• Re: No Thai SPAM on these USENET servers

    From Otto J. Makela@21:1/5 to pixels2words@gmail.com on Tue Oct 31 15:17:00 2023
    XPost: sci.logic, alt.stop.spamming

    polcott2 <pixels2words@gmail.com> wrote:

    news.eternal-september.org

    I believe you are incorrect in this, I saw plenty of it on here before
    making a proper killfile.
    --
    /* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
    /* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
    /* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
    /* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Carmody@21:1/5 to Otto J. Makela on Tue Oct 31 23:00:32 2023
    XPost: sci.logic, alt.stop.spamming

    om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) writes:
    polcott2 <pixels2words@gmail.com> wrote:

    news.eternal-september.org

    I believe you are incorrect in this, I saw plenty of it on here before
    making a proper killfile.

    Why do you believe that, whilst you can change your filters, ES can't change theirs?

    Phil
    --
    We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
    -- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Otto J. Makela@21:1/5 to Phil Carmody on Thu Nov 2 14:10:12 2023
    XPost: sci.logic, alt.stop.spamming

    Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> wrote:

    om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) writes:
    polcott2 <pixels2words@gmail.com> wrote:
    news.eternal-september.org
    I believe you are incorrect in this, I saw plenty of it on here
    before making a proper killfile.

    Why do you believe that, whilst you can change your filters, ES can't
    change theirs?

    You are correct, it seems they now have.
    For a moment I saw a lot of spam on their server.

    Followup-to: alt.stop.spamming
    --
    /* * * Otto J. Makela <om@iki.fi> * * * * * * * * * */
    /* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */
    /* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */
    /* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Otto J. Makela on Mon Nov 6 01:24:42 2023
    XPost: sci.logic, alt.stop.spamming

    On 10/31/2023 9:17 AM, Otto J. Makela wrote:
    polcott2 <pixels2words@gmail.com> wrote:

    news.eternal-september.org

    I believe you are incorrect in this, I saw plenty of it on here before
    making a proper killfile.

    Just for the record, SpamAssassin was added to the server,
    after a testing phase. This activity predates the uptick
    in CLC spam.

    This was originally implemented inside the server instance.
    The result (side-effect), is spam headers would show up in
    your feed, yet if you clicked on them, there were no bodies
    and the "article had expired". The server would clean these up,
    using a batch operation, maybe once a day. But... the damage
    is done, in terms of defacing your news client. Perhaps after
    your client does a "compact", the expired headers will be
    removed from in front of your eyeballs. Technically, this
    was "spam removal" (you couldn't read the bodies), but the
    headers made a mess and people would continue to call that
    spam.

    A recent change to the E-S architecture, added an additional
    server. A transit server equipped with the spam filter, does
    the usual thing. The transit server then passes the clean
    stream (with spam headers removed) to the real E-S server.
    The purpose of the dual server arch, is to avoid defacing
    your news client pane, with expired headers.

    The result of this today, is the expired headers are no longer
    pulled into the client. The visual appearance should be improved.

    If there are problems, report them to eternal-september.support .
    That group is on more than one server, but it is not on all
    servers. For example, it used to be on AIOE, before AIOE was
    knocked out of action. You do not need an account on E-S, to
    submit a report to that particular group. If your server does not
    have eternal-september.support, you can connect to E-S itself and the
    support groups are made available, with authentication turned off.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anton Shepelev@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 6 13:04:18 2023
    Paul:

    If there are problems, report them to eternal-
    september.support . That group is on more than one
    server, but it is not on all servers. For example, it used
    to be on AIOE, before AIOE was knocked out of action. You
    do not need an account on E-S, to submit a report to that
    particular group.

    But you need an E.-S. account to have something to complain
    about, because otherwise you would complaining about spam
    present on other servers!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Anton Shepelev on Mon Nov 6 07:47:40 2023
    On 11/6/2023 6:04 AM, Anton Shepelev wrote:
    Paul:

    If there are problems, report them to eternal-
    september.support . That group is on more than one
    server, but it is not on all servers. For example, it used
    to be on AIOE, before AIOE was knocked out of action. You
    do not need an account on E-S, to submit a report to that
    particular group.

    But you need an E.-S. account to have something to complain
    about, because otherwise you would complaining about spam
    present on other servers!


    The NOCEMS are a pooled effort of more than one Admin.
    The E-S administrator, can tell whether his filter did it,
    or one of the other filters did it, and can forward
    a legit problem to one of the other admins. They are sharing
    the cancels, to improve the individual servers.

    Some servers will have their own filters that were in place
    before this started. You would use their abuse address,
    if something leaked through.

    It shouldn't be up to users to guess what the problem
    might be, related to filtering.

    The problem with the other admins, is I don't know where
    they hang out. You'd have to use their abuse address (email) to
    get in touch with them. They sometimes show up in the above-named
    group (eternal-september.support), in response to the spamming issue.

    There are groups for USENET administration which may be a
    place for a question, but complaints about spam are unlikely
    to be welcome there (normally spam is not handled ad-hoc, one
    complaint at a time, in a global forum). Especially as the
    Google Admin would not be caught dead there. It's not like
    you can get all the responsible parties in the room at the same time,
    and get something done.

    Apparently, the Google Gropers, are being greeted by a Captcha box,
    as a meek attempt at controlling the flood. That means that
    legit non-spamming GG users are now saddled with another box to tick.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael S@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Nov 6 17:36:22 2023
    On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 07:47:40 -0500
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    Apparently, the Google Gropers, are being greeted by a Captcha box,
    as a meek attempt at controlling the flood. That means that
    legit non-spamming GG users are now saddled with another box to tick.

    Paul

    I don't know about all groups, but in this particular group
    (comp.lang.c) and in few others posting through Google Groups is
    disabled. Period.
    I tried to post in comp.arch.fpga where GG posting is still enabled
    and indeed there was a captcha box. But it was too easy to click. May
    be, it can help against script kiddies, but I don't believe that
    this measure is sufficient to stop Low Tech spam that we are seeing
    recently. As a matter of fact, right now there 10-30 spam messages per
    hour seen via GG on comp.arch.fpga. That's not 500 spam messages per
    hour that we had seen on comp.lang.c couple of weeks ago, but still
    more than enough to make your typical group non-functional.
    Fortunately, in case of comp.arch.fpga no impact done, because this
    group was not really functional to start with.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Retro Guy@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Nov 6 11:31:34 2023
    On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 07:47:40 -0500
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    On 11/6/2023 6:04 AM, Anton Shepelev wrote:
    Paul:

    If there are problems, report them to eternal-
    september.support . That group is on more than one
    server, but it is not on all servers. For example, it used
    to be on AIOE, before AIOE was knocked out of action. You
    do not need an account on E-S, to submit a report to that
    particular group.

    But you need an E.-S. account to have something to complain
    about, because otherwise you would complaining about spam
    present on other servers!


    The NOCEMS are a pooled effort of more than one Admin.
    The E-S administrator, can tell whether his filter did it,
    or one of the other filters did it, and can forward
    a legit problem to one of the other admins. They are sharing
    the cancels, to improve the individual servers.

    Some servers will have their own filters that were in place
    before this started. You would use their abuse address,
    if something leaked through.

    It shouldn't be up to users to guess what the problem
    might be, related to filtering.

    The problem with the other admins, is I don't know where
    they hang out. You'd have to use their abuse address (email) to
    get in touch with them. They sometimes show up in the above-named
    group (eternal-september.support), in response to the spamming issue.

    You should be able to contact most admins at news.admin.net-abuse.usenet
    I belive most read there regularly.

    You can also check to see what NoCeM message lists the message-id here: https://www.i2pn2.org/?page_id=272
    Just paste the Message-ID, and it should list all the 'Issuers' of
    NoCeMs that have listed the message as spam. Then you know who to contact.

    I hesitate to use Ray's group for my own stuff as much as I can as it's
    his group. You can let me know about incorrect listing in
    rocksolid.nodes.help if you wish (for news.i2pn2.org)

    --
    Retro Guy (admin@i2pn2.org)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)