XPost: fr.comp.lang.ada, alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
"Yup, however some crackpot could always suggest an attack on bounds checking, e.g. exception vs. not, index to bounds comparison dependent on the actual values etc, and then produce a lengthy paper on a constructed absolutely unrealistic scenario... (:-))"
Hello,
Supposedly scientific journals are rife with evil unrealistic fraudulent papers which cause really deadly consequences. Cf. inter alia
@article {fulltext6.pdf,
author = {Labb\'{e}, Cyril and Labb\'{e}, Dominique},
pages={379--396},
year={2013},
volume={94},
issue={1},
title = {{Duplicate and fake publications in the scientific literature: how many SCIgen papers in computer science?}},
journal = {Scientometrics},
abstract = {Two kinds of bibliographic tools are used to retrieve scientific publications and make them available online. For one kind,
access is free as they store information made publicly available online.
For the other kind, access fees are required as they are compiled on information provided by the major publishers of scientific literature. The former can easily be interfered with, but it is generally assumed that the latter guarantee the integrity of the data they sell. Unfortunately,
duplicate and fake publications are appearing in scientific conferences
and, as a result, in the bibliographic services. We demonstrate a software method of detecting these duplicate and fake publications. Both the free services (such as Google Scholar and DBLP) and the charged-for services
(such as IEEE Xplore) accept and index these publications.},
}
and
@online{dieHimmelistschoen,
author = {{Schlangemann (pseudonym)}, Herbert},
title = {{The Official Herbert Schlangemann Blog}},
url = {
HTTP://dieHimmelistschoen.BlogSpot.com},
year = {2008--2010}
}
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Evil_which_is_so-called_science/
I myself wrote on 13th April 2012:
"On February 19th 2012, Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter wrote: |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"Dear Sir/Madam: |
| |
|[. . .] |
| |
|I am a whistleblower and as such I am a victim of fraud, |
|much of which the Association for Computing Machinery |
|provided to people without publishing any of my attempts to |
|expose misconduct. Shame on you. |
| |
|I tried to expose fraud which I discovered when I applied |
|for a George Michael Memorial HPC Fellowship. An anonymous |
|reviewer wished me well and he or she advised me that I have |
|"other methods to ask for redress" but he or she left the |
|message too vague for me to take my complaints further. I |
|asked the Association for Computing Machinery for help in |
|obtaining more details as to which "other methods to ask for |
|redress" I have. I did not receive an answer to this |
|question. Why? |
| |
|Why does your website contain no warning that the paper |
|"OCCN: A Network-On-Chip Modeling and Simulation Framework", |
|DATE '04 is fraudulent? Shame on you. |
| |
|Yours sincerely, |
|Colin Paul Gloster |
| |
| |
|On October 6th, 2011, Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter |
|sent questions to
ACMhelp@ACM.org without receiving |
|answers: |
|"On October 5th, 2011, Mail Delivery Subsystem <
MAILER-DAEMON-ACM26-3@ACM.org> |
|claimed: |
||---------------------------------------------------------------------| |
||"The original message was received at Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:51:54 -0400| |
|| | |
|| ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- | |
||<
lathrop@mcs.anl.gov> | |
|| | |
|| ----- Transcript of session follows ----- | |
||.. while talking to mailgateway.anl.gov | |
RCPT To:<lathrop@mcs.anl.gov> | |
||<<< 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected." | |
||---------------------------------------------------------------------| |
| |
| |
|Gloster sent to
hpc-fellowship-questions@ACM.org on October 5th, |
|2011: |
||---------------------------------------------------------------------| |
||"Dear Sir/Madam, | |
|| | |
||As you would be aware, my application for a George Michael | |
||Memorial HPC Fellowship for 2011 failed. | |
|| | |
||Reviewer 3 was nice to comment: | |
||"Good luck with your research. A word of advice, this typy a | |
||submission is the forum to air the grievances you indicate. You have | |
||other methods to ask for redress." | |
|| | |
||I hope to be informed of details of how to proceed with airing the | |
||aforementioned grievances. What "other methods to ask for redress" do| |
||I "have"? | |
|| | |
||Yours faithfully, | |
||Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter" | |
||---------------------------------------------------------------------| |
| |
| |
|Dear Sir/Madam: |
| |
|I emailed
hpc-fellowship-questions@ACM.org and so I received a bounce report |
|for
lathrop@mcs.anl.gov . |
|Has anyone actually received the email which I had sent to |
|
hpc-fellowship-questions@ACM.org ? |
| |
|I mentioned in one of the online surveys which you requested me to partake in |
|after I left Italy that I am a victim of fraud published by ACM. In the |
|fellowship application I mentioned two fraudulent papers published by ACM which |
|a so-called "tutor" had ordered me to praise (he and the coauthors are friends |
|to each other). He himself had coauthored a similar fraudulent paper. I refused |
|to participate in this unethical activity. He censored my findings that they are|
|fraudsters and he said that if I would not quit then I would be failed for not |
|having a publication. |
| |
|I tried to expose this in "ACM Computing Surveys" and "The Journal of the ACM" |
|but the manuscripts were rejected. |
| |
|It seems that one reviewer for the fellowship cared, but the advice given was |
|not explicit enough for me to enact. Has the question reached that reviewer? |
| |
|Shall ACM retract fraudulent publications? When shall ACM |
|begin adhering to its own Code of Ethics? |
| |
|Yours faithfully, |
|Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouceſter"" |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Dear Sir/Madam:
Why have I not yet received answers to any of the questions above?
Why does the ACM Portal of the Association for Computing Machinery show so-called "research" which was reported and proven to be fraudulent
without warning that it is fraudulent?
Yours faithfully,
Colin Paul Gloster"
The ACM let be sent: |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|"25-Aug-2010 |
| |
|Dear Mr. de Glouceſter, |
| |
|I am sorry to inform you that your paper has been rejected. Unfortunately, ACM Computing |
|Surveys is able to accept only a rather small percentage of the submissions it receives. |
| |
|I have read your paper. It is clear that you feel that you have a grievance against the |
|University of Pisa and the SHAPES group. I am not prepared to let you use ACM Computing |
|Surveys as a vehicle for publicising that grievance. The language that you have used in the|
|paper is intemperate and would potentially lead to legal problems for the ACM if we were to |
|publish it. |
| |
|Sincerely, |
| |
|Chris Hankin |
|Editor-in-Chief |
|ACM Computing Surveys" |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
"[. . .]
* 7. Why did you let your membership to ACM lapse? Please select all that apply.
I didn’t see the value in my membership
[. . .]
Too expensive
[. . .]
Other (please specify)
I had complained to you about subsidy fraud which you publish (I used to
work under a coauthor fraudster). You refuse to retract it so you are accomplices so a subsidy fraudster got away with perpetrating perjury
covering up this fraud so he went on to murder 3 men.
[. . .]
* 9. Would you consider renewing your ACM membership in the future?
[. . .]
No
[. . .]
10. Please share what would compel you to become a member of ACM again.
Please publish errata and retractions and apologies. Testify against scientific malconduct instead of pretending that you adhere to your "Code
of Ethics". Resurrect the victims whose murders you are guilty of in 2nd
or 3rd degrees. Repair my reputation. Refuse to publish baloney. Arrange a fair PhD exam for me (I whistleblow against a PhD so-called "tutor" so I
am denied even a dissertation defense!). Make amends."
wrote I myself on
HTTPS://WWW.research.net/r/FPSC3KH
on April 20th, 2024. This survey stated that the Association for Computing Machinery wants to contact me afterwards to try to get me to join, but 3 months and 1 day afterwards I still do not get a follow-up.
Note by the way that a court made a final unappealable court order for a
PhD scholarship to be paid to myself but such a defendant refuses to obey
such an order. Note also that a court made orders to allow me to go to a university but such a putative university disobeyed such orders and
instead got armed professional combatants to hit me out even though I did
not threaten (confirmed by a district attorney); I myself did not fight (confirmed by CCTV); and I did not have a weapon (confirmed by policemen).
Cf.
HTTPS://WWW.COE.int/fr/web/cpt/portugal
Sincères salutations.
Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)