• OT: Told you so...

    From pete dashwood@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 11 11:45:16 2022
    I was amused and interested to see this:

    https://www.devjobsscanner.com/blog/top-10-highest-paid-programming-languages-in-early-2022/

    I mentioned Rust a while back and it is still on my list to gain
    familiarity with during this coming year.

    Whether you are into block chain currency or not there is a good living
    to be made from Solidity and Rust...

    With most posters here now settling for retirement and the forum
    descending into moribundance, some of you might be looking for a hobby
    to occupy your time.

    Did you ever hear of Solidity, as a programming language? It was new to me.

    Seeing the pay levels graphic brought back memories of the days when
    COBOL was in the top 3... now it isn't even on the list...

    Don't let all that programming skill you acquired over decades go to
    waste... Keep yourself mentally active with programming for fun and
    profit...

    Pete.
    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Gunshannon@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 10 19:11:43 2022
    Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:55:30 -0500 (EST)
    From: ACM TechNews <technews-editor@acm.org>
    Subject: Ancient Programming Language Is Way More Common Than We Thought

    Joel Khalili, *TechRadar*, 4 Feb 2022,
    via ACM TechNews, Wednesday, February 9, 2022

    A report by enterprise software provider Micro Focus found that more
    than 800 billion lines of COBOL code are in daily use worldwide, about
    three times more than expected, despite a decline in the number of
    developers familiar with the 60-year-old programming language. Moreover,
    nearly half of developers surveyed predict an increase in the volume of
    COBOL used in their organization in the coming year, while a similar
    share said they expect COBOL applications to live on for at least
    another decade. The report found that 64% of companies reliant on COBOL
    prefer to modernize their apps rather than replace them, while 92% of respondents said COBOL will retain strategic importance to their
    business. Said Micro Focus' Ed Airey, "For IT leaders, supporting core
    business systems, COBOL application modernization lies at the heart of
    digital transformation."

    ---------------------------------

    Thought some here might find this interesting as well.

    bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dennis Lee Bieber@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 10 18:18:27 2022
    On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:45:16 +1300, pete dashwood <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> declaimed the following:

    I was amused and interested to see this:

    https://www.devjobsscanner.com/blog/top-10-highest-paid-programming-languages-in-early-2022/


    One gets the impression that this ranking may reflect the scarcity of programmers in those languages.

    Many of the short blurbs made comparison to C++ with the addition of memory safety, etc... Wasn't that what C#/.NET was supposed to bring to the world?


    --
    Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN
    wlfraed@ix.netcom.com http://wlfraed.microdiversity.freeddns.org/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From docdwarf@panix.com@21:1/5 to bill.gunshannon@gmail.com on Fri Feb 11 01:02:17 2022
    In article <j6lntvF7qjfU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Bill Gunshannon <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> wrote:

    Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:55:30 -0500 (EST)
    From: ACM TechNews <technews-editor@acm.org>
    Subject: Ancient Programming Language Is Way More Common Than We Thought

    Joel Khalili, *TechRadar*, 4 Feb 2022,
    via ACM TechNews, Wednesday, February 9, 2022

    A report by enterprise software provider Micro Focus found that more
    than 800 billion lines of COBOL code are in daily use worldwide, about
    three times more than expected, despite a decline in the number of
    developers familiar with the 60-year-old programming language.

    Well... that Micro Focus found a lot of COBOL isn't surprising.

    Moreover,
    nearly half of developers surveyed predict an increase in the volume of
    COBOL used in their organization in the coming year, while a similar
    share said they expect COBOL applications to live on for at least
    another decade.

    (move stuff you can spill to a safe distance)

    'This application will be sunset in ten years, there's no need for a
    four-digit date.'

    That being said... every so often a new kid in a recruiting-office will
    find a copy of my vitals and send me a position to consider.

    I'll respond with a request for a rate... and invariably the number that
    comes back is less than what I was billing in 1982.

    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a new
    kid comes into the recruiting-office...

    DD

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Vincent Coen@21:1/5 to you on Fri Feb 11 15:44:12 2022
    Hello docdwarf!

    Friday February 11 2022 01:02, you wrote to All:

    That being said... every so often a new kid in a recruiting-office
    will find a copy of my vitals and send me a position to consider.

    I'll respond with a request for a rate... and invariably the number
    that comes back is less than what I was billing in 1982.

    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a
    new kid comes into the recruiting-office...

    I find that just requesting technical info from then if not already shows
    that they have zero knowledge of our industry even in a light manner but
    you are right just asking for the rate closes them down.

    Dumb and dumber, springs to mind :)


    Vincent

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Jones@21:1/5 to Vincent Coen on Fri Feb 11 15:36:02 2022
    On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 3:55:14 PM UTC, Vincent Coen wrote:
    Hello docdwarf!
    Friday February 11 2022 01:02, you wrote to All:

    That being said... every so often a new kid in a recruiting-office
    will find a copy of my vitals and send me a position to consider.

    I'll respond with a request for a rate... and invariably the number
    that comes back is less than what I was billing in 1982.

    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a
    new kid comes into the recruiting-office...
    I find that just requesting technical info from then if not already shows that they have zero knowledge of our industry even in a light manner but
    you are right just asking for the rate closes them down.

    Dumb and dumber, springs to mind :)


    Vincent
    I am pleased to see that there are still a few correspondents. Happy New Year all

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From docdwarf@panix.com@21:1/5 to 0robert.jones@gmail.com on Sat Feb 12 00:57:55 2022
    In article <7dd6cd13-ba1c-4e41-b121-d4fa1548b7dcn@googlegroups.com>,
    Robert Jones <0robert.jones@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 3:55:14 PM UTC, Vincent Coen wrote:
    Hello docdwarf!
    Friday February 11 2022 01:02, you wrote to All:

    That being said... every so often a new kid in a recruiting-office
    will find a copy of my vitals and send me a position to consider.

    I'll respond with a request for a rate... and invariably the number
    that comes back is less than what I was billing in 1982.

    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a
    new kid comes into the recruiting-office...
    I find that just requesting technical info from then if not already shows
    that they have zero knowledge of our industry even in a light manner but
    you are right just asking for the rate closes them down.

    Dumb and dumber, springs to mind :)


    Vincent
    I am pleased to see that there are still a few correspondents. Happy
    New Year all

    And likewise... Happy Tiger all around!

    DD

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pete dashwood@21:1/5 to Dennis Lee Bieber on Mon Feb 21 11:00:51 2022
    On 11/02/2022 12:18, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:45:16 +1300, pete dashwood <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> declaimed the following:

    I was amused and interested to see this:

    https://www.devjobsscanner.com/blog/top-10-highest-paid-programming-languages-in-early-2022/


    One gets the impression that this ranking may reflect the scarcity of programmers in those languages.

    Many of the short blurbs made comparison to C++ with the addition of memory safety, etc... Wasn't that what C#/.NET was supposed to bring to the world?



    I like C# and it has been my programming language of choice for over a
    decade now. It does do those things and it IS on the list...

    One of the lessons I learned from using COBOL is that it is not a good
    thing to become emotionally attached to ANY programming language.

    Pete.

    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pete dashwood@21:1/5 to Bill Gunshannon on Mon Feb 21 11:05:11 2022
    On 11/02/2022 13:11, Bill Gunshannon wrote:

    Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:55:30 -0500 (EST)
    From: ACM TechNews <technews-editor@acm.org>
    Subject: Ancient Programming Language Is Way More Common Than We Thought

    Joel Khalili, *TechRadar*, 4 Feb 2022,
    via ACM TechNews, Wednesday, February 9, 2022

    A report by enterprise software provider Micro Focus found that more
    than 800 billion lines of COBOL code are in daily use worldwide, about
    three times more than expected, despite a decline in the number of
    developers familiar with the 60-year-old programming language. Moreover, nearly half of developers surveyed predict an increase in the volume of
    COBOL used in their organization in the coming year, while a similar
    share said they expect COBOL applications to live on for at least
    another decade. The report found that 64% of companies reliant on COBOL prefer to modernize their apps rather than replace them, while 92% of respondents said COBOL will retain strategic importance to their
    business. Said Micro Focus' Ed Airey, "For IT leaders, supporting core business systems, COBOL application modernization lies at the heart of digital transformation."

    ---------------------------------

    Thought some here might find this interesting as well.

    bill

    LOL!

    Given that their main business is in "COBOL modernization" now, I would
    expect nothing less from the head of the company.

    However, I agree it is also interesting...

    Pete.

    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pete dashwood@21:1/5 to docdwarf@panix.com on Mon Feb 21 11:44:24 2022
    On 11/02/2022 14:02, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
    In article <j6lntvF7qjfU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Bill Gunshannon <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> wrote:

    Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:55:30 -0500 (EST)
    From: ACM TechNews <technews-editor@acm.org>
    Subject: Ancient Programming Language Is Way More Common Than We Thought

    Joel Khalili, *TechRadar*, 4 Feb 2022,
    via ACM TechNews, Wednesday, February 9, 2022

    A report by enterprise software provider Micro Focus found that more
    than 800 billion lines of COBOL code are in daily use worldwide, about
    three times more than expected, despite a decline in the number of
    developers familiar with the 60-year-old programming language.

    Well... that Micro Focus found a lot of COBOL isn't surprising.

    Exactly.

    Moreover,
    nearly half of developers surveyed predict an increase in the volume of
    COBOL used in their organization in the coming year, while a similar
    share said they expect COBOL applications to live on for at least
    another decade.

    (move stuff you can spill to a safe distance)

    'This application will be sunset in ten years, there's no need for a four-digit date.'

    I believe there will still be COBOL applications written recently, or
    even some years ago, that will still be running in 10 years time. It is
    because they are handling core processes that don't change a lot and
    because of Human resistance to change.

    "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

    If Evolution had taken that stance then we'd probably still be swimming
    around some primeval swamp...

    Change isn't always about "fixing"; sometimes it is about "improving"...

    However, if the environment that the COBOL is running in gets changed
    (and this has been the case for most of the world outside the USA) then
    it will be converted into COBOL for the new environment and Micro Focus
    are making a very nice multi-billion dollar business out of this.

    It doesn't take too long before people realize that just recompiling
    your COBOL code to run on the Network is an awful solution (because of
    paradigm clashes - I have written at length about this on the PRIMA web
    site -
    3 web pages -
    https://primacomputing.co.nz/PRIMAMetroObjectsAndLayers.aspx), so they
    start moving to OO COBOL, which is much better. But the new development
    is being done in newer OO languages and they are quicker to develop and
    have better tools. And so the final "migration" is undertaken and COBOL
    is eventually dropped.

    That being said... every so often a new kid in a recruiting-office will
    find a copy of my vitals and send me a position to consider.

    I'll respond with a request for a rate... and invariably the number that comes back is less than what I was billing in 1982.

    To be fair, Doc, 1982 was around the peak of COBOL popularity and usage.
    COBOL was the only game in town for commercial computer programming...
    PCs had just been invented and were still considered "toy computers" by
    many, the power of Networking them was still unknown to most, Relational
    DBs would not come along until the following year, and the mainframe and
    the procedural paradigm ruled supreme.

    The rates you are being offered supports the argument that it isn't just "supply and demand" that drives contract rates; there is also the
    perceived "popularity"of the language...

    It's insane. On the one hand journalists and senior managers are
    bewailing the lack of COBOL expertise available, but when it comes to
    it, they don't value it and won't pay for it, because someone says "We shouldn't be paying high rates for an obsolete, ancient language..."

    Being able to get contractors from the sub-continent for $8 an hour
    doesn't help... I'm all in favor of seeing the third-world make a living
    but there is a lot more to successfully developing a programming project
    than just writing code.

    I think many Western companies have learned that lesson over the last
    couple of decades...


    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a new kid comes into the recruiting-office...

    Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I would imagine that most of the work
    you do currently is with people you have worked with before, where they
    know you and you know them and their company. As such, they can justify
    paying you a proper rate.

    You definitely don't need an Agency after all the years you have put in.

    DD

    Pete.
    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pete dashwood@21:1/5 to Robert Jones on Mon Feb 21 11:51:38 2022
    On 12/02/2022 12:36, Robert Jones wrote:
    On Friday, February 11, 2022 at 3:55:14 PM UTC, Vincent Coen wrote:
    Hello docdwarf!
    Friday February 11 2022 01:02, you wrote to All:

    That being said... every so often a new kid in a recruiting-office
    will find a copy of my vitals and send me a position to consider.

    I'll respond with a request for a rate... and invariably the number
    that comes back is less than what I was billing in 1982.

    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a
    new kid comes into the recruiting-office...
    I find that just requesting technical info from then if not already shows
    that they have zero knowledge of our industry even in a light manner but
    you are right just asking for the rate closes them down.

    Dumb and dumber, springs to mind :)


    Vincent
    I am pleased to see that there are still a few correspondents. Happy New Year all
    Thanks for the greeting, Robert.

    This place is special to me because it is one of the last bastions of
    free speech and unmoderated postings on the planet.

    Over decades there have been great discussions here both on and off topic.

    But it is inevitable that it will go.

    Somebody is paying for it and, as traffic diminishes, they will be less inclined to do so.

    I don't come here anywhere near as often as I once did, but I still like
    to check it out occasionally.

    I'll be sad to see it go, but there is a fair chance it will see me go
    before that happens :-)

    Pete.

    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pete dashwood@21:1/5 to pete dashwood on Mon Feb 21 12:35:47 2022
    On 21/02/2022 11:44, pete dashwood wrote:
    On 11/02/2022 14:02, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
    In article <j6lntvF7qjfU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Bill Gunshannon  <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> wrote:

    Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 11:55:30 -0500 (EST)
    From: ACM TechNews <technews-editor@acm.org>
    Subject: Ancient Programming Language Is Way More Common Than We Thought >>>
    Joel Khalili, *TechRadar*, 4 Feb 2022,
    via ACM TechNews, Wednesday, February 9, 2022

    A report by enterprise software provider Micro Focus found that more
    than 800 billion lines of COBOL code are in daily use worldwide, about
    three times more than expected, despite a decline in the number of
    developers familiar with the 60-year-old programming language.

    Well... that Micro Focus found a lot of COBOL isn't surprising.

    Exactly.

    Moreover,
    nearly half of developers surveyed predict an increase in the volume of
    COBOL used in their organization in the coming year, while a similar
    share said they expect COBOL applications to live on for at least
    another decade.

    (move stuff you can spill to a safe distance)

    'This application will be sunset in ten years, there's no need for a
    four-digit date.'

    I believe there will still be COBOL applications written recently, or
    even some years ago, that will still be running in 10 years time. It is because they are handling core processes that don't change a lot and
    because of Human resistance to change.

    "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

    If Evolution had taken that stance then we'd probably still be swimming around some primeval swamp...

    Change isn't always about "fixing"; sometimes it is about "improving"...

    However, if the environment that the COBOL is running in gets changed
    (and this has been the case for most of the world outside the USA) then
    it will be converted into COBOL for the new environment and Micro Focus
    are making a very nice multi-billion dollar business out of this.

    It doesn't take too long before people realize that just recompiling
    your COBOL code to run on the Network is an awful solution (because of paradigm clashes - I have written at length about this on the PRIMA web
    site -
    3 web pages -

    Sorry, link was incorrect... https://primacomputing.co.nz/PRIMAMetro'ObjectsAndLayers.aspx
    https://primacomputing.co.nz/PRIMAMetroObjectsAndLayers.aspx), so they
    start moving to OO COBOL, which is much better. But the new development
    is being done in newer OO languages and they are quicker to develop and
    have better tools. And so the final "migration" is undertaken and COBOL
    is eventually dropped.

    That being said... every so often a new kid in a recruiting-office will
    find a copy of my vitals and send me a position to consider.

    I'll respond with a request for a rate... and invariably the number that
    comes back is less than what I was billing in 1982.

    To be fair, Doc, 1982 was around the peak of COBOL popularity and usage. COBOL was the only game in town for commercial computer programming...
    PCs had just been invented and were still considered "toy computers" by
    many, the power of Networking them was still unknown to most, Relational
    DBs would not come along until the following year, and the mainframe and
    the procedural paradigm ruled supreme.

    The rates you are being offered supports the argument that it isn't just "supply and demand" that drives contract rates; there is also the
    perceived "popularity"of the language...

    It's insane. On the one hand journalists and senior managers are
    bewailing the lack of COBOL expertise available, but when it comes to
    it, they don't value it and won't pay for it, because someone says "We shouldn't be paying high rates for an obsolete, ancient language..."

    Being able to get contractors from the sub-continent for $8 an hour
    doesn't help... I'm all in favor of seeing the third-world make a living
    but there is a lot more to successfully developing a programming project
    than just writing code.

    I think many Western companies have learned that lesson over the last
    couple of decades...


    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a
    new
    kid comes into the recruiting-office...

    Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I would imagine that most of the work
    you do currently is with people you have worked with before, where they
    know you and you know them and their company. As such, they can justify paying you a proper rate.

    You definitely don't need an Agency after all the years you have put in.

    DD

    Pete.


    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From docdwarf@panix.com@21:1/5 to dashwood@enternet.co.nz on Mon Feb 21 02:51:57 2022
    In article <j7fui5F8emiU1@mid.individual.net>,
    pete dashwood <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> wrote:
    On 11/02/2022 14:02, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:

    [snip]

    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a new >> kid comes into the recruiting-office...

    Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I would imagine that most of the work
    you do currently is with people you have worked with before, where they
    know you and you know them and their company. As such, they can justify >paying you a proper rate.

    You definitely don't need an Agency after all the years you have put in.

    Most of the people I worked with before have long since retired and in the
    USA many companies have (at certain levels) a No Direct Contract policy to prevent collusion between their 'indigenous fauna' and greedy consultants/contractors/hired guns.

    (this encourages collusion between said fauna and Agencies)

    DD

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joe@21:1/5 to pete dashwood on Thu Apr 14 07:41:50 2022
    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:51:38 +1300, pete dashwood <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> wrote:


    This place is special to me because it is one of the last bastions of
    free speech and unmoderated postings on the planet.

    Over decades there have been great discussions here both on and off topic.

    But it is inevitable that it will go.

    Somebody is paying for it and, as traffic diminishes, they will be less >inclined to do so.

    I don't come here anywhere near as often as I once did, but I still like
    to check it out occasionally.

    I'll be sad to see it go, but there is a fair chance it will see me go
    before that happens :-)

    Pete.

    For those that may loose access to usenet https://www.eternal-september.org/ could be a solution. Free, text only usenet. I'm
    using it as my provider winds down their newsservers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Gunshannon@21:1/5 to Joe on Thu Apr 14 08:06:10 2022
    On 4/14/22 03:41, Joe wrote:
    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:51:38 +1300, pete dashwood <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> wrote:


    This place is special to me because it is one of the last bastions of
    free speech and unmoderated postings on the planet.

    Over decades there have been great discussions here both on and off topic. >>
    But it is inevitable that it will go.

    Somebody is paying for it and, as traffic diminishes, they will be less
    inclined to do so.

    I don't come here anywhere near as often as I once did, but I still like
    to check it out occasionally.

    I'll be sad to see it go, but there is a fair chance it will see me go
    before that happens :-)

    Pete.

    For those that may loose access to usenet https://www.eternal-september.org/ could be a solution. Free, text only usenet. I'm
    using it as my provider winds down their newsservers.

    And then there is new.individual.net. Not free, but less per year than
    a couple of Starbucks Lattes.

    bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pete dashwood@21:1/5 to Bill Gunshannon on Fri Apr 15 14:23:46 2022
    On 15/04/2022 00:06, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
    On 4/14/22 03:41, Joe wrote:
    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:51:38 +1300, pete dashwood
    <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> wrote:


    This place is special to me because it is one of the last bastions of
    free speech and unmoderated postings on the planet.

    Over decades there have been great discussions here both on and off
    topic.

    But it is inevitable that it will go.

    Somebody is paying for it and, as traffic diminishes, they will be less
    inclined to do so.

    I don't come here anywhere near as often as I once did, but I still like >>> to check it out occasionally.

    I'll be sad to see it go, but there is a fair chance it will see me go
    before that happens :-)

    Pete.

    For those that may loose access to usenet
    https://www.eternal-september.org/ could be a solution.  Free, text
    only usenet.  I'm
    using it as my provider winds down their newsservers.

    And then there is new.individual.net.  Not free, but less per year than
    a couple of Starbucks Lattes.

    bill

    Yes, I use news.individual.net and, as Bill says, it is very reasonable.
    It runs out of German Academia...

    Pete.

    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pete dashwood@21:1/5 to docdwarf@panix.com on Wed Jun 15 12:36:29 2022
    On 21/02/2022 15:51, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
    In article <j7fui5F8emiU1@mid.individual.net>,
    pete dashwood <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> wrote:
    On 11/02/2022 14:02, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:

    [snip]

    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a new >>> kid comes into the recruiting-office...

    Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I would imagine that most of the work
    you do currently is with people you have worked with before, where they
    know you and you know them and their company. As such, they can justify
    paying you a proper rate.

    You definitely don't need an Agency after all the years you have put in.

    Most of the people I worked with before have long since retired and in the USA many companies have (at certain levels) a No Direct Contract policy to prevent collusion between their 'indigenous fauna' and greedy consultants/contractors/hired guns.

    (this encourages collusion between said fauna and Agencies)

    DD

    Yes, I have encountered this back in the day, in the UK, parading as
    "preferred suppliers".

    Agencies bend over backwards to get on the preferred supplier list and "incentives" are rife.

    I was working through a particular Agency for a while and there was a
    job that I had been interviewed for and passed the interview, but the
    Agency were told that, as they were not a "preferred supplier", They
    would have to present me through a company that was.

    (Big fleas have little fleas
    Upon their backs to bite 'em
    And little fleas have lesser fleas
    And so, ad infinitum...
    - Jonathan Swift 1733)

    I phoned the guy who interviewed me, told him the situation and asked if
    I could meet with him and his Boss to seek a solution.

    We duly met and the situation was explained. I told them I was not
    prepared to have more than one level of overhead and would have to
    withdraw my application unless the situation was resolved. It was
    getting too late to initiate another lengthy (and expensive) recruitment process...

    Suddenly, my Agency were notified that they were now "preferred
    suppliers" for that company, and everyone was happy.

    It was not long after this contract that I stopped using Agencies
    altogether and, in effect, became my own Agent, relying on previous
    contacts and track record. I was phoned in London by a German guy I had
    worked with, who was now back in Germany and had referred me to his
    Boss, as a person who could possibly solve a problem their IT people had
    said could not be done. (We, (my German team and I) did it and they just
    kept extending my contract...) I enjoyed living in Duesseldorf and found
    the people were nothing like my preconceptions.

    From then on, I worked at Senior Management level and started doing
    "trouble shooting". All the work was by referral and direct contact.

    On the rare occasions when HR would object to my being recruited
    directly, they'd get a phone call from a Board Member or similar level Management, saying I was needed for special projects and that was the
    end of it.

    This was all a long time ago and the IT contracting scene was
    reminiscent of the Wild West, with cowboy Agencies and cowboy
    contractors. I enjoyed it at the time but I like my life now, better.


    I returned more or less permanently to New Zealand in 2002 and I only
    did one contract as an IT Project Manager for an insurance company in
    Auckland. They had an enlightened CEO who was probably the best manager
    I ever worked for anywhere on Earth. I know you say that "a fish rots
    from the head", Doc, but the converse is also true. This guy was amazing
    and the morale in that Company was the best I have ever seen. It was a
    joy to go to work each day.

    I was kind of sorry when my critical project ended and there was nothing
    else in that company that interested me. I was getting tired of living
    in Auckland during the week and commuting home only at weekends, too. So
    I started writing the PRIMA software tools and building the PRIMA
    business from home.

    The tools have been completed and we can now automate COBOL Migration to
    RDB and to .NET with just mouse clicks. (We can salvage 100% of COBOL
    legacy and modernize it at the same time (to OO COBOL), without clients
    needing to write ANY code...) But the candidates for migration are
    mostly gone, and I think that ship has largely sailed. Most people had
    to find an alternative to COBOL and they did so. We get very few
    inquiries regarding moving COBOL on now, and I'll probably close PRIMA
    at the end of this year. I don't have the energy to start in a new
    direction but I'll see how it goes and how I feel at that time.

    I'm actually enjoying being home (it really is a beautiful country...)
    and will probably move towards writing things other than software in the
    coming year.

    I used to love traveling, but I think I've been everywhere I want to
    go... :-)

    They are opening the borders again so I might give it some thought but,
    for now at least, I'm very happy to enjoy my own place and be thankful.

    As international travel starts to resume, I'll take this opportunity to
    extend to any of the people here, an invitation to come and visit. If NZ
    is on your travel plans, drop by my place and share a beer, wine, or
    coffee...

    Cheers,
    Pete.




    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gilberto Junior@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 29 12:26:20 2022
    Em terça-feira, 14 de junho de 2022 às 21:36:34 UTC-3, dash...@enternet.co.nz escreveu:
    On 21/02/2022 15:51, docd...@panix.com wrote:
    In article <j7fui5...@mid.individual.net>,
    pete dashwood <dash...@enternet.co.nz> wrote:
    On 11/02/2022 14:02, docd...@panix.com wrote:

    [snip]

    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a new
    kid comes into the recruiting-office...

    Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I would imagine that most of the work >> you do currently is with people you have worked with before, where they >> know you and you know them and their company. As such, they can justify >> paying you a proper rate.

    You definitely don't need an Agency after all the years you have put in.

    Most of the people I worked with before have long since retired and in the USA many companies have (at certain levels) a No Direct Contract policy to prevent collusion between their 'indigenous fauna' and greedy consultants/contractors/hired guns.

    (this encourages collusion between said fauna and Agencies)

    DD
    Yes, I have encountered this back in the day, in the UK, parading as "preferred suppliers".

    Agencies bend over backwards to get on the preferred supplier list and "incentives" are rife.

    I was working through a particular Agency for a while and there was a
    job that I had been interviewed for and passed the interview, but the
    Agency were told that, as they were not a "preferred supplier", They
    would have to present me through a company that was.

    (Big fleas have little fleas
    Upon their backs to bite 'em
    And little fleas have lesser fleas
    And so, ad infinitum...
    - Jonathan Swift 1733)

    I phoned the guy who interviewed me, told him the situation and asked if
    I could meet with him and his Boss to seek a solution.

    We duly met and the situation was explained. I told them I was not
    prepared to have more than one level of overhead and would have to
    withdraw my application unless the situation was resolved. It was
    getting too late to initiate another lengthy (and expensive) recruitment process...

    Suddenly, my Agency were notified that they were now "preferred
    suppliers" for that company, and everyone was happy.

    It was not long after this contract that I stopped using Agencies
    altogether and, in effect, became my own Agent, relying on previous
    contacts and track record. I was phoned in London by a German guy I had worked with, who was now back in Germany and had referred me to his
    Boss, as a person who could possibly solve a problem their IT people had said could not be done. (We, (my German team and I) did it and they just kept extending my contract...) I enjoyed living in Duesseldorf and found
    the people were nothing like my preconceptions.

    From then on, I worked at Senior Management level and started doing
    "trouble shooting". All the work was by referral and direct contact.

    On the rare occasions when HR would object to my being recruited
    directly, they'd get a phone call from a Board Member or similar level Management, saying I was needed for special projects and that was the
    end of it.

    This was all a long time ago and the IT contracting scene was
    reminiscent of the Wild West, with cowboy Agencies and cowboy
    contractors. I enjoyed it at the time but I like my life now, better.


    I returned more or less permanently to New Zealand in 2002 and I only
    did one contract as an IT Project Manager for an insurance company in Auckland. They had an enlightened CEO who was probably the best manager
    I ever worked for anywhere on Earth. I know you say that "a fish rots
    from the head", Doc, but the converse is also true. This guy was amazing
    and the morale in that Company was the best I have ever seen. It was a
    joy to go to work each day.

    I was kind of sorry when my critical project ended and there was nothing else in that company that interested me. I was getting tired of living
    in Auckland during the week and commuting home only at weekends, too. So
    I started writing the PRIMA software tools and building the PRIMA
    business from home.

    The tools have been completed and we can now automate COBOL Migration to
    RDB and to .NET with just mouse clicks. (We can salvage 100% of COBOL
    legacy and modernize it at the same time (to OO COBOL), without clients needing to write ANY code...) But the candidates for migration are
    mostly gone, and I think that ship has largely sailed. Most people had
    to find an alternative to COBOL and they did so. We get very few
    inquiries regarding moving COBOL on now, and I'll probably close PRIMA
    at the end of this year. I don't have the energy to start in a new
    direction but I'll see how it goes and how I feel at that time.

    I'm actually enjoying being home (it really is a beautiful country...)
    and will probably move towards writing things other than software in the coming year.

    I used to love traveling, but I think I've been everywhere I want to
    go... :-)

    They are opening the borders again so I might give it some thought but,
    for now at least, I'm very happy to enjoy my own place and be thankful.

    As international travel starts to resume, I'll take this opportunity to extend to any of the people here, an invitation to come and visit. If NZ
    is on your travel plans, drop by my place and share a beer, wine, or coffee...

    Cheers,
    Pete.




    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...



    I Pete,

    If one day you want to know a place that maybe you never came
    I invite you to come to Brazil, and you will be my guest in my house.

    I have good coffee, wine and beer and a lot of hospitality.


    Regards

    Gilberto Junior

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pete dashwood@21:1/5 to Gilberto Junior on Mon Sep 5 16:52:02 2022
    On 30/08/2022 07:26, Gilberto Junior wrote:
    Em terça-feira, 14 de junho de 2022 às 21:36:34 UTC-3, dash...@enternet.co.nz escreveu:
    On 21/02/2022 15:51, docd...@panix.com wrote:
    In article <j7fui5...@mid.individual.net>,
    pete dashwood <dash...@enternet.co.nz> wrote:
    On 11/02/2022 14:02, docd...@panix.com wrote:

    [snip]

    Pointing this out insures that I don't hear from them again... until a new
    kid comes into the recruiting-office...

    Correct me if I'm wrong here, but I would imagine that most of the work >>>> you do currently is with people you have worked with before, where they >>>> know you and you know them and their company. As such, they can justify >>>> paying you a proper rate.

    You definitely don't need an Agency after all the years you have put in. >>>
    Most of the people I worked with before have long since retired and in the >>> USA many companies have (at certain levels) a No Direct Contract policy to >>> prevent collusion between their 'indigenous fauna' and greedy
    consultants/contractors/hired guns.

    (this encourages collusion between said fauna and Agencies)

    DD
    Yes, I have encountered this back in the day, in the UK, parading as
    "preferred suppliers".

    Agencies bend over backwards to get on the preferred supplier list and
    "incentives" are rife.

    I was working through a particular Agency for a while and there was a
    job that I had been interviewed for and passed the interview, but the
    Agency were told that, as they were not a "preferred supplier", They
    would have to present me through a company that was.

    (Big fleas have little fleas
    Upon their backs to bite 'em
    And little fleas have lesser fleas
    And so, ad infinitum...
    - Jonathan Swift 1733)

    I phoned the guy who interviewed me, told him the situation and asked if
    I could meet with him and his Boss to seek a solution.

    We duly met and the situation was explained. I told them I was not
    prepared to have more than one level of overhead and would have to
    withdraw my application unless the situation was resolved. It was
    getting too late to initiate another lengthy (and expensive) recruitment
    process...

    Suddenly, my Agency were notified that they were now "preferred
    suppliers" for that company, and everyone was happy.

    It was not long after this contract that I stopped using Agencies
    altogether and, in effect, became my own Agent, relying on previous
    contacts and track record. I was phoned in London by a German guy I had
    worked with, who was now back in Germany and had referred me to his
    Boss, as a person who could possibly solve a problem their IT people had
    said could not be done. (We, (my German team and I) did it and they just
    kept extending my contract...) I enjoyed living in Duesseldorf and found
    the people were nothing like my preconceptions.

    From then on, I worked at Senior Management level and started doing
    "trouble shooting". All the work was by referral and direct contact.

    On the rare occasions when HR would object to my being recruited
    directly, they'd get a phone call from a Board Member or similar level
    Management, saying I was needed for special projects and that was the
    end of it.

    This was all a long time ago and the IT contracting scene was
    reminiscent of the Wild West, with cowboy Agencies and cowboy
    contractors. I enjoyed it at the time but I like my life now, better.


    I returned more or less permanently to New Zealand in 2002 and I only
    did one contract as an IT Project Manager for an insurance company in
    Auckland. They had an enlightened CEO who was probably the best manager
    I ever worked for anywhere on Earth. I know you say that "a fish rots
    from the head", Doc, but the converse is also true. This guy was amazing
    and the morale in that Company was the best I have ever seen. It was a
    joy to go to work each day.

    I was kind of sorry when my critical project ended and there was nothing
    else in that company that interested me. I was getting tired of living
    in Auckland during the week and commuting home only at weekends, too. So
    I started writing the PRIMA software tools and building the PRIMA
    business from home.

    The tools have been completed and we can now automate COBOL Migration to
    RDB and to .NET with just mouse clicks. (We can salvage 100% of COBOL
    legacy and modernize it at the same time (to OO COBOL), without clients
    needing to write ANY code...) But the candidates for migration are
    mostly gone, and I think that ship has largely sailed. Most people had
    to find an alternative to COBOL and they did so. We get very few
    inquiries regarding moving COBOL on now, and I'll probably close PRIMA
    at the end of this year. I don't have the energy to start in a new
    direction but I'll see how it goes and how I feel at that time.

    I'm actually enjoying being home (it really is a beautiful country...)
    and will probably move towards writing things other than software in the
    coming year.

    I used to love traveling, but I think I've been everywhere I want to
    go... :-)

    They are opening the borders again so I might give it some thought but,
    for now at least, I'm very happy to enjoy my own place and be thankful.

    As international travel starts to resume, I'll take this opportunity to
    extend to any of the people here, an invitation to come and visit. If NZ
    is on your travel plans, drop by my place and share a beer, wine, or
    coffee...

    Cheers,
    Pete.




    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...



    I Pete,

    If one day you want to know a place that maybe you never came
    I invite you to come to Brazil, and you will be my guest in my house.

    I have good coffee, wine and beer and a lot of hospitality.


    Regards

    Gilberto Junior





    Hi Gilberto,

    Thanks for this very kind invitation.

    South America is one of the (few...) places on Earth I have not been.

    There is a Brazilian restaurant here in Tauranga and I love the food
    there and the drinks they serve... :-)

    It is unlikely I'll take up your invitation as I'm getting to an age
    where air travel is just a hassle (especially long haul), but I wanted
    you to know I really appreciate your kindness.

    Thanks,

    Pete.

    --
    I used to write *COBOL*; now I can do *anything*...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)