• Energy use in "off mode" with X10 modules and LED light bulbs

    From marklewesq@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 19 21:09:33 2016
    Does anyone know if there are any ill effects from using LED lamps with X10 modules. It is pretty well known that when "off", the LED's dim but stay lit. If I do not care bout them being completely off (like in a closet, stairwell, or garage ...), how
    much current drain is there if I just let them glow slightly. I am switching 11 watt LED's for 13 watt CFL's. If the drain is over 2 watts, then switching would not help much. If drain is lower, then it might make sense to let them glow in the off
    position.

    I also don't understand that in one circuit it is half brightness when off, but in another, the glow is only noticeable in complete darkness.

    I am using Phillips non-dimmable, but they do dim - maybe they might burn out sooner.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From isw@21:1/5 to marklewesq@gmail.com on Fri Aug 19 21:40:58 2016
    In article <42440b87-e4f4-40e8-8c1d-b9e8ae9a91db@googlegroups.com>,
    marklewesq@gmail.com wrote:

    Does anyone know if there are any ill effects from using LED lamps with X10 modules.

    Shouldn't be, if you run them as ON-OFF only.

    It is pretty well known that when "off", the LED's dim but stay
    lit. If I do not care bout them being completely off (like in a closet, stairwell, or garage ...), how much current drain is there if I just let them glow slightly. I am switching 11 watt LED's for 13 watt CFL's. If the drain is over 2 watts, then switching would not help much. If drain is lower, then it might make sense to let them glow in the off position.

    There is sometimes a problem with CFLs flashing every few seconds, due
    to leakage through an internal resistor in the X10 lamp module. The
    flashing can be stopped by removing the resistor, which also prevents
    local control. It is *possible* that the LED-dim problem is related.
    Ping me if you feel like clipping the resistor.

    Another trick to stop the flashing is to parallel the CFL with a 7-watt night-light, which serves to overcome the leakage current. It would be
    easy enough to try that with the LED lamps too. I have no idea whether
    it would work ...

    I also don't understand that in one circuit it is half brightness when off, but in another, the glow is only noticeable in complete darkness.

    Does a specific bulb do that regardless of which X10 unit it's connected
    to, or does a specific X10 unit cause any bulb to do that?

    I am using Phillips non-dimmable, but they do dim - maybe they might burn out sooner.

    If Philips says they are non-dimmable, I'd guess they mean "don't do it
    because a Bad Thing might happen" rather than "it won't work". You might
    ping them to see if they'll tell you.

    Isaac

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Wiss@21:1/5 to marklewesq@gmail.com on Sun Aug 21 21:13:33 2016
    On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:09:33 -0700 (PDT), marklewesq@gmail.com wrote:

    Does anyone know if there are any ill effects from using LED lamps with X10 modules. It is pretty well known that when "off", the LED's dim but stay lit. If I do not care bout them being completely off (like in a closet, stairwell, or garage ...), how
    much current drain is there if I just let them glow slightly. I am switching 11 watt LED's for 13 watt CFL's. If the drain is over 2 watts, then switching would not help much. If drain is lower, then it might make sense to let them glow in the off
    position.

    I also don't understand that in one circuit it is half brightness when off, but in another, the glow is only noticeable in complete darkness.

    I am using Phillips non-dimmable, but they do dim - maybe they might burn out sooner.

    You can always use an appliance module. Simply all on or all off.

    Don. www.donwiss.com (e-mail link at home page bottom).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From isw@21:1/5 to Don Wiss on Sun Aug 21 22:05:38 2016
    In article <obkkrb9p5sv79au1u3llbfmn4sumjcsski@4ax.com>,
    Don Wiss <donwiss@no_spam.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:09:33 -0700 (PDT), marklewesq@gmail.com wrote:

    Does anyone know if there are any ill effects from using LED lamps with X10 >modules. It is pretty well known that when "off", the LED's dim but stay >lit. If I do not care bout them being completely off (like in a closet, >stairwell, or garage ...), how much current drain is there if I just let >them glow slightly. I am switching 11 watt LED's for 13 watt CFL's. If the >drain is over 2 watts, then switching would not help much. If drain is >lower, then it might make sense to let them glow in the off position.

    I also don't understand that in one circuit it is half brightness when off, >but in another, the glow is only noticeable in complete darkness.

    I am using Phillips non-dimmable, but they do dim - maybe they might burn >out sooner.

    You can always use an appliance module. Simply all on or all off.

    Yup, but noisy.

    Isaac

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Todesco@21:1/5 to isw on Mon Aug 22 07:56:46 2016
    On 8/22/2016 1:05 AM, isw wrote:
    In article <obkkrb9p5sv79au1u3llbfmn4sumjcsski@4ax.com>,
    Don Wiss <donwiss@no_spam.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:09:33 -0700 (PDT), marklewesq@gmail.com wrote:

    Does anyone know if there are any ill effects from using LED lamps with X10 >>> modules. It is pretty well known that when "off", the LED's dim but stay >>> lit. If I do not care bout them being completely off (like in a closet, >>> stairwell, or garage ...), how much current drain is there if I just let >>> them glow slightly. I am switching 11 watt LED's for 13 watt CFL's. If the
    drain is over 2 watts, then switching would not help much. If drain is
    lower, then it might make sense to let them glow in the off position.

    I also don't understand that in one circuit it is half brightness when off, >>> but in another, the glow is only noticeable in complete darkness.

    I am using Phillips non-dimmable, but they do dim - maybe they might burn >>> out sooner.

    You can always use an appliance module. Simply all on or all off.

    Yup, but noisy.

    Isaac

    And still the small "leakage" continues because of the local control
    sense current. So, the lamp will still light dimly or flicker. I've
    removed the resistor (plenty of on line sites tell how). If the clicks
    bother you, you can modify an lamp module to make it a click free
    appliance module (again several sites show how). I have done this to
    several modules and they work just fine with CFLs and now LEDs. One
    such module seems to get stuck in the on state after a short power
    glitch. I have to then do a clean power cycle to get it back to normal.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian W. Antoine@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 27 15:11:57 2016
    On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:56:46 -0400, Art Todesco <actodesco@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On 8/22/2016 1:05 AM, isw wrote:
    In article <obkkrb9p5sv79au1u3llbfmn4sumjcsski@4ax.com>,
    Don Wiss <donwiss@no_spam.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:09:33 -0700 (PDT), marklewesq@gmail.com wrote:

    Does anyone know if there are any ill effects from using LED lamps with X10
    modules. It is pretty well known that when "off", the LED's dim but stay >>>> lit. If I do not care bout them being completely off (like in a closet, >>>> stairwell, or garage ...), how much current drain is there if I just let >>>> them glow slightly. I am switching 11 watt LED's for 13 watt CFL's. If the
    drain is over 2 watts, then switching would not help much. If drain is >>>> lower, then it might make sense to let them glow in the off position.

    I also don't understand that in one circuit it is half brightness when off,
    but in another, the glow is only noticeable in complete darkness.

    I am using Phillips non-dimmable, but they do dim - maybe they might burn >>>> out sooner.

    You can always use an appliance module. Simply all on or all off.

    Yup, but noisy.

    Isaac

    And still the small "leakage" continues because of the local control
    sense current. So, the lamp will still light dimly or flicker. I've
    removed the resistor (plenty of on line sites tell how). If the clicks >bother you, you can modify an lamp module to make it a click free
    appliance module (again several sites show how). I have done this to
    several modules and they work just fine with CFLs and now LEDs. One
    such module seems to get stuck in the on state after a short power
    glitch. I have to then do a clean power cycle to get it back to normal.

    There are modern applicance modules that still click loudly? I think I
    swapped out my last original X-10 module for something programmable and
    silent at least 10 years ago. You should also be able to program whether
    the "local on" feature is active, which is usually what wants to pass that small trickle current through the appliance to detect the local switch
    being toggled. That's the current that is just enough to make a high efficiency light like an LED come on dimly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Todesco@21:1/5 to Brian W. Antoine on Sun Aug 28 07:40:03 2016
    On 8/27/2016 6:11 PM, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
    On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:56:46 -0400, Art Todesco <actodesco@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On 8/22/2016 1:05 AM, isw wrote:
    In article <obkkrb9p5sv79au1u3llbfmn4sumjcsski@4ax.com>,
    Don Wiss <donwiss@no_spam.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:09:33 -0700 (PDT), marklewesq@gmail.com wrote:

    Does anyone know if there are any ill effects from using LED lamps with X10
    modules. It is pretty well known that when "off", the LED's dim but stay >>>>> lit. If I do not care bout them being completely off (like in a closet, >>>>> stairwell, or garage ...), how much current drain is there if I just let >>>>> them glow slightly. I am switching 11 watt LED's for 13 watt CFL's. If the
    drain is over 2 watts, then switching would not help much. If drain is >>>>> lower, then it might make sense to let them glow in the off position. >>>>>
    I also don't understand that in one circuit it is half brightness when off,
    but in another, the glow is only noticeable in complete darkness.

    I am using Phillips non-dimmable, but they do dim - maybe they might burn >>>>> out sooner.

    You can always use an appliance module. Simply all on or all off.

    Yup, but noisy.

    Isaac

    And still the small "leakage" continues because of the local control
    sense current. So, the lamp will still light dimly or flicker. I've
    removed the resistor (plenty of on line sites tell how). If the clicks
    bother you, you can modify an lamp module to make it a click free
    appliance module (again several sites show how). I have done this to
    several modules and they work just fine with CFLs and now LEDs. One
    such module seems to get stuck in the on state after a short power
    glitch. I have to then do a clean power cycle to get it back to normal.

    There are modern applicance modules that still click loudly? I think I swapped out my last original X-10 module for something programmable and silent at least 10 years ago. You should also be able to program whether
    the "local on" feature is active, which is usually what wants to pass that small trickle current through the appliance to detect the local switch
    being toggled. That's the current that is just enough to make a high efficiency light like an LED come on dimly.

    The programmable appliance modules I've used, Smarthome, still squirt a
    current through the appliance (lamp) for the local on/off function.
    And, as I recall, the current is still present even when the local
    on/off function is unused. The current for these modules is much
    smaller than that of regular older design modules, but still can make a
    string of LED Christmas lights glow dimly, but less than the regular
    modules.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian W. Antoine@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 2 14:12:04 2016
    On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 07:40:03 -0400, Art Todesco <actodesco@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On 8/27/2016 6:11 PM, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
    On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:56:46 -0400, Art Todesco <actodesco@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On 8/22/2016 1:05 AM, isw wrote:
    In article <obkkrb9p5sv79au1u3llbfmn4sumjcsski@4ax.com>,
    Don Wiss <donwiss@no_spam.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 21:09:33 -0700 (PDT), marklewesq@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>
    Does anyone know if there are any ill effects from using LED lamps with X10
    modules. It is pretty well known that when "off", the LED's dim but stay
    lit. If I do not care bout them being completely off (like in a closet, >>>>>> stairwell, or garage ...), how much current drain is there if I just let >>>>>> them glow slightly. I am switching 11 watt LED's for 13 watt CFL's. If the
    drain is over 2 watts, then switching would not help much. If drain is >>>>>> lower, then it might make sense to let them glow in the off position. >>>>>>
    I also don't understand that in one circuit it is half brightness when off,
    but in another, the glow is only noticeable in complete darkness.

    I am using Phillips non-dimmable, but they do dim - maybe they might burn
    out sooner.

    You can always use an appliance module. Simply all on or all off.

    Yup, but noisy.

    Isaac

    And still the small "leakage" continues because of the local control
    sense current. So, the lamp will still light dimly or flicker. I've
    removed the resistor (plenty of on line sites tell how). If the clicks
    bother you, you can modify an lamp module to make it a click free
    appliance module (again several sites show how). I have done this to
    several modules and they work just fine with CFLs and now LEDs. One
    such module seems to get stuck in the on state after a short power
    glitch. I have to then do a clean power cycle to get it back to normal.

    There are modern applicance modules that still click loudly? I think I
    swapped out my last original X-10 module for something programmable and
    silent at least 10 years ago. You should also be able to program whether
    the "local on" feature is active, which is usually what wants to pass that >> small trickle current through the appliance to detect the local switch
    being toggled. That's the current that is just enough to make a high
    efficiency light like an LED come on dimly.

    The programmable appliance modules I've used, Smarthome, still squirt a >current through the appliance (lamp) for the local on/off function.
    And, as I recall, the current is still present even when the local
    on/off function is unused. The current for these modules is much
    smaller than that of regular older design modules, but still can make a >string of LED Christmas lights glow dimly, but less than the regular
    modules.

    Ok, good to know. I'd have thought by now that companies making these
    modules would have dealt with the LED issue, but maybe not. The module
    has to get power from someplace to operate. The really old X-10 stuff
    was two wire, it got it's power via a trickle current through the load.
    With modern three wire modules, I'd have expected that when you turned
    off the local sense feature, it really did mean do not pass current
    through the load.

    One of the last old style appliance modules I swapped out was for my
    Christmas Tree lights. It was loud and I had to put a 4W nightlight
    on the circuit also, otherwise the trickle current from the LED's was
    enough to trip the local sense and a few seconds after I turned the
    lights off, they'd come back on. The ICON module that I used next
    was both silent and the lights stayed off.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From lxbzz6@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 5 11:38:53 2017
    To get a lamp module to work with LEDs and CFLs and low-power incandescent, you have to remove components associated with the local control feature.

    If you are ok with doing mods to your appliance module, open it up and locate the 100K resistor (brown-black-yellow bands) and the 330K resistor (orange-orange-yellow bands). Chop both out of the unit. Or at least clip one lead of each.

    The local control feature won't work, but LEDs and other low-power bulbs will work fine.

    This will also reduce the quiescent power drain of the module.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jadru3@gmail.com@21:1/5 to lxb...@gmail.com on Mon Dec 11 20:19:34 2017
    On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 2:38:55 PM UTC-4, lxb...@gmail.com wrote:
    To get a lamp module to work with LEDs and CFLs and low-power incandescent, you have to remove components associated with the local control feature.

    If you are ok with doing mods to your appliance module, open it up and locate the 100K resistor (brown-black-yellow bands) and the 330K resistor (orange-orange-yellow bands). Chop both out of the unit. Or at least clip one lead of each.

    The local control feature won't work, but LEDs and other low-power bulbs will work fine.

    This will also reduce the quiescent power drain of the module.

    Mr. lxb,
    Thanks for this info! In other posts suggested snipping a zener which did not help. But please clarify: there are two 330k resistors in the schematic. Which one is the correct one?

    Thanks tremendously! Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dspiffy@gmail.com@21:1/5 to jad...@gmail.com on Wed Apr 11 18:50:01 2018
    I have the same question! Which 330k resistor?


    On Monday, December 11, 2017 at 10:19:37 PM UTC-6, jad...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 2:38:55 PM UTC-4, lxb...@gmail.com wrote:
    To get a lamp module to work with LEDs and CFLs and low-power incandescent, you have to remove components associated with the local control feature.

    If you are ok with doing mods to your appliance module, open it up and locate the 100K resistor (brown-black-yellow bands) and the 330K resistor (orange-orange-yellow bands). Chop both out of the unit. Or at least clip one lead of each.

    The local control feature won't work, but LEDs and other low-power bulbs will work fine.

    This will also reduce the quiescent power drain of the module.

    Mr. lxb,
    Thanks for this info! In other posts suggested snipping a zener which did not help. But please clarify: there are two 330k resistors in the schematic. Which one is the correct one?

    Thanks tremendously! Joe

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From drrnorth@gmail.com@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 30 04:29:19 2019
    Here's an easy fix for LED lamp glow (and perhaps flicker) with X10 modules (AM466 appliance modules in particular). Recently I replaced several outdoor halogen floodlights with LED units and was was surprised to see that they remained ON (faintly but
    definitely) even when switched off. I had assumed that the appliance modules, which click audibly when switched on or off and which have no dimming function, were simple relays . . . but it turns out that, like the dimmable lamp modules, they emit a
    small current. This doesn't make incandescent or halogen bulbs glow, but it does so with the efficient LED's.

    X10 websites show many schemes for modifying the AM466 to defeat this; it relates to "local control" current, and it involves clipping resistor(s) and/or diodes. Unfortunately, there are many different makes and models of the unit with different
    circuit board layouts, and the online plans don't distinguish among them.

    Fortunately, along the way, I saw mention of hooking a small load such as a night light in parallel with an LED lamp to draw away current and eliminate the glow. This would of course just replace one glow with another, albeit the night lights could be
    tucked away in the cabinet with my X10 modules. Then I saw mention of using a small AC adapter, e.g. a phone charger, typically 1W or less, as the load. One simply plugs a splitter/adapter into the X10 module and then plugs in the LED lamp and the
    dummy load in parallel.

    I have a whole collection of AC power supplies in different sizes; I tried a couple of the 5V units, which are most plentiful, and mirabile dictu no more glow! I ordered several inexpensive USB phone chargers, and alas these didn't solve the problem;
    they replaced the steady glow with an intermittent glow, flickering about 1/sec. Perhaps these use solid state switching rather than good, old fashioned transformers . . . In any event, I've gone back to the older power supplies, and these work very
    nicely. It's a simple plug-and-play solution.

    I wonder what principles are involved here, and what dummy load (resistive, inductive, etc.) would be ideal (lowest power, lowest cost)? Would a similar approach work for dimmer modules? I have some dimmer circuits with multiple lamps which will
    accept LED's as long as one halogen bulb (resistive load) remains. In a dimmer circuit with a single lamp, I wonder what load might be plugged into a socket adapter, in parallel with the lamp?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob F@21:1/5 to drrnorth@gmail.com on Tue Apr 30 19:08:09 2019
    On 4/30/2019 4:29 AM, drrnorth@gmail.com wrote:
    Here's an easy fix for LED lamp glow (and perhaps flicker) with X10 modules (AM466 appliance modules in particular). Recently I replaced several outdoor halogen floodlights with LED units and was was surprised to see that they remained ON (faintly
    but definitely) even when switched off. I had assumed that the appliance modules, which click audibly when switched on or off and which have no dimming function, were simple relays . . . but it turns out that, like the dimmable lamp modules, they emit
    a small current. This doesn't make incandescent or halogen bulbs glow, but it does so with the efficient LED's.

    X10 websites show many schemes for modifying the AM466 to defeat this; it relates to "local control" current, and it involves clipping resistor(s) and/or diodes. Unfortunately, there are many different makes and models of the unit with different
    circuit board layouts, and the online plans don't distinguish among them.

    Fortunately, along the way, I saw mention of hooking a small load such as a night light in parallel with an LED lamp to draw away current and eliminate the glow. This would of course just replace one glow with another, albeit the night lights could be
    tucked away in the cabinet with my X10 modules. Then I saw mention of using a small AC adapter, e.g. a phone charger, typically 1W or less, as the load. One simply plugs a splitter/adapter into the X10 module and then plugs in the LED lamp and the
    dummy load in parallel.

    I have a whole collection of AC power supplies in different sizes; I tried a couple of the 5V units, which are most plentiful, and mirabile dictu no more glow! I ordered several inexpensive USB phone chargers, and alas these didn't solve the problem;
    they replaced the steady glow with an intermittent glow, flickering about 1/sec. Perhaps these use solid state switching rather than good, old fashioned transformers . . . In any event, I've gone back to the older power supplies, and these work very
    nicely. It's a simple plug-and-play solution.

    I wonder what principles are involved here, and what dummy load (resistive, inductive, etc.) would be ideal (lowest power, lowest cost)? Would a similar approach work for dimmer modules? I have some dimmer circuits with multiple lamps which will
    accept LED's as long as one halogen bulb (resistive load) remains. In a dimmer circuit with a single lamp, I wonder what load might be plugged into a socket adapter, in parallel with the lamp?


    Other (dimmable?) LED bulbs will not have the problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)