• Re: Wavelength Dependency in RF Propagation?

    From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Les Cargill on Fri Jun 3 12:26:57 2022
    Les Cargill wrote:
    Marcel Mueller wrote:
    On 26.05.18 07.40, Randy Yates wrote:
    I was miffed initially by this statement since, as far as I know,
    there is nothing inherent in wavelength that impacts how RF waves
    travel through space.

    If you are talking about vacuum then yes. In all other media the
    velocity of propagation depends on the frequency. E.g. water
    molecules in the air interact frequency dependent.

    But I guess this was just a way (a confusing one, IMO) of referring
    to the wavelength dependency of antenna aperture, as explained
    nicely in this article on the Friis equation?

    The coupling of the antenna to the free space also introduces a
    frequency dependent group delay.

    All necessary apologies in advance.

    All group delay is inherently frequency dependent:

    " Group delay is the actual transit time of a signal through a device
    under test as a function of frequency."

    http://na.support.keysight.com/pna/help/latest/Tutorials/Group_Delay6_5.htm

    A reasonable definition.

    But unfortunately dead wrong because it ignores causality.
    Group delay != true delay, in general.

    Group delay is d phi / d omega, and is useful as a leading-order
    approximation to how a nice wide smooth pulse propagates through a
    network. It's exactly analogous with group velocity in radio or optical propagation, which is d(omega)/d k, where k is the wave vector.

    You can see the distinction in two ways. First, group delay can be
    negative, which true delay cannot.

    Second, networks can have group delay without having true delay. You
    can undo the effect of a 1-pole RC lowpass with an RC highpass, for
    instance.


    I have the conceit that I'm not picking nits here so much as heading
    off one potentially confusing interpretation of that
    sentence :) The  "quantifiers" for "a group delay" sort of leaves
    the phrase "for all group delay" dangling.


    And last but not least a short
    distance link has some frequencies with poor performance due to
    eigenvalues of the overall geometry.


    Aka comb filtering/multipath/cosite interference?


    Marcel

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Phil Hobbs on Fri Jun 3 12:30:07 2022
    (This weirdly came up as a new message--silly me.)

    Phil Hobbs wrote:
    Les Cargill wrote:
    Marcel Mueller wrote:
    On 26.05.18 07.40, Randy Yates wrote:
    I was miffed initially by this statement since, as far as I know,
    there is nothing inherent in wavelength that impacts how RF waves
    travel through space.

    If you are talking about vacuum then yes. In all other media the
    velocity of propagation depends on the frequency. E.g. water
    molecules in the air interact frequency dependent.

    But I guess this was just a way (a confusing one, IMO) of referring
    to the wavelength dependency of antenna aperture, as explained
    nicely in this article on the Friis equation?

    The coupling of the antenna to the free space also introduces a
    frequency dependent group delay.

    All necessary apologies in advance.

    All group delay is inherently frequency dependent:

    " Group delay is the actual transit time of a signal through a device
    under test as a function of frequency."

    http://na.support.keysight.com/pna/help/latest/Tutorials/Group_Delay6_5.htm >>

    A reasonable definition.

    But unfortunately dead wrong because it ignores causality.
    Group delay != true delay, in general.

    Group delay is d phi / d omega, and is useful as a leading-order approximation to how a nice wide smooth pulse propagates through a
    network.  It's exactly analogous with group velocity in radio or optical propagation, which is d(omega)/d k, where k is the wave vector.

    You can see the distinction in two ways.  First, group delay can be
    negative, which true delay cannot.

    Second, networks can have group delay without having true delay.  You
    can undo the effect of a 1-pole RC lowpass with an RC highpass, for
    instance.


    I have the conceit that I'm not picking nits here so much as heading
    off one potentially confusing interpretation of that
    sentence :) The  "quantifiers" for "a group delay" sort of leaves
    the phrase "for all group delay" dangling.


    And last but not least a short
    distance link has some frequencies with poor performance due to
    eigenvalues of the overall geometry.


    Aka comb filtering/multipath/cosite interference?


    Marcel

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs


    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)