Hugh Aguilar <hugoa...@rosycrew.com> writes:
I don't understand how a word can not have execution semantics.
...
I looked up ['] in the ANS-Forth document and it says:
"Place name's execution token xt on the stack."What's the execution token of a word that has no execution semantics.
Hmm, since you think that ";" is immediate, I guess you want an
execution token that, when executed, performs the compilation
semantics. You can get that as follows. Before the rest of the
program, define:
: ; postpone ; ; immediate
Now you have an immediate ";" with an execution semantics that's the
same as the compilation semantics, and you can tick it.
What I am saying is that I didn't have any warning that what I wasA system that would tell us all non-standard usages would be nice, but
doing in MACRO: was going to be a problem.
we don't have that. For now the solution is to test on as many
systems as possible.
- anton
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 50:23:01 |
Calls: | 6,712 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 12,243 |
Messages: | 5,354,922 |
Posted today: | 1 |