• Chrome Is The Bad Browser Now, And Other Facts

    From Anonymous@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 8 13:47:59 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    The Real Bev laid this down on his screen :
    On 07/08/2018 06:26 AM, Anonymous wrote:
    Nomen Nescio submitted this idea :

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet?

    I thought Opera was dead.

    Or the new, faster Firefox?

    NO! As a result of the new Firefox browser no longer running the
    old
    Addons, I switched to WaterFox.

    Still running FF58, and a lot of my favorite extensions don't work on
    it, and Facebook videos don't work either. Can I install WaterFox
    and copy in my FF profile and have it work? Can I install the older extensions (like tab mix plus, which I miss most of all)?

    I ask mainly because I'm tired of spending hours trying to get back
    to where I was 5 years ago and failing.

    I'm sure there's a reason I can't go back to FF52, which was pretty
    much OK...

    Waterfox is a branch of FF, so I think you can.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Real Bev@21:1/5 to Anonymous on Sun Jul 8 13:11:14 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    On 07/08/2018 11:47 AM, Anonymous wrote:
    The Real Bev laid this down on his screen :
    On 07/08/2018 06:26 AM, Anonymous wrote:
    Nomen Nescio submitted this idea :

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet?

    I thought Opera was dead.

    Or the new, faster Firefox?

    NO! As a result of the new Firefox browser no longer running the
    old
    Addons, I switched to WaterFox.

    Still running FF58, and a lot of my favorite extensions don't work on
    it, and Facebook videos don't work either. Can I install WaterFox
    and copy in my FF profile and have it work? Can I install the older
    extensions (like tab mix plus, which I miss most of all)?

    I ask mainly because I'm tired of spending hours trying to get back
    to where I was 5 years ago and failing.

    I'm sure there's a reason I can't go back to FF52, which was pretty
    much OK...

    Waterfox is a branch of FF, so I think you can.

    Seems to (I got tab mix plus back!), but there are some javascript
    issues involving various things. Looks promising, though.

    --
    Cheers, Bev
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    "Friends help you move. *Real* friends help you move bodies."
    --A. Walker

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ant@21:1/5 to Nomen Nescio on Sun Jul 8 20:12:40 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    Yep. I hate Chrome more than IE now. :(


    In alt.privacy.anon-server Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
    http://digg.com/2018/garbage-day

    Welcome to What We Learned This Week, a digest of the most
    curiously important facts from the past few days. This week: The
    deadly profession of garbage collection, Google Chrome is
    definitely bad now and the rich love to drink expensive raw
    sewage.

    Chrome Has Finally Become What It Hated Most
    It's a familiar trend amongst any form of popular technology:
    You either enjoy an early fade into obscurity, or endure mass
    popularity for so long you eventually are outed as being
    actually bad.

    This week, The Verge's Tom Warren details how this regular twist
    of fate happened to Google Chrome. You see, at one point,
    Internet Explorer 6 was the most popular browser ? if only
    because it came with Windows XP. Microsoft's sheer market
    dominance, something stupid like 90 percent share of all
    browsers, afforded them the ability to ignore building in web
    standards. Eventually Firefox, and then quickly Google Chrome,
    came onto the scene touting browsers built with common standards
    in mind. Devs quickly shifted to no longer catering to Internet
    Explorer, and Chrome won out.

    Now, Chrome is so ubiquitous that ? intentionally or not ? devs
    just optimize their web-based services to work best on Chrome.
    Once again, we are faced with a web landscape that works great
    on a single browser and less so on others. Which sucks because
    Chrome is a massive resource hog.

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet? Or the new, faster
    Firefox?


    --
    Quote of the Week: "I got worms! That's what we're going to call it.
    We're going to specialize in selling worm farms. You know like ant
    farms. What's the matter, a little tense about the flight?" --Lloyd
    Christmas (Dumb and Dumber movie)
    Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
    /\___/\Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org / http://antfarm.ma.cx
    / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit-
    | |o o| | ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and URL/link.
    \ _ /
    ( )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nomen Nescio@21:1/5 to Anonymous on Mon Jul 9 09:11:48 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    In article <pht3f9$rdg$1@news.mixmin.net>
    Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:

    Nomen Nescio submitted this idea :
    http://digg.com/2018/garbage-day

    Welcome to What We Learned This Week, a digest of the most
    curiously important facts from the past few days. This week: The
    deadly profession of garbage collection, Google Chrome is
    definitely bad now and the rich love to drink expensive raw
    sewage.

    Chrome Has Finally Become What It Hated Most
    It's a familiar trend amongst any form of popular technology:
    You either enjoy an early fade into obscurity, or endure mass
    popularity for so long you eventually are outed as being
    actually bad.

    This week, The Verge's Tom Warren details how this regular twist
    of fate happened to Google Chrome. You see, at one point,
    Internet Explorer 6 was the most popular browser — if only
    because it came with Windows XP. Microsoft's sheer market
    dominance, something stupid like 90 percent share of all
    browsers, afforded them the ability to ignore building in web
    standards. Eventually Firefox, and then quickly Google Chrome,
    came onto the scene touting browsers built with common standards
    in mind. Devs quickly shifted to no longer catering to Internet
    Explorer, and Chrome won out.

    Now, Chrome is so ubiquitous that — intentionally or not — devs
    just optimize their web-based services to work best on Chrome.
    Once again, we are faced with a web landscape that works great
    on a single browser and less so on others. Which sucks because
    Chrome is a massive resource hog.

    and a massive personal data collector also. I refuse to use it.

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet?

    I thought Opera was dead.

    not here. i still use it on my android phone, tablet, desktop
    and laptop.

    Or the new, faster Firefox?

    NO! As a result of the new Firefox browser no longer running the old
    Addons, I switched to WaterFox.

    i occasionally use urinefox.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nomen Nescio@21:1/5 to The Real Bev on Mon Jul 9 09:39:05 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    In article <phtr52$ma8$1@dont-email.me>
    The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 07/08/2018 11:47 AM, Anonymous wrote:
    The Real Bev laid this down on his screen :
    On 07/08/2018 06:26 AM, Anonymous wrote:
    Nomen Nescio submitted this idea :

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet?

    I thought Opera was dead.

    Or the new, faster Firefox?

    NO! As a result of the new Firefox browser no longer running the
    old
    Addons, I switched to WaterFox.

    Still running FF58, and a lot of my favorite extensions don't work on
    it, and Facebook videos don't work either. Can I install WaterFox
    and copy in my FF profile and have it work? Can I install the older
    extensions (like tab mix plus, which I miss most of all)?

    I ask mainly because I'm tired of spending hours trying to get back
    to where I was 5 years ago and failing.

    I'm sure there's a reason I can't go back to FF52, which was pretty
    much OK...

    Waterfox is a branch of FF, so I think you can.

    Seems to (I got tab mix plus back!), but there are some javascript
    issues involving various things. Looks promising, though.

    java sux.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nomen Nescio@21:1/5 to The Real Bev on Mon Jul 9 10:49:04 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    In article <phth0k$kch$1@dont-email.me>
    The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 07/08/2018 06:26 AM, Anonymous wrote:
    Nomen Nescio submitted this idea :

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet?

    I thought Opera was dead.

    Or the new, faster Firefox?

    NO! As a result of the new Firefox browser no longer running the old Addons, I switched to WaterFox.

    Still running FF58, and a lot of my favorite extensions don't work on
    it, and Facebook videos don't work either. Can I install WaterFox and
    copy in my FF profile and have it work? Can I install the older
    extensions (like tab mix plus, which I miss most of all)?

    I ask mainly because I'm tired of spending hours trying to get back to
    where I was 5 years ago and failing.

    I'm sure there's a reason I can't go back to FF52, which was pretty much OK...

    why can't you?

    https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/

    Dir 52.0-funnelcake101/
    Dir 52.0-funnelcake102/
    Dir 52.0-funnelcake103/
    Dir 52.0-funnelcake104/
    Dir 52.0.1-funnelcake101/
    Dir 52.0.1-funnelcake102/
    Dir 52.0.1-funnelcake103/
    Dir 52.0.1-funnelcake104/
    Dir 52.0.1/
    Dir 52.0.1esr/
    Dir 52.0.2-funnelcake107/
    Dir 52.0.2-funnelcake108/
    Dir 52.0.2-funnelcake109/
    Dir 52.0.2/
    Dir 52.0.2esr/
    Dir 52.0/
    Dir 52.0b1/
    Dir 52.0b2/
    Dir 52.0b3/
    Dir 52.0b4/
    Dir 52.0b5/
    Dir 52.0b6/
    Dir 52.0b7/
    Dir 52.0b8/
    Dir 52.0b9/
    Dir 52.0esr/
    Dir 52.1.0esr/
    Dir 52.1.1esr/
    Dir 52.1.2esr/
    Dir 52.2.0esr/
    Dir 52.2.1esr/
    Dir 52.3.0esr/
    Dir 52.4.0esr/
    Dir 52.4.1esr/
    Dir 52.5.0esr/
    Dir 52.5.2esr/
    Dir 52.5.3esr/
    Dir 52.6.0esr/
    Dir 52.7.0esr/
    Dir 52.7.1esr/
    Dir 52.7.2esr/
    Dir 52.7.3esr/
    Dir 52.7.4esr/
    Dir 52.8.0esr/
    Dir 52.8.1esr/
    Dir 52.9.0esr/

    Index of /pub/firefox/releases/52.9.0esr/win64/en-US/
    Type Name Size Last Modified
    Dir ..
    File Firefox Setup 52.9.0esr.exe 45M 25-Jun-2018 08:56

    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/switch-to-firefox-extended- support-release-esr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Neodome Admin@21:1/5 to Anonymous on Wed Jul 11 06:24:21 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
    Nomen Nescio submitted this idea :
    http://digg.com/2018/garbage-day

    Welcome to What We Learned This Week, a digest of the most
    curiously important facts from the past few days. This week: The
    deadly profession of garbage collection, Google Chrome is
    definitely bad now and the rich love to drink expensive raw
    sewage.

    Chrome Has Finally Become What It Hated Most
    It's a familiar trend amongst any form of popular technology:
    You either enjoy an early fade into obscurity, or endure mass
    popularity for so long you eventually are outed as being
    actually bad.

    This week, The Verge's Tom Warren details how this regular twist
    of fate happened to Google Chrome. You see, at one point,
    Internet Explorer 6 was the most popular browser — if only
    because it came with Windows XP. Microsoft's sheer market
    dominance, something stupid like 90 percent share of all
    browsers, afforded them the ability to ignore building in web
    standards. Eventually Firefox, and then quickly Google Chrome,
    came onto the scene touting browsers built with common standards
    in mind. Devs quickly shifted to no longer catering to Internet
    Explorer, and Chrome won out.

    Now, Chrome is so ubiquitous that — intentionally or not — devs
    just optimize their web-based services to work best on Chrome.
    Once again, we are faced with a web landscape that works great
    on a single browser and less so on others. Which sucks because
    Chrome is a massive resource hog.

    and a massive personal data collector also. I refuse to use it.

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet?

    I thought Opera was dead.

    Opera Mobile is very alive. Their desktop version switched from Presto
    engine to Blink a while ago though. There is also Vivaldi project, founders
    of which are people who used to work on Opera from the very beginning.

    <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivaldi_(web_browser)>

    Or the new, faster Firefox?

    NO! As a result of the new Firefox browser no longer running the old
    Addons, I switched to WaterFox.




    --
    Neodome

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anonymous@21:1/5 to Neodome Admin on Wed Jul 11 07:41:32 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    Neodome Admin wrote on 7/11/2018 :
    Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
    Nomen Nescio submitted this idea :
    http://digg.com/2018/garbage-day

    Welcome to What We Learned This Week, a digest of the most
    curiously important facts from the past few days. This week: The
    deadly profession of garbage collection, Google Chrome is
    definitely bad now and the rich love to drink expensive raw
    sewage.

    Chrome Has Finally Become What It Hated Most
    It's a familiar trend amongst any form of popular technology:
    You either enjoy an early fade into obscurity, or endure mass
    popularity for so long you eventually are outed as being
    actually bad.

    This week, The Verge's Tom Warren details how this regular twist
    of fate happened to Google Chrome. You see, at one point,
    Internet Explorer 6 was the most popular browser — if only
    because it came with Windows XP. Microsoft's sheer market
    dominance, something stupid like 90 percent share of all
    browsers, afforded them the ability to ignore building in web
    standards. Eventually Firefox, and then quickly Google Chrome,
    came onto the scene touting browsers built with common standards
    in mind. Devs quickly shifted to no longer catering to Internet
    Explorer, and Chrome won out.

    Now, Chrome is so ubiquitous that — intentionally or not — devs
    just optimize their web-based services to work best on Chrome.
    Once again, we are faced with a web landscape that works great
    on a single browser and less so on others. Which sucks because
    Chrome is a massive resource hog.

    and a massive personal data collector also. I refuse to use it.

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet?

    I thought Opera was dead.

    Opera Mobile is very alive. Their desktop version switched from
    Presto engine to Blink a while ago though. There is also Vivaldi
    project, founders of which are people who used to work on Opera from
    the very beginning.

    <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivaldi_(web_browser)>

    Or the new, faster Firefox?

    NO! As a result of the new Firefox browser no longer running the
    old Addons, I switched to WaterFox.


    Opera may be ok, but there are too many excellent old firefox addons
    that are indispensable to me. I have a very secure (I hope) system
    that uses Waterfox with uMatrix, CookieAutoDelete, HTTPS Everywhere,
    Privacy Badger, Ghostery (no longer reliable after its buy out),
    AdBlocker Ultimate, uBlock Origin, Block Site, Randon User-Agent. I as
    well am running an external pfSense firewall with pfBlockerNG and Snort
    on a controller. I run my browser through Privoxy with a big list of
    rejected sites and all this is tunneled through an SSH Cotse proxy.
    The only thing bad about Waterfox is that it is a ram hog like the old
    Firefox. I have to keep an eye on a ram meter when I have to open
    multiple tabs, especially when looking at videos. The worst that
    happens is that Waterfox shuts down, but the OS gives a warning ahead
    of time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ant@21:1/5 to Anonymous on Wed Jul 11 13:48:19 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    In alt.comp.google Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
    ...
    Opera may be ok, but there are too many excellent old firefox addons
    that are indispensable to me. I have a very secure (I hope) system
    that uses Waterfox with uMatrix, CookieAutoDelete, HTTPS Everywhere,
    Privacy Badger, Ghostery (no longer reliable after its buy out),
    AdBlocker Ultimate, uBlock Origin, Block Site, Randon User-Agent. I as
    well am running an external pfSense firewall with pfBlockerNG and Snort
    on a controller. I run my browser through Privoxy with a big list of rejected sites and all this is tunneled through an SSH Cotse proxy.
    The only thing bad about Waterfox is that it is a ram hog like the old Firefox. I have to keep an eye on a ram meter when I have to open
    multiple tabs, especially when looking at videos. The worst that
    happens is that Waterfox shuts down, but the OS gives a warning ahead
    of time.

    Ditto. I still use old SeaMonkey (User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT
    6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3).
    However, I noticed many of the installed old addons aren't getting
    updates lately. :(

    --
    Quote of the Week: "I got worms! That's what we're going to call it.
    We're going to specialize in selling worm farms. You know like ant
    farms. What's the matter, a little tense about the flight?" --Lloyd
    Christmas (Dumb and Dumber movie)
    Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
    /\___/\Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org / http://antfarm.ma.cx
    / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit-
    | |o o| | ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and URL/link.
    \ _ /
    ( )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anonymous@21:1/5 to Ant on Wed Jul 11 15:06:57 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    Ant wrote :
    In alt.comp.google Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
    ...
    Opera may be ok, but there are too many excellent old firefox addons
    that are indispensable to me. I have a very secure (I hope) system
    that uses Waterfox with uMatrix, CookieAutoDelete, HTTPS Everywhere,
    Privacy Badger, Ghostery (no longer reliable after its buy out),
    AdBlocker Ultimate, uBlock Origin, Block Site, Randon User-Agent. I
    as well am running an external pfSense firewall with pfBlockerNG
    and Snort on a controller. I run my browser through Privoxy with a
    big list of rejected sites and all this is tunneled through an SSH
    Cotse proxy. The only thing bad about Waterfox is that it is a ram
    hog like the old Firefox. I have to keep an eye on a ram meter
    when I have to open multiple tabs, especially when looking at
    videos. The worst that happens is that Waterfox shuts down, but
    the OS gives a warning ahead of time.

    Ditto. I still use old SeaMonkey (User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT
    6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3).
    However, I noticed many of the installed old addons aren't getting
    updates lately. :(

    Waterfox seems to find them ok.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nomen Nescio@21:1/5 to Ant on Thu Jul 12 08:33:21 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    In article <g8SdnXhU9-ZuzdvGnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
    ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.google Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
    ...
    Opera may be ok, but there are too many excellent old firefox addons
    that are indispensable to me. I have a very secure (I hope) system
    that uses Waterfox with uMatrix, CookieAutoDelete, HTTPS Everywhere, Privacy Badger, Ghostery (no longer reliable after its buy out),
    AdBlocker Ultimate, uBlock Origin, Block Site, Randon User-Agent. I as well am running an external pfSense firewall with pfBlockerNG and Snort
    on a controller. I run my browser through Privoxy with a big list of rejected sites and all this is tunneled through an SSH Cotse proxy.
    The only thing bad about Waterfox is that it is a ram hog like the old Firefox. I have to keep an eye on a ram meter when I have to open
    multiple tabs, especially when looking at videos. The worst that
    happens is that Waterfox shuts down, but the OS gives a warning ahead
    of time.

    Ditto. I still use old SeaMonkey (User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT
    6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3).
    However, I noticed many of the installed old addons aren't getting
    updates lately. :(

    no point in coding for deprecated products. nobody will pay for
    them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nomen Nescio@21:1/5 to Anonymous on Thu Jul 12 08:28:10 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    In article <pi4tu0$dvg$1@news.mixmin.net>
    Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:

    Neodome Admin wrote on 7/11/2018 :
    Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
    Nomen Nescio submitted this idea :
    http://digg.com/2018/garbage-day

    Welcome to What We Learned This Week, a digest of the most
    curiously important facts from the past few days. This week: The
    deadly profession of garbage collection, Google Chrome is
    definitely bad now and the rich love to drink expensive raw
    sewage.

    Chrome Has Finally Become What It Hated Most
    It's a familiar trend amongst any form of popular technology:
    You either enjoy an early fade into obscurity, or endure mass
    popularity for so long you eventually are outed as being
    actually bad.

    This week, The Verge's Tom Warren details how this regular twist
    of fate happened to Google Chrome. You see, at one point,
    Internet Explorer 6 was the most popular browser — if only
    because it came with Windows XP. Microsoft's sheer market
    dominance, something stupid like 90 percent share of all
    browsers, afforded them the ability to ignore building in web
    standards. Eventually Firefox, and then quickly Google Chrome,
    came onto the scene touting browsers built with common standards
    in mind. Devs quickly shifted to no longer catering to Internet
    Explorer, and Chrome won out.

    Now, Chrome is so ubiquitous that — intentionally or not — devs
    just optimize their web-based services to work best on Chrome.
    Once again, we are faced with a web landscape that works great
    on a single browser and less so on others. Which sucks because
    Chrome is a massive resource hog.

    and a massive personal data collector also. I refuse to use it.

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet?

    I thought Opera was dead.

    Opera Mobile is very alive. Their desktop version switched from
    Presto engine to Blink a while ago though. There is also Vivaldi
    project, founders of which are people who used to work on Opera from
    the very beginning.

    <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivaldi_(web_browser)>

    Or the new, faster Firefox?

    NO! As a result of the new Firefox browser no longer running the
    old Addons, I switched to WaterFox.


    Opera may be ok, but there are too many excellent old firefox addons
    that are indispensable to me. I have a very secure (I hope) system
    that uses Waterfox with uMatrix, CookieAutoDelete, HTTPS Everywhere,
    Privacy Badger, Ghostery (no longer reliable after its buy out),
    AdBlocker Ultimate, uBlock Origin, Block Site, Randon User-Agent. I as
    well am running an external pfSense firewall with pfBlockerNG and Snort
    on a controller. I run my browser through Privoxy with a big list of rejected sites and all this is tunneled through an SSH Cotse proxy.
    The only thing bad about Waterfox is that it is a ram hog like the old Firefox. I have to keep an eye on a ram meter when I have to open
    multiple tabs, especially when looking at videos. The worst that
    happens is that Waterfox shuts down, but the OS gives a warning ahead
    of time.

    Do you actually do anything purposeful on the Internet or just
    spend all your time tying yourself up layers of attempted
    invisibility?

    You can't really hide from someone who knows how to look.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nomen Nescio@21:1/5 to Neodome Admin on Thu Jul 12 09:01:33 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    In article <pi47ql$60i$1@neodome.net>
    Neodome Admin <admin@neodome.net> wrote:

    Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
    Nomen Nescio submitted this idea :
    http://digg.com/2018/garbage-day

    Welcome to What We Learned This Week, a digest of the most
    curiously important facts from the past few days. This week: The
    deadly profession of garbage collection, Google Chrome is
    definitely bad now and the rich love to drink expensive raw
    sewage.

    Chrome Has Finally Become What It Hated Most
    It's a familiar trend amongst any form of popular technology:
    You either enjoy an early fade into obscurity, or endure mass
    popularity for so long you eventually are outed as being
    actually bad.

    This week, The Verge's Tom Warren details how this regular twist
    of fate happened to Google Chrome. You see, at one point,
    Internet Explorer 6 was the most popular browser — if only
    because it came with Windows XP. Microsoft's sheer market
    dominance, something stupid like 90 percent share of all
    browsers, afforded them the ability to ignore building in web
    standards. Eventually Firefox, and then quickly Google Chrome,
    came onto the scene touting browsers built with common standards
    in mind. Devs quickly shifted to no longer catering to Internet
    Explorer, and Chrome won out.

    Now, Chrome is so ubiquitous that — intentionally or not — devs
    just optimize their web-based services to work best on Chrome.
    Once again, we are faced with a web landscape that works great
    on a single browser and less so on others. Which sucks because
    Chrome is a massive resource hog.

    and a massive personal data collector also. I refuse to use it.

    Which, by the way, have you tried Opera yet?

    I thought Opera was dead.

    Opera Mobile is very alive. Their desktop version switched from Presto
    engine to Blink a while ago though. There is also Vivaldi project, founders of which are people who used to work on Opera from the very beginning.

    <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivaldi_(web_browser)>

    I actually use that browser. Fast, works pretty good except
    some of the crappy over-loaded ad-crammed sites cause it
    rendering problems every now and then.

    Or the new, faster Firefox?

    NO! As a result of the new Firefox browser no longer running the old Addons, I switched to WaterFox.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ant@21:1/5 to Nomen Nescio on Thu Jul 12 14:10:03 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    In alt.comp.google Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
    In article <g8SdnXhU9-ZuzdvGnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
    ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.google Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
    ...
    Opera may be ok, but there are too many excellent old firefox addons
    that are indispensable to me. I have a very secure (I hope) system
    that uses Waterfox with uMatrix, CookieAutoDelete, HTTPS Everywhere, Privacy Badger, Ghostery (no longer reliable after its buy out), AdBlocker Ultimate, uBlock Origin, Block Site, Randon User-Agent. I as well am running an external pfSense firewall with pfBlockerNG and Snort on a controller. I run my browser through Privoxy with a big list of rejected sites and all this is tunneled through an SSH Cotse proxy.
    The only thing bad about Waterfox is that it is a ram hog like the old Firefox. I have to keep an eye on a ram meter when I have to open multiple tabs, especially when looking at videos. The worst that
    happens is that Waterfox shuts down, but the OS gives a warning ahead
    of time.

    Ditto. I still use old SeaMonkey (User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT
    6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3). However, I noticed many of the installed old addons aren't getting
    updates lately. :(

    no point in coding for deprecated products. nobody will pay for
    them.

    People paid for free softwares like web browsers' extensions?
    --
    Quote of the Week: "I got worms! That's what we're going to call it.
    We're going to specialize in selling worm farms. You know like ant
    farms. What's the matter, a little tense about the flight?" --Lloyd
    Christmas (Dumb and Dumber movie)
    Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
    /\___/\Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org / http://antfarm.ma.cx
    / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail privately. If credit-
    | |o o| | ing, then please kindly use Ant nickname and URL/link.
    \ _ /
    ( )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nomen Nescio@21:1/5 to Ant on Fri Jul 13 10:50:00 2018
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.google, alt.google-sucks

    In article <wtGdnYLRF40WOtrGnZ2dnUU7-budnZ2d@earthlink.com>
    ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.google Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
    In article <g8SdnXhU9-ZuzdvGnZ2dnUU7-a2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> ANTant@zimage.com (Ant) wrote:

    In alt.comp.google Anonymous <anonymous@anonymous.com> wrote:
    ...
    Opera may be ok, but there are too many excellent old firefox addons that are indispensable to me. I have a very secure (I hope) system that uses Waterfox with uMatrix, CookieAutoDelete, HTTPS Everywhere, Privacy Badger, Ghostery (no longer reliable after its buy out), AdBlocker Ultimate, uBlock Origin, Block Site, Randon User-Agent. I as well am running an external pfSense firewall with pfBlockerNG and Snort on a controller. I run my browser through Privoxy with a big list of rejected sites and all this is tunneled through an SSH Cotse proxy.
    The only thing bad about Waterfox is that it is a ram hog like the old Firefox. I have to keep an eye on a ram meter when I have to open multiple tabs, especially when looking at videos. The worst that happens is that Waterfox shuts down, but the OS gives a warning ahead of time.

    Ditto. I still use old SeaMonkey (User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3). However, I noticed many of the installed old addons aren't getting updates lately. :(

    no point in coding for deprecated products. nobody will pay for
    them.

    People paid for free softwares like web browsers' extensions?

    "Free softwares" aren't free. Somebody has to fund the projects.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)