Dear Members of comp.lang.ada,
We would like to inform you that we have made Renaissance-Ada, a toolset for legacy Ada software, open source:
https://github.com/TNO/Renaissance-Ada
On 27/01/2022 12:32, Pierre van de Laar wrote:I would suspect that “for legacy Ada software” might be a euphemistic way of saying: doesn't support modern Ada after either Ada83 or Ada95.
Dear Members of comp.lang.ada,
We would like to inform you that we have made Renaissance-Ada, a toolset for legacy Ada software, open source:
https://github.com/TNO/Renaissance-Ada
What does "for legacy Ada software" mean?
On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 6:55:11 AM UTC-6, Luke A. Guest wrote:
On 27/01/2022 12:32, Pierre van de Laar wrote:I would suspect that “for legacy Ada software” might be a euphemistic way of saying: doesn't support modern Ada after either Ada83 or Ada95.
Dear Members of comp.lang.ada,What does "for legacy Ada software" mean?
We would like to inform you that we have made Renaissance-Ada, a toolset for legacy Ada software, open source:
https://github.com/TNO/Renaissance-Ada
On 27/01/2022 12:32, Pierre van de Laar wrote:
Dear Members of comp.lang.ada,
We would like to inform you that we have made Renaissance-Ada, a
toolset for legacy Ada software, open source:
https://github.com/TNO/Renaissance-Ada
What does "for legacy Ada software" mean?
On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 6:55:11 AM UTC-6, Luke A. Guest wrote:
What does "for legacy Ada software" mean?I would suspect that “for legacy Ada software” might be a euphemistic way of saying: doesn't support modern Ada after either Ada83 or Ada95.
fredag den 28. januar 2022 kl. 03.23.32 UTC+1 skrev Andreas ZEURCHER:
On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 6:55:11 AM UTC-6, Luke A. Guest wrote:
What does "for legacy Ada software" mean?I would suspect that “for legacy Ada software” might be a
euphemistic way of saying: doesn't support modern Ada after either
Ada83 or Ada95.
The video [1] from the README tells an up-to-date Ada success story.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHrd-9wgALM
I found myself using a case statement rather than an if so as to avoid a
'use type': U is an Interfaces.Unsigned_16,
case U is
when 1 => do one thing;
when others => do something else;
end case;
On Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 6:55:11 AM UTC-6, Luke A. Guest wrote:
On 27/01/2022 12:32, Pierre van de Laar wrote:I would suspect that “for legacy Ada software” might be a euphemistic
Dear Members of comp.lang.ada,What does "for legacy Ada software" mean?
We would like to inform you that we have made Renaissance-Ada, a
toolset for legacy Ada software, open source:
https://github.com/TNO/Renaissance-Ada
way of saying: doesn't support modern Ada after either Ada83 or Ada95.
https://github.com/TNO/Renaissance-Ada
What does "for legacy Ada software" mean?
Looking at the link, it seems that it's software that has been just
growing, to the point at which it's becoming unmaintainable. I don't see anything that says Ada83 (though software with that sort of problem is
likely to have been around for a long time).
I understand that recent GNATs have dropped some support for less
recent editions of the Ada language.
G.B. schrieb am Samstag, 29. Januar 2022 um 10:26:36 UTC+1:
I understand that recent GNATs have dropped some support for less
recent editions of the Ada language.
Hu? Examples please.
On 29.01.22 10:49, AdaMagica wrote:
G.B. schrieb am Samstag, 29. Januar 2022 um 10:26:36 UTC+1:
I understand that recent GNATs have dropped some support for lessHu? Examples please.
recent editions of the Ada language.
gnat1: invalid switch: -gnat83
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 399 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 65:15:29 |
Calls: | 8,355 |
Calls today: | 15 |
Files: | 13,159 |
Messages: | 5,893,953 |
Posted today: | 1 |