I've got some innovative graphic mode and sound ideas. Colour, colour modes, graphic tiling based on real 0% CPU
graphic mode rendering, a simple graphic object alternative, screen scrolling, native vector line drawing, maybe not,
512 horizontal resolution, and enhanced sound.
I've got some innovative graphic mode and sound ideas. Colour, colour modes, graphic tiling based on real 0% CPUIf it's about „retro-computing” the better idea will be to acquire
graphic mode rendering, a simple graphic object alternative, screen scrolling, native vector line drawing, maybe not,
512 horizontal resolution, and enhanced sound.
old XT-clone mobo, ISA 8-bit VGA and AdLib soundcard. You'll get
a machine you've described — featuring higher capabilities and
powerful ML. And with plenty of software already available,
many books that describe the system etc.
If not — you may want to select something already available at
Tindie, like RC2014 ( https://www.tindie.com/products/semachthemonkey/rc2014-pro-homebrew-z80-computer-kit/ )
or anything similar (several designs available there for a few bucks).
Of course plenty of similar SBCs designs can be found just by googling
for „SBC computer”, like:
http://searle.wales/ https://sites.google.com/site/retroelec/retroelecs-electronics-projects/r162 …and many others.
Albert reread the thread. It's never about what you said. It's about simulating what
could actually have been done to a design that has nothing to do with a system at
10x+ the price (just for the monochrome version probably) and Les capable in the
Cpu department, once you add a p16 etc in.
[..]
It requires an elegant mind to design anything ahead properly, and the people who
object should follow.
Albert reread the thread. It's never about what you said. It's about simulating whatIn such case you may want to join „8-bit Guy” 's project: https://www.commanderx16.com/
could actually have been done to a design that has nothing to do with a system at
10x+ the price (just for the monochrome version probably) and Les capable in the
Cpu department, once you add a p16 etc in.
[..]
It requires an elegant mind to design anything ahead properly, and the people who
object should follow.
I seen his videos. Why would you want to join his project when you are talking about advice
on the practicalities of realistically simulating customisations of a design on an original fab
process by extending a seperate image for a different system, as a new entity?
I see you were here in 2018 with a commodore 64. Then the friction over retro computing?
You also were talking differently back then. What happened?
I seen his videos. Why would you want to join his project when you are talking about adviceBecause his design still isn't „carved in stone” and there are still discussions
on the practicalities of realistically simulating customisations of a design on an original fab
process by extending a seperate image for a different system, as a new entity?
going on about ev. use of FPGA: https://www.commanderx16.com/forum/index.php?/search/&q=fpga&quick=1
Then, who knows, maybe you'll be able to „redirect” that project?
I see you were here in 2018 with a commodore 64. Then the friction over retro computing?Differently? Maybe just being somewhat less Commodore-enthusiastic today; since I started
You also were talking differently back then. What happened?
to learn x86 ML I found out what the gap is between the world of 6502 and x86 — a real rift,
actually.
Despite the fact, that — initially — C64 was actually faster than that original IBM 5150.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 54:36:55 |
Calls: | 6,712 |
Files: | 12,243 |
Messages: | 5,355,329 |