• LANGUAGE COMPARISONS

    From Robin Vowels@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 21 03:22:32 2022
    Has anyone been following this?

    https://greenlab.di.uminho.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/sleFinal.pdf

    Has anyone seen any source?

    It would be interesting to see it.
    In previous language comparisons (notably, Tucker),
    either the code has been much less than optimum,
    or the wrong compiler options were used.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John W Kennedy@21:1/5 to Robin Vowels on Mon Feb 21 17:22:36 2022
    On 2/21/22 6:22 AM, Robin Vowels wrote:
    Has anyone been following this?

    https://greenlab.di.uminho.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/sleFinal.pdf

    Has anyone seen any source?

    It would be interesting to see it.
    In previous language comparisons (notably, Tucker),
    either the code has been much less than optimum,
    or the wrong compiler options were used.

    It’s been making the rounds. (They probably shouldn’t have included
    Swift, which was not only still in beta in 2017, but not even fully spec'd.)

    I’m afraid his version is the most complete I’ve seen.

    --
    John W. Kennedy
    Algernon Burbage, Lord Roderick, Father Martin, Bishop Baldwin,
    King Pellinore, Captain Bailey, Merlin -- A Kingdom for a Stage!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter J. Seymour@21:1/5 to Robin Vowels on Tue Mar 1 17:43:28 2022
    On 21/02/2022 11:22, Robin Vowels wrote:
    Has anyone been following this?

    https://greenlab.di.uminho.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/sleFinal.pdf

    Has anyone seen any source?

    It would be interesting to see it.
    In previous language comparisons (notably, Tucker),
    either the code has been much less than optimum,
    or the wrong compiler options were used.

    If the focus is on energy efficiency, I would want to see some
    comparisons across various hardware platforms. Related to that. it would presumably be instructive to see at least a histogram of hardware
    instruction usage (since ultimately that is where the energy use is) and
    a discussion of how that usage relates to the source language and
    performance. I am having difficulty understanding the point of the
    present paper, but perhaps I am missing something, lengthy IBM mainframe experience may predispose me to a particular perspective.

    On a broader issue, what seems an interesting question is whether
    program performance can be analysed adequately by solely external means
    (as contrasted with simply being time measured) or whether it requires
    also some sort of internal instrumentation (as provided for instance by
    some PL/I options).

    Peter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)