There had been the website awk.info (I think Tim Menzies had run it)
but a try to call it today didn't lead to that page. - Is it gone or
has the content moved to another domain?
Janis
On 3/19/2021 11:26 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
There had been the website awk.info (I think Tim Menzies had run it)
but a try to call it today didn't lead to that page. - Is it gone or
has the content moved to another domain?
It went away years ago. Tim had posted at the time about not being able
to maintain it any longer and looking for someone to take over. I
believe you have his email address so you could ask him for C&V.
On 19.03.2021 17:30, Ed Morton wrote:
On 3/19/2021 11:26 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
There had been the website awk.info (I think Tim Menzies had run it)
but a try to call it today didn't lead to that page. - Is it gone or
has the content moved to another domain?
It went away years ago. Tim had posted at the time about not being able
to maintain it any longer and looking for someone to take over. I
believe you have his email address so you could ask him for C&V.
(What does "C&V" mean?)
I vaguely remember such a post, but thought (or hoped) someone would
have inherited it. Now the domain is gone, it seems.
I see that the contents are still available through Wayback at least.
Janis
On 3/19/2021 11:48 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
On 19.03.2021 17:30, Ed Morton wrote:
On 3/19/2021 11:26 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
There had been the website awk.info (I think Tim Menzies had run it)
but a try to call it today didn't lead to that page. - Is it gone or
has the content moved to another domain?
It went away years ago. Tim had posted at the time about not being able
to maintain it any longer and looking for someone to take over.
FWIW http://awk.freeshell.org/ has some similar content.
In article <s32l16$ocl$1...@dont-email.me>,
Ed Morton <morto...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/19/2021 11:48 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:That is (sadly) correct. I owned the domain, but let it drop.
On 19.03.2021 17:30, Ed Morton wrote:
On 3/19/2021 11:26 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
There had been the website awk.info (I think Tim Menzies had run it) >>>> but a try to call it today didn't lead to that page. - Is it gone or >>>> has the content moved to another domain?
It went away years ago. Tim had posted at the time about not being able >>> to maintain it any longer and looking for someone to take over.
(Which was a mistake, but that's how it goes.)
FWIW http://awk.freeshell.org/ has some similar content.I now own awklang.org, and that web site is run by a volunteer.
It also has a bunch of awk-related things.
Arnold
--
Aharon (Arnold) Robbins arnold AT skeeve DOT com
gone since 2011... great to see how important it was to people :-)
in fact, I gave up on that project when I realized that the most of the awk community did not want to go beyond 5 line scripts
meanwhile, I've been gawking 1000s of lines of applications ever since....
t
On 22.03.2021 23:10, Tim Menzies wrote:
gone since 2011... great to see how important it was to people :-)(Does that long time span makes it unimportant? - I cannot tell.)
I've just asked because someone (some of you know who) asked for
non-trivial examples and I remembered and suggested to inspect
(via Wayback) the awk.info source.
in fact, I gave up on that project when I realized that the most of the awk community did not want to go beyond 5 line scriptsWell, when making a lines-of-code histogram on my awk sources I
certainly have a peek in the 1-30 lines range. Longer programs
are maybe only just lengthy, or also more complex. In the latter
case the complexity typically requires more language features,
e.g. support for data structures; then I'm out of luck with Awk
(meaning it would be an unnecessary burden to try solving the
task with Awk).
Janis
meanwhile, I've been gawking 1000s of lines of applications ever since....
t
Janis writes that awk is only good for short programs. In all things he is always correct.
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 9:43:12 AM UTC-4, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
Well, when making a lines-of-code histogram on my awk sources I
certainly have a peek in the 1-30 lines range. Longer programs
are maybe only just lengthy, or also more complex. In the latter
case the complexity typically requires more language features,
e.g. support for data structures; then I'm out of luck with Awk
(meaning it would be an unnecessary burden to try solving the
task with Awk).
Janis
On 24.03.2021 01:49, timm wrote:
Janis writes that awk is only good for short programs. In all things he is always correct.For someone who has a job in science where logic and accuracy is a
basic grounding you are not only making primitive rhetorical and
offensive contortions here but are just lying.
PS: The first couple github web-links you posted lead to 404-errors.Janis
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 9:16:59 PM UTC-4, Janis Papanagnou wrote:-----------------
On 24.03.2021 01:49, timm wrote:
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 23:12:17 |
Calls: | 6,646 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,191 |
Messages: | 5,327,626 |