It does everything I want a word processing program to do and it
doesn't do anything else. I don't want any help. I hate some of
these modern systems where you type up a lowercase letter and it
becomes a capital. I don't want a capital, if I'd wanted a capital,
I would have typed the capital.
--George R.R. Martin
Subject: The Beauty of Finished Software
I hate some of
these modern systems where you type up a lowercase letter and it
becomes a capital.
Finished software is software that’s not expected to change, and
that’s a feature! You can rely on it to do some real work.
In a world where constant change is the norm, finished software
provides a breath of fresh air.
Why would someone use such an old piece of software to write over
5,000 pages?
Why would someone use such an old piece of software to write over
5,000 pages?
In today's WordStar I'd want to have Eshell, Org/Babel and Tramp.Ah, I See You're a Man of Culture As Well.
In today's WordStar I'd want to have Eshell, Org/Babel and Tramp.
yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> writes:
In today's WordStar I'd want to have Eshell, Org/Babel and Tramp.Ah, I See You're a Man of Culture As Well.
Tramp can be a PITA sometimes, though. I shall add Gnus to your list.
cr0c0d1le <cr0c0d1le.ewlkg@8shield.net> writes:
yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> writes:
In today's WordStar I'd want to have Eshell, Org/Babel and Tramp.Ah, I See You're a Man of Culture As Well.
Tramp can be a PITA sometimes, though. I shall add Gnus to your list.
With Gnus you'll never get anything done. :)
On 1/1/24 10:03 AM, Ben Collver wrote:
I liked WS a lot. There's a linux look-alike (can't remember the
name) which I tried and decided I didn't want to use it
Good for him! I liked WS a lot. There's a linux look-alike (can't
remember the name) which I tried and decided I didn't want to use it --
I liked WordStar a lot.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:35:26 -0800 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>
wrote:
Good for him! I liked WS a lot. There's a linux look-alike (can't
remember the name) which I tried and decided I didn't want to use it --
There are several, now. I use JOE (Joe's own editor), whose jstar mode emulates WS well-enough for me. There's also WordTsar, who aims to
replicate it exactly.
http://wordtsar.ca
Their website is a hoot: "the keyboard controls we love -- the user
interface we all know, etc." Fun to see this running on a Mac though.
I'm going to take a laptop with 32GB of RAM and run a binary whose
original version ran in, what, 16MB in DOS? What will you do with all
your extra RAM not otherwise in use?
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:35:26 -0800, The Real Bev
<bashley101@gmail.com> wrote:
I liked WordStar a lot.
Yummy, WordStar on CP/M on a North Star Horizon [Z80]
computer.
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:35:26 -0800
The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote:
Good for him! I liked WS a lot. There's a linux look-alike (can't
remember the name) which I tried and decided I didn't want to use it --
There are several, now. I use JOE (Joe's own editor), whose jstar mode emulates WS well-enough for me. There's also WordTsar, who aims to
replicate it exactly.
http://wordtsar.ca
Their website is a hoot: "the keyboard controls we love -- the user
interface we all know, etc." Fun to see this running on a Mac though.
I'm going to take a laptop with 32GB of RAM and run a binary whose
original version ran in, what, 16MB in DOS? What will you do with all
your extra RAM not otherwise in use?
On Thu, 04 Jan 2024 12:15:05 -0500, Retrograde wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 19:35:26 -0800 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>
wrote:
Good for him! I liked WS a lot. There's a linux look-alike (can't
remember the name) which I tried and decided I didn't want to use it --
There are several, now. I use JOE (Joe's own editor), whose jstar mode
emulates WS well-enough for me. There's also WordTsar, who aims to
replicate it exactly.
http://wordtsar.ca
Their website is a hoot: "the keyboard controls we love -- the user
interface we all know, etc." Fun to see this running on a Mac though.
I'm going to take a laptop with 32GB of RAM and run a binary whose
original version ran in, what, 16MB in DOS? What will you do with all
your extra RAM not otherwise in use?
Did you mean to say 16MB?
Their website is a hoot: "the keyboard controls we love -- the user
interface we all know, etc." Fun to see this running on a Mac though.
I'm going to take a laptop with 32GB of RAM and run a binary whose
original version ran in, what, 16MB in DOS? What will you do with all
your extra RAM not otherwise in use?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 388 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 05:45:11 |
Calls: | 8,220 |
Calls today: | 18 |
Files: | 13,122 |
Messages: | 5,872,261 |
Posted today: | 1 |