fails fff
I think that Stephen Pelc introduced bugs into the latest VFX versions
for the purpose of preventing my novice package from working.
In article <6fb65bf5-2e2a-4957-8bb5-381eed68dd64n@googlegroups.com>,
Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that Stephen Pelc introduced bugs into the latest VFX versions
for the purpose of preventing my novice package from working.
Welcome back, Hugh! I like the idea that a multiple-billion
multinational goes to the trouble of making your novice package
unusable. It is of Trumpian arrogance.
However it is one of two. You have identified a crime against
portability of VFX or your program has not been standard to
begin with. Which is it?
In article <6fb65bf5-2e2a-4957-8bb5-381eed68dd64n@googlegroups.com>,
Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that Stephen Pelc introduced bugs into the latest VFX versions
for the purpose of preventing my novice package from working.
Welcome back, Hugh! I like the idea that a multiple-billion
multinational goes to the trouble of making your novice package
unusable. It is of Trumpian arrogance.
However it is one of two. You have identified a crime against
portability of VFX or your program has not been standard to
begin with. Which is it?
ANS be praised. The band is getting back together on a mission to
root out non-compliance.
However it is one of two. You have identified a crime against
portability of VFX or your program has not been standard to
begin with. Which is it?
In article <6fb65bf5-2e2a-4957-8bb5-381eed68dd64n@googlegroups.com>,
Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that Stephen Pelc introduced bugs into the latest VFX versions
for the purpose of preventing my novice package from working.
Welcome back, Hugh! I like the idea that a multiple-billion
multinational goes to the trouble of making your novice package
unusable. It is of Trumpian arrogance.
However it is one of two. You have identified a crime against
portability of VFX or your program has not been standard to
begin with. Which is it?
Groetjes Albert--
--
Don't praise the day before the evening. One swallow doesn't make
spring. You must not say "hey" before you have crossed the bridge.
Don't sell the hide of the bear until you shot it. Better one bird in
the hand than ten in the air. - the Wise from Antrim -
In article <tpoohm$77e$1@gioia.aioe.org>, dxforth <dxforth@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/01/2023 8:29 pm, albert wrote:
In article <6fb65bf5-2e2a-4957-8bb5-381eed68dd64n@googlegroups.com>,
Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that Stephen Pelc introduced bugs into the latest VFX versions >>>> for the purpose of preventing my novice package from working.
Welcome back, Hugh! I like the idea that a multiple-billion
multinational goes to the trouble of making your novice package
unusable. It is of Trumpian arrogance.
However it is one of two. You have identified a crime against
portability of VFX or your program has not been standard to
begin with. Which is it?
ANS be praised. The band is getting back together on a mission to
root out non-compliance.
Suppose you don't bother about ANS, and you have written a program that compiles with a particular version of VFX.
Then you should not complain that it no longer compiles with a newer
version of VFX.
However if you do bother about ANS/ISO , then you can reap great benefit
from the efforts within MPE to deliver a compiler that be standard.
Even if you are not a paying customer.
In article <6fb65bf5-2e2a-4957...@googlegroups.com>,I am confused that what makes you such a scumbag? Can't you just get lost out of this forum? It's a shame to all of us see this post!
Hugh Aguilar <hughag...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that Stephen Pelc introduced bugs into the latest VFX versionsWelcome back, Hugh! I like the idea that a multiple-billion
for the purpose of preventing my novice package from working.
multinational goes to the trouble of making your novice package
unusable. It is of Trumpian arrogance.
However it is one of two. You have identified a crime against
portability of VFX or your program has not been standard to
begin with. Which is it?
Groetjes Albert
--
Don't praise the day before the evening. One swallow doesn't make
spring. You must not say "hey" before you have crossed the bridge.
Don't sell the hide of the bear until you shot it. Better one bird in
the hand than ten in the air. - the Wise from Antrim -
Can I suggest the following change :
: lit, ( val -- ) \ runtime: -- val
align postpone literal ;
Does this fix the problem Hugh ?
In article <nnd$67b5d1fe$55134055@76782156cee9e472>,
none) (albert <albert@cherry.> wrote:
In article <6fb65bf5-2e2a-4957...@googlegroups.com>,
Hugh Aguilar <hughag...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that Stephen Pelc introduced bugs into the latest VFX versions >>for the purpose of preventing my novice package from working.
Welcome back, Hugh! I like the idea that a multiple-billionI regret sending this post. I was out of line sending this riposte. Apologize.
multinational goes to the trouble of making your novice package
unusable. It is of Trumpian arrogance.
I made a typo in the title of this thread.[]
It should have been "Bugs in VFX" not "Bugs in SwiftForth."
SwiftForth hasn't changed at all.
On Thursday, January 12, 2023 at 5:26:35 AM UTC-7, none albert wrote:
In article <nnd$67b5d1fe$55134055@76782156cee9e472>,
none) (albert <albert@cherry.> wrote:
In article <6fb65bf5-2e2a-4957...@googlegroups.com>,
Hugh Aguilar <hughag...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that Stephen Pelc introduced bugs into the latest VFX versions >>for the purpose of preventing my novice package from working.
Welcome back, Hugh! I like the idea that a multiple-billionI regret sending this post. I was out of line sending this riposte. Apologize.
multinational goes to the trouble of making your novice package
unusable. It is of Trumpian arrogance.
I accept your apology.
I have to point out however, that you never apologized for this attack: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.forth/c/qqlp1gZnVic
I still think that Stephen Pelc introduced the bug for the purpose of breaking my novice package. Stephen Pelc hates me because I wrote
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 51:13:07 |
Calls: | 6,712 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 12,243 |
Messages: | 5,355,036 |
Posted today: | 1 |