to pay them to sell you a new savings account or to take out a loan.

    FWIW my bank in the UK gives out a free card reader device, a bit like
    a pocket calculator, for their 2FA system. To use it you insert your
    bank card, enter your card pin, which it validates using the chip in
    the chip & pin card and then displays an 8 digit number to enter into
    the website.

    You use this to log in initially (so no password to remember) and then
    to re-authenticate prior to carrying out any sensitive actions such as
    making a payment or changing personal details.


    Would that be the same bank that asks you for, e.g. the 3rd character of
    your pin and the 5th character of your password? This seems to mean
    that they must have plaintext of your pin and password on line. Doesn't
    seem very secure...
    --
    *********** To reply by e-mail, make w single in address **************

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)