This has been in beta for quite a long time. Any idea when it might go GA? I ask because you cannot install 4.2 under the latest LTS versionWell, it's a beta ONLY because we can't seem to get the development team
of Ubuntu (or the latest version of Linux Mint). You MUST install 5.0,
but I'm concerned that it is only a beta version...
On 7/30/2020 8:47 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote:
This has been in beta for quite a long time. Any idea when it mightWell, it's a beta ONLY because we can't seem to get the development team
go GA? I ask because you cannot install 4.2 under the latest LTS
version of Ubuntu (or the latest version of Linux Mint). You MUST
install 5.0, but I'm concerned that it is only a beta version...
to do what is required to make it a full release, not because it has
unfixed bugs. I actively use the latest builds and have experienced NO problems. As it fixes many of the issues that are part of 4.2 as well as providing a LOT of new features and enhancements, I would strongly
suggest that you give it a try. I'm sure you will be happy with the result!
On 7/31/20 1:21 PM, Gil Barmwater wrote:Gil Barmwater
On 7/30/2020 8:47 PM, Cruz, Jaime wrote:
This has been in beta for quite a long time. Any idea when it mightWell, it's a beta ONLY because we can't seem to get the development
go GA? I ask because you cannot install 4.2 under the latest LTS
version of Ubuntu (or the latest version of Linux Mint). You MUST
install 5.0, but I'm concerned that it is only a beta version...
team to do what is required to make it a full release, not because it
has unfixed bugs. I actively use the latest builds and have
experienced NO problems. As it fixes many of the issues that are part
of 4.2 as well as providing a LOT of new features and enhancements, I
would strongly suggest that you give it a try. I'm sure you will be
happy with the result!
Thank you. I have it installed on my Ubuntu 20.04LTS and Linux Mint 20
VM test sessions, and so far haven't seen any issues. I did notice I had
to change the first (comment line) in order to get my scripts to work
with 5.0 and that the change also works with 4.2, so I've already
updated all of my scripts on my "live" systems in preparation for the upgrades.
--
If you don't mind sharing, I'n curious as to what you needed to change
in the first line that was keeping 5.0.0 from working?
Gil B.
On 8/1/20 10:21 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote:
If you don't mind sharing, I'n curious as to what you needed to change
in the first line that was keeping 5.0.0 from working?
Gil B.
I don't think I have a copy of a script with the old comment line. TheGil Barmwater
new comment line is:
#!/usr/bin/env rexx
The old one pointed to the directory where the REXX interpreter lived,
but it seems that 5.0 gets installed into a different directory. The comment above works with both 4.2 and 5.0
--
Ah, yes that was to be expected. There was a LOT of discussion among the developers about the "proper" location for ooRexx to be installed on *nix-like systems. We believe we now have it "right" but it is different
than it was for 4.2.0 so the hash-bang line was impacted. Sorry for the
extra work that caused you. I'll make sure the documentation covers that change and its impact on existing shell scripts. As you've discovered,
there is a way to make the hash-bang line independent of the installed location so it will work regardless of where ooRexx resides.
Gil Barmwater
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 84:28:03 |
Calls: | 6,658 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,203 |
Messages: | 5,333,601 |
Posted today: | 1 |