If anyone is interested: In "comp.misc", there's a discussion
about the use of mailing lists in software development.
Subject: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms
(I did not create this subject!)
On 10/01/2023 08.46, Stefan Ram wrote:
If anyone is interested: In "comp.misc", there's a discussion
about the use of mailing lists in software development.
Subject: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms
(I did not create this subject!)
(and I don't read comp.misc)
There is an increasingly relevant question though: how do we 'reach' as
many people as possible, without diluting the (community) value of
responses?
At one time, if you wanted to talk/hear certain folk you felt compelled
to join Twitter (see also AOL, MySpace, Facebook, ...). Recently many
more people have realised that a single, centralised, (and
corporately-owned) 'service' has its down-sides.
See also the wisdom of enabling comp.lang.python and python-list as 'mirrors', enabling those who prefer one mechanism/client to another,
yet maintaining a single 'community'.
On 10/01/2023 08.46, Stefan Ram wrote:
If anyone is interested: In "comp.misc", there's a discussion
about the use of mailing lists in software development.
Subject: An objective criteria for deprecating community platforms
(I did not create this subject!)
(and I don't read comp.misc)
There is an increasingly relevant question though: how do we 'reach'
as many people as possible, without diluting the (community) value of >responses?
At one time, if you wanted to talk/hear certain folk you felt
compelled to join Twitter (see also AOL, MySpace, Facebook, ...).
Recently many more people have realised that a single, centralised,
(and corporately-owned) 'service' has its down-sides.
If there are too many channels for communication, it increases the
difficulty for any one person to 'keep up', eg python-list and
python-forum.
...
Yes, this is important I think. Plus, if possible, if it's decided to
move to a forum format make that accessible by E-Mail.
dn <PythonList@danceswithmice.info> wrote:
See also the wisdom of enabling comp.lang.python and python-list asYes, this is important I think. Plus, if possible, if it's decided to
'mirrors', enabling those who prefer one mechanism/client to another,
yet maintaining a single 'community'.
move to a forum format make that accessible by E-Mail.
On 10Jan2023 08:45, Chris Green <cl@isbd.net> wrote:
dn <PythonList@danceswithmice.info> wrote:
See also the wisdom of enabling comp.lang.python and python-list asYes, this is important I think. Plus, if possible, if it's decided to
'mirrors', enabling those who prefer one mechanism/client to another,
yet maintaining a single 'community'.
move to a forum format make that accessible by E-Mail.
There's a Discourse forum over at discuss.python.org. I use it in
"mailing list mode" and do almost all my interactions via email, exactly
as I do for python-list. Posts come to me and land in the same local
mail folder I use for python-list. My replies land on the forum as
expected (and of course also go by email to those members who have
turned that mode on).
So I'm using both the new forum and the currently mailing list still,
and broadly in exactly the same way.
...
There's a Discourse forum over at discuss.python.org. I use it in
"mailing list mode" and do almost all my interactions via email, exactly
as I do for python-list. Posts come to me and land in the same local
mail folder I use for python-list. My replies land on the forum as
expected (and of course also go by email to those members who have
turned that mode on).
Cameron Simpson wrote at 2023-1-11 08:37 +1100:
...
There's a Discourse forum over at discuss.python.org. I use it in
"mailing list mode" and do almost all my interactions via email, exactly
as I do for python-list. [...]
I am also using the Plone `Discourse` forum in "mailing list mode".
It now works quite well but it took some years before reaching this state.
For a very long time, my mail replies did not reach the forum reliably.
My latest complaint (more than half a year ago): when I had visited
the forum via `http` (I did this occasionally to verify
my reply has reached the forum), it sometimes thought, I had
seen a new message and did not inform me about it via mail.
Meanwhile, all replies seem to arrive reliably and I no longer
use `http` for access. Therefore, I do not know whether
the behavior described above still persists.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 77:24:13 |
Calls: | 6,716 |
Files: | 12,247 |
Messages: | 5,357,732 |