On 9/9/23 00:08, Rich wrote:
Typically you get your editor pre-loaded with quoted text from the
article and you enter your responses (and clip out parts that no longer
need to remain).
That last bit doesn't happen as much as it should.
References: <1531475146@f172.n1.z21.fsxnet> <lEIKM.585771$Fgta.181666@fx10.iad> <udgb2d$3obdi$3@dont-email.me> <udgujh$3udev$2@dont-email.me> <C4HLM.1176633$SuUf.32855@fx14.iad>
Followup-To:
On 2023-09-11, rdh <rdh@tilde.institute> wrote:
On 9/9/23 00:08, Rich wrote:
Typically you get your editor pre-loaded with quoted text from the
article and you enter your responses (and clip out parts that no longer
need to remain).
That last bit doesn't happen as much as it should.
Yes indeedy. But why?
Ok the obvious - idleness, in a hurry, lack of focus.
The not obvious - how many "editors" in non-text apoplications make it difficult? The one's I've come across need you to highlight the bit to delete, then hit delete. While text mode editors have mark/line delete keyboard functions which work quite quick (for those that use them). I'm happy using vi or emacs type keys for delete and finds it really quick.
The quick line delete is particularly useful.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 388 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 05:29:33 |
Calls: | 8,220 |
Calls today: | 18 |
Files: | 13,122 |
Messages: | 5,872,261 |
Posted today: | 1 |