XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.os.linux.misc
Nigerian Pirates <nig.pirates@dont-email.me> writes:
In article <eli$1811152009@qaz.wtf> Eli the Bearded wrote:
Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server,comp.os.linux.advocacy,
comp.os.linux.misc,alt.comp.os.windows-10,comp.internet.services.google
... Just because Google and Microsoft are on the adjacent places
in the "List of the largest information technology companies" on
Wikipedia, I suppose? Trimming a bit, and setting Followup-To:
news:comp.internet.services.google.
[...]
That URL was not in your original post, was it? And the first three
URLs in there didn't have it either, after which I gave up reading.
Because someone with the name Nigerian Pirates
<nig.pirates@dont-email.me> doesn't come with enough of a reputation
to just read screenful after screenful of text without good
citations.
Yes it was present.
"212 IP prefixes belonging to Google."
<a href="https://bgp.he.net/AS37282">autonomous system 37282</a> was
the proper path to reach <a href="https://portal.bgpmon.net/data/google-leak- nov2018.txt">212 IP prefixes belonging to Google</a>.
The original post, news:
e79eeb76b19f8b46aabcdc1a198b5cde@dizum.com,
most certainly was /not/ HTML. The relevant portion was:
Internet\222s global routing system to improperly declare that its
autonomous system 37282 was the proper path to reach 212 IP
prefixes belonging to Google. Within minutes, China Telecom
If the intent is to direct the audience here at Usenet to a Web
page, it's much better to just give its URI, along with a short
description or excerpt. Copying it into a netnews article while
striping the links seems rather counter-productive.
[...]
--
FSF associate member #7257
http://am-1.org/~ivan/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)