• Language tag for Anglo-Saxon?

    From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 13:03:16 2024
    Is there a lang="..." attribute for Anglo-Saxon (English before the
    Normal Conquest)? I tried a language tag search, but the closest I
    could come up with was early modern English, 1500-1700. Anglo-Saxon
    would be 1100 or earlier.

    Does such a language tag exist? If so, where should I have looked to
    find it?

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to Stan Brown on Fri Jan 26 13:21:25 2024
    On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:03:16 -0800, Stan Brown wrote:

    Is there a lang="..." attribute for Anglo-Saxon (English before the
    Normal Conquest)? I tried a language tag search, but the closest I
    could come up with was early modern English, 1500-1700. Anglo-Saxon
    would be 1100 or earlier.

    Does such a language tag exist? If so, where should I have looked to
    find it?

    I had a brainstorm to look up infangthief in Wikipedia, and it was
    identified with lang="ang". The W3C validator accepts that.

    I'd love to know where Wikipedia got that language code, because I
    must be using an outdated source, namely
    <https://r12a.github.io/app-subtags/>

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@21:1/5 to Jukka K. Korpela on Sat Feb 10 17:59:33 2024
    On 2024-01-26 23:21:51 +0000, Jukka K. Korpela said:

    Stan Brown wrote:

    I'd love to know where Wikipedia got that language code

    Who knows? Anyone can write anything on any Wikipedia pages without
    citing any sources.

    They're not supposed to, but they do. Sometimes eagle-eyed editors will
    tag egregious examples.

    The defined authority for 3-letter language codes says that “ang”
    stands for “English, Old (ca.450-1100)” or (in French) “anglo-saxon”, which is probably what you are looking for.
    https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php

    Declaring some content as being in some language in HTML has generally
    no effect on the universe, especially when it is some ancient language.

    --
    Athel cb

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to Jukka K. Korpela on Sat Feb 10 12:17:11 2024
    On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 01:21:51 +0200, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

    Stan Brown wrote:

    I'd love to know where Wikipedia got that language code

    The defined authority for 3-letter language codes says that ?ang? stands
    for ?English, Old (ca.450-1100)? or (in French) ?anglo-saxon?, which is probably what you are looking for. https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php

    Thanks, Jukka! Sorry I got involved in other stuff and didn't
    acknowledge this sooner.

    Declaring some content as being in some language in HTML has generally
    no effect on the universe, especially when it is some ancient language.

    The MS-Word spell checker does seem to respond to language codes.
    Because I'm so bad at proofreading my own stuff on screen, I try to
    force myself to use at least one spell checker.

    In this specific case, I don't expect MS-Word to spell check old
    English, but at least it won't flag the included words as errors,
    probably. (I don't know which list of language codes MS-Word 2010
    uses, and what it does if it doesn't recognize a code in HTML.)

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arno Welzel@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 14 14:00:20 2024
    Stan Brown, 2024-01-26 22:21:

    On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:03:16 -0800, Stan Brown wrote:

    Is there a lang="..." attribute for Anglo-Saxon (English before the
    Normal Conquest)? I tried a language tag search, but the closest I
    could come up with was early modern English, 1500-1700. Anglo-Saxon
    would be 1100 or earlier.

    Does such a language tag exist? If so, where should I have looked to
    find it?

    I had a brainstorm to look up infangthief in Wikipedia, and it was
    identified with lang="ang". The W3C validator accepts that.

    I'd love to know where Wikipedia got that language code, because I
    must be using an outdated source, namely <https://r12a.github.io/app-subtags/>

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639-2_codes>

    --
    Arno Welzel
    https://arnowelzel.de

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to Arno Welzel on Wed Feb 14 07:42:19 2024
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:00:20 +0100, Arno Welzel wrote:

    Stan Brown, 2024-01-26 22:21:

    On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 13:03:16 -0800, Stan Brown wrote:

    Is there a lang="..." attribute for Anglo-Saxon (English before the
    Normal Conquest)? I tried a language tag search, but the closest I
    could come up with was early modern English, 1500-1700. Anglo-Saxon
    would be 1100 or earlier.

    Does such a language tag exist? If so, where should I have looked to
    find it?

    I had a brainstorm to look up infangthief in Wikipedia, and it was identified with lang="ang". The W3C validator accepts that.

    I'd love to know where Wikipedia got that language code, because I
    must be using an outdated source, namely <https://r12a.github.io/app-subtags/>

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639-2_codes>

    That looks similar to the one at the Library of
    Congress that Jukka posted a few days ago:

    <https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-
    2/php/code_list.php>

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA

    https://BrownMath.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to Jukka K. Korpela on Wed Feb 14 11:48:44 2024
    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 18:26:34 +0200, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

    Stan Brown wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:00:20 +0100, Arno Welzel wrote:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639-2_codes>

    That looks similar to the one at the Library of
    Congress that Jukka posted a few days ago:

    <https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-
    2/php/code_list.php>

    The Library of Congress is the designated authority for maintaining the
    list of ISO 693-2 codes. There is no reason to consult or cite secondary sources, especially things like wiki pages; nobody is responsible for
    them, anyone can change them at will, and there is no maintenance or verification procedure.

    That's my feeling too. I did bookmark Arno's wiki link, just in case
    the Library of Congress stops its support and the Internet Archive
    doesn't have a backup. Unlikely, I know, but stranger things have
    happened.

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arno Welzel@21:1/5 to All on Sat Feb 17 10:53:40 2024
    Jukka K. Korpela, 2024-02-14 17:26:

    Stan Brown wrote:

    On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:00:20 +0100, Arno Welzel wrote:
    – –
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639-2_codes>

    That looks similar to the one at the Library of
    Congress that Jukka posted a few days ago:

    <https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-
    2/php/code_list.php>

    The Library of Congress is the designated authority for maintaining the
    list of ISO 693-2 codes. There is no reason to consult or cite secondary sources, especially things like wiki pages; nobody is responsible for
    them, anyone can change them at will, and there is no maintenance or verification procedure.

    They link to the sources as well - see "References" there:

    <https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/>


    --
    Arno Welzel
    https://arnowelzel.de

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)